Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mynampally rohit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mynampally rohit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. All of the sources used in the article are the same paid-for press release (as seen by this disclosure at the bottom of the Hindustan Times version) with slightly different wording. Likely either a paid for WP:PROMO article or a vanity page. GPL93 (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Coverage appears to be exclusively self-manufactured. Google brings up many results, but as the nominator observed, all appear to be derivative of the same press release. I just clicked through 5 that read almost identically, with the only difference being the adjective in front of "horseback rider." Is he versatile, professional, flexible, or adventurous as a rider? I'm not sure, but I don't believe he's notable. Skeletor3000 (talk) 20:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete nothing much to add after the statements of GPL93, and Skeletor3000. Whatever I could find were PR/paid articles. Subject clearly fails WP:GNG, and WP:ANYBIO. I am not sure if it is a vanity article, or promo. But given his career as "travel influencer" (whatever the heck it is), I think he is trying to promote his tours n travel "consultancy" (not agency), or again; just a vanity article establishing himself as "experienced bareback horse riding with cats on saddle traveller" (this makes more sense than the article). —usernamekiran (talk) 22:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete despite several references, this reads more like a promotional material that's short of WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. PenulisHantu (talk) 00:40, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Way too promotional and lacking quality refs. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 14:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:MILL. "Travel influencer" is nonsense, and a neologism at best. This page is a jumble of poor citations, neologisms, PR, and run of the mill coverage. Bearian (talk) 16:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Please, not another "influencer". This one with some 23K followers, which is something anyone can buy for about $25. Can we depricate or blacklist in.news.yahoo.com, m.dailyhunt.in, hindustantimes.com, ibtimes.co.in, latestly.com, mid-day.com. They're all garbage. Vexations (talk) 23:45, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.