| Toolbox |
| »Vandalism → UTM • RC • HUG • TW |
| »Wikipedia → AfD • BL • DYK • FAC • FAR • GAN (vg) • GAR • RfA |
| »Admin → DASH • AIV • AN • ANI • RAA • RFPP • UAA • RM • AC/N • IANB |
| »Tools → AP • ATS • CIU • ELC • GLBCON • IPL • OEC • PHS • PROJ • SQL • WCHKR • WLH • WHOIS |
| »Other → COPY • CSD • DEL • NP • NUL • PARSE • UBX (vg) • UW-warn |
| Toolbox format |
Administrative backlog
Reports
- 2600:1700:2e30:4600:1f1:8bf3:3724:adf1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:45, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- 92.184.124.130 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Also commented at Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports#92.184.124.130. Peaceray (talk) 01:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- 71.105.188.171 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 339 five times in the last 5 minutes (Claims of sexual orientation or gender in a BLP, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:56, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- 124.38.105.163 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:05, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:40e5:3:2dbc:c8ce:67ff:fec0:4741 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:47, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- SomeHelpfulEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:24, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 04:22, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1010:a13e:eef4:fcf5:735e:7d29:e98e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 132 five times in the last 5 minutes (Removal of all categories, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:13, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Trudoholic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:19, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 2600:1007:B033:23C4:1849:4CFD:7FD6:5332 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – disruptive editing on my talk page and please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#ip_edit_warring. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 21:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- FishingForIndia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On India Fisher (diff): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. M.C. (talk) 21:41, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:59, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2A0A:EF40:15B:F101:E091:3511:20CA:6FE6 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Gilbert Gottfried (diff): Hopping IP editwarring over English variants. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:46, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1014:B0B2:59CD:2A4C:6762:6861:307C (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning - Vandalism after level 4 warning CR (talk) 22:18, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Xwoke99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) defiant disruption after warnings and reverts by two editors; obviously WP:NOTHERE. Sweetpool50 (talk) 22:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Bbb23 (talk) 23:05, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- 69.14.20.184 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Emily Alyn Lind (diff): vandalism after recent release of block. Also see this statement. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:19, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Muasis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Obvious block-evading sock of Mooezzz. See their edits to Abd el-Krim (adding the titles of "Emir" and "Lion of the Rif")[1][2][3] and Mohammed Ameziane[4][5] (unnecessary capitalization of Sharif). Skitash (talk) 00:11, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. Peaceray (talk) 00:32, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ezraazx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – User is clearly editing under multiple accounts. See the similarities with the editing history of User:Jonathan duski. I already warned them but they've continued to edit under this other account. CycloneYoris talk! 02:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| Attack pages | 0 |
| Copyright violations | 2 |
| Hoaxes | 0 |
| Vandalism | 0 |
| User requested | 0 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 3 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Possibly contested candidates | 3 |
| Other candidates | 4 |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 28 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I would kindly like to submit a request for autopatrolled rights. I have created 50+ articles since 2017, which you will find listed on my user page here, none of which have been deleted nor have received any new page reviewers' comments in quite some time. I have also improved thousands more articles across Wikipedia. I am mainly interested in increasing the coverage of all things Brussels-related. Thanks in advance! Jason Lagos (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request autopatrolled rights, as I have been creating and plan to create many articles on the lists of chemical compounds that are well cited and have historically had few issues. I have also created other articles on biography, video games, and other subjects, which I may unreview myself if there are any doubts towards their suitability to the encyclopedia; I am mainly asking for this right for the chemical articles. Reconrabbit 18:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
He created 5,728 articles so far, out of which only 25 have been deleted. Most of these articles are based on elections and politics. I believe granting autopatrolled rights would be a suitable recognition for this work. Baqi:) (talk) 15:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
I have created over 200 articles, including twenty-nine since I was temporarily granted autopatrolled 90 days ago. Since November 2020, I have been primarily editing on Antigua and Barbuda-related topics. CROIXtalk 00:05, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikipedia for nearly 10 years with over 1000 edits, with 32 live articles primarily focusing on topic elated to asian audio visual and the institute in Bangladesh. Thank you for considering my request. UzbukUdash (talk) 07:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I want to get into the swing of helping out in more ways other than RCP/PCP. Manually editing each article can only do so much. This would be handy to have. Synorem (talk) 06:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Perform article maintenance on date formats, typos, etc. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 18:53, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
Reason for requesting confirmed rights Adding to the pregnancy portion to the cancer page. I have worked on this piece for a whlie and have valid citations and sources. This is for a school project and not an act of vandalism or false information. Prarthanarawal (talk) 19:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
In the beginning of November my EC permissions have been revoked by User:ScottishFinnishRadish due to what he considered to be gaming, because of me doing a large number of minor edits requested as part of the CW Project. SFR said that he would not object to the restoration of my EC permissions once I made a few hundred more substantial edits. Since then I made over 350 edits, mainly on pages related to mathematics and food security, and I believe this should qualify me for restoration of extended-confirmed permissions. DancingOwl (talk) 17:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
I have been editing on Wikipedia for 2 years now and have been making frequent edits, and I wish to be granted Extended Confirmed to be able to work on the 2028 United States presidential election article, which I had benefited to until the restrictions were increased. Vlklng (talk) 16:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I am User:Stranger43286. This is my main account. "StrangerGaplow" is a backup account. My main account is extended confirmed. I request the extended confirmed flag StrangerGaplow (talk) 07:14, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator |
| There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag. |
|---|
Mass message sender |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
Hello, I'm Memer15151! I've been actively working at Articles for Creation for the past month, and I believe am ready to start reviewing new articles in addition to AfC submissions. I'd love to help reduce the amount of unreviewed new articles. I am confident that I meet the guidelines for becoming a NPR. I have reviewed over 200 AfC submissions, created over 45 articles, and participated in over 20 AfD discussions. My account was created over one and a half years ago, and I have over 3,000 edits. One time, I did accept some AfC submissions by User:Tatar Russian (who was later confirmed a sockpuppet) that were deemed to be written by AI. I was unaware of this, although I was a bit unsure why the user created drafts so quickly (I assumed they were copied from a doc or something else that they were working on). Although in Cryllic, I was able to locate the books in the drafts, and all of the ones I checked were indeed existing works of literature. I am now aware that many of the sources in one of the drafts that another reviewer accepted consisted of hallucinated sources. I assumed good faith and accepted the drafts. From now on, I will make sure to check all works of literature to make sure they can be accessed online, and if not, get information from the draft's creator. I learned from this experience and I believe I am ready for the new role in the community. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 17:33, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
I believe this is the right time to apply for these rights. Over the past year, I have been highly active on Wikipedia. Currently, I am serving as an AFC reviewer, diligently contributing to the review process. In addition, I actively participate in AFD discussions with full commitment. I have a solid understanding of notability guidelines, reliable sources, and the principles related to biographies of living persons. So far, I have created over 90 articles. Baqi:) (talk) 16:34, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Greetings! I have continued my service of new page patrol, AfC review, and AfD review. I have familiarized myself with all the policies and have improved according to the comments during my trial. I request that my NPP right be made permanent, and you may also comment on what I could've done better. Thank you. Pygos (talk) 05:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
I got Page Mover permissions in late August to help with the post-move cleanup of LGBT->LGBTQ and have since moved several (probably hundreds) uncontroversial subpages to follow it. I got an extension for another two months granted a month and a half ago to finish the cleanup and voiced my interest in helping with other unrelated moves as well. I started clerking at RM and RMTR for the past two months without issues or challenges to move requests I have acted on, showing that I appear to have a good grasp of our AT policies (and taking this note from SiverLocust as a compliment) and would like to request to keep the Page Mover permissions indefinitely to continue to help with RM and RMTR (and the occasional LGBTQ cleanup as I still stumble across some every now and then). Raladic (talk) 02:52, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I've read and understood WP:RPC and will proceed slowly at first (that is, leave what I deem edge cases to someone else). JayCubby Talk 17:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
I am seeing pending review on several pages I regularly edit. For example, Larry Ellison ReferenceMan (talk) 11:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
I want to help new non-autoconfirmed and unregistered editors find their way on Wikipedia. I figured this role is the best and easiest way to do that. Also, just to let you know: I applied for this position back when I had 30 edits but I have around 70 edits now. WikiEditor5678910 (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
I regularly check a variety of pages for editing issues and help fight vandalism. I also watch several pages, some of which have pending changes protection. I believe this would further help me fight vandalism. I’ve read and understand the guidelines for reviewing pending changes and am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies. Thanks for considering my request. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Requesting rollback permission to combat the pervasive presence of vandalism and/or edits of unencyclopedic quality to the best of my ability. At the present moment I am a semi-retired user; however, I have been a regular patroller of recent changes to both specific pages as well as the site as a whole. I'd very much like to learn the counter-vandalism tool RedWarn and/or Ultraviolet and get involved to a greater extent across the site in keeping pages up to editors' standards - I intend to be a long-term contributor to the site and expect to be much more active in the future, predominantly in this line of work. I've familiarized myself with WP:VANDTYPES and have encountered and attempted thus far to manually revert instances of controversial edits at times - edits which it would be far more helpful to all parties to take care of via rollback. I'd particularly like to delve into new ways to spot the more subtle instances that go unnoticed for longer periods of time, per WP:SNEAKY, as well as monitor for violations of WP:TPV and continually make an effort to practice WP:WARNVAND, WP:HTSV, WP:NOTVANDALISM, WP:RVAN and WP:NORESVAND among others. My most notable effort to prevent escalated conflict(s) would be in the Talk:Wings_of_Fire_(novel_series)#February_2023_Content_Editing_Conflict, though I do not yet have a track record of notifying users when reverting their edits beyond discussions on article talk pages (though this is typically as the reverted editor has tended to initiate the conversations first). Furthermore, I intend to prioritize diligently monitoring sockfarm-targeted pages in addition watching out for recent changes. Please let me know if you'd like me to undergo training and/or further regulatory practice first - and thank you for your consideration of me for this responsibility. ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 19:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
I'm reapplying for rollback rights to continue supporting anti-vandalism efforts on Wikipedia after a misunderstanding that led to a false blocking and false accusations of violating WP:NOSHARE. I am committed to maintaining the integrity of articles and have prior experience using tools like Twinkle and Ultraviolet to tag and revert edits involving unnecessary soures or clear vandalism, often from IP address and new users. Having rollback rights would allow me to contribute more effectively by streamlining the process of reverting disruptive edits and vandalism. I understand the responsibility that comes with this permission and I am fully prepared to take accountability for any incorrect reverts. I will be greater caution moving forward and use any mistakes as learning opportunities. Royiswariii Talk! 06:53, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
I am here to reapply for Rollback permission. I used to be pretty active when it came to patrolling Recent Changes but due to some password mismanagement I accidentally got locked out my own account. I was previously rejected by User:Fastily (I wish them a happy retirement) who told me to be active in Recent changes for a month or so more before requesting rollback permissions again. It hasn't been exactly a month but I think I have done enough to prove that I won't use rollback perms to vandalise or otherwise disrupt Wikipedia. I'm requesting rollback perms to use tools like AntiVandal or Huggle and have thoroughly read Wikipedia:Rollback policy. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 10:49, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
My next logical request for permission, one that I don't suppose I can utilize alongside Ultraviolet to stop the bad faith one-timers and vandals where I watch. Although, I must admit, I should simultaneously take care to not get into any content dispute I see; I'll do my best not to get into one this way. Thanks for considering (again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like rollback permissions to make fighting vandalism quicker and easier. I have been reverting vandalism for over 1 month and have experience with tools such as Twinkle and Ultraviolet. I would also like to be able to have access to Huggle to make my anti-vandalism experience easier. MouseCursor (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to be able to access rollback tools to fight vandalism more effectively, I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
|