Turkish vs South American Indian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Turkish
South American Indian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Turks
South American Indians
11.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs South American Indian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,510,878 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,483,116 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 3.3%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.69% | 0.72% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 38.9% |
| Range | 20.4% | 38.2% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 8.5% |
| Median | 7.1% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and South American Indians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Eastern European (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants (11.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Cheyenne (11.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Portugal (11.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Honduras (11.8%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Nigerian (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Liberian (12.0%, a difference of 0.76%), Macedonian (12.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and Honduran (12.0%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 2.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 2.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Turks | 2.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Cheyenne | 2.4 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 2.2 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Menominee | 2.0 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.0 /100 | #247 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 1.9 /100 | #248 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #249 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Paiute | 1.8 /100 | #250 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 1.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 1.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Egyptians | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |