User talk:ReneeWrites
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Academiesingel 47 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Academiesingel 20 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Mauritsstraat 16 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Mauritsstraat 18 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Spanjaardsgat 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Van Coothplein 37 2024-08-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 06:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk rouwbord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk toren 2024-09-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk beeld M. Tydeman Jr. zijkant 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Delpratsingel 23 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Prinsenkade 9–10 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Oude Postkantoor 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Nieuwe Watertoren gezien vanaf Van Heemstraweg-West 2024-09-24-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Nieuwe Watertoren gezien vanaf Van Heemstraweg-West 2024-09-24-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Oudemannen- en vrouwenhuis beelden voorgevel 2024-09-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint Janstraat zicht op de Grote Markt 2024-09-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Organ in Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk, Zaltbommel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Haven Fietsenstalling 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste aan de Sint Janstraat ingang 2024-09-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Regentesseplein 2024-08-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Breda beeld van een heilige - Sint-Antoniuskathedraal 2024-09-17.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Breda beeld van een heilige - Sint-Antoniuskathedraal 2024-09-17.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Tramsingel T63 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Wilhelminapark 19 2024-08-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk gewelf zijbeuk 2024-09-24-1 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk middenbeuk 2024-09-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ulvenhout Sint-Laurentiuskerk apsis 2024-08-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Nieuwe Watertoren gezien vanaf zuidelijk fietspad 2024-09-24-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Nieuwe Watertoren gezien vanaf zuidelijk fietspad 2024-09-24-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda bord Haagdijk bij Rozemarijnstraat 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk koorbank 2024-09-24-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel bord schoolzone met Jip en Janneke 2024-09-24-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel bord schoolzone met Jip en Janneke 2024-09-24-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda beeld Sint-Martinuskerk - Sint Bernardus 2024-10-06-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda beeld Sint-Martinuskerk - Sint Lucia 2024-10-06-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda 't Hout 2024-08-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ulvenhout Dorpstraat 60 2024-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ulvenhout Sint-Laurentiuskerk zilveren godslamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ulvenhout Sint-Laurentiuskerk koperen deksel doopvontkastje 2024-08-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mespilus germanica 2024-09-24-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda beeld Sint-Martinuskerk - Sint Bernardus 2024-10-06-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Molen De Korenbloem, Ulvenhout 2024-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Molen De Korenbloem, Ulvenhout achterkant 2024-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ulvenhout Sint-Laurentiuskerk nis met koperen deksel doopvontkastje 2024-08-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Feedback Request for Wiki Loves Folklore2024
[edit]Hello!
As we close the curtains on a successful Wiki Loves Folklore 2024, we'd love to hear your thoughts! Your valuable feedback will help us improve future campaigns and ensure the continued preservation of cultural heritage around the globe.
Please take a few minutes to share your experience by filling out the following feedback form.
The form will be open for submissions until November 10th, 2024, at 23:59 UTC (Coordinated Universal Time). We appreciate your participation and support! See you in February 2025!
Sincerely, The Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda beeld Sint-Martinuskerk - Sint Lucia 2024-10-06-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aixam D-Truck side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aixam D-Truck three-quarter back view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aixam D-Truck three-quarter front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Haven Fietsenstalling 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk doopvont 2024-10-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Antwerpen beeld het Vreedzame Hand 2023-05-16-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Antwerpen beeld het Vreedzame Hand 2023-05-16-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Koningin Wilhelmina Paviljoen voorkant 2023-05-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk stergewelf bij ingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk koorbank 2024-09-24-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Antwerpen beeld het Vreedzame Hand 2023-05-16-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaltbommel Buitengracht 2024-09-24-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk doopkapel 2024-10-06-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Galderse Heide 2024-10-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Koningin Wilhelmina Paviljoen 2023-05-29-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aixam D-Truck front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Haagdijk 168 voorkant 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Emmastraat 16 voorkant 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Emmastraat 14 voorkant 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Delpratsingel 29 voorkant 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Delpratsingel 28 voorkant 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Veemarktstraat 48 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Martinuskerk kruisweg Jezus 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Antwerpen Centraal Station 2023-05-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Veemarktstraat 39 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam links 2024-10-26-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam links 2024-10-26-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam links 2024-10-26-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Woonboulevard 2024-10-23-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! White Škoda Kodiaq side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoofdstraat 37, Terheijden 2023-06-15-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoofdstraat 37, Terheijden 2023-06-15-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam rechts 2024-10-26-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam rechts 2024-10-26-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Catharinakapel gebrandschilderd raam rechts 2024-10-26-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Delpratsingel 6 2024-08-05-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Willemstraat 1–3 venster 2024-10-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Beatrixstraat appartementencomplex 2024-10-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Plaquette Hendrik Gerard Seelig 2024-10-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Mauritsstraat 34 torentje 2024-10-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Mastbos Vlonderpad 2024-10-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Woonboulevard 2024-10-23-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Akkermolen, Zundert 2023-06-13-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Groenendijk 2, Lage Zwaluwe voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Haagsemarkt 5 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Achtmaal Sint-Corneliuskerk gevelbeeld Jozef met kind 2024-08-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste sluitsteen ingang Sint Janstraat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint Ignatiusstraat 111–113 NILLMIJ geveltegel 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint Ignatiusstraat 87–89 NILLMIJ geveltegel 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Grote Kerk beeld M. Tydeman Jr. zijkant 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beeld Sint Trudo.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beeld Sint Trudo 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint Ignatiusstraat 123–125 NILLMIJ geveltegel 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint Ignatiusstraat 135–137 NILLMIJ geveltegel 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint Ignatiusstraat 75–77 NILLMIJ geveltegel 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Achtmaal Sint-Corneliuskerk gevelbeeld Maria 2024-08-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hooge Zwaluwe ingang aan de Kerkdijk 2023-06-15-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Canon EOS R50
[edit]Hi, Renее,
сongratulations on your new camera Canon EOS R50.
Excellent result. Now technical equipment does not limit your creative potential.
I wish you more new creative success!
Respectfully, George -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Emblem of Takashima, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Xeror (talk) 04:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Akkermolen, Zundert 2023-06-13-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Oosterhoutseweg 15 2024-08-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint Jansklooster 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint Jansklooster 2024-08-05-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dethleffs Camper 450 DB side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! White Dodge Challenger SRT side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Laurentiuskerk toren 2024-11-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sint-Laurentiuskerk Agnus Dei voorgevel 2024-11-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Veemarktstraat 39 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Veemarktstraat 48 2024-08-05-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Sophiastraat 42 voorkant 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Herweg 23, Den Hout voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Herweg 23, Den Hout.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Herweg 25, Den Hout.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoofdstraat 37, Terheijden voorkant 2023-06-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoofdstraat 39, Terheijden voorkant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Haagdijk 141 2024-08-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marksluis, Oosterhout 2023-08-23 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Nieuwe Veste aan de Sint Janstraat ingang kraagsteen 2024-09-17-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Exterior of Sint-Laurentiuskerk (Ginneken), tower of the church, seen from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Galderse Heide 2024-10-05 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda beeld Barbara Belcrumwatertoren 2024-10-25-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Veemarktstraat 39 voorkant 2024-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda beeld van Generaal P. van Ham 2024-11-06-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nieuwe watertoren (Zaltbommel), view from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda beeld Barbara Belcrumwatertoren 2024-10-25-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breda Den Arent 2024-08-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marksluis, Oosterhout 2023-08-23-2 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Koningin Wilhelmina Paviljoen, front facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
A small favour (and a small apology to User:MacOS Weed).
[edit]Hi, User:ReneeWrites. I was focusing on other things such as taking care of non-empty categories, deleting useless categories, etc. Anyway, I need you to do me a small favour. I want Category:Symbols of municipalities in Japan used in Wikipedia articles with vector versions available to be cleared (I've moved that category from Category:Flags of municipialities of Japan used in Wikipedia articles with vector versions available to make you clear, no pun intended). So, I'd like your help in that.
Also, I said something heartwrenching in File talk:Emblem of Nishiki, Kumamoto.svg, because I feel sorry for talking rude to User:MacOS Weed and still remember that bitter moment. User:MacOS Weed haven't forgiven me for that yet. I wish I was considerate of that user's feelings. I don't know about you, but that unforgiving nature of User:MacOS Weed still haunts me. It's my fault after all. I am very sorry. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 10:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey OperationSakura6144, I hope you've been doing well. I wouldn't worry too much about MacOS Weed. You've already apologised to him, and it's up to him to accept the apology or not. That's not something you can make him do. At this point you've done all you can do on your end, so it's best to put all of this behind you and move forward having learned from the experience. They say the best apology is changed behaviour. ReneeWrites (talk) 11:10, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advice. I'll try to forget about it and move forward. Also, thank you for clearing Category:Symbols of municipalities in Japan used in Wikipedia articles with vector versions available. I feel better with a good friend like you. Anyway, see you tomorrow. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 11:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Sint-Martinuskerk (Schijf), view from the south-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
A small favour again.
[edit]Hi, User:ReneeWrites. Sorry to disturb you, but I want Category:Symbols of municipalities in Japan used in Wikipedia articles with vector versions available to be cleared, again. The category currently has over 20 files, which is kinda enough for me, and, so, I can't resist my wanting to have it cleared. I'm not treating you like a slave, though, but I'd like you to help me in this thing immediately. I'm sorry if I said anything wrong.
To let you know, I've been working on something important that I need to leave all my work to you, in which I'll be free to focus on other things. I'll talk about it in more detail after I finish it.
Anyway, I'll see you next time. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 08:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey OperationSakura6144, I've cleared the category. An increasing number of files in that category have nothing to do with Japanese seals/flags though, and include files from other areas of Commons. I think it might be a good idea to rename the category or make a new one to reflect this change of scope, and make it a maintenance category like all the others of its kind.
- I also think it would be good to try to not be too bothered by the fact that this category may not be empty most or even all of the time.
- Good luck with your other project. ReneeWrites (talk) 09:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
The project is ready.
[edit]Hey, User:ReneeWrites. I have something to tell. I have finished my project, which I have downloaded over 200 SVG files online. I also made some vectorized versions of flags and edited some of the flags by correcting the colors in them. Now, I want to share the files with you so that you could work on making the vector versions of Category:Symbol of municipalities in Japan images that should use vector graphics. I know I could put some work in it and upload the finished files myself, but the job is too heavy for me right now. If you like, I can share the files with you, if you have a spare cloud or whatever you like me to share them. Also, thank you for the help in Category:Symbol of municipalities in Japan images that should use vector graphics. I really appreciate your contributions in it. Anyway, see you later. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 12:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey OperationSakura6144, It's no problem. I think the easiest way to share these files is putting them in a single .zip file, uploading them to https://gofile.io/, and then posting the link to the download here. ReneeWrites (talk) 15:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I am posting this link to the ZIP containing the files I said: https://gofile.io/d/gvw6ak. I've done the steps you mentioned. Now, you can download all the files now by clicking the link before it's too late. See you if you're ready. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 00:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I downloaded the zip. I'm unsure what you want me to do with them? Aside from the folder with edited versions these are all emblems and flags already on Commons. ReneeWrites (talk) 10:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Look, I can explain. I downloaded some emblems for vectorizing the complete versions of flags, and some flags for extracting the emblems out of them. I know I could do the work myself, but I'm tired of doing it right now because it's too heavy for me. I need to focus on other things like study and stuff. So, I'm leaving all the work to you.
- If you think it's absurd to see the files look like they're already on the Commons, please think twice. I didn't only download files from Commons but also elsewhere in the internet. Some of the files have irregularities like outlined emblems, unreasonably rounded corners instead of pointed one and so on. I'm sure you'd recognize the irregularities, and correct them in the flags and emblems, because you make professionally-looking SVGs.
- To be clear, I'm sharing the files so that you could work on them and upload the final files to Commons. I don't have enough time to do the work myself, and, so, I thought it would be good to share the work with you. Please don't think it is a favor from me. I'm trying to help you in some way. We're working to replace the non-vector files with the vectorized ones. So, I don't think it's wrong to share the files.
- I don't know about you, but I'm taking break from Commons for a while. Also, if you think I said something wrong, I'd apologize to you. Besides that, thank you for your contributions. I really appreciate them. Now, it's time for me to go. Hope I see you again. Bye. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 11:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- See you later, and good luck with your studies. ReneeWrites (talk) 12:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I downloaded the zip. I'm unsure what you want me to do with them? Aside from the folder with edited versions these are all emblems and flags already on Commons. ReneeWrites (talk) 10:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I am posting this link to the ZIP containing the files I said: https://gofile.io/d/gvw6ak. I've done the steps you mentioned. Now, you can download all the files now by clicking the link before it's too late. See you if you're ready. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 00:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Emblem of Takashima, Nishisonogi, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
OperationSakura6144 (talk) 04:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleting other user's talk page contributions
[edit]Please refrain from doing that, as you did at [1].
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 07:02, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- I was clearly trying to leave this person alone, but you could have just pinged them or leave a normal message if you felt really strongly they should be notified instead of a "fake" CfD notice. ReneeWrites (talk) 07:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- There is nothing fake about the notice. I think it's a problem if you deliberately avoid notifying people about discussions they are most certainly interested in.
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 07:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)- The CfD notice gets automatically added to the talk page of the person who made the category - and it did. But that person wasn't Trung, it was Mdd - that was part of the problem. Trung already said in the VP and on his talk page that he doesn't like these categories, I wouldn't have started the discussion in the first place if he was fine with them. And again, a ping or a regular message would've been preferred. The CfD notice implies he made these categories, when he didn't. ReneeWrites (talk) 07:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- There is nothing fake about the notice. I think it's a problem if you deliberately avoid notifying people about discussions they are most certainly interested in.
[Workshop] Identifying Win-Win Relationships with Partners for Wikimedia
[edit]Dear Recipient,
We are excited to invite you to the third workshop in our Advocacy series, part of the Feminism and Folklore International Campaign. This highly anticipated workshop, titled "Identifying Win-Win Relationships with Partners for Wikimedia," will be led by the esteemed Alex Stinson, Lead Program Strategist at the Wikimedia Foundation. Don't miss this opportunity to gain valuable insights into forging effective partnerships.
Workshop Objectives
[edit]- Introduction to Partnerships: Understand the importance of building win-win relationships within the Wikimedia movement.
- Strategies for Collaboration: Learn practical strategies for identifying and fostering effective partnerships.
- Case Studies: Explore real-world examples of successful partnerships in the Wikimedia community.
- Interactive Discussions: Engage in discussions to share experiences and insights on collaboration and advocacy.
Workshop Details
[edit]📅 Date: 7th December 2024
⏰ Time: 4:30 PM UTC (Check your local time zone)
📍 Venue: Zoom Meeting
How to Join:
[edit]Registration Link: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:Identifying_Win-Win_Relationships_with_Partners_for_Wikimedia
Meeting ID: 860 4444 3016
Passcode: 834088
We welcome participants to bring their diverse perspectives and stories as we drive into the collaborative opportunities within the Wikimedia movement. Together, we’ll explore how these partnerships can enhance our advocacy and community efforts.
Thank you,
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:27, 03 December 2024 (UTC)