User talk:TheSlumPanda

Welcome!

Hi TheSlumPanda! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 18:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks CNMall41. TheSlumPanda (talk) 18:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tankeshwar Kumar (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tankeshwar Kumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk to me! • contribs 20:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheSlumPanda! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kline • talk to me! • contribs 20:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amit Balwan Singh (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guessitsavis was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amit Balwan Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 20:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikash Choudhary has been accepted

Vikash Choudhary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 07:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tankeshwar Kumar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tankeshwar Kumar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 07:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. Sorry. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 11:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tankeshwar Kumar (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by User4edits were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All sources as WP:PSTS or non-WP:RS. Please provide WP:RS citations for the texts. Remove awards which are not notable (from body & infobox). Please feel free to ping me after making changes and submitting. The individual passes WP:NACADEMIC but not right now.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tankeshwar Kumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 14:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Priyanka Chaudhary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tankeshwar Kumar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tankeshwar Kumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tankeshwar Kumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 23:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turban, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rajasthani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harendra Mirdha has been accepted

Harendra Mirdha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– DreamRimmer (talk) 15:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Kameshwar Nath Singh

Hello, TheSlumPanda,

Thank you for creating Kameshwar Nath Singh.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating! Kindly De-orphan and categorise.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some categories. TheSlumPanda (talk) 09:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Man Singh (professor)

Hello, TheSlumPanda,

Thank you for creating Man Singh (professor).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

He needs independent sources, otherwise this page will probably be nominated for deletion. Does he have awards? Also, the article is very "braggy", which is not allowed on Wikipedia

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 05:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Man Singh (professor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Man Singh (professor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man Singh (professor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 11:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kisan Ghat (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unsourced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kisan Ghat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barangaon has been accepted

Barangaon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 16:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Anil Agarwal Stadium

Hello, TheSlumPanda,

Thank you for creating Anil Agarwal Stadium.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work. I've tagged the article as an orphan, so please add some links to it. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CanonNi}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 12:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivo V20 (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Encoded was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vivo V20 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Encoded Talk 💬 22:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jat politicians from Rajasthan has been nominated for deletion

Category:Jat politicians from Rajasthan has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A page related to Jat politicians of Rajasthan State, Jats in Rajasthan politics already available on Wikipedia database, hence no need to create a new page.

Thanks & Regards! Super Dud (talk) 11:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Hey!TheSlumPanda, Hi there, Thank you for creating article releated on Indian politician like this; I really aporeciate you're efforts to making article on Indian politicians on Wikipedia.😎 ~~ αvírαm\|(tαlk) 05:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Aviram7😊 TheSlumPanda (talk) 07:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox flag

Flags and similar items such as party logos are to be avoided in the infobox per MOS:INFOBOXFLAG. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it and thanks for guidance @Fylindfotberserk 😊 TheSlumPanda (talk) 13:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Border 2 (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Border 2 (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Border 2 (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Border 2 (film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Border 2 (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it was nominated for deletion, and the result of the discussion was to draftify the article. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 19:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shri Kalyan Government College

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shri Kalyan Government College requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shri Kalyan Government College. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - FitIndia ^{Talk (Admin on Commons)} 18:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jats in Rajasthan politics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jats in Rajasthan politics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jats in Rajasthan politics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ratnahastin (talk) 07:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ratnahastin (talk) 16:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Asian social groups

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ratnahastin (talk) 16:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nathi Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bharatpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TheSlumPanda. Thank you for your work on Hari Singh Kumher. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start! but you may expand it bit more. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 14:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Amit Balwan Singh

Hello, TheSlumPanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amit Balwan Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caste in a living person's biography

Caste can only be included in a WP:BLP (biography of a living person) if the subject themself sell-identify it in an interview (video or otherwise), tweet, etc, per our WP:CASTEID policy. Mentioning caste written by a third-party source (authors of news articles) is not permitted. I've removed some of your additions. So take this policy into consideration next time. Note that mentioning caste in a dead person's biography only needs a reliable source (no self identification required). Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks TheSlumPanda (talk) 13:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajit Kumar Mohanty (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dcotos was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajit Kumar Mohanty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dcotos (talk) 18:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited S. R. Jangid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barmer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vivo V20

Hello, TheSlumPanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vivo V20, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vivo V20

Hello, TheSlumPanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vivo V20".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shivratan Agarwal has been accepted

Shivratan Agarwal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RachelTensions (talk) 00:45, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ajay Pal Lamba for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ajay Pal Lamba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay Pal Lamba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 14:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ranjiv_Singh_Dalal

Hi @TheSlumPanda, I'm not seeing the notability for this person, so have moved this back to draftspace for you. Qcne (talk) 13:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Qcne, i see that you moved this article into draft space but i think this article clearly meets notability because he was the head of police of whole state i.e., DGP and also he holds the record for having longest tenure as DGP of haryana. Then how does this subject is not notable ? TheSlumPanda (talk) 16:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think head of police of a state is a notability criteria WP:NPEOPLE. So I'm looking at WP:NBASIC instead, and I don't think it quite passes? Qcne (talk) 16:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir but if you talk about basic criteria like independent sources then i found a article Prabha Misra, and it doesn’t have a single reliable source which discuss the subject then how sir notability of this article was decided TheSlumPanda (talk) 19:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSlumPanda (talk page watcher) You make a good point. I've nominated the article for deletion. Now, instead of focusing on other articles and pointing out they exist, please focus on your draft. At the very least, if you are going to focus on other articles, focus on articles that are of high quality instead so you know what we look for. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 19:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But @I dream of horses sir if we nominate pages like this for deletion then there are many pages on member of Rajasthan Legislative Assembly which do not have coverage in news media still they have pages on Wikipedia only because they are Member of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly. Should we nominate all them which do not have any single source that talk about them and sir i am talking about these other articles because if we search then we may also found some articles which donot have any source which discuss about them except their result as won then Should we take into consideration these new articles as well. Thanks TheSlumPanda (talk) 19:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, @TheSlumPanda, we should nominate them all for deletion if there are no sources. Qcne (talk) 19:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with @Qcne above. If none of them have adequate sourcing, they all need to be nominated for deletion en masse. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 23:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Members of the Rajasthan legislative assembly, or any other Indian state assembly, always meet the NPOL criteria and are typically kept at AfD. I have worked on nearly all of these pages and haven't found any without sources, though some may rely on database sources. These pages, however, are always kept at AfD. Could you please point out any articles you have seen that lack sources? – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was also talking that some articles only rely on elections results database and have no mention in news articles about them. TheSlumPanda (talk) 14:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced articles need to be deleted at AfD still, but if there's consensus that databate sources are enough, then that's enough. Courtesy ping to DreamRimmer I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 20:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sudarshan Singh Bajwa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sudarshan Singh Bajwa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudarshan Singh Bajwa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— MimsMENTOR ^talk 09:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello TheSlumPanda! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Regarding Copyright of Photos, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]