Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David S. Blitzer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David S. Blitzer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not independently notable outside of his companies, lack WP:RS, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 13:11, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 13:11, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 13:11, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:39, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Can you please specify which of the citations are from sources that might breach WP:RS? Unless the majority of sources are unreliable, I would think this meets the GNG because coverage is fairly significant. Thanks.
Keep Co-managing partner and minority owner of two major sports teams (as well as other significant sporting investments) which have seen major builds in value (seems to be building a multi-sport franchise with forays into baseball, soccer, and esports); key executive at Blackstone ($7 billion in sales); active philanthropist. What sources are unreliable?Patapsco913 (talk) 15:46, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you share a few RS that covers him in-depth and not his business? Also, being a owner of a big company doesn't makes you notable, it is important to know what you are notable for. All of sources are primarily routine coverage and fails to establish his notability to deserve an encyclopedic page. Meeanaya (talk) 18:16, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He is a businessman so it will be hard to find an article that mentions only him and not any of the sports teams he manages and owns or his employment at Blackstone.Patapsco913 (talk) 02:31, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete owning a sports team is not a default sort of notability. The sourcing is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:28, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- He is "co-managing partner" not just owner; he does not own just one sport team; he has a separate business and philanthropic career; and is a major investor in esporting.Patapsco913 (talk) 17:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to be more than just an owner of a team, he's a co-manager, also a philanthropist, also a founder of a fund, also serves on boards, etc. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 19:23, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. My request for unreliable source examples has not been answered and I agree with points made by Sir Joseph. Subject meets GNG. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:57, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There's a strong claim of notability as a sports-team owner and businessman, backed by a broad and deep range of reliable and verifiable sources supporting that claim. Alansohn (talk) 14:35, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.