User talk:Nv8200pa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Thanks so much for the lovely photo of the McWhirter House in Belton, TX. I am writing an article about Martha McWhirter and the Sanctificationists. I will be sure to link back to the photograph, and also to properly attribute the photo to you. Thanks again. AnaSoc (talk) 20:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Susan Orlean.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaston Museum Joinerville Texas 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Independent Austin Texas NE Corner 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 01:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurora apartment hotel san antonio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brazos valley african american museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clifton college admin building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dr E L and Nannie Lewis Walker House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cassaday Grey Granite Company Office Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Immaculate Conception Isla Mujeres 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Concho San Saba and Llano Valley Railroad Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blanco courthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orange county tx courthouse 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cuero Texas Knights of Pythias Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Downtown Stamford Texas 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Why do you reduce the size of your photos? --Moroder 04:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former Bay St Louis MS Post Office.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 16:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! George Childress Centennial Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok --Jakubhal 14:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Godley School Main Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! First national bank and trust building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 07:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Old MacKenzie Trail Texas Centennial Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Hidalgo County Jail Edinburg Texas 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:54, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stony Point High School Auditorium Round Rock Texas 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok for me --Jakubhal 18:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dr Jacob Moore Frazier House Belton Texas 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tobin Land Bridge San Antonio Texas Skywalk 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capital MetroRail MLK Jr Station 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New Sweden Lutheran Church Travis County Texas 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! W Y Penn Home Georgetown Texas 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Post Office Building Round Rock Texas 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There are some strange green and yellow artifacts on the clouds and over roof --Jakubhal 18:17, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. New version uploaded. I believe all the artifacts are removed Nv8200pa 10:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks. Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Floyd County Texas Courthouse 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Marble Falls Texas 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There are some dust spots that need to be removed (one above the building on the left e.g.) --FlocciNivis 15:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Removed dust spots Nv8200pa 20:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View Through Mesa Arch Canyonlands NP Utah 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης 10:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Consigned (talk) 15:48, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jefferson Davis Statue by Pompeo Coppini.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: this photograph of a statue by Pompeo Coppini (d. 1957) was taken in the USA, where freedom of panorama does not apply to 3D artworks; Coppini's copyright will be in effect until January 1, 2028.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

DS (talk) 15:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jefferson Davis Statue by Pompeo Coppini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 22:03, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Patrolling uploads

[edit]

Please notify users about problems with their files. Help:Gadget-UserMessages is very helpful for this purpose. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you be more specific about what you are referring to? Nv8200p (talk) 14:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For example, you added {{SD}} on File:Simulador 360VIRTU.jpg, but there is no {{Project scope}} or {{No advertising}} on User talk:360VIRTU.
You could use {{Ping}} on existing conversation if you need somebody attention instead of copying entire conversation on other user talk page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Cathedral RockGarden of the Gods Colorado 2024.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cathedral RockGarden of the Gods Colorado 2024.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2024

[edit]

Hello! In 2023, you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States. Thanks to people like you, we had over 250 participants contributing over 2,400 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. If you haven't seen yet, you can view the top-ten winners of the US competition here.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in the United States through the month of October, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our event page for more information.

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2023, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you have any questions, please leave them on the event talk page.

Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:19, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cleopatra Terrace Yellowstone NP 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window Devils Tower 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]