Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan Munnerlyn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan Munnerlyn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable per WP:NGRIDIRON Connormah (talk) 17:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Non-notable "college" football player. Not entitled to a presumption of notability under WP:NCOLLATH or WP:NGRIDIRON because he never won a major college sports award and never played a down in a regular season game in a top-tier pro football league. Fails the general notability guidelines for lack of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources per WP:GNG. This is an example of an article stitched together from school newspapers (not "independent" sources), fansites, blogs and social media (not "reliable" sources), combined with WP:ROUTINE coverage from recruiting sites, NFL draft evaluation sites, and the mainstream media. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 21:29, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable under NGRIDIRON. Quis separabit? 18:34, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NGRIDIRON and WP:NCOLLATH.204.126.132.231 (talk) 18:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.