- Palak Tiwari (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)
Most Respected Sir Namaskar Palak Tiwari is a famous Indian actress, you can know about her at your level. She is the daughter of Bollywood film actress Shweta Tiwari. Apart from this, she is active in Indian films. I feel that her page should not be removed. If you feel that there is a need to improve the page, then you will be greatly appreciated if you help me in improving it. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by WaftCinematic (talk • contribs) 13:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- No case to answer. Speedy close, WP:DRVPURPOSE not#1. —Cryptic 19:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse, properly deleted. If you want to recontest after a consensus to delete, use WP:AfC and follow the advice at WP:THREE. SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:09, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse if the close is being challenged, but the appellant appears to want to add new material. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Allow Submission and Review of Draft - The title has not been salted. A new draft can be submitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse: endorse, if nom finds new SIGCOV sources and wishes to rework the article, they can submit a draft to AFC. // Timothy :: talk 21:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse: Let it be in the draft space, hopefully the nom finds more sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a very weak discussion all around. Only 1 person addressed the sourcing, and none of the others explained how the article doesn't meet the initialism salads that they wrote. No-one above seems to be picking up on the fact that WaftCinematic (talk · contribs) isn't challenging the original AFD discussion, but the subsequent speedy deletion of the attempt to re-do this with sources and more material that xe already did. It isn't the same article, although it shares a lot of the same tabloid-level sources and is similar in many parts. Uncle G (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- WaftCinematic's (who I now note has been blocked indef for undisclosed paid editing) version hadn't been deleted when they made this review request. Still no case to answer. —Cryptic 02:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
|
