Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gedion Zelalem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gedion Zelalem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A search through Trove, Google Books, Google News, Canberra Times websites, Sydney Morning Herald website, Newsbank, The West Australian all show no results. --LauraHale (talk) 02:07, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you've got the right discussion? I see no reason to expect coverage in Australian sources. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 19:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So that would be "just not notable", as usual. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.