Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/06/01
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Global path of the total solar eclipse 2016-03-09.png
Copyvio, long time abuse of globally blocked user Yahadzija C3r4 (talk) 05:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 12:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Imagen aparece en https://malahtun.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/htun-portrait-for-carnegie.jpg Campylobacter (talk) 17:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 19:40, 1 Juni 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Mala Htun.jpg --Krdbot 00:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Yitchak (cropped).png
License on source site says per Google translation: "Allowed to distribute and use free of charge for credit - Photographer's name". I'm not sure, that this is enough. What about derivative works and commercial use? Taivo (talk) 09:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC) - I received written consent to cc-by-sa-3.0 by author, sent by email. Unfortunately I don't posses this email account anymore, it was transferred to a Hebrew Wikipedia member who continued my work of receiving free images by email with consent for cc-by-sa from others, until/during the setup of Wikimedia's email consent system. Do as you wish with this photo, just thought you should know why it was marked as cc-by-sa-3.0 at the time. Yonidebest Ω Talk 08:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept, because the file was uploaded really long times ago, in January 2008. These files are called grandfathered old files, where evidence for free license is not so strictly required. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Image only used for vandalism, uploaded by a user who is banned on enwiki and frequently globally locked. The text added to the photo is a pejorative of interest to this vandal zzuuzz (talk) 15:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Image only used for vandalism, uploaded by a user who is banned on enwiki and frequently globally locked. The text added to the photo is a pejorative of interest to this vandal zzuuzz (talk) 15:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
empty category Farragutful (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: clear case. --JuTa 02:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
no tiene categorías Davibelgo (talk) 03:13, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected to dupe. --JuTa 18:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
A disturbing picture serving no educational purposes. According to Commons:Nudity, such file of poor quality should be deleted. WhitePhosphorus (talk) 09:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete According to the description, this is a nude photo of the uploader's classmate. So it probably violates our privacy policy. --Antigng (talk) 16:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PENIS. --Storkk (talk) 13:51, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dgchenjunyu (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:小鸡鸡.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡1.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡2.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡3.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡4.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡5.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡6.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡7.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡8.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡9.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡10.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡11.jpg
- File:小鸡鸡13.jpg
Per Commons:Nudity, all are disturbing penis pictures serving no more educational contents than things we have. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 10:07, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No realistic educational value 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No educational value over the higher quality stuff we have. See COM:PENIS. --Storkk (talk) 13:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
文件名起错了,为避免歧义,请求删除!
碧海风 (talk) 02:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 00:52, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
文件名起错了,为避免歧义,请求删除! 碧海风 (talk) 00:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- According to Google Translate, you want to request a file rename. Click the link and follow the directions there. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:31, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fanghong. --Yann (talk) 11:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Inaccurate name 1v1n (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Inaccurate name 1v1n (talk) 18:48, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep @1v1n: You can ask for the file to be renamed using the "Move" option in the "More" menu. See COM:FR for details. --bjh21 (talk) 16:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- FYI. Rename is done. --Den man tau (talk) 15:12, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
inaccurate name 1v1n (talk) 16:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- @1v1n: Is this now a request to delete the redirect? --bjh21 (talk) 17:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
false source description "own work" as this image is a scan of the printed book Ryanag (talk) 01:55, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Two other images by uploader Татарин116 have already been deleted, and a nearly identical file File:Volga Bulgaria.jpg is also nominated for deletion as a copyvio. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation 100cellsman (talk) 02:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Almost certainly exceeds TOO in every country. Essentially orphaned and possibly out of scope. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:29, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:14, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prafull achari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused imagery mostly formerly in w:User:Prafull achari/sandbox. No potential for educational use.
- File:Ti ani mi novel pre publishing ceremony .jpg
- File:Ti ani mi pre -publishing.jpg
- File:Ti ani mi.jpg
- File:Prafull Achari.jpg
- File:Pre publishing of tee ani mi novel on 25 September 2018 .jpg
- File:Prafull achari.jpg
—Cryptic (talk) 02:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:14, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
UPF, proposed to delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nane-wikipedia.jpg. E4024 (talk) 06:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Licensed under a standard YouTube license — Racconish 💬 06:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am quite sure the file was released as CC-BY when I uploaded it. I always take good care. However, since I did not request a license review, we will not able to get a proof of that. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Licensed under a standard YouTube license. — Racconish 💬 06:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am quite sure the file was released as CC-BY when I uploaded it. I always take good care. However, since I did not request a license review, we will not able to get a proof of that. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Licensed under a standard YouTube license. — Racconish 💬 07:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am quite sure the file was released as CC-BY when I uploaded it. I always take good care. However, since I did not request a license review, we will not able to get a proof of that. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:02, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope and taken from the net
Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
No metadata, facebook images
- File:টিলাগড় ইকোপার্ক মাকড়শা.jpg
- File:In Tilaghar.jpg
- File:Middle Road of Tilaghar.jpg
- File:Path of Tilaghar 2.jpg
- File:Sunshine in Tilaghar.jpg
- File:Path of Tilaghar 1.jpg
- File:টিলাগড়ের শুভ্রতা.jpg
- File:Deep Jungle of Ratargul.jpg
- File:Views from Watch Tower of Ratargul.jpg
- File:Boat in Ratargul.jpg
- File:In Mid Lake of Ratargul.jpg
- File:Connecting Roots in Ratargul.jpg
- File:Ratarguls Beauty.jpg
- File:Upper trees of Ratargul.jpg
- File:Mid Ratargul.jpg
- File:Mid of Ratargul.jpg
- File:Ratargul & Sky.jpg
- File:Ratargul View.jpg
- File:Infront of Ratargul Watch Tower.jpg
- File:রাতারগুলে প্রবেশের মুখে মাছ শিকার.jpg
- File:রাতারগুলে প্রবেশের মুখে।.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:23, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Selfie with filters, not usable for anything, person non relevant. Quedel (talk) 14:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, OOS. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
There is no connection with the competition. Mehman 97 15:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support It is not relevant for Wiki loves Earth. Beqabai (talk) 15:02, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Still is in scope. No valid reason for deletion. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farhana hridoyini (talk · contribs)
[edit]Metadata shows copied from facebook
- File:লাউয়াছড়া বিবরণী স্ট্যান্ড.jpg
- File:বুনো.jpg
- File:খুজুর গাছের সারি.jpg
- File:গাছের শেকড়.jpg
- File:পথের উপর উল্টানো গাছ.jpg
- File:সবুজ বনের মায়া.jpg
- File:গাছের ফাকে বিশ্রামের বেঞ্চ.jpg
- File:বুনোপথে রেলচলে.jpg
- File:পত্র পল্লবীত গাছের ফাকে আকাশ ডাকে.jpg
- File:বেতের ঝোপে.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:26, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
File copied from Facebook. Please import the original, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:27, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image.
- File:@oak oklok.jpeg
- File:Oak oklo.jpg
- File:Oklok oak.jpg
- File:Oak oklo.jpeg
- File:Oklo.jpeg
- File:Oklo.jpg
- File:Oklok.jpg
- File:Oak.jpeg
- File:Oak oklok 2.jpg
- File:Oak oklok.jpeg
- File:Oak oklok.jpg
Mitte27 (talk) 23:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nimai Das Shana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image.
- File:Magazine pic 2.jpg
- File:Smiling pic.jpg
- File:Sitting on rock.jpg
- File:Sitting on stairs and thinking.jpg
- File:Magazine shoot pic.jpg
Mitte27 (talk) 23:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by INSANARABY (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:قسم شايفينكم.png
- File:تلفزيون إنسان.png
- File:قسم دعوة المظلوم.png
- File:راديو انسان.png
- File:قسم سينما جراف.png
- File:قسم فوكس.png
- File:قسم الوجه الآخر.png
- File:قسم أجمل لحظة فشل.png
- File:قسم فيها حاجة حلوة.png
- File:قسم شبيك لبيك.png
- File:قسم الحكاية فيها انت.png
- File:قسم الشقيانين.png
- File:قسم ب100 راجل.png
- File:INSANWEBSITE.png
Mitte27 (talk) 23:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Túrelio. per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:30, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Unangemessen 93.225.180.210 08:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Unangemessen E1234r67 (talk) 08:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung E1234r67 (talk) 08:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Photograph of an potentially identifiable but non-notable person. Out of scope - no reasonable educational use. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete because I don't think she was aware the photo was taken. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:11, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, right, the description even admits it.. "Candid subway photos. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"flickr4jazz" insource:"candid"
- ..and that's how it's done. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 04:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Denisa Kola (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unfree license, taken from http://www.comune.genola.cn.it/ita/gallery.asp and subpages: http://www.comune.genola.cn.it/ita/notelegali.asp I contenuti di questo sito sono rilasciati sotto Licenza Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IT); salvo dove è diversamente specificato.
- File:Via Roma, Municipio.jpg
- File:Scuole medie.jpg
- File:Villa Manera.jpg
- File:Centro Genola.jpg
- File:Sala conferenze.jpg
- File:Parco cittadella.jpg
- File:Cittadella2.jpg
- File:Castello di Genola- Cortile Interno.jpg
- File:CastelloGenola.jpg
- File:Facciata castello.jpg
- File:Castello- Cortile interno.jpg
- File:Castello - Facciata.jpg
- File:Municipio di Genola.jpg
- File:Villa Conti Tapparelli.jpg
- File:Castello di Genola.jpg
- File:Ritratti Dei 17 Civili Trucidati Nel 1944-'45.jpg
- File:Funerale Dei Genolesi Uccisi Il 29 Aprile 1945.jpg
Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:09, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Source site uses CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0 license.
- File:MIT6002XT214-V060500.webm
- File:MIT6002XT214-V043700.webm
- File:MIT6002XT214-V043000.webm
- File:MIT6002XT214-V050500.webm
- File:MIT6002XT214-V045700.webm
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RR Auction (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Jfk-diary copy.pdf
- File:Shepard-watch copy.jpg
- File:Capone-watch copy.jpg
- File:Gold-module copy.jpg
- File:Amp-kit copy.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
I used Wikimedia OTRS release generator this afternoon to grant permissions.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RR Auction (talk • contribs) 19:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
unused logos of questionable notability : out of scope
- File:Mytra on demand services solution-01.jpg
- File:Logo mytra (1).jpg
- File:Mytra on demand services solution.png
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Blatant spam jdx Re: 06:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Previously used to vandalise category Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
obscure image Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete That huge streak artifact and the relatively small size of the foreground object make the subject unidentifiable. Far better images of Earth's Moon already exist. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Dr. Rami Shaheen Receiving the latest award from Her Excellency Sheikha Ayisha Alqasimi for his added value to Sajaya-youth leadership program in the United Arab Emirates. .jpg
[edit]Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 14:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused selfie of an unknown person. OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused selfie of an unknown person. OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused image of an unknown person. Single upload. OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused selfie of an unknown person. OoS. (Interesting hair style though. :) E4024 (talk) 15:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused selfie of an unknown person. OoS. (Author of... ?) E4024 (talk) 15:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused image of two unknown persons. OoS. (Spielvogel? Rings a bell?) E4024 (talk) 15:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Unidentified, unused, and unlikely to be uploader's own work. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 15:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kraftstar Management (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising of another wedding planner, out of project scope. Same like on en:wp.
Achim (talk) 15:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope local football club. E4024 (talk) 15:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
The conversation is out of scope. The artworks need permission from the copyright holder. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
No problem, let’s go ahead and delete it
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Vandalismo Geom (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal file. E4024 (talk) 16:21, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Vandalismo Geom (talk) 16:21, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused image of a person. Formerly in w:User:Mr.varma1 and w:User:Mr.varma1/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 17:05, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused promotional image of a person. Formerly in w:Ammar Mango. —Cryptic (talk) 17:07, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Out of project scope and promotional. Corresponding article on enWP deleted as spam. --Randykitty (talk) 10:06, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 18:28, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
This screenshot is out of the scope of the Wikimedia project and cannot be used. Danidamiobi (talk) 19:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
This screenshot of a personal image is out of the scope of the Wikimedia project and cannot be used. Danidamiobi (talk) 19:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
This screenshot of a selfie is out of the scope of the Wikimedia project and cannot be used. Danidamiobi (talk) 19:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
This screenshot is out of the scope of the Wikimedia project and cannot be used. Danidamiobi (talk) 19:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
This screenshot of a personal picture is out of the scope of the Wikimedia project and cannot be used. Danidamiobi (talk) 19:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
This self image is out of the scope of the Wikimedia project and cannot be used. Danidamiobi (talk) 19:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Signature of unknown person, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dolaretxeko irakurmena (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Euskara lantzen literatura mintzamena.pdf
- File:Euskal literatura Gernika aldizkari liberalean.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:PS. Duplicate of File:Screenshot2018-06-01--16 11 26.jpg 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Test map only, serves no purpose. Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
This self image is out of the scope of the Wikimedia project and cannot be used. It could be self promoting. If it tried to portray anything in good faith, Commons could have had it already. Danidamiobi (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 23:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Thu Phuong performed with colleagues of Youth Theatre in August Theatre of Haiphong 1995.jpg
[edit]uploaded by a known sockpuppeteer who upload copyright-infringing works as their own DHN (talk) 03:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
uploader is known sockpuppeteer, obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 03:20, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
uploader is known sockpuppeteer, obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 03:21, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Photos from yellowrin.tistory.com
[edit]Although the posts are labeled as {{Cc-by-4.0}}, the blog's homepage states "상업적 이용 / n차 가공 / 로고 크롭을 금지합니다." (commercial use / secondary processing / logo crops are prohibited.) This contradicts the Creative Commons license, and photos from this blog can not be hosted on Commons.
ℯxplicit 04:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
With copyrighted screenshot of the TV B dash (talk) 04:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
We've got enough "bowl cut" pics, looks like an unnecessary addition. Found in uncat files... E4024 (talk) 15:28, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karavatakis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative work of non-free works: Taking picture of computer screen does not make the photographer the copyright holder of the original images.
4nn1l2 (talk) 15:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
No self-presentation. Advertising for person in own thing. Advertising for a political party in Germany. Out of scope. Quedel (talk) 07:04, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Guten tag zurerst wurde bemängelt ohne warenfotos könnte ich hier keinen text verewigen nun wurde bemängelt das angeblich etwas mit dem uhrheberrecht nicht stimmig werden könnte diese materialen von uns sind familieneigentum und unterstehen somit ganz anderen gesetzlichkeiten ich bin abermals auf ihre wünsche eingangen und bin nun gespannt was sie diesmal zu bemängeln haben!;[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniela Sedelke (talk • contribs) 17:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
vielen dank um ihre sorgen aber in diesem fall handelt es sich um ablichtungen des eigenen eigentums haben sie noch weitere wünsche; — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniela Sedelke (talk • contribs) 17:21, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, COM:ADVERT. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, per Jeff, per COM:ADVERT, per everything. --E4024 (talk) 14:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:ADVERT. --Wdwd (talk) 13:38, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Crime Border (talk · contribs)
[edit]A bunch of advertising, out of scope
- File:Crime Border.jpg
- File:Journalism Training Centre.jpg
- File:Jounalism Training Centre directed by Crime Reporter Welfare Association & Crime Border.jpg
- File:CRIME REPORTER WELFARE ASSOCIATION.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
dubious own work claim, the image is available in the web in better resolution and uncropped, possibly a TV series promo image (the subject is an actor). [2] —Ah3kal (Talk) 08:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:44, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
A photoshopped version of a photo taken from the net (http://pigweek.com/index.php/contact-us/) and used in an attack page Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:45, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Aren't cups copyrighted? E4024 (talk) 08:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: FlickR-public-domain-mark (PDM) is not a valid license. --Wdwd (talk) 13:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
The uploader is not the author, no evidence that the work has been published under CC-BY-SA 4.0, different authors in the description and the metadata. Suspect copyvio. Gyrostat (talk) 09:21, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Two source photos have been deleted as copyright violations, for example look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sultan Yusuf Ali Kenadid.jpg, making the whole collage copyvio as well. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:05, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. I used Google Earth and its video/animation feature. Nicolas G. Mertens (talk) 09:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Do not meet the criteria Contributor 111 (talk) 10:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete COM:NETCOPYVIO [3] 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:10, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Missing metadata, low quality, can be found here. Possibly a copyvio Texniths (talk) 10:17, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:11, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Source site is down and license is never reviewed. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:12, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
These are all official Flight Design images ([4], [5]), so we must assume that they are subject to copyright. To use them under a Creative Commons license, we need written permission via COM:OTRS.
El Grafo (talk) 11:53, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Previously published photo: http://www.danbadea.net/2007/02/13/gherilele-militienilor-lui-blaga/ Ytoyoda (talk) 12:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
I cannot see educational value, probably out of project scope. In addition, source is here YouTube without exact link, maybe copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
file png would not be used Jdapenao (talk) 12:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redir. --Wdwd (talk) 14:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
copyright infringement 83.149.19.158 13:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Two other images by uploader Татарин116 have already been deleted, and a nearly identical file File:Volga-Bulgaria.jpg is also nominated for deletion as a copyvio. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
is fake image Apriljeanettep (talk) 16:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Copyvio, assuming bad faith. Uploader is indeffed on several wikis. --Achim (talk) 18:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
delete it pls Apriljeanettep (talk) 16:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
delete it pls 2804:431:9724:3A7F:D1E2:5C22:C71B:339A 15:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support Falsified photo being used for vandalism. Her face is taken from this image and plastered on. Not sure where the original image is taken from. Prefall (talk) 03:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader request, not used, and if falsified... --E4024 (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
hasn't seen a dog face + seems like a screenshot, not a free photo. Stryn (talk) 20:12, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
It was created by me. You can delete it. It is just pure nonsense. Cookingmonster123 (talk) 18:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader agreed. --Achim (talk) 19:49, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Source info added. --Achim (talk) 19:36, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Dad d xvv dg cvbv cvb cv cvb cv cv cv cv uh cvb vbb cv vhndgghdfghdffghhgfghhvggghhhh 2001:8A0:6110:E401:BD42:5A74:98EF:7148 22:36, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- speedy keep No reason given, file seems to be fine – troll request or accident? --El Grafo (talk) 09:50, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, obviously nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation 100cellsman (talk) 02:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image] MiguelAlanCS (talk) 22:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Barcex (talk) 11:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image] MiguelAlanCS (talk) 22:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Barcex (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Even if the image is not considered promotional, it needs to go through COM:OTRS process due to high quality. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Also File:A HELL energiaital legfőbb összetevői.jpg which is completely promotional. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 17:33, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect EXIF information Alina Ananyeva (talk) 14:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Unidentified, unused, and unlikely to be uploader's own work. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 15:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sumerkivlesu666 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Author Ермолин, Рем Николаевич died in 2004. His works are still protected by the Russian copyright law.
- File:Ермолин Рем Николаевич. Портрет Клавы Булыгиной. 1974.jpg
- File:Ермолин Рем Николаевич Печора. С тони. Портрет Валентина Аксёнова. 1969.jpg
- File:Ермолин Рем Николаевич Дядя Паша. 1972.jpg
- File:Ермолин Рем Николаевич Усть-Цильма. 1969.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 16:55, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mephisto spa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Captioned in the image with inaccurate names. The diagrams themselves are of lower quality than other images of the same compounds.
- File:Anulenos fusionados2.png
- File:Ciclobutacicloocteno.png
- File:Identificación de anulenos3.png
- File:Identificación de anulenos2.png
GKFXtalk 21:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment:
All these images are currently in use.Ed (Edgar181) 13:34, 2 June 2018 (UTC) Edit: Images have now been replaced. Thanks GKFX. Ed (Edgar181) 12:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC) - Comment: I was wrong. These images are designed to explain a system of naming for fused rings by breaking the new name into chunks, but since that system contradicts normal ring nomenclature and I hadn't seen it used before, I assumed it was an error. I did find an explanation of the scheme online (although it seems to be rare). I still think the images are misleading out of context and are quite poor quality, so I will continue to edit them out of the article (replacing with SVG and wikitext captions) and they can then be deleted. GKFXtalk 12:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Done, ready for deletion. GKFXtalk 15:56, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 13:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
File:LISTA DE PRECANDIDATOS PARA PARTICIPAR EN LAS ELECCIONES REGIONALES Y MUNICIPALES 2018 PROV. PALLASCA.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. Irrelevant for Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Not used screenshot. Any reason to keep this? E4024 (talk) 15:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Panel in a touristic place. Very probably it's copyrighted. Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Traduction : Panneau dans un lieu touristique. Très probablement protégé par des droits d'auteur
Voir les exemples de « signalétiques » sur des sites naturels publics propriété communale, avec accès libre et gratuit (ces informations sur les parcours à respecter sont reprises dans tous les dépliants, journaux, sites internet communaux et offices de tourisme, l'Inventaire National du Patrimoine Naturel...) pour assurer la promotion des sites.
Voir pour ce cas précis les exemples de signalétique d'information d'ensemble qui sont uniquement des panneaux de « promotion touristique des sites » et non des « modèles » de panneaux car les contenus de la Charte signalétique (textes, images, pictogrammes, illustrations, maquettes types…), ont eux été créés pour le compte de la commune de Saint-Nabord : - sur wikipédia : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal%C3%A9tique Signalétique - sur Commons : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Signs?uselang=fr Category:Signs--René Dinkel (talk) 16:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
file in copyviol - licensed by LaPresse Photojournalistic Agency, not a free-licence file. Danyele (talk) 15:13, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
One-time upload. Looks like a disc cover. Is this free? E4024 (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
file in copyviol - licensed by LaPresse Photojournalistic Agency, not a free-licence file. Danyele (talk) 15:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Unidentified, unused, and unlikely to be uploader's own work. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 15:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
No source, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- I have added disclaimers about copyright disclaimers and soures regarding the flag. RainbowSilver2ndBackup (talk) 00:47, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
is fake image Apriljeanettep (talk) 16:40, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
copyright by Editorial Galaxia Estevoaei (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:26, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
inaccurate name 1v1n (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader holds the copyright of the image which has "Patrick Holland-Moritz" in meta data MilborneOne (talk) 17:04, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
David Beckham photo needs to be removed. I don't think that we can consider it as DM. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:05, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Imagen aparece en https://malahtun.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/htun-portrait-for-carnegie.jpg Campylobacter (talk) 17:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ramiro Arrue
[edit]Ramiro Arrue, Spanish painter (1892-1971), not in the Public Domain.
- File:Ramiro Arrue - Basque Study (1).jpg
- File:“Eguerdia”, Ramiro Arrue.jpg
- File:“Pilotaria”, Ramiro Arrue.jpg
Mutter Erde (talk) 18:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
previosly deleted File:Jiam Momin.jpg, out of scope Ronhjones (Talk) 19:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:29, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
This self image is out of the scope of the Wikimedia project and cannot be used. It could be self promoting. If it tried to portray anything in good faith, Commons could have had it already. Danidamiobi (talk) 20:05, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:30, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
No concise subject. Out of scope. Danidamiobi (talk) 20:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:31, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
It is outdated. It is promotional for the company. It is an undesirable photo. The subject did not know it would be used for public posting. Drsammyjohnson (talk) 20:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:31, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Cropped photo of previous request for original to be deleted. Drsammyjohnson (talk) 20:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:31, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
File copied from Facebook. Please import the original, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Les photos sont issues du Facebook de la Ville de Joinville dont je suis l'auteur ! J'utilise donc ces photos sur Facebook comme sur Wikipedia. Elles sont réalisées par moi-même, Anthony Koenig, dans le cadre de mes activités professionnelles comme salarié de la Ville de Joinville. J'utilise donc ces photos en totale liberté et légalité. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Koenig (talk • contribs) 21:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Merci d'importer les photos originales. --Yann (talk) 22:32, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Image lacks value and significance. I am also the creator and wish it deleted. Truerevol (talk) 22:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:32, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Image lacks value and significance. I am also the creator and wish it deleted. Truerevol (talk) 22:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Image lacks value and significance. I am also the creator and wish it deleted. Truerevol (talk) 22:53, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Image lacks value and significance. I am also the creator and wish it deleted. Truerevol (talk) 22:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Image lacks value and significance. I am also the creator and wish it deleted. Truerevol (talk) 22:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Image lacks value and significance. I am also the creator and wish it deleted. Worldsgreen2012 (talk) 23:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
This unclear image does not even match into WIkiloves earth and does not tally with the goals and vision of this project as a whole, let alone the WLE contest. Danidamiobi (talk) 23:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
No subject. Restaurant is in far, dark view. The image may find no use. Danidamiobi (talk) 23:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
small photo without metadata Mitte27 (talk) 23:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
This unclear image from WLE 2017 of the Erin Ijesha Waterfall already have a better image that fits the scope of Commons well. Danidamiobi (talk) 23:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
This unclear image from WLE 2017 of the Erin Ijesha Waterfall already have a better image that fits the scope of Commons well. Danidamiobi (talk) 23:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work based on [6], using Cc-by-nc-4.0 license, which is not allowed in Commons B dash (talk) 02:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- You should know that all moon photos look the same. . Please review other deleted moons nominated by this user. [7] --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Derivative of File:Moon 0063 Nevit.jpg, CC-BY-SA 3.0. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:10, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Ya hay un archivo svg Jdapenao (talk) 03:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: we must keep both files. --Ezarateesteban 20:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Ya hay un archivo SVG Jdapenao (talk) 03:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Ya existe una version SVG Jdapenao (talk) 03:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is another SVG version Jdapenao (talk) 03:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- And ? A bitmap (PNG, JPEG or GIF) file superseded by a vector graphic is not considered to be an exact enough duplicate. BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 01:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is another svg versión Jdapenao (talk) 03:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is another svg versión Jdapenao (talk) 03:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is another svg versión Jdapenao (talk) 03:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is another svg versión Jdapenao (talk) 03:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is another svg versión Jdapenao (talk) 03:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is another svg file Jdapenao (talk) 04:07, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is another svg file Jdapenao (talk) 04:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is another svg file Jdapenao (talk) 04:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is another svg file Jdapenao (talk) 04:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
There is another svg file Jdapenao (talk) 04:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Licensed under the standard YouTube license. — Racconish 💬 06:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am quite sure the file was released as CC-BY when I uploasded it. I always take good care. However, since I did not request a license review, we will not able to get a proof of that. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 20:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Licensed under the standard YouTube license. — Racconish 💬 06:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am quite sure the file was released as CC-BY when I uploaded it. I always take good care. However, since I did not request a license review, we will not able to get a proof of that. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 20:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Licensed under the standard YouTube license. — Racconish 💬 06:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am quite sure the file was released as CC-BY when I uploaded it. I always take good care. However, since I did not request a license review, we will not able to get a proof of that. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 20:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Poster is the focus of this image. Therefore it's a DW. E4024 (talk) 09:21, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- I understand what is your real problem, dear "sweet Turkish delight".
But you can not hide the barbarian events of 1955 in Constantinople by removing an own work, because you do not like "focus of this image". Macedon-40 (talk) 10:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi. I will respond to your kind words as soon as this DR is closed, but with nothing that can be considered a personal attack. In the meantime please read Commons:Derivative works and other Commons guidelines and policies. They are valid for all of us. --E4024 (talk) 08:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not COM:FOP in Greece. --Ezarateesteban 20:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:19, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 20:18, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 20:18, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
File is logo for show, and clearly NOT "own work". See google image search [8] for similar images. Uploader also has history of uploading copyright violations, claiming "own work" falsely. Ravensfire (talk) 13:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 20:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 20:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Image lacks value and significance. I am also the creator and wish it deleted. Worldsgreen2012 (talk) 23:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, uploader request. --Ezarateesteban 20:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
see exif: 1923, UK --- Portrait of Irish playwright George Bernard Shaw standing with his hands on his hips. --- Image by © E.O. Hoppé/CORBIS:
- wrong person
- en:E._O._Hoppé died in 1972
- uncooperative uploader (see source and author in description)
I would consider this to be a troll upload. Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:32, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Laurent Pagani is needed. No evidence, that uploader Papatamus is the same person. Taivo (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
I am very unfamiliar with wiki things. Papatamus is indeed my nickname on wiki but I don't know how to prove that. I am not even sure to answer at the right place. I just learned the minimum to post the picture I took in my garden. I have not enough time to learn more about how to use wikipedia/media. Sorry. L. Pagani
- You wrote into very correct place. Actually you should open COM:OTRS page and look, what kind of e-mail should be sent into permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. But ... I am ready to assume good faith here. Taivo (talk) 17:53, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
So do I still have to do something ? I cliked on COM:OTRS but this leads to several pages to read and it is already a headache. I took a picture, uploaded it and when I did that, I guess I had to certify it was my picture and that I was giving permission to use it, thus I thought everything was clear and settled and I don't even understand why you, a baltic guy visit French pages of wiki. What if I did not speak English to understand that you were asking for the deletion of my picture ? I possibly had no account at that time and opened the Papatamus account later on or simply did not follow the tortuous road to upload the file. I don't find wiki edition easy/simple as claimed all across the site and the administrators keep thinking we always know what goes on and what to do. I don't. I wanted to send you an email directly to tell you to stop that deletion, did not find how to do that. I find having to come to this place to discuss very awkward and heavy.
Kept: not really any doubt that uploader is not author. --Amada44 talk to me 08:35, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Small unused photo without metadata, the user's only upload. Depicted person is non-notable, no mention neither in en.wiki nor in sv.wiki. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 13:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 10:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Broken SVG file. Yann (talk) 22:13, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
In what way is it broken? It displays fine for me. I used automated tools in creating it so it's totally conceivable that there's an error, I would love to know more. Siddharthist (talk) 23:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- See for example [9]. This should display the diagram with a 1000px width, but it is all black (with a white strip at the middle) to me. to create proper SVG files, you should use a software like Inkscape. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm, that image works fine for me on my Firefox on Android. Unfortunately, the best way to create such diagrams is with LaTeX, and use Imagemagic to convert them. Are all my other uploads similarly afflicted? Siddharthist (talk) 14:03, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the file is fine. --James F. (talk) 18:42, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Photoshop graphic Danidamiobi (talk) 23:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
http://www.mot.gov.my/en/about-mot/former-Minister *angys* (talk) 06:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Ezarateesteban 22:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Uploader is depicted person. I suspect not own photo, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. --Ezarateesteban 22:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
No permission from Jean Picon. Jcb (talk) 13:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS of Jean Picon is needed. --Ezarateesteban 22:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Meta Indicates that this image belongs to Key Publishing so unlikley to be the work of the uploader and probably a copyright violation MilborneOne (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS is needed. --Ezarateesteban 22:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Image is copyrighted by philip gatward in metadata so unlikely to be the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS of philip gatward is needed. --Ezarateesteban 22:29, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
This self image is out of the scope of the Wikimedia project and cannot be used. It could be self promoting. If it tried to portray anything in good faith, Commons could have had it already. Danidamiobi (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use and out of scope, personal photo. --Ezarateesteban 22:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
This self image is out of the scope of the Wikimedia project and cannot be used. It could be self promoting. If it tried to portray anything in good faith, Commons could have had it already. Danidamiobi (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use and out of scope, personal photo. --Ezarateesteban 22:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Unangemessen 93.225.180.210 08:36, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --E4024 (talk) 08:48, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:04, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
unused derivate of existing file file:SH2-AL.svg Puclik1 (talk) 12:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
1945 drawings are usually copyrighted. You can consult en:Alfred Müller and de:Alfred Müller, but I did not find the artist there and maybe the drawing is out of project scope as well. Taivo (talk) 13:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
With a copyrighted screenshot in the photo B dash (talk) 13:20, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:24, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect information conveyed. There are no Welsh language speakers in the north east of England, nor are there anywhere near the suggested amount in London. The image also shows inaccurate concentration of speakers in Wales. Dyolf87 (talk) 22:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Dyolf87 Mistakes fixted.-- Fobos | ¿algo que decirme? 00:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fobos92 The mistakes are not fixed. The areas of concentration of Welsh speakers is all wrong, all you've done is remove the blue areas of London and Newcastle. Also there is a much more accurate and detailed map used on many articles: here Dyolf87 (talk) 14:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The map is in use on five Wikipedias. Commons should not delete used files just for being inaccurate. See COM:NPOV for more details. In any case, the map has no legend, so who knows what the colours might mean? --bjh21 (talk) 17:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- I've no opinion as to whether the file should be deleted or not. But it is still inaccurate and shouldn't be used to illustrate articles on the Welsh language. If there are 110,000 Welsh speakers living in England, with significant pockets of first-language Welsh speakers in London and the North East, then the deletion rationale is wrong. Now the map has been "fixted", it shows no Welsh speakers at all in the capital city of Wales, which is just plain stupid! Sionk (talk) 21:51, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds like a vote for delete to me! Dyolf87 (talk) 15:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- It was more like a 'Keep the original' vote. Your deletion rationale is wrong. But clearly the creator doesn't know what the map represents and seems to be making it up as they go along, with repeated changes and no explanation. It is now less useful than it was before. There is definitely a need for a simple map of Welsh language speakers. I'm not a statistician so don't know what will be most useful. But there are five times more Welsh speakers per square km in Cardiff that there are in Anglesey, so a map of percentages only tells half the story. Sionk (talk) 09:50, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds like a vote for delete to me! Dyolf87 (talk) 15:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- It has been removed from other Wikipedias for the same reason it has been removed from Welsh language - for being non-encyclopaedic and inaccurate. Dyolf87 (talk) 15:04, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Gwych/great!! Sionk (talk) 09:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Map made without citing sources for data. Cannot rely on it, thus out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 06:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Floutage incohérent William Jexpire (talk) 16:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amaragrawalchattisgarh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Highly unlikely to be own work: inconsistent quality and sizes. Derivative work.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
is fake image Apriljeanettep (talk) 16:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio from [10]. Ruthven (msg) 06:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The image shows a monument image of which was previously deleted. See Deletion request. Jarash (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Statue by Viktor Sergeevich Chebotarev (1915−1993). Ruthven (msg) 07:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
В газетах, как правило, всегда указывают авторов фотографий. Очень сомнительный лицензионный статус файла. Dogad75 (talk) 18:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Dogad75: No, they don't "always". (They indicate authors in bottom right corner IF they do) Please see for yourself, adding links to examples: (just a few out of MANY more)
- @Dogad75: No, they don't "always". (They indicate authors in bottom right corner IF they do) Please see for yourself, adding links to examples: (just a few out of MANY more)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M._Mametova,_Komsomolskaya_Pravda.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/1/1e/20180515200704%21Natalya_Meklin%2C_Komsomolskaya_Pravda.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/0/05/20180515182550%21I._Sebrova%2C_Komsomolskaya_Pravda.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/0/07/20180515182640%21Yekaterina_Ryabova%2C_Komsomolskaya_Pravda.png
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%A2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2_%D0%A4%D1%91%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80_%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87.png
And sequence rows almost NEVER have author info, ex:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B4%D0%B0_8_%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8F_1940_%D0%B3,_%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80._5.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/11/%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B4%D0%B0_9_%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8F_1940_%D0%B3%2C_%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80._5.png
Modern newspapers today do attribution, but back then it seems certain newspapers were a bit spotty about it. I don't know where you got the idea that every photo had individual author indicated when this is clearly not the case based on newspaper archives.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am curretly in the process of labeling thousands of anonymous photos from the Red Star newspaper before a mass upload and just managed to get my hands on a bunch of WWII newspapers. Attribution is common but neither is it uncommon for it to be lacking.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- В приведённых Вами примерах все файлы взяты из газеты "Комсомольская правда", авторские права на которые принадлежат газете и все подлежат удалению. Если автор не указан, это не значит, что он анонимен. Возможно, в редакции имена авторов этих фотографий (фотографов) известны. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 19:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Dogad75: Let's go through Russian copyright law, shall we? They were published over 70 years ago and the author did not become known in 70 years after publication, hence it has fallen into the public domain. I have serached high and low for any author information and none has ever come up. Legally speaking, even if an attribition says something like "Tass" or "war photographer" instead of someone's name, then after 70 years the photos become public domain.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- В приведённых Вами примерах все файлы взяты из газеты "Комсомольская правда", авторские права на которые принадлежат газете и все подлежат удалению. Если автор не указан, это не значит, что он анонимен. Возможно, в редакции имена авторов этих фотографий (фотографов) известны. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 19:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- And if you go through KP's archives you would notice that most had attributions, but these did not. The only reason why would be because the author was not known OR did not wish to become known (ie, used a pseudonym to publish the work and the pseudonym was never matched to a person); like you said earlier, they would provide attributions and like I said they often did, but not all photographers can be found/identified. Go read a few GPW newspapers, would you? there's archives all over the place but after various reverse image searches, if the author is not found out in 70 years then it goes into the public domain.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:04, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- And instead of nominating stuff for deletion that meets PD critera based on incorrect assumptions, could you please take care of some obvious copyright violations, like this?--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am curretly in the process of labeling thousands of anonymous photos from the Red Star newspaper before a mass upload and just managed to get my hands on a bunch of WWII newspapers. Attribution is common but neither is it uncommon for it to be lacking.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Для того, что бы решить, анонимен автор фото или нет, просто его имя никто не искал, необходимо видеть сам источник фотографии-весь номер указанных газет, а не вырезанные из газет фотографии, так как фотографы иногда указывались вместе с создателями номера. Кроме того для выяснения автора фотографий вполне доступно обратиться в редакции указанных газет, которые существуют до сих пор. На данном этапе, сказать что это-анонимные работы невозможно. Delete. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 11:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- Original archived image with notes (just info about subject of photo nothing of author) http://www.magas.ru/sites/all/files/imagecache/image_small/Ozdoev%20Murad.jpg
- Original archived image with notes (just info about subject of photo nothing of author) http://www.magas.ru/sites/all/files/imagecache/image_small/Ozdoev%20Murad.jpg
Government archive that includes photo and documents doesn't know author: http://ingarchive.ru/velikaja-otechestvennaja-voina-1941-1945/rubrika-zhivi-i-i-pomni/zhivi-i-pomni-ozdoev-murat-ahmetovich.html
NEVER published with an author indicated, no archives know of any author. I certainly searched high and low and sent emails but nobody knows. If author not known after 70 years, then PD. It's obviously anonomouys; please find a scrap of evidence that the author was known by literally anyone, or please rescind this request to worry about REAL copyright violations (like jerks who upload really old photo as their own) Published in newspaper in 1943 without author known, and author not found in 70 years; what more do you want? Keep--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 12:32, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- Besides, it is impossible to prove a negative. Can you prove that the tooth fairy does not exist, or that there is no invisible unicorn that hides in the shoes of every Wikipedian? No, because you can't prove a negative. Legally speaking, in the context of copyright law, anonymous or under a pseudonym means so that the general public does not know who the creater is after 70 years. Maybe the unknown creater had an assistant that took the secrect of what they created to their grave. Maybe the photographer's wife knows what they did but did not tell anyone - as long as the public does not know after 70 years, then its public domain. And what would be the motive for an editorial office keeping the identity of a low photographer a secret? This is a photo of a pilot, not the raising of the flag over the Reichstag. Please show some evidence of the author being known by the public during the 70 year limit, or even today.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Quest'opera è stata in origine pubblicata anonimamente o sotto uno pseudonimo tra il 1º gennaio 1943 ed il 1º gennaio 1948, ed il nome dell'autore non è stato reso noto nei 70 anni successivi alla pubblicazione (cioè al più tardi il 1º gennaio 2015). Ruthven (msg) 07:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Over half of the video compromises the performance of BLØF's "Zoutelande", a copyrighted song. ℯxplicit 23:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose the video is the interview only, the performance itself is not in the video on Commons (I edited the video). --Hannolans (talk) 00:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Hannolans: Apologies, I didn't realize the video was edited to omit the performance. I formally withdraw this deletion request. ℯxplicit 00:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks and I can imagine you didn't notice as I did not mentioned it in the text this was a shortened fragment. I think we don't have a template for altered videos, probably I should have used https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Retouched_picture ? --Hannolans (talk) 00:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Hannolans: Apologies, I didn't realize the video was edited to omit the performance. I formally withdraw this deletion request. ℯxplicit 00:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. Ruthven (msg) 07:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
I guess these figures are copyrighted. Taking a picture does not make the awards "own work". E4024 (talk) 12:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 09:08, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Undeklarierter Ausschnitt aus http://www.jura.uni-muenchen.de/fakultaet/studienbuero/aktuelles/archiv/lesung_stevens/foto-stevens-lesung.jpg? Jbergner (talk) 16:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: needs OTRS permission, unclear copyright. -- User: Perhelion 04:01, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphan image from video File:Hinode's View of the Eclipse - First Pass xo.ogv B dash (talk) 04:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File does not have to be in use to be in scope. File can be extracted from other file and still be a free file. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: File is in scope since it can realistically be useful in an encyclopedic article. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphan image from video File:Hinode's View of the Eclipse - First Pass xo.ogv B dash (talk) 04:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: File is in scope since it can realistically be useful in an encyclopedic article. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm opening this file to discussion only because there is a modern artwork involved in the image. I could take it as DM and keep the file but would like to know what others think. E4024 (talk) 08:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Of course an option could be to carve out the artwork and delete the original file, keeping the cropped image. --E4024 (talk) 08:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Dean Obeidallah (cropped).jpg
OTRS-permission from copyright holder Robert Lowell and not from depicted person is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Where does it say that copyright holder is Robert Lowell? The source says Own work? --Huldra (talk) 23:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Metadata in bottom of file:Dean Obeidallah.jpg says: copyright holder – Robert Lowell. No evidence, that uploader وسام زقوت is the same person. Taivo (talk) 07:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Where does it say that copyright holder is Robert Lowell? The source says Own work? --Huldra (talk) 23:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Derivative works from Metro Warszawskie, which is copyrighted B dash (talk) 13:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keep Data cannot be copyrighted, so let's drop that from the discussion right away. Now is the image itself subject to copyright? I think that it is just automatic enough to be COM:TOO. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Gone Postal. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- also almost-copy file:Figuur Bestuurskracht IDEA consult .jpg
In my opinion the files are out of project scope, but I'm not totally sure. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- As they were made a year ago but not used anywhere, probably they are out of scope. Still there is at least a week for someone to come out and say they will have some use. --E4024 (talk) 13:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Be aware, that some non-wikimedia-sites using commons for their wiki-files. They can't be triggered with our software here. --Quedel (talk) 14:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete of the cropped version and change it to a redirect. Keep the (?)original as it is just "interesting to somebody" enough. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: DW, copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Another image by this uploader was not their work, this looks like a professional image so should be deleted without more evidence of provenance MilborneOne (talk) 16:13, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Source video was deleted, it is no longer possible to verify the license. ℯxplicit 23:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Oh come on. This had a license review template since 25 August 2017, even the backlog for OTRS is not that bad. How does this happen? (I tried Google for cache and archive.org. Both nothing.)
- @Zhuyifei1999: does video2commons register in any way if the original video had a standard YT license or YT-CC? I know uploading standard YT license videos is not blocked, but I'm asking if video2commons keeps any record of the original video features at all. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- No records, but the file description looks to be what v2c would have provided if the license were YT-CC. That is just as trustworthy as self-review. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 04:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- I applied to become a reviewer about a month after this file was uploaded, and even then the backlog at CAT:LR was at 1,700. At one point, we were able to bring the number down to 600, but it has only ballooned since then. One of my uploads happens to be up for deletion as well for the same reason. There are simply not enough reviewers and admins willing to do the task, which is compounded by the fact those able to do so tend to be the ones uploading hundreds of files for review to begin with. ℯxplicit 00:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- This is sad, I have started using v2c and unlike this person, I actually edit the description before uploading. Now I am a bit scared that my uploads will be deleted a year from now. Ok, let's approach this in a clear-headed manner: 1) The name of the channel Planet Odd Daily and the fact that the title is in all caps isn't a great sign, often such channels just collect random bits and pieces from the net. 2) The fact that the channel took time to reference a veterinary clinic is something positive, often copyvio channels only references their own twitters and the way to pay them money. 3) The fact that the channel was closed in this day and age is just neutral, it could be due to copyright violations, but just as easily it could be because of adpocalipse or false flagging, which happens all the time. 4) The video is most definitely in scope, and it was around for a long time for somebody to notice that it is a copyvio, even before it was vetted (failed to be vetted) by Explicit. ... Unfortunately this isn't enough for me to say that I believe the copyright status one way or another. @Arado: and @Pitke: Both of you made some categorisation edits to the page, did you happen to check out the original video by any chance? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 05:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- I did not check the video at source. I found a thumbnail on an aggregate site that shows the exact same horse; it should show up on the top of the list. https://www.popthatzits.com/tag/horse/ here's the direct link to the image. Reverse searching with the image only shows up trash results and aggregate sites. here's a mirror upload on YT. Considering that the potato quality of the video, the uploader's handle (airamz), and the language heard in the video as well as the style of stable and biotope, and the fact that the only non-english reverse search results for this seem to be in Turkish I feel fairly comfortable in assuming a genuine self-authored upload. Unfortunately, this is not enough to convince me to keep. --Pitke (talk) 10:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, came from YouTube license laundering uploader.--17:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- @BevinKacon: , do you happen to have any reason for that conclusion or is it simply your uninformed opinion? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 19:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- It's based on all the evidence above. Not only that, the description itself is a copyvio, it's a click bait title and language of video does not match source. Google cache also provides us some previous upload titles from the user. Not only were they stealing amatuer footage, they stole "National Geographic - Predator Bay" and "National Geographic Wild - The animal kingdom". Other lovely titles "SATISFYING BLACKHEADS AND WHITEHEADS REMOVAL CLOSE UP", "Maggots in racoon skull". So you think it was licensed? Well if permission was granted, why was it not the original file uploaded, and why would why it be published under such a license which would stop any profit? Clearly the user was rightly terminated for serial copyright theft.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- While I can see in your heart you'd prefer to retain such as useful medical video, your head knows otherwise.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, I am unable to confirm this new information, the damning bit for me is the uploads of National Geographic videos. If that is actually true, we should probably delete to be on the safe side. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 03:30, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- @BevinKacon: , do you happen to have any reason for that conclusion or is it simply your uninformed opinion? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 19:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 18:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
o Oak oklok (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
The file was deleted by User:Moheen Reeyad per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Oak oklok. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC)