Sudanese vs Czech No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Sudanese
Czech
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Sudanese
Czechs
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Czech No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,072,180 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,256,863 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 43.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Czech |
| Minimum | 0.33% | 0.94% |
| Maximum | 86.7% | 14.9% |
| Range | 86.3% | 14.0% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 4.6% |
| Median | 8.4% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Dutch (6.8%, a difference of 0.55%), Scotch-Irish (6.8%, a difference of 1.1%), Swedish (6.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |