Jump to content

User talk:Sbb1413/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 January 2021 — 31 January 2021

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:21, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox disputed territory

Template:Infobox disputed territory has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 22:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 February 2021 — 28 February 2021

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

"4000-7000 Å" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 4000-7000 Å. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 17#4000-7000 Å until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Space programs of the United States

Information icon Hello, Soumya-8974. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Space programs of the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Please unblock me

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
April fools' day is over. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 13:47, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

The page WP:ANI is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (3rd nomination). However, ANI is the place where I was blocked. If the page is deleted, then I will no longer be able to appeal my block. Please unblock me before the page is being deleted.[April Fools!] --Soumya-8974 (talk) 13:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 March 2021 — 31 March 2021

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of languages by religion

Information icon Hello, Soumya-8974. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of languages by religion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Unblock me for real

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sbb1413 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have realised why I was blocked. I had edited disruptively on Wikipedia, did not respond to others and expressed my racist opinions. However, I am changed significantly since then and am proving that I will perform good edits through my 2nd chance editings above this section. Administrators should review the editing before unblocking. After my unblock, I will never express my racist opinion and will edit competantly. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 14:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your attempt to follow template:2nd chance was clearly insufficient. I see no non-trivial edits and no reliable sources as citations for your edits. Frankly, even outside of the 2nd chance, this unblock request is nowhere near sufficient to take to the community to have your block lifted. Yamla (talk) 12:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ায় আমন্ত্রণ | An invitation to the Bangla Wikipedia :)

I hope you don't mind an invitation to work on the Bangla Wikipedia. We have less than 1500 editors(even less good editors). I hope you will join us :)

https://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A6%AA%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%A7%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A8_%E0%A6%AA%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A4%E0%A6%BE

--Greatder (talk) 16:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Will join at 10 June 2021 or later. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 April 2021 — 30 April 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 7
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News!
Article of the month.

Michael Collins was an American astronaut who flew the Apollo 11 command module Columbia around the Moon in 1969 while his crewmates, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, made the first crewed landing on the surface. He was selected as part of NASA's third group of 14 astronauts in 1963 and flew in space twice.

Image of the month.

The unofficial flag of earth day which is made of the "Blue Marble" image taken onboard of the Apollo 17 spacecraft with a blue background.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 112.
Total number of members: 325.

April Launches
All times stated here are in UTC.

  1. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L23 (7th at 16:34:18) Success Success
  2. China Long March 4B – Shiyan 6-02 (8th at 23:01) Success Success
  3. Russia Crewed mission Soyuz-2.1a – MS-18 (9th at 07:42:40) Success Success
  4. United States Crewed mission Falcon 9 – Crew-2 (23rd at 22:14:08) Success Success
  5. Russia Soyuz-2.1b – OneWeb 6 (25th at 22:14:08) Success Success
  6. United States Delta IV Heavy – NROL-82 (26th at 20:47) Success Success
  7. China Long March 6 – Qilu 1 & Qilu 4 (27th at 03:20) Success Success
  8. European Union Vega – Pléiades Neo 3 (29th at 01:50:00) Success Success
  9. China Long March 6 – Tianhe 1 (29th at 03:23:15) Success Success
  10. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L24 (29rd at 03:44) Success Success
  11. China Long March 6 – Yaogan 34 (27th at 03:20) Success Success

May Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.

  • Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L25
  • GSLV Mk.2 – GISAT 1
  • Long March 7 – Tianzhou 2
  • Atlas 5 – SBIRS GEO Flight 5
  • Soyuz – OneWeb 7
 Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 30 April 2021.
Spaceflight articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 7 18 4 7 36
FL 4 4 8
FM 97 97
GA 11 22 35 53 121
B 1 49 37 48 135
C 56 160 534 489 11 1,250
Start 37 158 1,115 2,235 373 3,918
Stub 7 244 2,191 226 2,668
List 14 130 79 211 1 435
Category 1,033 1,033
Disambig 48 48
File 202 202
Portal 55 55
Project 57 57
Redirect 1,131 1,131
Template 495 495
Other 38 38
Assessed 126 544 2,052 5,238 3,162 611 11,733
Unassessed 56 56
Total 126 544 2,052 5,238 3,162 667 11,789
Monthly Changes

Since March, 39 new pages have been added to Spaceflight. There is 1 less GA-class, with 3 more files, 4 more B-class, 6 more C-class, 7 more start-class and 5 new stub-class articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Balon Greyjoy and Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:51, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of languages by religion

Hello, Soumya-8974. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of languages by religion".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! signed, Iflaq (talk) 12:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-yousuck

Template:Uw-yousuck has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 13:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

@Soumya-8974: Hello, I have noticed that you have been blocked for a while, and with no recent unblock requests I am removing you from the Mailing list so that the newsletter does not fill your talk page. If you still wish to recieve this then I can re-add you. Thanks, Terasail[✉] 10:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Negotiation to unblock

I have requested to unblock twice, but both are declined. Therefore, I want an admin to WP:NEGOTIATE with the matters related to my block. As I said in my last unblock request, I have changed myself significantly, and will never edit disruptively. I will edit constructively with no vandalism or racism. I also request to blank my userpage for now. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Pinging @Rosguill and Tavix:, the admins involved with my block. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 13:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Well, it's been six months so I am fine with a WP:SO unblock as long as there are significant restrictions, namely topic bans from redirects, Kashmir, and China broadly construed. I'd also like to see an assurance to stay away from anything that may be considered controversial, as controversial topics are an easy way to shorten the amount of WP:ROPE you have left. I'll go ahead and blank your userpage as requested. -- Tavix (talk) 14:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
I am on board with the above suggestion. signed, Rosguill talk 15:40, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Soumya-8974, in February 2021, you removed on OpenStreetMap, a boundary line that was being referred to on Wikipedia, without any discussion. Do you consider this disruptive behaviour? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:South Tibet (disputed territory)

Information icon Hello, Soumya-8974. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:South Tibet (disputed territory), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Demographics of Kashmir

Information icon Hello, Soumya-8974. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Demographics of Kashmir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Time to unblock?

Just reading the Lunar Module Eagle page again, which Soumya created, and was interested in asking for his comment on a question, and saw this block. An editor who had the interest and creativity to began and nurture that page surely is valuable to Wikipedia, and will only get better with time. Please consider enough as being enough, and unblock this editor who was insightful enough to fly with the Eagle. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:49, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

@Randy Kryn:Oppose. This user has made too many unilateral changes on other wikis and thus I fear they'll do the same here. SHB2000 (talk) 05:04, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Control copyright icon Hello Soumya-8974, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lunar Module Eagle, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.aerotechnews.com/blog/2019/07/21/moon-landing-culmination-of-years-of-work/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Lunar Module Eagle saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! SHB2000 (talk) 23:06, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

@SHB2000:, Soumya-8974 is indefinitely blocked, and is not going to be changing the text to avoid COPYVIO, so please just go ahead and delete everything that has been copied; no reason to wait further. You might check their contribution history and run direct checks with Earwig or whatever tool you're using to see if you can find other OCPYVIOs. Good luck, Mathglot (talk) 05:52, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
@Mathglot: Unfortunately about 90% of the text is copyvio, might as well be better to nuke it. SHB2000 (talk) 07:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
@SHB2000:, Go for it. It's not unfortunate, it's policy, and there's good reason to nuke the material, or the whole article if you feel that's better. I support either decision. Mathglot (talk) 08:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Yeah I'll start a deletion nom soon. SHB2000 (talk) 09:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
@SHB2000: Actually, there might be an easier way than that. Can you post an Earwig (or other) link showing the 90% copied text? If so, then I think we could just PROD the article, link it to this discussion, and then it will get deleted in a week. Or alternatively to PRODding it, just add the Earwig link here, then change the article to a redirect. Save folks at Afd the trouble of a discussion. 19:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Please edit the page and not delete it, the topic is easily notable. There are lots of cites from various acceptable sources. Let's see what's left when those sources are checked as back up of the text, including the images which are still good, and then a few edits can polish it up. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
@Randy Kryn and Mathglot:, Link to copyvio. Also, I meant 80%, not 90%. That was a typo.
But if you think that you guys can rewrite this, then go for it. This isn't my home wiki at all (although I do have a high interest in astronomy), and I barely do stuff here. SHB2000 (talk) 07:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

@Randy Kryn: Okay. @SHB2000:, I removed copied material, moving the refs nearby to the new "Further reading" section, where they can be reapplied by editors who expand the article. Can you double check my work? Here's the result of Earwig at this point: 2%. Mathglot (talk) 07:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

LGTM SHB2000 (talk) 07:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Starship Mk1.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Wcam (talk) 14:25, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sbb1413 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After a long-term hiatus, I have decided to edit Wikipedia with competence. I promise that I will listen to others, avoid major edits on controversial articles, respect all Wikipedians irrespective of age, gender, ideology, ethnicity, religion etc. I promise to avoid the circumstances that led to my block. Please unblock me. Soumya-8974 (talk) 13:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As per WP:SNOW, I am declining to copy this unban request to a noticeboard for community consideration. You are welcome to make a new unban request as per WP:UNBAN, but it'll need to be massively more convincing. Yamla (talk) 13:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I disagree; this was pretty clearly community consensus (WP:CBAN) by my investigation. Regardless, no admin is going to unilaterally lift the block. In this situation, they'd risk losing their permissions if they did so. So whether or not you are actually banned, the only path forward is via WP:UNBAN. --Yamla (talk) 14:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Since I cannot appeal at the discussion board (I can only edit this page), someone have to do so in behalf of me per WP:UNBAN. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Correct. And you'll need a massively more convincing request in order for that to happen. WP:UNBAN gives specific instructions. --Yamla (talk) 14:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

WP:AN thread opened

I have opened a discussion on WP:AN. You can see it at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Unban_request_for_Soumya-8974. --Yamla (talk) 11:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Unblock request (another attempt)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sbb1413 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked in 9 January 2021 by Rosguill because of "Disruptive editing, WP:CIR and racism per Special:Permalink/999244891#Soumya-8974,_again". In my earlier requests to unblock, the sysops pointed out that I did not understand the rules of Wikipedia back then. Now I have learnt that competence is required to edit, ignoring feedbacks from others will tell unwanted consequences, personal attacks will make Wikipedia a harsh environment to edit for others, etc. If I am allowed to edit Wikipedia again, then I will promise that I will listen to the feedbacks carefully and try to address them, I will edit very carefully to avoid disruption, I will respect all editors irrespective of age, gender, religion and ethnicity and I will follow the rules of Wikipedia. Just like most of you, I am here to build an encyclopedia. I want to help improve the quality of existing articles, and avoid creating unnecessary redirects. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry to report, the community declined your unban request. This is my closing of the request. Yamla (talk) 10:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I bet this request is much more convincing than the previous one, adhering the WP:GAB and WP:UNBAN guidelines. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
What, if any, topic bans are you currently subjected to? What, if any, additional topic bans would you adhere to, if the community decided it was appropriate for you to edit again? I ask because you earlier stated you would "avoid major edits on controversial articles" and I believe, but could be mistaken, that it's unlikely you'd be unblocked without a topic ban in the areas you were previously causing disruption. --Yamla (talk) 18:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
I am currently subjected to a topic ban on creating redirects since March 2020, as I created a lot of useless redirects back then. Editors were then telling to me always to avoid creating too much redirects, and I was reluctant to hear them. Now I promise to hear the feedbacks and take necessary steps to address them. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 18:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
If additional topic bans are necessary to unblock, then I will adhere a topic ban on controversial topics like Kashmir, Pakistan, Afghanistan, terrorism, where disruptive edits by me are possible due to lack of competence in those topics. I have no such history of disruptive edits related to astronomy and spaceflight, however. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 18:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Oppose. This user has been given many chances to improve, and WP:Standard offer doesn't apply here.. Generally, a disruptive editor would also disrupt other topics as well, and even then, you have shown to repeat your behavior many times. You don't want feedback and improvement, you just want to get in to Wikipedia as soon as possible, and it is likely that I bet this request is much more convincing than the previous one is an obvious indicator of insincereness. We don't have to unban you becuse you have an eloquent argument, nor admitting people who drain our soul and will even if they make 100 featured articles. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 19:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
While my comments may still sound insincere due to my past behaviours, I have now changed my behaviour since my block due to my participation in other communities. While I may be disruptive in certain topics (Kashmir, redirects etc.), I have never been disruptive on topics about which I have significant knowledge and interest (astronomy, spaceflight). Of course, I am not irreplaceable (since there are several Wikipedians with spaceflight interest), and I am not the centre of Wikipedia either. I am here to volunteerly improve the encyclopedia. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 06:06, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
I believe this should be discussed by the community. While I'm currently unsure if I'd support unblocking/unbanning, I think there's enough here for the discussion. I plan to move the request to an admin noticeboard over the weekend. Soumya-8974, given the oppose above, you may choose to have me hold off if you wish. --Yamla (talk) 13:13, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Oppose This user also has CIR issues on other WMF projects as well, such as Wikivoyage and never communicates with us, and to the point where I had to start nominating Soumya's pointless redirects for deletion (Vaticidalprophet also nominated some controversial Taiwan redirects as well). I've also had to decline numerous file move requests on Commons as well. And what about that copyright violation? SHB2000 (talk) 11:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
    Extremely sorry for these. Besides, I never actually had any will to contribute to travel guides, and I could not realise that the code of conduct in WV is different from WP. Most of my copyvios in Commons were in my early stages of uploading files, now they are little to none. Also sorry for behaving almost like Neelix when it comes to redirects. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 14:17, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Oppose. I know this user from the immense amount of redirect related disruption they caused last year, and I'm seeing a huge disconnect between their actions and what they're saying they're going to do. They claim they now understand that communication is important, but looking at their talk pages on other projects shows a complete lack of communication. Their talk page on Wikivoyage [1] has an enormous list of issues, almost none of which have been responded to. They claim that they understand competence is required to edit, but they don't seem to have provided any clue how they plan to develop some, and a look at their other project contributions shows a proposed redirect topic ban on Wikivoyage [2] a commons talk page full of warnings about uploading copyrighted images and policy violations [3] and on wiktionary even today they're unilaterally retargeting ancient project space shortcuts to new places [4]. To support an unblock I would expect to see some evidence of trouble free contributions on other projects and a plan to address the fundamental issue underlying all their editing issues - brashly jumping into areas and processes that they haven't bothered to read up on and bullheadedly making poorly thought out edits that other editors have to clean up after them. As it stands I think we'll simply end up playing whack-a-mole with this editor's disruption, if we ban them from doing X they'll just start disrupting Y instead. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 13:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
— Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Unban_request_for_Soumya-8974

The disruptions on Wikivoyage were months ago, and I no longer touch Wikivoyage due to the lack of willingness to contribute there. I will try to follow the social and behavioural norms if you kindly give me the last chance to contribute in my primary interest area at least (my primary interest is on spaceflight). I am here to improve an encyclopedia, not a travel guide. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 14:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
I unilaterally redirected the WT:BBL redirect as I was looking for Babel box for Wiktionary. I have reverted it and address the problem with a makeshift hatnote. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 14:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
I think you should wait and do something else. If you return 6 months later and being sincere, you might get a second chance. You should edit in your native language wiki as well, to prove that you are not being disruptive as well. Also, please listen to others, since this is one of your major complaints. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 14:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Since I don't really like to reveal my native language (although I had revealed it several moons ago), I am reluctant to edit in my native language. I will try Simple English Wikipedia as a proving point instead. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 14:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Talk page

Remember, you have talk page access solely so you can contest your ban, in a few months or years. That's the only reason you should be editing your talk page. --Yamla (talk) 18:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Oh, thank you! Just reverting some of my edits for the last time. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 18:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia GUS userboxes has been nominated for renaming

Category:Wikipedia GUS userboxes has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Starship Mk1.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Starship Mk1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox world by religion

Template:Infobox world by religion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kashmir topics

Template:Kashmir topics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Politics of Kashmir

Template:Politics of Kashmir has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Political infoboxes

Template:Political infoboxes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Is it the time to be unbanned?

I have been contributing in Commons for six months since my last unban request in October, with numerous constructive edits. As my enthusiasm towards Wikipedia is surging, I want to know whether it is the time to be unbanned. Soumya-8974 (talk) 13:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Frankly, no. There are far, far, far too many warnings over at commons/UT/Soumya-8974/Archive_1. Nor has it been six months since you were last considered for unblocking here. WP:SNOWBALL would apply to any unban request from you at this time. --Yamla (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Most of the warnings are from my early days of Commons. If you look at the warnings in 2021 and 2022, you can see that I have strived to solve those warnings. Anyway, I'll wait further and work more in Commons and possibly other projects. --Soumya-8974 (talk) 05:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Let me be blunt: your competency has not being proven by your Commons edits. However, I do see that you have improved over time (or it is just because you uploaded less between March and April), so I suggest that an unblock request should be done in early 2023. Not a firm date though... CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Well, I was less active in March and April as I focused much on my off-wiki activities and I have even thought of leaving the whole Wikimedia for good. However, as I see that there are still some opportunity to improve myself here, I have decided to stay in Wikimedia. Due to my alleged incompetence in English Wikipedia, my unblock request is unlikely and I have formally declared myself as a former English Wikipedian. Soumya-8974 (talk) 14:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Starship flights/suborbital

Template:Starship flights/suborbital has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox group of territories

Template:Infobox group of territories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:43, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Is it still the time to be unblocked?

Since I have established myself in Commons, Wikivoyage and Bengali Wikipedia, I'm wondering if the time has come to be unblocked in English Wikipedia? After unblocking, I swear to avoid the stuff that led me to this situation in the first place. Sbb1413 (talk) 05:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rocket launches in 2013

A tag has been placed on Category:Rocket launches in 2013 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Infobox aircraft begin

Template:Infobox aircraft begin has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox aircraft. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 14:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Downlink selected page

Template:Downlink selected page has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 00:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Unblock request 8 February 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sbb1413 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have already understand why I was blocked and I have since attempted to reform myself in several other Wikimedia sites, including Bengali Wikipedia, Commons and Wikivoyage. I was blocked for my disruptive edits, lack of competence and racism. I have since focused on other sites and I'm now considered a valuable contributor there. So I think I should be unblocked in English Wikipedia and if I were unblocked, I will focus to the articles on West Bengal and avoid the areas that lead me to my current situation. Sbb1413 (talk) 11:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are banned, not just blocked. See WP:UNBAN. Yamla (talk) 12:54, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The WP:UNBAN says that I should use the unblock template, since I'm banned/blocked by English Wikipedia community. --Sbb1413 (talk) 13:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Yes. But it says more than that, doesn't it? --Yamla (talk) 13:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
It says "Post an appeal "unblock" template or comment there, by email or other off-site means such as the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS), and ask for it to be reposted to the appropriate discussion board. This is a voluntary act and should not be abused or used to excess. Submit an appeal to UTRS and ask an administrator to post it to the appropriate discussion board. This is a voluntary act and should not be abused or used to excess." It means, my unblock request should be posted to the appropriate venue by an admin. Sbb1413 (talk) 13:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Your request was for an unblock, not an unban. I'm not convinced you understand the difference between a block or a ban and I have to warn you, that strongly indicates WP:CIR still applies. You didn't ask for it to be copied over to the appropriate discussion board. Take your time. Make sure you get it right, because you will be judged on how you handle your unban request. --Yamla (talk) 13:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Should I take yet another six (or so) months before initiating another unban/unblock request or should I repeat the unban request with better wording right now? Sbb1413 (talk) 13:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
You haven't made an unban request, you have only made an unblock request so far. Provided you have not edited (the English language) Wikipedia in at least six months (with another account, or while not signed in to an account), you can make your unban request now. --Yamla (talk) 13:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Articles featured on The Downlink indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Files featured on The Downlink indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Unban request 8 February 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sbb1413 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have already understood why I was banned by the English Wikipedia community. I was banned from the entire site for my disruptive edits, lack of competence and racism. Since then, I have attempted to reform myself in several other Wikimedia sites, including Bengali Wikipedia, Commons and Wikivoyage. After some time, some editors have commented that I have become a valuable contributor. So I think I should be unbanned in English Wikipedia and if I were unbanned, I will focus to the articles on West Bengal and possibly the whole India and avoid the areas that led me to my current situation. I may also use WP:AFC/R sparingly to create useful redirects in accordance to the relevant policies.

The above comment is to copied to an appropriate venue by an unbiased administrator. --Sbb1413 (talk) 13:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The consensus at WP:AN was to decline the unban request. RickinBaltimore (talk) 01:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm leaving this for another admin, just in case anyone claims I'm biased. However, you are free to copy the following (hopefully helpful) statement. Based on checkuser data, I see no evidence of recent block evasion for this user. --Yamla (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
@Yamla: is there a link to the ban discussion by any chance? RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
The ban notice was added to the user page by CactiStaccingCrane. I think the most pertinent link discussing the ban is here. Let me know if you want more, happy to dive more deeply. --Yamla (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks Yamla, I am going to post this request to WP:AN. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
While the unban request is declined, I have pledged to never trigger hate speech against any community. Since 2021, I have said nothing against any community in any wiki. Sbb1413 (talk) 04:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BFR in orbit, 2017.PNG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BFR in orbit, 2017.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:06, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Newsletter status

Template:Newsletter status has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

"Arrêt" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Arrêt has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 8 § Arrêt until a consensus is reached. Awesome Aasim 04:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Unban me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sbb1413 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have already understood why I was banned in February 2021. I used to create zillions of useless redirects and behaved negatively towards other users (intentionally or unintentionally) under the username Soumya-8974. Now I understand the consequence of disruptive editing and behaving negatively towards other users. I have worked in English Wikivoyage, Wikimedia Commons and Bengali Wikipedia for more than two years, and I have largely avoided anything that could prevent working there. I know that banning is undertaken as a preventative measure and not as a punitiative measure. I hope the English Wikipedia community will unban me with certain terms and conditions, including topic bans on certain topics. I promise that I will avoid any disruptive editing in English Wikipedia and I won't behave negatively towards any users. I want topic bans on China, Pakistan and all redirects, and focus on topics related to India and transport systems instead. So many years have passed and everything has changed. I have already translated many English articles into Bengali. Now I want to translate Bengali articles into English. Thank you for your support and happy new year 2024. I want to copy this post to an appropriate venue by an uninvolved experienced editor.

Decline reason:

Your unban request was archived with only an oppose in response. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 16 § Category:Rocket launches

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 16 § Category:Rocket launches on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Regions of Eurasia has been nominated for merging to Category:Regions by continent

Category:Regions of Eurasia has been nominated for merging to Category:Regions by continent. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 19:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Duodecimal

I've recently noticed that there's a COI template in the talk page with my previous username. I had added the template due to my poor understanding of WP:COI back then. Since I never have had any real association with any organization promoting the duodecimal system, the template should be removed. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 13:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

A note of forgiveness

I see a lot of my redirects and other pages being deleted or put under deletion discussions, so I want to forgive whatever I had done under my previous username Soumya-8974. I used to create nonsense redirects, harrass other users (directly or indirectly) etc. However, I have learnt a lesson from this sitewide ban and I have avoided doing these things in other Wikimedia projects like Bengali Wikipedia and Commons. Although there are queries related to categories and images in Commons, I have discussed those queries and most of them are resolved. It is not one of those failed unban requests, just a note of my forgiveness. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 13:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Remove all CSS and JS gadgets

When I used to edit English Wikipedia, I had installed several gadgets at User:Sbb1413/common.css and User:Sbb1413/common.js. However, since I'm now banned from editing, I cannot remove those gadgets myself and I now have problems with those gadgets while reading articles. So I request an experienced editor to remove all those gadgets from User:Sbb1413/common.css and User:Sbb1413/common.js. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 17:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Sounds like you want {{iper}}. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 09:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done these pages have been blanked. — xaosflux Talk 09:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 09:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request 25 September 2024

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sbb1413 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel the ban by @Rosguill: since 2021 needs to be reviewed by the community. I understand the reasons for my current ban: WP:DISRUPTIVE, WP:CIR, and WP:PA, and I don't want to violate these policies in English Wikipedia ever. I understand I had created redirects excessively, which consumed the time of many users here by nominating them to WP:RFD. I promise not to do that ever. I have contributed to many other projects (Commons, Bengali Wikipedia, Simple English Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikifunctions, Wikivoyage), and avoided disruptive editing and personal attacks in those places. I expect my community will give at least one chance to demonstrate my competence in English Wikipedia, and I promise I won't try to break any major policies that caused my ban. I simply want to volunteer in this project, and contribute to the sum of knowledge. I will focus on articles related to my current interests and avoid making redirects. I'm open to any discussions related to this block. Thank you. Any administrator not involved in previous discussions related to my blocks can copy this request to WP:AN, where the community can review my current block. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 15:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; stale request that ended up on an archive page. Yamla (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will not carry this across for community discussion, partly because I was involved in the discussion last time and partly because WP:SNOW (I mean, there's not even a suggestion of a topic ban here, let alone any meaningful attempt to address the catastrophic problems previously demonstrated). I will note there's no evidence of recent ban evasion, which I suppose is a good thing. --Yamla (talk) 17:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

I want to continue the topic the topic ban on redirects, and I want the community to let me address the problems I had demonstrated way back. I have made it clear that I won't violate relevant policies that caused my current ban. I'll respect everyone regardless of nationality, and focus on articles that align with my interests. I will never try to do anything related to redirects, unless I request to lift the topic ban on redirects. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 17:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
@Yamla: WP:SNOW is what concerns me the most. If the community continues to legitimize my ban, then there's nothing to say. I have to mutely follow them, as no one owns English Wikipedia. However, I still hope the community will allow me to demonstrate that I have learned lessons from this ban, as the community runs this project. I cordially promise that whatever disastrous I did back then was the thing of the past, and I'll never do that as long as I'm active here. There will be no redirects and no personal attacks from me, just contributions on articles that our readers will see. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 18:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sbb1413/Archive_2&oldid=1254196487"