Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmar Lacerda da Silva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edmar Lacerda da Silva

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and who has not played in a fully pro league. No reason was given for contesting. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - all fail WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 13:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - new evidence has come to light that the Cypriot league is fully-pro, meaning he meets WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 20:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On the basis that this league appears to be professional, I say Keep, and if the league's semi-professionalism becomes more apparent, relist it as a new AfD. Stu.W UK (talk) 17:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as nominator. In light of new sources provided at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Gibbons‎ and listed at WP:FPL, I am now satisfied that the Cypriot First League is fully pro, and I am prepared to withdraw the nomination. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep players have played in a notable professional league. Eldumpo (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.