Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Four Wheeler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There doesn't seem to be sources so,,, Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Four Wheeler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film per my Google search; a selection to the little-known Syracuse International Film Festival does not confer sufficient notability. Perhaps just a case of WP:TOOSOON. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:13, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON#Films. It exists. It was screened. But so far, that's all we can confirm. Let it get wider release and some coverage... then a return of the article might be considered. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. The film does not meet any of the criteria set out in WP:NF nor WP:N. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 16:54, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I think this is an over-strict application of what are, essentially, guidelines and not iron-clad zero-tolerance rules. The film-maker certainly is notable, meriting an article himself, and several of the cast have extensive credits listed on imdb. It seems a little North-American-centric to be deleting this. Agent 86 (talk) 00:17, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- As for the filmmaker being "certainly" notable, his article bio that he "merits" appears to have been written by the subject himself and I can find no reliable sources verifying his notability. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.