Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Howell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Howell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither notable under WP:ACADEMIC (apparently adjunct faculty at DeVry University from 2006 to 2011) or WP:ATHLETE (non-notable instructor). Article creator Hewoods is a single-purpose account. bender235 (talk) 21:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article is more like an academic resume and then jumps into judo. A self promo piece. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 04:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources, no notability as a professor or instructor, and possible conflict of interest = delete. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 12:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as although I found some links at Books and browser, there's nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per above. Non-notable as martial artist - basically a promo piece.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant independent coverage of any kind.Jakejr (talk) 04:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.