Latvian vs Sioux 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Latvian
Sioux
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Latvians
Sioux
56.2%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
83.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
56.8%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Sioux 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,663,993 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050 and weighted average of 56.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,124,703 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.587 and weighted average of 56.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Sioux |
Minimum | 24.9% | 6.2% |
Maximum | 92.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.9% | 93.8% |
Mean | 64.5% | 57.9% |
Median | 64.1% | 61.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 55.7% | 46.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.4% | 68.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.7% | 22.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Sioux by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Armenian (56.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Salvadoran (56.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Cuban (56.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Asia (56.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from the Azores (56.4%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Costa Rican (56.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from South Africa (56.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Australian (56.7%, a difference of 0.29%), New Zealander (56.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Tsimshian (56.7%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
Costa Ricans | 94.7 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 56.9% |
Sioux | 93.8 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 56.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 92.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 56.7% |
Australians | 91.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 56.7% |
New Zealanders | 91.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 56.7% |
Tsimshian | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 56.7% |
Estonians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Ute | 90.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Yugoslavians | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Bulgarians | 89.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 56.5% |
Hungarians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 56.5% |
Comanche | 88.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 56.5% |
Immigrants | Azores | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 56.4% |
Blackfeet | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 56.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 86.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 56.3% |
Cubans | 84.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 56.3% |
Salvadorans | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 56.3% |
Armenians | 84.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 56.3% |
Latvians | 83.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 56.2% |