User talk:Superegz

Welcome!

Hello, Superegz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

April 2014

Hi Superegz, I've reverted your change to the main photo in the infobox for Adelaide, for a couple of reasons. The earlier image has high resolution and gives a very good indication of the city centre's layout and setting in relation to the parklands and River Torrens. Your photo is much lower res, and has a high amount of vignetting, making it technically a poorer quality image. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 08:18, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. It would be good to get a more recent image though. That one is nearly 10 years old now! Superegz (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Australian Senate into Parliament of Australia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Double spacing

Hi Superegz. Personally, I'd rather you didn't change double spacing to single spacing after full stops and the like, as you have just done in Parliament of Australia. Double and single spacing come out just the same when published, but double spacing makes later editing easier. Some users prefer double, others single, so anyone who sets about converting is going to be awfully busy.

BTW "a bankrupt" is correct, but, since one person has found it awkward, I'm content with your addition of "person". Wikiain (talk) 01:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hare-Clark Ballot Paper.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Hare-Clark Ballot Paper.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 19 May 2005, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Majora (talk) 03:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 28 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Members of the Australian Senate, 2016–2019 page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Conservatives

On what date have the Australian Conservatives become a political party, if indeed they have? Wikiain (talk) 13:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they have been registered by the AEC yet but it is clear that Bernardi wants to do so. I am not sure how to really deal with the situation as it is. Does a party really need to be registered to actually exist? Superegz (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changed it to "to form", as the story says, which also fits his speech. Wikiain (talk) 00:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Senate

Good work on the recent edits. I was wondering whether the breakdown into Lib/Nat/LNP/CLP is correct. While Senators are indeed elected under those respective party banners, they take their seat in the Senate as either Libs or Nats. All LNP (Qld) Senators are listed as either Liberal or National - see for example Matthew Canavan's page, as well as the Seating Plan. Curiously, Nigel Scullion is listed as CLP on both his page and the Seating Plan, it is also noted that he is the Leader of the Nationals in the Senate.

The political composition of the Senate is really reflected by which party room a Senator attends. For all intents and purposes, there is nothing separating Canavan from Nash. Note also that the Nat Senators (including Scullion) are seated separately. Portwalrus (talk) 07:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Premier of South Australia, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Superegz. Both File:Don dunstan.jpg and File:FrankWalsh.jpg are non-free images and Wikipedia's non-free content use policy requires that all 10 non-free content criteria be satisfied for each use of a non-free image on Wikipedia. Premier of South Australia is essentially a list article and decorative use of non-free images (i.e., simply to show the image) is generally not allowed for individual list entries per WP:NFLISTS. Moreover, the non-free use of the Walsh image was previously discussed at Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 70#File:FrankWalsh.jpg and the consensus was that non-free use is only acceptable in the article about Walsh himself. Although the community does consider non-free images of deceased individuals to be acceptable in certain cases (item 10 of WP:NFCI), a much stronger justification for non-free use typically needs to be provided for articles other that stand-alone articles about the person in question. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask for help at WP:MCQ. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page here. This webpage is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia licence, which is not a compatible license. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WA LegCo

Hey, just letting you know I've had to undo your updates here for the time being - the new Legislative Council doesn't start until May, a rather bizarre fact of WA politics. Frickeg (talk) 05:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Senate lists

I've mostly thought your changes to the various Senate lists have been great, but there's one major problem: as at Members of the Australian Senate, 2016–2019, they're completely scrambling the section on subsequent changes to the Senate's composition: so Bernardi is listed first, then Conroy, Culleton and Singh. This is quite important to the page being intelligible - can it be fixed? The Drover's Wife (talk) 21:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Drover's Wife, I don't see the issue, its in alphabetical order. Those notes are in that order because the people they refer to are in alphabetical order. Quite intelligible to me. Superegz (talk) 22:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Every parliamentary list (of which there are hundreds) has always been in chronological order, so that you can follow changes as they unfolded. Can you please fix it - or get a consensus to change it? The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chronological is definitely much better here. There's no value to having it alphabetical, but chronological makes the changes much clearer throughout the term. Frickeg (talk) 08:26, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ABC News logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ABC News logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABC News Channel.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ABC News Channel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adelaide

I can't understand why the image layout was mutilated. - Because it looked really bad on my screen, whereas what I changed it to (I assume it was me - it could have been someone else) should look at least halfway acceptable on everybody's screen, not just yours and mine. What you've change it to isn't ideal, but it's no worse than what I changed it to, (i.e. I can't see that you've achieved anything), and is still a whole lot better than the disaster it looked like before I, in your words, "mutilated" it.
In future, if you "can't understand" something, ask - don't assume. If/when you assume, you will almost certainly be wrong. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reflist template

Thanks for converting <references/ to {{reflist}}! I see you are manually adding a column-width, |30em, but the documentation for {{reflist}} says that is the default anyway. So you can save yourself some work, and leave things more flexible if Wikipedia's overall layout standards ever change, but not bothering to add that detail. DMacks (talk) 04:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

+1 to this. The template now automatically sorts into columns if there are more than 10 references, so there's no need to add |30em. If there are fewer than 10, it's often not a good idea to force it into columns. Cheers, Number 5 7 10:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Superegz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Parliament of Australia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parliament of Australia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 23:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Single transferable vote

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Single transferable vote you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:20, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Single transferable vote

The article Single transferable vote you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Single transferable vote for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Parliament of Australia

The article Parliament of Australia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Parliament of Australia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 13:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raid on Celtic Wood Cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ICAC South Australia.svg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Superegz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FA article Australia

In FA level articles we dont like charts over written out paragraphs pls see WP:PROSE.--Moxy (talk) 12:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A thing of beauty

	Cathedral Builder
	Your recent work on the Aus PM and the National Cabinet is a fine addition. Thank you. Erasmus Sydney (talk) 09:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Superegz, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Parliament of South Australia have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 16:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ICC World Test Championship Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ICC World Test Championship Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ICAC South Australia.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ICAC South Australia.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to South Australian Legislative Council you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 14:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Virtual War Memorial Australia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Virtual War Memorial Australia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://vwma.org.au/about/the-virtual-war-memorial-australia and https://vwma.org.au/explore/schools. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanCherek (talk) 02:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Australian first ministers by time in office

Template:Australian first ministers by time in office has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABC News Channel.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ABC News Channel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:10, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citation bot

Please do not run on more than one category at a time. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 13:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regicide (card game) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Regicide (card game). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:09, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to Tetris Battle Gaiden, but please remember that Wikipedia isn't a place for walkthroughs, cheats, lists of game content or detailed instructions on how to play a game. For more information please read the video game guideline. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 12:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Regicide (card game)

Hello, Superegz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Regicide (card game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Regicide (card game)

Hello, Superegz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Regicide".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tasmania Devils Logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tasmania Devils Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow it down with Citation bot

It looks like you're running it across a bunch of different categories all at once, and at least its last hundred edits all seem to be at your behest. How are you possibly checking these edits to see whether it's making any mistakes? I see one of the maintainers asked you not to do this like a year ago. Folly Mox (talk) 00:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't run Citation bot against multiple categories simultaneously. I feel like this has been mentioned by maintainer AManWithNoPlan over a year ago on this very talkpage, at § Citation bot, still visible above.

I'm not sure why you're in such a hurry. Just space out your runs a bit more. Folly Mox (talk) 01:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adelaide Crows Logo 2024.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adelaide Crows Logo 2024.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 08:47, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]