Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/July-2024

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.


	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2025:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Portland, Oregon, in 1898

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 05:13:12 (UTC)

Reason: A fine bit of historical photography
Articles in which this image appears: Portland, Oregon, History of Portland, Oregon, The Oregonian Building
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
Creator: Herbert A. Hale, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, forgot to transclude this. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 19:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Bammesk (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 17:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 10:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Portland, Oregon, in 1898 - Herbert A. Hale.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beaufort Gyre

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 16:44:44 (UTC)

Original – Weekly variation of Arctic sea ice from 1984 to 2019. Younger ice (first-year ice) is shown in darker shades, while older ice (four-year or older) is shown in white.

Reason: Good addition to the Beaufort Gyre article, in the Dynamical mechanisms section. It shows the weekly change in the Arctic sea ice coverage. Younger ice accumulation (first-year ice) is shown in darker shades, while older ice (four-year or older) is shown in white.
Articles in which this image appears: Beaufort Gyre, Arctic ice pack
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others
Creator: NASA, visualization by: Cindy Starr and Horace Mitchell

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 16:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 13:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --_ZZ^Z 'S 16:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - It's ali-i-i-ve! (But dying out at an alarming rate...) --Janke | Talk 11:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moonreach (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:NASA-WeeklyArcticSeaIceAge-1984-2019.webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Golden-shouldered parrot

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 10:03:50 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons in January. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Golden-shouldered parrot
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – perfectly posed shot of both male and female. —Bruce1ee ^talk 10:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 10:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 18:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Golden-shouldered Parrot 0A2A7450.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jun Takahashi dress for Undercover

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 10:30:21 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Illustrates both articles well.
Articles in which this image appears: Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion, Jun Takahashi
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle
Creator: Rhododendrites, Jun Takahashi

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: EV? –Sca (talk) 12:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – EV at both articles, esp as the lead image in the parent article The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:45, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 15:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moonreach (talk) 17:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Jun Takahashi dress for Undercover (51492).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Space Shuttle Atlantis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 03:21:54 (UTC)

Reason: Lead image in the Atlantis space shuttle article. It shows Atlantis in orbit during the STS-132 mission in 2010. The photo shows the Payload bay area in full, as well as the extended Canadarm (the remote manipulator arm).
Articles in which this image appears: Space Shuttle Atlantis, Space Shuttle
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Getting there
Creator: NASA

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 03:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~& Comment~~ ~~- The Internet Archive link is about 50% larger (as cropped).~~ To really nitpick, it could also be slightly rotated CCW... --Janke | Talk 06:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, the nom and archived image [1] are the same size (except for the crop, and now the slight rotation). Your browser magnifications might be off. CCW rotation is now done, see latest upload [2]. Bammesk (talk) 00:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are entirely correct, it was a glitch in my browser settings... --Janke | Talk 09:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Moonreach (talk) 17:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 18:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:STS132 Atlantis undocking2 (cropped).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Titanus giganteus beetle

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 19:40:15 (UTC)

Reason: High res high quality image with excellent EV. Lead image in a very notable article with high readership.
Articles in which this image appears: Titan beetle
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Didier Descouens on Commons

Support as nominator – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 19:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Thats a big beetle ―Howard • 🌽³³ 10:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - — Rexter7890 (talk) 02:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:18, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also, why is the page title "Nightmare stuff?" – _ZZ^Z 'S 18:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cuz, why not? A beetle of that size is nightmare worthy, right? xP The Herald (Benison) (talk) 01:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit of an FPC tradition to hide Easter eggs in the page names. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Titanus giganteus MHNT.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Giado concentration camp

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 12:38:31 (UTC)

Reason: This is the only known photograph of the Giado concentration camp. Its quality has some issues (it looks like it's been digitally softened), but... this is the only surviving image of a concentration camp, whose structure has since been destroyed.
Articles in which this image appears: Giado concentration camp, Jadu, Libya
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War II
Creator: Unknown

Support as nominator – ꧁Zanahary꧂ 12:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Unfortunetely this is too small. The Featured picture criteria says "images should be a minimum of 1500 pixels in width and height". In this case, however, an exception may be granted for historical reasons. —Bruce1ee ^talk 12:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think an exception is called for here. It's the deadliest North African WWII concentration camp, and this is the only photo of it. No trace remains of the camp nor of the nearby medieval cemetery where the prisoners buried their dead—so not even a photo of ruins can be taken to replace or supplement it. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 13:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose - I'd be okay with giving this one a pass on resolution, since it's historical and exceeds 1500px on the long axis, but it's both low-contrast and kind of blurry up close. If there were a better copy of this image, I'd support it. Moonreach (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Empty buildings (in low-rez), without people, don't really convey the nature of the topic. – Sca (talk) 16:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per above, esp. because of its poor resolution. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Male springbok

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 07:35:36 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously promoted to FP on Commons, as well as the Arabic and Persian Wikipedias. Used in many articles, most importantly being the headline image of its species, which is a FA
Articles in which this image appears: Springbok, List of bovids, List of artiodactyls, Karoo, Golden Gate Highlands National Park, Gerenuk, Border Cave
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Yathin sk

Support as nominator – _ZZ^Z 'S 07:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would prefer a little more fur detail, but we can D&R if that hypothetical becomes a reality. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Antidorcas marsupialis, male (Etosha, 2012).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Socially Distanced Homeless Encampment

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 14:18:23 (UTC)

Reason: Good EV for the pandemic (even if it has to compete with a lot of other good-EV pictures on both pages it's on). Aesthetically interesting, contextually illustrative (of the concept of social distancing), and historically important. I'm nominating it under "Other" for a category because it doesn't fit neatly into any of the others. "People" comes closest, since this is a human thing, but there aren't that many people in the focus area of the image, so I'm stumped. Moonreach (talk) 14:18, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Articles in which this image appears: COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 pandemic in the San Francisco Bay Area
FP category for this image: Other
Creator: Christopher Michel on Flickr, uploaded to Commons by Tm

Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 14:18, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Interesting concept but poor execution. I really doubt the EV because this is a very wide aerial shot that very poorly depicts the social distancing. From this angle, it is nothing more than a courtyard with equally distant rectangles. The shadow on the lower half and the structures on the sides are distracting too. Regretful oppose but good concept. Any other angle resolving those points I raised have my support. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are two other pictures from the same set. I'd be happy to support either if other people think they have merit, but I don't think the composition of either one is quite as impactful. Moonreach (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. Sadly, they are worse. As Sca said, the EV is almost nil for any of them and doesn't give any information to the general reader. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 16:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per above. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie Nation

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 17:55:51 (UTC)

Reason: A fine (if originally badly damaged) photograph of a notable temperance campaigner
Articles in which this image appears: Carrie Nation, June 1900
FP category for this image: The logic we usually use is that people advocating for change in laws, such as suffragettes, get filed under political. This is a little more subtle, as she's arguably advocating for societal change, but the movement culminated in Prohibition. She was also a religious leader of sorts. Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political? I'll let Armbrust decide.
Creator: White Studio, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 17:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Love the title and I guess Political category fits. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Carlosmarkos2345 13:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – By far one of the most interesting articles I’ve ever read. Kentuckian |💬 22:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Carrie Nation by White Studio.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Percival Lowell

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 00:52:53 (UTC)

Reason: One of the best photos I've seen of him.
Articles in which this image appears: Percival Lowell
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: James E. Purdy, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 00:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 16:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Janke | Talk 20:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Percival Lowell by James E. Purdy.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scoliid wasp

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 20:35:35 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. Adds EV to articles. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Scolia hirta, Scolia (wasp)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:35, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 06:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Charles, are you certain that this is Scolia hirta unifasciata? I know very little about scoliid wasps, but the fact that the antennae are bright yellow rather than black doesn't seem to match that species, and the two separate yellow spots on the abdomen (rather than a single yellow band, as the Latin name implies) gave me pause. There are over 900 photos labeled Scolia hirta on Flicker (including some of the subsp. unifasciata), and I scrolled quickly through all of them looking for a parallel. While I did find a some individuals in which the abdominal dots had not fully fused into solid band, I didn't find a single instance of yellow antennae. When I widened my search to other Mediterranean scoliids, however, I came across a number of photos of Megascolia bidens that seem to match your wasp exactly. The female of that species has four yellow abdominal spots and short reddish antennae, but the male has only two spots and long bright yellow antennae. Compare these photos: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. All of these are identified as Megascolia bidens, and all of them seem to me to be a better fit for your wasp than Scolia hirta. I also found this paper, which confirms that M. bidens is found in Tunisia, where your photo was taken, and describes the distinguishing features of the species, including the yellow antennae and two abdominal spots on the male. I'm no expert, and I don't want to substitute my judgment for yours, but take a look at the photos and the paper and see what you think. Choliamb (talk) 21:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Choliamb for your hard work and correct analysis. There is a great danger in relying on others' identification and I fell into this trap. Charlesjsharp (talk)

Request withdrawn Error in identification Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Schrödinger's cat film

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 10:17:07 (UTC)

Reason: High quality educational illustration in vector format
Articles in which this image appears: Many-worlds interpretation, Schrödinger's cat, Multiverse, Jorge Luis Borges and mathematics
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Drawings
Creator: Physikinger

Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 10:17, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Obscure, arcane. – Sca (talk) 12:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 16:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Great EV. Depicts the topic well. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Janke | Talk 20:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --_ZZ^Z 'S 06:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Schroedingers cat film.svg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Instrumental temperature record

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 16:32:28 (UTC)

Original – NASA animation portrays global surface temperature changes from 1880 to 2023. The colour blue denotes cooler temperatures and red denotes warmer temperatures.

Reason: Good visual depiction of global surface temperature changes from 1880 to 2023. Good addition to the "Total warming and trends" section of the Instrumental temperature record article.
Articles in which this image appears: Instrumental temperature record
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others
Creator: NASA, visualization by: Mark SubbaRao

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 16:32, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hot stuff! --Janke | Talk 20:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --_ZZ^Z 'S 06:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Moonreach (talk) 18:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:1880- Global surface temperature - heat map animation - NASA SVS.webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snake handling

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 05:59:59 (UTC)

Reason: A somewhat chaotically shot, but significant and rare image.
Articles in which this image appears: Snake handling in Christianity + 3
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Religion and mythology
Creator: Russell Lee, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Definitely deserves FP status ―Howard • 🌽³³ 11:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Very strong support – Thank you for nominating! This is an amazing nomination with excellent EV. Kentuckian |💬 03:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Handling serpents at the Pentecostal Church of God. (Kentucky) by Russell Lee. - NARA - 541335.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ilulissat

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 10:14:17 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons two weeks ago. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Ilulissat
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
Creator: Ekrem Canli

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee ^talk 10:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 10:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Moonreach (talk) 14:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ilulissat panorama from SW large.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Red-rumped swallow

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 10:22:43 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons in April. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Red-rumped swallow
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Prasan Shrestha at Commons

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --_ZZ^Z 'S 22:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 10:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Red Rumped Swallow.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:02, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Set:Morpho rhetenor

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 06:20:47 (UTC)

Reason: Excellent images with great EV, illustrating the topic very well.
Articles in which this image appears: Morpho rhetenor
FP category for this image: Insects
Creator: Didier Descouens

Support as nominator – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't know if the image is excellent but the butterfly is incredible. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 17:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --_ZZ^Z 'S 00:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Moonreach (talk) 16:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Morpho rhetenor rhetenor MHNT dos.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted File:Morpho rhetenor rhetenor MHNT ventre.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pisa Cathedral

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 21:06:12 (UTC)

Reason: Good capture.
Articles in which this image appears: Pisa Cathedral, Buscheto, December 1187 papal election, Buscheto, Duomo, Rainaldo
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Luca Aless

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 21:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Straight-on view not the most interesting, IMO. – Sca (talk) 12:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm fine with the straight-on view, myself, but the picture is slightly crooked. Moonreach (talk) 16:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not so good view, colors, crop above. --Petar Milošević (talk) 10:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per Petar Milošević's vote (and also Sca's comment). – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abbey of the Dormition

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 21:15:22 (UTC)

Reason: High quality and resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Abbey of the Dormition
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Godot13

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 21:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great quality, interesting subject and a robust target article. Moonreach (talk) 13:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support No, quality is actually not so great (from Medium format) - probably flat scanner. But span of dynamic range is great and since it is film i support. --Petar Milošević (talk) 10:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This wasn't shot on film, and no scanner. See EXIF data. It was shot with a digital camera back. It's a digitial photo. Not so sharp at full size, but the large pixel count makes up for it. Bammesk (talk) 15:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Explaining why best didnt came out. --Petar Milošević (talk) 10:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 15:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:ISR-2015-Jerusalem-Dormition Abbey.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Black Lives Matter art

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 01:09:49 (UTC)

Reason: Quality lead image in its article Black Lives Matter art in New York City. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Black Lives Matter art in New York City, Black Lives Matter protests in New York City, +1
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others
Creator: Rhododendrites

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 01:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 10:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – In the U.S., BLM is a widely recognized acronym for the Bureau of Land Management, a federal agency employing more than 10,000. – Sca (talk) 12:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 16:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 15:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:BLM mural in Greenpoint (35406p).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cattle farm in Borongan City, Eastern Samar

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 02:11:37 (UTC)

Reason: Passes the FP Criteria.
Articles in which this image appears: Borongan, Agriculture in the Philippines
FP category for this image: Category:Borongan
Creator: TheNuggeteer

Support as nominator – TheNuggeteer (talk) 02:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment EV? --_ZZ^Z 'S 02:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Snapshot-type photo, does not fulfill criteria 3 and 5. (Does one animal constitute a farm?) --Janke | Talk 09:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per Janke. Poor comp, poor detail. – Sca (talk) 12:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per Janke & Sca. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Ritchie playing dulcimer

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 03:55:19 (UTC)

Reason: Good quality and excellent EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Jean Ritchie, Appalachian dulcimer
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Associated Press

Support as nominator – Kentuckian |💬 03:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 20:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Jean Ritchie - Appalachian folk singer, 1950.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to People/Entertainment instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Lee

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2024 at 14:15:23 (UTC)

Reason: Another in a series of photographs of photographers. There are a couple other options (e.g. File:Russell-Lee-FSA.jpg), but this one was by far the most widely used, and the one that looked the worst in the old version. I'd say the crop is fairly conservative: I didn't crop any of him (except maybe a few pixels at the bottom: edges aren't perfectly straight), but did take a smidgen more off the right to centre him, and cropped the weird... reflection? damage? intruding lights? at the top, which still has more than ample headspace. (Compare File:Portrait of Russell Lee, FSA (Farm Security Administration) photographer - Original.tif)
Articles in which this image appears: Russell Lee (photographer) +2
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Farm Security Administration/Office of War Information, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 14:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Those out of focus areas aren't great for FP. Can you do something about that, Adam? The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can't go back to the 40s and reshoot it. Choices are either to crop or accept it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 17:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. But that out of focus areas really do bother me. It's an excellent shot with good EV. But since we don't have a time machine lying around in a hot tub to fix that focus issues, ~~Oppose~~. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair, but, y'know, sharpening doesn't really work with film grain, and Charles would be here to oppose if I crop his legs out. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 05:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose A photo of a photographer ought to be perfect. Here, the focus in on his ears, not his eyes... --Janke | Talk 18:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald and Janke: How about the alt? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 02:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support alt - Yep, works for me now. Better. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:11, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Alt is quite fuzzy, too... --Janke | Talk 08:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
for the 30s/40s? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 10:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. There are some much sharper studio portraits from decades earlier, many of them seen here at FPC... Here, too, the focus seems to be in the wrong place. The eyes need to be in perfect focus, even if the Depth of field is shallow. --Janke | Talk 20:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Decades earlier was a very different camera technology. The increase in film speed was met with a decrease in focus for a while. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 00:37, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

True, but in both these photos I see a focusing error. A grainy photo can also be sharp. --Janke | Talk 09:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, I suspect there's somewhat of an issue in the 40s of them knowing what images were being used for. No need to get an amazing perfect focus in an image that's never going to be seen bigger than about 6" (15cm) tall at most, or is going to be halftone printed. 1910-1950 is kind of a nadir of photography, so I'd say the second, especially, is decent for the era. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 12:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aiming for mediocrity??? ;-) --Janke | Talk 12:43, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Astronaut training

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2024 at 20:30:48 (UTC)

Reason: good enough quality and good EV
Articles in which this image appears: Astronaut training
FP category for this image: probably Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others
Creator: NASA

Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 20:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 17:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Janke | Talk 20:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This belongs in a gallery with other photos of people walking on walls, like Fred Astaire in Royal Wedding and Adam West and Burt Ward in the 1960s Batman TV series. Choliamb (talk) 20:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, but here, the wires show... ;-) --Janke | Talk 08:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 10:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I found the same photo with higher resolution, updated the file here and in the article. New file is 5,690 × 4,546 pixels, old one is 3,000 x 2,395. Artem.G (talk) 13:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Moonreach (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Reduced Gravity Walking Simulator - NASA 1963.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added image to Space/Getting there instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Farewell of Telemachus and Eucharis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2024 at 22:45:27 (UTC)

Reason: High quality and resolution. Good digitization
Articles in which this image appears: The Farewell of Telemachus and Eucharis etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Jacques-Louis David

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 22:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Awful lot of JPEG artefacting, or am I confused? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 06:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is soft at full size. Both google art and getty have a more detailed version (if you zoom in). Bammesk (talk) 14:46, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Farrow

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2024 at 22:45:36 (UTC)

Reason: High quality and resolution.
Articles in which this image appears: Mia Farrow etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Andrew Lih

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 22:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Adventures of Prince Achmed

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 01:39:52 (UTC)

Original – The Adventures of Prince Achmed is a 1926 German animated film by Lotte Reiniger, based on One Thousand and One Nights.

Reason: The Adventures of Prince Achmed is the oldest surviving feature-length animation. It's the best-known work by German director Lotte Reiniger and showcases her unique visual style, which used a novel multiplane camera setup to recreate the look of a shadow play.
Articles in which this image appears: The Adventures of Prince Achmed, Lotte Reiniger, Silhouette animation, Shadow play
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: Lotte Reiniger (director)

Support as nominator – hinnk (talk) 01:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support due to historical significance, but it's a pity that the original intertitles have been replaced. --Janke | Talk 08:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 16:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 08:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I second Janke's misgivings about the intertitles but support anyway. — Moonreach (talk) 14:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Adventures of Prince Achmed (1926).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spectacled weaver

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 20:29:02 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Spectacled weaver
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 06:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 10:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Spectacled weaver (Ploceus ocularis ocularis) male Mbombela.jpg --The Herald (Benison) (talk) 20:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samango monkey

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 20:25:27 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. Illustrates article well with high EV. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Sykes' monkey
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some gorgeous fur detail. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 06:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 14:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 21:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 11:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Samango monkey (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus) Mount Sheba.jpg --The Herald (Benison) (talk) 20:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nadar élevant la Photographie à la hauteur de l'Art

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2024 at 17:17:04 (UTC)

Reason: Quite a famous artwork, one of the reasons Nadar became famous.
Articles in which this image appears: Nadar, Aerial photography, Honoré Daumier
FP category for this image: Not sure, but Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle seems to fit.
Creator: Honoré Daumier, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 17:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Iconic image! --Janke | Talk 20:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:46, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Carlosmarkos2345 14:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 21:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Moonreach (talk) 14:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Honoré Daumier, Nadar élevant la Photographie à la hauteur de l'Art, 1862, NGA 42966.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:27, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One Hundred Horses

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2024 at 10:32:10 (UTC)

Reason: Notable painting, good quality reproduction, featured on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: One Hundred Horses, Giuseppe Castiglione (Jesuit painter), National Palace Museum
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Giuseppe Castiglione (Jesuit painter)

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image loads as separate parts while in reality, if I understand correctly, it's a single scroll. Comprare, e.g. A Thousand Li of Rivers and Mountains. Brandmeister^talk 17:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 15:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support; Note: The picture is fine and I supported it; but some spots are seen in the background when you zoom in. If there will be a good Alt, I'll prefer to support it indeed. Thank you MER-C. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I counted them twice and got a total of 99 horses both times. Here's my working copy if anyone wants to check my work and point out the horse I missed. Choliamb (talk) 14:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the left side, there is a rider on a brown horse (in the river). Adjacent and behind that brown horse there are two white horses. You counted those two as one. Bammesk (talk) 03:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yes, I see it now. Thanks, Bammesk. Choliamb (talk) 11:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:A Hundred Steeds.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indian paradise flycatcher

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2024 at 10:48:53 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Illustrates article well.
Articles in which this image appears: Indian paradise flycatcher
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Prasan Shrestha

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support; wonderful focus! – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 11:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 09:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Asian Paradise Flycatcher.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bathymetry

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2024 at 14:31:46 (UTC)

Original – Animation reveals oceanic floors and seabeds. Continental shelves appear mostly by a depth of 140 meters, mid-ocean ridges by 3000 meters, abyssal plains from 3000 to 6000 meters, and oceanic trenches at depths beyond 6000 meters.

Reason: Informative animation by NASA reveals the ocean floors and seabeds as the water level drops. Water depth is displayed as a parameter. To see the animation in full resolution you may need to change its display setting to "source".
Articles in which this image appears: Bathymetry
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology
Creator: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Horace Mitchell and James O'Donoghue

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 14:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 11:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Moonreach (talk) 14:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Draining the Oceans video by NASA.webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wings poster

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2024 at 17:55:14 (UTC)

Reason: FP on Persian Wikipedia
Articles in which this image appears: Wings (1927 film), 1st Academy Awards, El Brendel, Clara Bow filmography, August 1927
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: Paramount Pictures

Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 17:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alt 1 – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 19:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Do we have a larger version? This one is 990 pixels wide. hinnk (talk) 23:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The picture needs some edits; especially, it's good that one removes some extra light (or whitish) spots, dots, and disturbing line-likes. Note: The article is good. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since the original doesn't meet the size requirement, I found an alternative version of the image currently in Wings (1927 film)#Release and reception, a higher-resolution scan of a restored poster. There's not as much physical wear, although it could probably still use some digital retouching. Will swap it into some of the relevant articles unless there are objections. hinnk (talk) 04:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 1. I'd also support a higher-res copy of the first version, too. I consider that to be the more visually interesting of the two, but both are good. Moonreach (talk) 20:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 per higher resolution, but yes, both are artistically good. Brandmeister^talk 18:41, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of the images has enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duck and Cover

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2024 at 18:37:37 (UTC)

Original – Duck and Cover is a 1951 American civil defense animated and live action social guidance film that is often mischaracterized as propaganda. It has similar themes to the more adult-oriented civil defense training films. It was widely distributed to United States schoolchildren in the 1950s, and teaches students what to do in the event of a nuclear explosion.

Alt 1 Levels adjusted for better contrast.

Reason: A Featured Media on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Duck and Cover (film), Duck and cover
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: Archer Productions, Inc.

Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 18:37, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carlosmarkos2345 if you support Alt 1, then you need to say so, as have four other editors. As it stands currently, your vote applies to the originally nominated image, not the alternate image. Bammesk (talk) 02:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alt 1 --Carlosmarkos2345 | Talk 7:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Comment - would be much better with a contrast hike, too gray as it is. --Janke | Talk 20:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like this was nominated in 2018 but didn't have any support. I've gone ahead and made ALT1 from the original MOV at the Library of Congress. The levels have been adjusted to give it more contrast, so it's less grey than File:Duck and Cover 1440 x 1080 01836081.webm but doesn't have the blown highlights in File:Duck And Cover (1951) Bert The Turtle.webm. hinnk (talk) 06:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 1 — Moonreach (talk) 14:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt 1. MER-C 18:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 --Janke | Talk 18:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Duck and Cover (1951).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:39, 17 July 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

Wristwatch Casio W-96H-4A2V

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2024 at 10:41:31 (UTC)

Reason: good quality, rare color, background choosen for this color (orange)
Articles in which this image appears: Casio
FP category for this image: Engineering and technology/Electronics
Creator: Petar Milošević

Support as nominator – Petar Milošević (talk) 10:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image was recently added to the gallery section of Casio two days ago. --_ZZ^Z 'S 10:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Smacks of free adv. – Sca (talk) 12:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment FPC images have to add significant value to an article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 'S 2 months ago (6th May), and i dont make waste photos. Other wont comment. --Petar Milošević (talk) 18:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The first photo is quite good, but would be better with a more neutral background. The underlying EV is good here given that Casio is best known for making affordable digital watches and this is a good example of their designs, but the placement of the image in a large gallery reduces the value of the image to readers. Nick-D (talk) 01:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Both images were nominated for FP on Commons and failed. The main reason was the distracting background. _ZZ^Z 'S 12:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Masked lapwing

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2024 at 16:01:37 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Masked lapwing
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 13:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 16:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Masked lapwing (Vanellus miles miles) Darwin.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greater blue-eared starling

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2024 at 16:10:08 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Greater blue-eared starling
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:30, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Moonreach (talk) 15:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 13:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 16:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Artem.G (talk) 17:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Greater blue-eared starling (Lamprotornis chalybaeus nordmanni) Kruger.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

African leopard

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2024 at 16:21:12 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. Illustrates article well with high EV. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: African leopard
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:21, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 13:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Artem.G (talk) 17:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 21:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 19:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus) Kruger.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:13, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Their New Jerusalem

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2024 at 18:35:10 (UTC)

Reason: A fine print from one of the major illustrated American magazines, Judge. For some reason the unrestored version was an FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: History of antisemitism in the United States, Grant E. Hamilton
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History probably.
Creator: Grant E. Hamilton, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 18:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:30, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 16:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm not withdrawing my vote for now, but at a closer glance it appears this illustration is neutral or even optimistic on Jewish immigration to the United States? It appears to depict the Jews gaining prosperity in the United States through "Perseverance and Industry" and acknowledging their persecution in the Russian Empire. If so, it might not be an educative illustration of antisemitic attitudes in the United States, or at the very least requires a more detailed caption in History of antisemitism in the United States. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 12:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It also shows "our first families driven out." At most I would call this mixed, rather than neutral, and I think its place in the antisemitism article is warranted. Moonreach (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, I understand. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 20:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – leaning to support, but the original [10] is much larger (higher resolution). Bammesk (talk) 03:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We shouldn't be making observations like 'optimistic take'. And as above, it does not illustrate article well does it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:15, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:15, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shelf cloud

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2024 at 15:05:46 (UTC)

Reason: Good, comprehensive shot that illustrates its subject well; image quality looks good at maximum resolution
Articles in which this image appears: Arcus cloud
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather
Creator: Will y theweatherguy473737

Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 15:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ – even though the file size is a tad small _ZZ^Z 'S 17:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing vote per Adam Cuerden --_ZZ^Z 'S 20:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's 4,032 × 3,024 pixels. That's well above the 1500px square in the criteria; is there an unofficial higher target? Moonreach (talk) 17:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was referring to the size, not resolution _ZZ^Z 'S 03:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, okay. Moonreach (talk) 13:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That forest looks rather like an oil painting, which might indicate way too much compression, or a terrible camera. I'm not sure about image quality. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 21:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:58, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plate tectonics

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2024 at 02:33:09 (UTC)

Reason: Quality SVG file, lead image in Plate tectonics, depicts and is based on published work in 2022 in the journal of Earth-Science Reviews.
Articles in which this image appears: Plate tectonics, Outline of plate tectonics, List of tectonic plates, +5
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology
Creator: University of Adelaide, Derrick Hasterok, graphics: M.Bitton

Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 02:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ – _ZZ^Z 'S 19:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing vote per Adam Cuerden --_ZZ^Z 'S 15:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - This doesn't really grab me, as illustrations go, but it has plenty of information and a citation on the file page to back it up. Moonreach (talk) 20:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't love the colour scheme for the borders: I'm not colourblind, but with all the colours for the plates, telling dark green from dark blue and dark purple is very difficult unless you zoom in quite a bit. And then you have a magenta-red pair. There has to be a better way. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 21:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Crossing the Delaware

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2024 at 05:56:51 (UTC)

Reason: High res image of an event with historical significance, along with excellent EV in multiple articles. Featured Picture in various Wikiprojects.
Articles in which this image appears: George Washington's crossing of the Delaware River and Washington Crossing the Delaware (1851 paintings) primarily, +over a dozen
FP category for this image: Paintings
Creator: Emanuel Leutze/MMA New York

Support either as nominator – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Reason for a change? Orig is from Metropolitan Museum of Art. – Sca (talk) 12:19, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Alt 1 is definitely better, the original looks upsampled (less detail even though a tad larger), and has practically blown highlights (255 in some channel), as well as detail loss in shadows (0 in places). Alt 1 needs a slight rotation, and black borders cropped. --Janke | Talk 13:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Janke: It's not square: The top's pretty much dead on horizontal, the bottom's angled. There's no way to crop the borders without cropping paint. I, for one, simply Support alt 1, no crop. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 21:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Alt 1 is better. But the painting is 21.2 feet wide, so at 3,874 × 2,269 pixels, the resolution is 15 pixels per inch. That's low. For a painting, fine details are lost at that resolution. I say 40+ pixels per inch would be Ok. Bammesk (talk) 12:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of the images reached the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Racially segregated drinking fountain

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2024 at 08:57:01 (UTC)

Reason: High EV: demonstrates racial segregation well; good composition; appears in various articles; already featured in Turkish Wikipedia
Articles in which this image appears: Discrimination, Racial segregation, Discrimination in the United States, Russell Lee (photographer), Jim Crow laws +4
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: Russell Lee

Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 08:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Howardcorn33: Okay, this is weird: The copy available on the Library of Congress, uncropped, is 4269 x 3038 px. This one is 5,276 × 3,618 px. However, if you look below the hand on the sign on the left, you will see a majorly blurry section. Not blurry as in the photo is blurry; the grain disappears. That's not in the current LoC copy. Given the grain size of the photo; I'm inclined to say the LoC copy is amply sized, and would probably choose a better scan over theoretical resolution. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 21:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, LoC copy is better. I would support if it's nominated. Bammesk (talk) 12:50, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I wish you had said that sooner. I'll upload my restoration tomorrow. Sorry, Howard! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 18:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it would be better to just create a new nomination if possible. it doesn't seem there is enough time to vote on the alt ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chromodoris willani

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2024 at 10:21:30 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons last month. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Chromodoris willani
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Molluscs
Creator: Diego Delso

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 12:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:45, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Given the difficulty of underwater pics, the minor flaws are very forgivable. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 23:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 19:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Babosa de mar (Chromodoris willani), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-24, DD 34.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:02, 24 July 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

Red-tailed laughingthrush

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2024 at 10:23:45 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons last month. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Red-tailed laughingthrush
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 12:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Artem.G (talk) 17:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Surprising how close it manages to go to being blown out on the white patch without quite getting there. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 23:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 19:39, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Red-tailed Laughingthrush 0A2A2723.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beach Chair

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2024 at 10:27:17 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator. Moonreach (talk) 14:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Historically significant animation in the evolution of CGI and Pixar, that still holds entertainment value despite not being made for that purpose.
Articles in which this image appears: Pixar, Beach Chair (film test)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: Eben Ostby

~~Support as nominator~~ – RockosModernLifeFan848 (talk) 10:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I struck this vote. Editor has less than 100 edits. See instructions on top of the WP:FPC page. However, thanks for the nom and your comments. Bammesk (talk) 12:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I thought there was an exception for the nominator? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adam, I don't see that in the FPC voting instructions, or the closing instructions. Also I don't think that's a good idea, because it would make it easy to double vote with a sockpuppet account. Bammesk (talk) 01:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – Gimmicky. Lacks EV. – Sca (talk) 12:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The EV is in showing at what level computer animation was in 1986, nine years before Toy Story was released... --Janke | Talk 14:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is correct - it should be noted that this test film predates The Abyss, which is the first full film to feature CGI water. I think it's a good representation of not just the technology of CGI at the time, but also what experimental CGI productions were like in the late 80s to early 90s, typically being plotless and very short, intended less for a general audience and more for animators in the CGI industry. I also think it holds educational value specifically pertaining to Pixar in a vacuum as well as CGI, as AFAIK it, alongside Luxo Jr., was the first instance of the "What if *insert object or abstract concept here* had feelings?" concept that Pixar - and American CGI animation in general - has become known for. RockosModernLifeFan848 (talk) 16:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Source is 720p, rather than 360p. Also, source has the Pixar splash screen/logo that is excluded here. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:07, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I hade updated the upload to a higher quality download, now 1080p, using the same source as my update - It still lacks the Pixar intro logo however. RockosModernLifeFan848 (talk) 17:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm leaning support, but wonder if we should have the intro logo. On the whole, Support: The Pixar logo trademarks might limit use more. Although, if we can get the Pixar logo, that'd probably be a neat addition to the Pixar page. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 19:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Its interesting to see a work by Pixar in the public domain so why not? GamerPro64 01:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The Pixar article never discusses Beach Chair except in the video's caption, and Beach Chair (film test) is a stub that doesn't currently demonstrate significant coverage (the references are the video on YouTube and two 2-sentence mentions in books). hinnk (talk) 05:36, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – assuming the (public domain) copyright tag is valid. Bammesk (talk) 13:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Do we know if the animation was ever legally published before 1 March 1989? The Wikipedia article says that it was exhibited in 1986, but the s:Copyright Act of 1976 says that "A public performance or display of a work does not of itself constitute publication." Though, the Copyright Office's Circular 45 says that exhibiting a film at a film festival may constitute publication if "copies [are] made and [are] ready for distribution." prospectprospekt (talk) 15:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Its article says its an easter egg in Pixar Short Films Collection, Volume 1 so I would assume if its copywritten they would have added a copyright in the DVD. GamerPro64 04:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  The back of the Pixar Short Films Collection, Volume 1 DVD has copyright notices for the short films in the collection (all without a year, except for The Adventures of André & Wally B.). There's an additional notice that says "Pixar Shorts © 2011 Disney/Pixar". There's no mention of Beach Chair or Flags and Waves in either the description of the contents or the copyright notices, take from that what you will. hinnk (talk) 05:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  I looked up the Liquid Television episode featuring Beach Chair, and there is no copyright notice for it in the credits - it is listed as being distributed by "Expanded Entertainment". The fact the film had a distributor basically confirms it's copyrighted, so I will remove the file and repeal the entry. RockosModernLifeFan848 (talk) 09:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — I'm uneasy about the argument that this is PD, especially considering the discussion above. It seems likely that Pixar still considers "Beach Chair" copyrighted, and the only way to find out definitively would be a lawsuit. I don't think this is worth it. Moonreach (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not seeing a registration here. Pixar does have registrations for Luxo Jr. and Red's Dream. The question is if the short was published in the 80s, though. A test reel sounds like something kept internal. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --RockosModernLifeFan848 (talk) 09:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2024 at 00:37:32 (UTC)

Original – The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog is a 1927 British silent thriller film directed by Alfred Hitchcock, based on Marie Belloc Lowndes' novel The Lodger.

Reason: We now have copies of most of Alfred Hitchcock's silent films, and this one I think stands out among them. It's Hitchcock's first film to develop the "Hitchcockian" style we know today, and the article touches on a bunch of those elements and motifs. The restoration is a big improvement over previous releases, with better reproduction of the color scheme that Gainsborough Pictures used in the UK release (the opening scene is a good example, where instead of blue tinting it restores the amber tinting and blue toning used to look like street lighting at night).
Articles in which this image appears: The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog, Jack the Ripper in fiction
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: Alfred Hitchcock (director)

Support as nominator – hinnk (talk) 00:37, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (Talk) 00:47, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I haven't watched the whole thing, but did flip around. Looks good! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 23:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moonreach (talk) 19:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:23, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Lodger - A Story of the London Fog (1927).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sarlyk Yak

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2024 at 12:26:55 (UTC)

Reason: Featured on Commons and on fa.wiki. A wonderful photo of a yak in the Altai Mountains.
Articles in which this image appears: Yak
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Alexandr frolov

Support as nominator – ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Artem.G (talk) 17:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would support if it is the infobox where it should be. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kind of inclined to agree that this is very low down the article. Weirdly, lead is an FP, and, while I don't think this is necessarily a case where we need to delist one to promote one - different fur colours are, at least, good for showing variation - I do think this is a much more encyclopedic lead image and would like to see the current lead stay in the article, but lower down. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 23:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 21:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:11, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 17:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sarlyk Yak2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gettysberg Portrait

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2024 at 14:29:14 (UTC)

Reason: It is high-resolution (2,200 × 2,835 px), and captures Abraham Lincoln's likeness better than any other portrait. The Wikipedia caption of the image says "Lincoln’s character was notoriously difficult to capture in pictures, but Alexander Gardner’s close-up portrait, quite innovative in contrast to the typical full-length portrait style, comes closest to preserving the expressive contours of Lincoln’s face and his penetrating gaze."
Articles in which this image appears: Abraham Lincoln
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: Alexander Gardner

Support as nominator – Wcamp9 (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is an encyclopedia, you might want to check the spelling of your nomination. The town in Pennsylvania is a borough, not a mountain. :) - Choliamb (talk) 19:37, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Documentation is terrible: https://museums.fivecolleges.edu/detail.php?t=objects&type=ext&f=&s=&record=0&id_number=1947.135 - the supposed source - is a sepia-toned portrait and very small. This image exists in various crops; https://www.loc.gov/item/scsm000793/ is a maybe? https://www.loc.gov/resource/ppmsca.19301/ is also possible. Or there's https://www.loc.gov/resource/ppmsca.38948/ - I'd probably need to compare them all. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 18:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a huge 4835 × 5718 TIFF file at: https://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/ppmsca.19301/ - with some bungled retouching, but it might be a good candidate for a restoration. --Janke | Talk 18:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Dreadnought

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2024 at 18:22:42 (UTC)

Reason: Tighter crop than I'd like, but a truly iconic naval vessel.
Articles in which this image appears: HMS Dreadnought (1906) and related articles
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water
Creator: U. S. Navy, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 18:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Historic vessel that overnight made most other warships obsolete. Detail is decent for very early 20th C. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sca (talk • contribs) 00:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality photo of this important ship with strong EV as a result Nick-D (talk) 11:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 18:49, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:21, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:HMS Dreadnought 1906 H61017.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NASA Researchers Analyze a Moon Dust Simulation

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2024 at 17:11:48 (UTC)

Reason: good quality, good EV, interesting composition
Articles in which this image appears: Lunar soil
FP category for this image: maybe Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Getting there?
Creator: NASA

Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 17:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Does not add much EV to article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:10, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
well, it shows simulated Moon dust quite well. I've also added the photo to Lunar regolith simulant. Artem.G (talk) 19:31, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It feels fairly poor of a photo, especially given it's barely at resolution. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 20:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Barely meeting the technical criteria is still meeting the technical criteria, and as a photo I find this both interesting and informative. If it passes, I would use it to link to lunar regolith simulant rather than lunar soil, as I think it's more illustrative of the former rather than the latter. Moonreach (talk) 19:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Northrop HL-10

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2024 at 17:15:28 (UTC)

Reason: nice historical photo, good quality and good EV
Articles in which this image appears: Northrop HL-10 (lead), William H. Dana, +1
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Air
Creator: NASA

Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 17:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Titan2456 (talk) 1:51, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Support --Argenberg (talk) 21:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A tiny number of dust specks in the shadows really don't hold back much. Good quality for colour film of the era (I've seen better indoor shots with colour film of the era, but outdoor shots with moving objects?). Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dramatic and interesting shot with solid EV. It would be good though if more details could be added to the caption here and at Commons, though the NASA caption is rather sparce. In particular, it appears that the B-52 is probably the aircraft that dropped the HL-10 for its flight (note the equipment under its right wing). Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Not Promoted~~ --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~While there’s a clear consensus to promotion, an unused image can’t become a featured picture.~~ Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hey, I was offline for a ~week, and had no chance to response. the photo was switched during the nomination with a larger version File:HL-10 on Lakebed with B-52 flyby - GPN-2000-000201.jpg. though it is indeed larger, its quality is worse, and it's full of jpeg artifacts. I restored the nominated photo in the articles, and given 8 supports I think it can be promoted. Artem.G (talk) 13:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Armbrust, it might be good to revisit the timeline of this nomination and reconsider it's closure. The image was switched Here after the nom had 6 supports and zero opposition. There was consensus for it becoming FP prior to it being replaced in the article. The image was replaced with a technically subpar image and the replacement went unnoticed. If the closure was delayed a few days and the nominator had been notified, the nominator would have caught up with it (as they did on August 2nd [11]). If it's possible, you may want to reconsider the closure. Cheers. Bammesk (talk) 16:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Northrop HL-10.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reclosed per above comments. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Common noddy

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2024 at 20:50:48 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image.
Articles in which this image appears: Common noddy
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive in-flight shot, with fantastic composition. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 23:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 19:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 20:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:19, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Common noddy (Anous stolidus pileatus) in flight Michaelmas Cay.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Female galah in flight/2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2024 at 20:57:08 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons. Nominated earlier this year, when it received 3 support votes
Articles in which this image appears: Galah
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support No idea how this didn't pass last time, it's even more stunning than the Noddy. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 23:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Carlosmarkos2345 01:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 20:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:18, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful pose and feathers. --RockosModernLifeFan848 (talk) 11:02, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Galah (Eolophus roseicapilla) female in flight Mount Pleasant.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

African chaffinch female

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2024 at 21:11:47 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: African chaffinch
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 23:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 20:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:18, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 19:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:African Chaffinch (Fringilla spodiogenys) female Sfax.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Hunt Jackson

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2024 at 16:20:41 (UTC)

Reason: A fine portrait of a notable author.
Articles in which this image appears: Helen Hunt Jackson, et al.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Charles F. Conly, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support but note minor fleck of dust near the viewer's-left bulge of her hair. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Crisco 1492: Should be fixed after this upload goes through, presuming I'm looking at the same fleck. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 18:15, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, that got it! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question The wall on the right is strange. I guess it is like this in all prints that you've found. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: That's the edge of a, like, column or pillar? It's definitely a real object. You can see it better in a different image (sadly unavailable at a decent size) from the photographic session - I'm going to call that the "NYPL" image, for convenience. We could crop it: some of the publication uses crop or edit it out - [12] for example, which is the thumbnail for [13] is a half-tone print that crops rather harshly on the right. Likewise, there's a very harsh crop at [14], [15] - which I'd guess are photogravures or something else that degrades the image, because they're definitely worse quality than the photographic print I restored. I think they're the same image, but given I can barely tell the NYPL is different (look at the thumb and lack of wool on the table), I don't want to discount there being a third image that they were based on. Other copies like the Emily Dickenson Museum one appear to be a copy of the half-tone print from the LOC.

There may (have been?) other images in that session. I think it's a drawing, but [16] looks a lot like the images from this session, but with a hand pose that blocks her face. It's definitely a drawing in File:Helen Hunt Jackson (The Magazine of Poetry and Literary Review, 1893).png and [17]. If that is based on a photo - and I can't see why you'd move the hand to block view of the face - the hand position likely blocks it from consideration, quirky though it may be. Meanwhile [18] - while composited - may indicate the existence of a standing photo of her. Possibly the same as this, but I'm starting to lose track of all these images.[19] has some thumbnails, including a few of a very young Jackson. All very small.

We're nearing the end. Abandoning Conly to see what's out there, we can immediately abandon the goblin-faced terrible artwork in "A Short History of England's and America's Literature". There's another mediocre sketch on the Library of Congress.

Finally, there's this from the Huntington, probably the best of the non-Conly photos that's available at a decent size. [20] is similar. This book has a lovely image of her, but I don't know where they got it from.

Hope this helps! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 00:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just to note, [21] does have the book cover image; probably cropped. Tineye indicates it was on JSTOR at some point? Honestly, if somone has the book, it'd probably be easier to check the photograph credit. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 01:51, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for all the detail; clearly just a shadow from the window which should not be removed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 01:48, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Helen Hunt Jackson by Charles F. Conly.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:21, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Raft of the Medusa

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2024 at 20:03:53 (UTC)

Reason: High resolution upload of a famous painting; target article is FA. I confess I'm not an expert on color grading but this version appears to be superior to the other ones I found in a quick Google Image search. I can't tell if the faint color-banding in the lower left is an aspect of the canvas or a fault in the reproduction.
Articles in which this image appears: The Raft of the Medusa, among many others
FP category for this image: link to category (listed on the WP:FP page) that best describes the image
Creator: Théodore Géricault, uploaded to Commons by Pq32

Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 20:03, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Crushed blacks, overly contrasty shadows. Strange horizontal lines. Is this really the best version available? --Janke | Talk 11:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – The painting is 23.4 feet wide, so at 5,872 × 4,008 pixels, the scan resolution is 21 pixels per inch. That's low. For a painting, fine details are lost at that resolution. I say 40+ pixels per inch can be Ok. Bammesk (talk) 12:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Screen resolution is 72 dpi. MER-C 16:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to accept that very large paintings may have a low dpi because they're very large. However, I expect better than "Unknown source" for an image of a painting at FPC. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 19:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. MER-C 16:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Fagradalsfjall eruption

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2024 at 23:19:04 (UTC)

Reason: Great view of the eruption, unanimously promoted to FP, QI, and VI on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Fagradalsfjall, Lava, Keilir
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena/Others
Creator: Giles Laurent

Support as nominator – _ZZ^Z 'S 23:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It looks... odd, but then, it's literally lava; I haven't seen lava in person. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 19:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – very cool! ―Howard • 🌽³³ 10:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Choliamb (talk) 14:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:001 Volcano eruption of Litli-Hrútur in Iceland in 2023 Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Palm warblera title for the nomination

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2024 at 10:54:52 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons in April. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Palm warbler
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Rhododendrites

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 14:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support too small really, but it's a nice shot. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 16:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Palm warbler (41597).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Smerinthus ocellatus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2024 at 11:04:01 (UTC)

Female
Male

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons last month. Headline images.
Articles in which this image appears: Smerinthus ocellatus
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Ivar Leidus

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ – _ZZ^Z 'S 14:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Changing vote to Oppose per Janke --_ZZ^Z 'S 02:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to the very harsh shadows. (Light comes from different sides of male & female - why?) --Janke | Talk 17:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I presume because they aren't literally next to each other in reality. I do think it looks almost more like black - well the term's setae, but let's call it fur for ease of understanding - on their abdomen. Which is bad, but I think it's also forgivable. Support. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 10:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those dark areas are shadows, not black fur. This can cause a misconception if you're not familiar with the insect, so it lessens the EV. (You can also see the sharp shadows of the wing edges.) --Janke | Talk 07:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Milk Drop Coronet

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2024 at 12:00:42 (UTC)

Reason: A good scan of the original photographic negative at MIT museum. interesting photo. high EV for the article it's in.
Articles in which this image appears: Milk Drop Coronet, List of photographs considered the most important
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment
Creator: Harold Eugene Edgerton

Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 12:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Notable photo. Ok quality for an innovative photo in 1957. The file size 731 KB is small, but I doubt a larger file size would make any difference in this case. Bammesk (talk) 13:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Aye. I'm not seeing enough JPEG artefacting to distract from, well, the film grain. Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 19:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Simply iconic! --Janke | Talk 16:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Moonreach (talk) 16:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 17:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Milk Drop Coronet, 1957.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]