Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidney Vogel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 09:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sidney Vogel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 04:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 04:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 04:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 04:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 04:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and the sources I can find don't amount to SIGCOV in multiple RS satisfying WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 04:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete As per above fails WP:SOLDIER. Setreis (talk) 06:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete or delete per above. –Cupper52^Discuss! 20:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.