Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phạm Văn Rạng

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Phạm Văn Rạng

Phạm Văn Rạng (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phạm Văn Rạng/Archive.

This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.


17 December 2024

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar editing interests and habits as previous socks PersonAccount 🐉 (talk) 15:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • This account is in  Possible territory. A lot of their editing comes out of a range that PVR uses, but it's a pretty wide range and the other technical information isn't a match. If it is them, they are taking care to make this account look different from the other recently blocked accounts.  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation Girth Summit (blether) 16:43, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Based on my look I wouldn't be inclined to block this account as PVR and would ascribe the topic overlap as being someone from a region of interest. There is another account bee bopping on the same IPs as Eternal Viet though. Not sure if I'm inclined to do anything about that one? cc Girth Summit Izno (talk) 20:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmm. They don't just share that range - there's a unique IPv4 on a separate range they both crop up on as well, and they're editing the same pages. They're obviously connected in some way - different accounts for different devices? I'll have a word. Girth Summit (blether) 13:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If the technical connection is that cut and dry, I'm inclined to believe it's a simple case of block evasion, just not here. Bin thúi ờm is blocked on viwiki, with block reason I've seen used for sockpuppets in the past. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, I said that earlier I don't think it's PVR but now I'm wondering if he just found himself a 2nd device. The behavior over there is pretty similar to PVR's haunts over here, never mind the behavior here. Kind of inclined to a CU block for the two as likely to each other and a suspected stamp to PVR. Izno (talk) 00:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19 December 2024

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

This is a new account with a similar nonsense user page to previous socks that rolled back my reversion of a previous sock as one of their first edits. (diff). Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:43, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Spicy (talk) 22:56, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

24 December 2024

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

This editor has made the same sort of nonsense edits to their own userspace that we've seen from previous sock, in order to edit Ngo Dinh Diem, which was currently under semi-protection at the time to prevent PVR socking. Their edit summary here shows they are unusually aware of PVR for an account this new. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


25 December 2024

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

This editor has made similar infobox changes to North Vietnam as previous socks. (diff set 1, diff set 2). Their edits to Waffen-SS indicate an overlapping interest in Germany as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:05, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments