Matija Črešnar
Related Authors
Michael Boyd
University of Cambridge
Alexandra Chavarria Arnau
Università degli Studi di Padova
Steffen Terp Laursen
Moesgaard Museum
Philipp Wolfgang Stockhammer
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Marta Diaz-Guardamino
Durham University
Julian Thomas
The University of Manchester
Giulia Sissa
Ucla
Stefano R L Campana
University of Siena / Università di Siena
Lorenzo Verderame
Università degli Studi "La Sapienza" di Roma
Enrico Cirelli
Università di Bologna
InterestsView All (20)
Uploads
Papers by Matija Črešnar
Within the framework of the project, a strategy has been adopted by the partners from 10 countries of the Danube region. The strategy approaches the topic of archaeological heritage from an archaeological, social and a technological standpoint. By using SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analyses conducted by the
working groups, major challenges in the sector were defined, leading to two main strategy units. The first unit focuses on working processes from the archaeological discovery to a virtual visualisation, and the second on the potential of archaeological heritage in the digital world. To support the
further adaptation and development of new technologies for the archaeological sector, the strategy concludes with 12 recommendations for heritage stakeholders. Priority lists are adopted for the implementation of the recommendations at national level for each participating country.
Within the framework of this project we strove to obtain the greatest possible set of samples of organic matter (wood charcoal, wood, bones, seeds, grain and so forth) to be subjected to radiocarbon analysis. These were taken from reliable archaeological contexts, such as graves or single settlement units (postholes, storage and refuse pits and others), that could be using the comparative archaeological method reliably determined both chronologically and culturally. From the beginning of the project in 2008 and until 2013, we were able to obtain 249 radiocarbon-dated samples from 55 archaeological sites in Slovenia. With these, we hope to have created a solid database for establishing a relevant chronological network based on absolute radiocarbon dates, primarily for the Bronze, but also for the Iron Age. Besides that, we hope it will provide a new starting point for the better understanding of various diachronic and synchronic phenomena, and their historic significance during the last three millennia BC in Slovenia, Europe and wider, across the Eurasian continent.
Arheološka dediščina je neskončen vir znanja in navdiha. To velja tudi za arheološke sledove razvoja kmetijstva in kulturne krajine med kameno dobo in koncem srednjega veka, ki so bili pod drobnogledom večletnega čezmejnega projekta PalaeoDiversiStyria – paleokrajina Štajerske in njena biodiverziteta od prazgodovine do odkritja Novega sveta. Ob kratki predstavitvi projekta sledi predstavitev nekaterih pomembnejših najdišč projektnega območja, ki časovno segajo od mlajše kamene oz. bakrene dobe do srednjega veka in v veliki meri vključujejo tudi rezultate analiz rastlinskih in/ali živalskih ostankov. A sledi še pomembnejši in zanimivejši (ter okusnejši) del pričujoče publikacije. V poglavju "Živa arheologija" so najprej predstavljene številne rastline, ki so bile na projektnem območju odkrite pri arheoloških izkopavanjih, nato pa so jih prepoznali paleobotaniki. Pod naslovom "Okusna in uporabna arheologija" pa se skriva tisto, kar je pri tem projektu pomembna novost. Arheološko dediščino smo poskušali prenesti v sedanjost in prihodnost ter jo narediti uporabno, otipljivo, dišečo in okusno. Čakajo vas torej jedi, pijače in drugi izdelki, ki jih je navdihnila arheologija. Ker knjiga prinaša tudi recepte, se na primer lahko v pripravi jedi preizkusite sami ali pa se odpravite do katerega izmed ponudnikov v Avstriji ali Sloveniji in se pustite razvajati z okusi preteklosti. Lahko pa si pri njih priskrbite sestavine in končne izdelke, ki imajo svoj izvor v arheoloških dognanjih in so zato označeni z znakom blagovne znamke HERITERRA.
--------
Das archäologische Erbe ist eine unendliche Quelle des Wissens und der Inspiration. Dies gilt auch für archäologische Spuren der Entwicklung der Landwirtschaft und der Kulturlandschaft zwischen der Steinzeit und dem Ende des Mittelalters, die im Rahmen des mehrjährigen grenzüberschreitenden Projekts PalaeoDiversiStyria – Paläolandschaft der Steiermark und ihre Biodiversität von der Urgeschichte bis zu Entdeckung der Neuen Welt. Einige der Ergebnisse dieses Projekts werden in der vorliegenden Publikation zusammengefasst. Nach einer kurzen Vorstellung des Projekts werden einige der wichtigsten Fundorte des Projektgebietes, die sich über den Zeitraum von der jüngeren Steinzeit bzw. von der Kupferzeit bis zum Mittelalter erstrecken, und zu einem großen Teil auch die Ergebnisse von Analysen der Pflanzen- und/oder Tierreste vorgestellt. Aber der wichtigere und interessantere (und schmackhaftere) Teil dieser Veröffentlichung ist wohl folgender: Im Kapitel „Lebende Archäologie“ werden zunächst die zahlreichen Pflanzen vorgestellt, die bei archäologischen Ausgrabungen im Projektgebiet entdeckt und anschließend von Paläobotanikern/innen identifiziert wurden. Unter dem Titel „Geschmackvolle und nützliche Archäologie“ versteckt sich eine wichtige Innovation in unserem Projekt. Wir haben versucht, das archäologische Erbe auf die Gegenwart und die Zukunft zu übertragen und es nützlich, greifbar, duftend und lecker zu machen. Hier kann man von der Archäologie inspirierte Speisen, Getränke und andere Produkte finden. Da das Buch auch Rezepte enthält, können Sie selbst versuchen, die Gerichte zuzubereiten – oder Sie können zu einem unserer Anbieter in Österreich oder Slowenien gehen und dort die Aromen und Geschmackserlebnisse der Vergangenheit genießen. Sie erhalten dort auch Zutaten und Fertigprodukte, die ihren Ursprung in archäologischen Erkenntnissen haben und mit der Marke HERITERRA gekennzeichnet sind.
Special attention was given to the changes in the landscape caused by human intervention into the environment, e.g. by the cultivation of new plants and the domestication of animals, by the building of larger settlements or metal production. Part of the research included the discovery and identification of different plant species as well as domesticated and wild animals in archaeological contexts. To reach these results it was necessary that archaeologists, botanists, archaeobotanists as well as archaeozoologists worked hand in hand to create a better understanding of the interaction between nature and humans. With this interdisciplinary cooperation, we built new knowledge of the circumstances that influenced the dietary habits of people in the past.
The publication is one of the results of the interdisciplinary “PalaeoDiversiStyria” project, with the full name “Palaeolandscape of Styria and its Biodiversity from Prehistory to the Discovery of the New World”. It was a partnership between Universalmuseum Joanneum, the Institute for Protection of Cultural Heritage of Slovenia, two botanical gardens led by the Universities of Maribor and of Graz, and two Municipalities, Grosklein in Austria and Hoče-Slivnica in Slovenia. The project was co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in the framework of the INTERREG Slovenia-Austria V-A 2014-2020 cooperation programme.
The studies have a broad span in their interpretative approaches; however, they all bring important new results on the Early Iron Age landscapes of the Danube region and present a fundament for further research of archaeological landscapes in the region and beyond.
The Iron-Age-Danube project — its full title is “Monumental Landscapes of the Early Iron Age in the Danube Basin” — was initiated in 2017 by 20 partners and associated partners from five countries in the Danube region. The project was co-financed within the framework of the Interreg Danube Transnational Programme with EFRE funds in the amount of € 2,169,200. One of the major focuses of the project was the exploration of the rich archaeological heritage of the Early Iron Age (i.e. Hallstatt Period) in the Danube region using modern archaeological methods. For that purpose, a new format, the Archaeological Camps, was introduced to the region. This format for the first time combined various types of activities and comprised, in addition to research campaigns, a wide variety of heritage protection activities as well as actions to promote the inclusion of Iron-Age landscapes into the touristic offers of these regions. The camps were organized in four countries at selected locations within the nine preselected micro-regions and lasted one or two months. In this period, the institutions involved had the opportunity to combine their technologies, methodologies and expertise as well as to exchange their experiences and views. These chosen sites and their surrounding landscapes are embedded in a variety of environments of the Danube region, which in fact had a strong impact on the populations settling in these areas in the Early Iron Age, as well as on the archaeological research approaches. Combining their knowledge and specific skills, the experts have in this intensive cooperation established new strategies, which are tailored to each of the micro-regions. One of the results of this cooperation is also the monograph Researching Archaeological Landscapes across Borders (Budapest: Archaeolingua, 2019), which should help other researchers and heritage experts with planning their projects on archaeological landscapes.
New research strategies have emerged to help broaden our understanding of the First World War. Multidisciplinary approaches have been applied to material culture and conflict landscapes, from archive sources analysis and aerial photography to remote sensing, GIS and field research. Working within the context of a material and archival understanding of war, this book combines papers from different study fields that present interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches towards researching the First World War and its legacies, with particular concentration on the central and eastern European theatres of war.
Recent scientific and methodological advances have reshaped our understanding of ancient mobility. Although patterns of far-reaching contact have long been hypothesised, DNA and isotope analyses have demonstrated that mobility was much more widespread than has traditionally been supposed, and that these networks were complex and diverse. Furthermore, artefact studies (including the more routine implementation of materials science and provenance studies) are demonstrating the ubiquity of long-distance trade networks, and the different ways trade (here defined as any peaceful way of exchanging materials, commodities or services) was made. Such strong and sustained levels of connectivity between different regions for varying durations could only have been achieved with a certain degree of agreement over common social and economic rules, which must have been achieved on the basis of an enduring shared practice, particularly in pre-literate societies where written laws did not exist. As such, informal institutions-i.e. those not enforced by law but based on a common sense of honour and trust-must have been sufficiently strong to allow for swift travel and convenient interaction, within or outwith a formal economic framework. This session invites contributions examining the materiality of long-distance networks across Continental, Atlantic, Northern and pre-classical Mediterranean Europe, from the beginning of the Bronze Age until the appearance of written law. Papers examining patterns of trade, exchange and mobility through systems of material exchange or distribution, the transmission of ideas (related to, for example, technological or symbolic activities) and bioarchaeological methods are welcome, as are those which consider these processes from a range of perspectives: theoretical models, case studies, regional synthesis, etc.
Please join our session about the protection and promotion of archaeological landscapes at the 24th annual meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) in Barcelona, Spain, 5 - 8 September 2018!
This will be the largest convention of archaeologists in Europe this year, an excellent platform for your projects or studies about managment of archaeological landscapes.
Deadline for submission of abstracts is 19 February.
Willing to present? Please submit your abstracts via the EAA Barcelona 2018 website: https://eaa.klinkhamergroup.com/eaa2018/
More information on the EAA Conference: http://www.e-a-a.org/eaa2018
New technologies and methodological advances of the last few decades have radically changed the potentials of archaeological research. The focus has shifted from investigations of single sites to studies of broader archaeological landscapes. In particular, remote sensing technologies and geophysics have yielded vast amounts of new archaeological data, opening new avenues to the better understanding of archaeological sites, landscapes, regions and beyond.
This process has however raised also two important issues, which call for discussion: (1) the often (too) superficial interpretations of the data, and (2) the long-term impact of the new data on decision-making processes in European heritage management. Both issues are closely connected. The lack of depth in interpretation often means that we fail to realize the broader potentials in the use of the data collected. The missing awareness of these possibilities also constrains the process of developing new, more efficient heritage management tools. However, it also due to the lack of closer cooperation between science, heritage protection and politics that is hindering more profound advances.
As a response, several initiatives are focusing on development of new approaches and strategies to tackle the present situation. Unfortunately, these strategies are often solely restricted to a project’s research area or/and its duration and are not implemented on any political or legislative level.
In this session, we would like to hear from your positive as well as the negative experiences and practices in the strategic planning and implementation processes, dealing in the broadest sense with the management of archaeological landscapes.
This session will draw on a number of papers from the ENTRANS Project (2014-16); a HERA-funded collaborative project between the Universities of Bradford (UK), Ljubljana (SLO) and Zagreb (CRO), which explores cultural identities and encounters across the Late Bronze Age and Iron Age transition in the East Alpine region- a zone of interaction and encounters between Mediterranean societies and their traditionally perceived ‘barbarian’ neighbours. We also invite papers which seek to break down chronological, geographical or disciplinary boundaries within other parts of later prehistoric Europe (broadly, the Bronze and Iron Ages).
held in the Gallery of the Spomeniškovarstveni center ZVKDS from 12.1.2012 to 17.3.2012.
Antiquities as the 'hottest invest' (TIME-Magazine, 12/2007) are one of the biggest problems of archaeology. Finds deriving from unauthorised excavations, metal detectoring, robberies of museums/public collections, appear on the market with faked provenience, and are legally sold. The majority of illegal/illicit finds that enter the market, seemingly entirely legally, go unacknowledged by archaeologists. Only rarely do such finds later surface and only few, like the spectacular find of the Bronze Age Nebra-disc, are acknowledged by the wide public. In the case of more mundane finds this rarely ever occurs.
APPLY TO PARTICIPATE WITH A PRESENTATION UNTIL MARCH 1st, 2016 here: eaavilnius2016.lt
The main objective of the symposium is to offer a multidisciplinary forum to discuss relevant topics and specific issues in cultural heritage protection and management and the application of digital methods for this purpose. The program shall encourage the scientific exchange and strengthen collaborative ties between participating institutions as well as increase the awareness of non-invasive methods in cultural heritage protection among stakeholders and the interested public.
Session 3: Raising Awareness for digital methods for cultural property protection and cultural heritage management
In the new volume of the Monographs of the Centre for Preventive Archaeology, we present the minimum standards for the implementation of the research methods, which have been incorporated into daily work process on the field of preventive archaeology in our Institute.
V novem zvezku Monografij Centra za preventivno arheologijo predstavljamo minimalne standarde izvedbe raziskovalnih metod, ki so na področje preventivne arheologije pri nas vključene v vskodnevni procesa dela.
CORING IS NOT BORING! Drillings in combination with other non or minimal-invasive methods for investigating archaeological monuments [COMFORT].
This session is dedicated to multi-method approaches in archaeological investigations, that involve the use of drilling. Especially monuments like fortifications with their often enormous rampart-and-ditch systems, terraces, slopes and thick occupation layers full of archaeological and biological relicts, but also burial mounds or settlement tells, offer the perfect playground for hand augering and mechanical coring. Quick and cheap, drillings serve as an endoscope into the past of such monuments. Drillings in modern times have become an omnipresent, but not en-vogue tool on excavations to verify geophysical results, to distinguish occupation phases, and to answer palaeo-environmental questions. Yet systematic coring strategies are lacking standards.
The often multi-layered cores may contain soil material and hence information about the entire life span of the monuments. They are used for dating hillforts and other monuments by radiocarbon analysis or micromorphological studies of the soil and the relicts it contains, which provide information about the age and function of the site and its parts. Combined with (p)XRF measurements or pollen and phytolyth analysis they add information about the environment and the human impact; susceptibility measurements and other geophysical methods help to understand the geomagnetic images or ERT and GPR data. Hence there is a bouquet of methods, which can be applied to drilling cores themselves to make them speak about the history of the site.
We invite archaeologists, soil scientists, geologists, and those from related disciplines to present their method and strategy of drillings used for investigating fortifications, burial mounds or settlement tells with massive earthen elements. Reports about technical challenges, problems, limitations or successful new ideas are welcome, as are presentations on best practice examples of different methods combined with drillings and especially the results we can gain from systematic interdisciplinary coring strategies.
Contact for paper proposals or questions:
Timo Ibsen, Centre for Baltic and Scandinavian Archaeology, Schleswig (ZBSA)
[email protected]
Or
Matija Črešnar, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana / Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Archaeology (CIRA)
[email protected]