It looks like a lovely book, but the publisher sent only a PDF and it is too hard on my eyes to read a PDF on screen. I don't rate books I haven't finiIt looks like a lovely book, but the publisher sent only a PDF and it is too hard on my eyes to read a PDF on screen. I don't rate books I haven't finished. ...more
I came across All Sorts of Lives, Katherine Mansfield and the Art of Risking Everything, via Brona's review of Claire Tomlin's biography — both booksI came across All Sorts of Lives, Katherine Mansfield and the Art of Risking Everything, via Brona's review of Claire Tomlin's biography — both books published to coincide with the anniversary of the death of New Zealand's best-known author Katherine Mansfield in 1923.
I had already read a Kathleen Jones' wonderful biography Katherine Mansfield The Storyteller (2010), not to mention C.K. Stead's novelisation Mansfield, (2004), but I do like a literary analysis of an author's writing, as long as it's not so scholarly that I feel out of my depth. Or that I have to Make An Effort instead of just enjoying myself.
Well, I did have to Make a Bit of An Effort with Harman's book, because although I've read Mansfield's collections and her novella...
... I hadn't read all the short stories that Harman explores and so I had to engage in the pleasurable task of finding them online and reading them.
[image]Chapter One starts with How Pearl Button was Kidnapped (1912), and here it is — online at the Katherine Mansfield Society's site — if you want to read it too. It was first published under a nom-de-plume in the avant-garde monthly Rhythm which was edited by her husband-to-be John Middleton Murry but soon became a joint venture between them. Apparently, as well as editing, KM wrote quite a bit for this journal: poems, fiction and book reviews but these were not always under her name because they didn't want Rhythm to have 'too much' of her work in it.
Harman says that Pearl Button wasn't identified as one of KM's until it was included in a posthumous collection. (Unless I missed it, Harman doesn't say which one. It's in my 2007 Penguin Classics Collected Stories, which was first published by Constable in 1945, maybe that one?) It's not long — only about 1000 words —and it's a story which would seem less disquieting without that word 'kidnapped' in its title. Pearl, playing in her front garden, is beguiled into joining a couple of women who take her for a long walk, and then a ride in a cart down to the sea which she has never seen before. She has a lovely time. She is cuddled, and carried, and fed treats. Nobody gets cross when she spills food on her clothes, and she is made a fuss of because her new 'dark' friends are enchanted by her blonde curls. She is never frightened at all, and it is not until a crowd of little blue men arrive to take her back where she belongs, that the reader is made aware that there's been a hue-and-cry over her disappearance and that the little blue men knew exactly where to find her. As Harman says, the story relies heavily on withholding all sorts of information...
The location is exotic but not specified; the protagonist is guileless yet unreliable; the plot develops but isn't in any ordinary sense resolved. We are told the story entirely from the point of view of Pearl, a child of about three years old, who has been left to look after herself while her mother is busy working. (p.18)
Harman notes that this is an early work, of an unsubtle kind of simplicity and has the air of an experiment, or fragment of something bigger.
But the cleverness of the story, and the thing that Mansfield learned to exploit more effectively later, is in the manipulation of the point of view. In 'Pearl Button' she is using what is (now) called 'free indirect discourse' or a 'close third person' voice, that is, writing as if the narrator is passing on a character's experiences and thoughts, but not judging them. Or not appearing to judge them, for of course there's always space between the author and the narrator in which to plant doubts and ironies; that's what the space is for. (p.19)
The reader's doubt about Pearl's delightful day arises because of that word in the title.
From there, Harman goes on to explore the biographical origins of the themes of Otherness, belonging and an awakening sensuality that permeate Mansfield's fiction.
PS: Alas, I didn’t get to finish this absorbing book because there are eight reserves on it at the library and they won’t let me renew it. When the enthusiasm dies down, I’ll borrow it again....more
This is such an excellent book, it's a real pity I have to send it back to the library unfinished, and I am definitely going to borrow it again in dueThis is such an excellent book, it's a real pity I have to send it back to the library unfinished, and I am definitely going to borrow it again in due course. I've only read up to the chapter about the goings-on in Cuba, but for an Australian obviously not taught much about US history (especially not the murky bits) it has been a revelation.
This is excellent, but it's long and it had to go back to the library before I'd finished it. The chapter about China's history was fascinating. I shoThis is excellent, but it's long and it had to go back to the library before I'd finished it. The chapter about China's history was fascinating. I should buy it, but I still haven't read Rudd's 2-volume autobiography so I need to make space on the shelves for it. Or borrow it again... I don't rate books I don't finish. ...more
I read the first four of these essays and quite enjoyed them, but I have so many other books to read at the moment... I don't rate books I don't finishI read the first four of these essays and quite enjoyed them, but I have so many other books to read at the moment... I don't rate books I don't finish. ...more
Since it’s Anzac Day today, I’m sharing the story of Mardi (Margaret Helen) Gething (1920-2005), a WW2 ATA Ferry Pilot. Like my mother in the ATS, (AuSince it’s Anzac Day today, I’m sharing the story of Mardi (Margaret Helen) Gething (1920-2005), a WW2 ATA Ferry Pilot. Like my mother in the ATS, (Auxiliary Territorial Service) providing crucial and sometimes dangerous support to soldiers on the ground, women in the ATA (Air Transport Auxiliary) provided similarly crucial support to the male fighter pilots of WW2. They were a small band of women in a male-dominated role during that time who ferried the aircraft from the production line to the airfields from which the fighters were launched for battle.
Twenty-two years old, Mardi Gething was only 151 cm (5 feet) tall and she needed a booster cushion to reach the cockpit controls. But she had a B (commercial) licence and 194 flying hours when she enlisted in 1942. In her two years at ATA, she flew 600 hours in 26 different aircraft types, and — to the envy of every star-struck aviation enthusiast — she made 233 flights in the British hero, the cutting-edge Spitfire. She also flew the Hurricane, the Tempest, the Typhoon, the Mustang and the Blenheim Bomber.
Born in Melbourne in 1920, as a child Mardi begged her way onto joy flights above Essendon with her siblings but wasn’t able to take to the air as a pilot until 1939. She had graduated from Melbourne Girls Grammar in 1938 and set off for England on the SS Orford to do ‘the season’. While onboard she heard inspiring tales of derring-do from future husband Flight Lieutenant Richard Gething who at 27 years of age had just established a long-distance record flying from Egypt to Darwin. With war imminent, society plans were on hold and Mardi was reluctant to return home, but her parents were understandably anxious. However, with Nancy Bird Walton* reassuring them that it was okay for Mardi to stay in England, she took lessons at the Thanet Aero Club and flew solo after just seven flying hours.
Her parents, however, then intervened, and Mardi had to continue her flight training in California. She was home again in Melbourne by Christmas 1939, and old enough to qualify for her B licence. Whatever plans to help with the war effort from Australia she had, they were shelved by Richard’s proposal, and she married him back in Canada where he had been posted. Once he was posted back to the Air Ministry in London, Mardi was intent on joining the ATA. Her height didn’t meet the minimum, but when the need eclipsed the need for them to be tall, Mardi joined a team of about 60 women proving their worth to the war effort.
Whereas combat airmen were endorsed to fly only one type of aircraft, the ATA pilots had to be adaptable, flying many types of craft, often with no prior knowledge, let alone training. And Spitfires, I learned, had different variants, all with different instructions.
I've only read 'The Singers' so far, because it's reference in A Swim in a Pond in the Rain.
The second story that George Saunders explores in A Swim I've only read 'The Singers' so far, because it's reference in A Swim in a Pond in the Rain.
The second story that George Saunders explores in A Swim in a Pond in the Rain (see my review) is 'The Singers' by Ivan Turgenev (1818-1893). It comes from an 1852 collection of short stories called A Sportsman's Sketches also translated as A Sportsman's Notebook, The Hunting Sketches and Sketches from a Hunter's Album. According to Wikipedia, this collection was a milestone of Russian realism, and it made Turgenev's name.
When I read Fathers and Sons, I was very taken by the characterisation of the young idealist Bazarov and in the comments below my review you can see where I admired the way Turgenev uses dialogue to differentiate his characters. There is not much dialogue, however, in this most engaging short story about a singing competition in a remote rural pub. Instead, it is Turgenev's powers of description which impel the reader on.
Plunging into the story reproduced in Saunders' book without an introduction or any context, it's not immediately obvious who the unnamed narrator is and why he is roaming about in the vicinity of Kolotovka, a small and cheerless village. But within a couple of pages we have learned that he's an observant outsider, (which is apparently an element of the Russian realist tradition where the narrator is usually an uncommitted observer of the people he meets.) However, he passes by regularly enough to be acquainted with some of the drinkers at the Cosy Corner pub, and to make some judgements about them. He's a gentleman well-educated enough to have 'readers' and even if we didn't have Wikipedia, we could guess that he's either a journalist or that he's writing a newsy letter for educated people at home, who're going to read it en famille as people did in those days. He explains his reasons for being in such a dismal place by saying that he's a sportsman who goes everywhere. Since he's pursuing this sport alone out in the middle of nowhere this is enough to identify him as a hunter, (though some of us would dispute that shooting animals is any kind of sport.)
Outside, the narrator witnesses an excited exchange between two patrons of the pub. Booby exhorts Blinker to hurry up because everyone is waiting: there is Yashka the Turk, the Wild Gentleman, and the contractor from Zhizdra. (The contractor is not named, not even with an intriguing nickname although Russians are past-masters at giving nicknames.) The excitement is because Yashka and the contractor have made a bet: they've wagered a quart of beer to see who wins.
So in this remote rural outpost, with nothing to commend it, an extraordinary cultural moment takes place—a singing competition between the local hero and a challenger from a nearby village. These two men bring the pub to awed silence as they listen with rapt attention. Though the audience consists only of the chubby publican and his sharp-eyed wife; a mysterious but threadbare Tartar, swarthy with a leaden hue; a dissolute former house-serf with no job and no money but has the knack of sponging on others; an enterprising former serf respected for his cunning; and a ragged peasant—they are expert judges of singing.
[The contractor] evidently felt that he was dealing with experts and that was why he simply put his best leg forward, as the saying goes. And, indeed, in our part of the country people are good judges of singing, and it is not for nothing that the large village of Sergeyevskoye, on the Oryol Highway, is renowned throughout all Russia for its especially agreeable and harmonious singing.
The contractor sang for a long time without arousing any particular enthusiasm in his hearers; he missed the support of a choir; at last, after one particularly successful transition, which made even the Wild Gentleman smile, Booby could not restrain himself and uttered a cry of delight. (p.75)
To read the rest of my review please visit anzlitlovers.com...more
This was such a lucky find, I am still pinching myself that I came across it at a U3A bookswap just before all U3A classes were shut down.
The table ofThis was such a lucky find, I am still pinching myself that I came across it at a U3A bookswap just before all U3A classes were shut down.
The table of contents gives a good indication as to why I was so pleased to find it:
Daisy White: An Accomplished Schoolgirl in France, 1887-1889 Trouble in Bohemia: the Belle Epoque Novels of Tasma, 1891 and 1895 Digger Nurses on the Western Front, 1916-1919 Stella Bowen's 'education of another sort': the Paris Years, 1922-1933 'All that Glitters': Illusory Worlds in Christina Stead's The Beauties and Furies (1936) and House of All Nations (1938) 'No Time to Be Frail': Nancy Wake, Resistance Heroines, 1940-1944
I've read The Beauties and Furies (see here) but I'm 'saving' the chapter about Christina Stead until I've read House of All Nations, which is on the TBR. And although I don't have it yet, I'm also leaving the chapter about Stella Bowen till I've either tracked down or given up looking for Drawn from Life (which is her memoir of her life in Paris with Ford Madox Ford). Australian author Debbie Robson read it as research for her trilogy and she has written an enticing review of it at Goodreads. Stella Bowen is known to many Australians as a war artist, and in particular for her painting 'Bomber Crew' which was recently featured on a commemorative stamp for Anzac Day so I would like to read her book if I can find a copy of it. So this review is only about the other four chapters...
Daisy White was an inspired choice to begin the book. She and her sister Dorothy were parked in a finishing school Paris by her middle-class Australian parents who quickly left them to it. As Rosemary Lancaster puts it:
Daisy was sixteen and Dorothy fourteen when they left Sydney in 1887. The diary of what followed, covering the years 1887-89, is an historical jewel and rare document: such is the detail, the gusto, the wit and insight and mind-set of a nineteenth-century Australian schoolgirl abroad. Full of verve and introspections, of rich perceptions, of adolescent grudges and high hopes, it traces Daisy's school life as a near-daily unfolding of cultural discovery, tempered by boarding-house ritual and classroom grind. In the two years of her Parisian stay Daisy changed from being a reluctant schoolgirl into an accomplished woman, fluent in French and, in her opinion, rather wise than when she set sail. (p.2)
There are many interesting aspects to Daisy's account of her Parisian life. She wasn't much interested in the social aspirations that mattered so much to her parents that they were willing to abandon such young girls, but she thrived on experiencing great literature and art. Despite this, she was peeved that the curriculum at Les Ruches was less engaging than her Australian education where physical geography, physics and chemistry, and nature 'under all forms' were, in her opinion, 'some of the most delightful studies ever to charm a student. Alas, arithmetic at Les Ruches was described as 'simply insupportable', chemistry as 'a little more bearable' and physics as 'simply beastly, drier than bone-dust, and pretty hard to understand.' From Lancaster's analysis we can gather that Daisy's Sydney school was progressive, because she learned sciences as well as the two usual areas of knowledge, which were subjects such as English, literature, composition and grammar, elementary mathematics, history and geography, even elocution and calligraphy; and also the 'accomplishments' (music, drawing and modern languages; dancing, needlework, callisthenics, and sometimes more unusual crafts). She must have had good teachers of French in Australia too, because all the lessons at Les Ruches were in French and yet she achieved excellent results. Daisy doesn't hold back in her opinions about the teachers at Les Ruches, but they can't have been all that bad!
Her school calendar, however, also included chaperoned excursions to cultural activities, including visits to galleries, monuments, theatres, parks, boulevards, shops and gardens. She went everywhere: the Louvre, Notre-Dame, Sainte-Chapelle, the Panthéon, and Napoleon's Tomb. She saw France's most-loved plays, and this cultural saturation developed an aesthetic sensibility that is remarkable in one so young. It is almost painful to read that we know almost nothing about her return to Australia, except that she died of cardiac failure, aged only thirty two.
The next chapter, about Jessie Couvrier a.k.a. 'Tasma' is more literary, and there's not so much about her life. I haven't read any of Tasma's Parisian novels, and don't intend to, despite Lancaster's suggestion that they are of academic interest. I might one day read Uncle Piper of Piper's Hill (1889), (which gets a mention in Jean-François Vernay's A Brief Take on the Australian Novel and his The Great Australian Novel, a Panorama. See also Bill's review at The Australian Legend). But the Parisian romances, The Penance of Portia James and Not Counting the Cost, just don't appeal, even if they are unique social and literary documents. Nonetheless, it is interesting to read about Tasma's time in the Bohemian ambience of the Latin Quarter and how she used the city's legendary reputation as a site of freedom and decadence in her novels.
I read quite a bit of this but took a break because I wasn't making sense of it, and never mustered the enthusiasm to return to it. I read quite a bit of this but took a break because I wasn't making sense of it, and never mustered the enthusiasm to return to it. ...more
Well, I haven't exactly abandoned this... I never undertook to read it all anyway.
As you might recall if you read the exchange of comments after my rWell, I haven't exactly abandoned this... I never undertook to read it all anyway.
As you might recall if you read the exchange of comments after my review of On Rape by Germaine Greer, Fourtriplezed and I agreed to read each other’s suggestions: he had never read anything by Greer, and I hadn’t read The Better Angels of Our Nature, the decline of violence in history and its causes (2011) by Steven Pinker. Mercifully, since the Pinker book is 802 pages long, I wasn’t asked to read the whole book— just the sub chapter in Chapter 7 ‘The Rights Revolution’ which is called ‘Women’s Rights and the Decline of Rape and Battering’. So this is not a ‘book review’, it’s just a response to the part of the book which I was asked to read…
Pinker’s book has been nominated for a swag of awards: the Royal Society Science Book Prize Nominee for Science Books (2012), the Julia Ward Howe Prize Nominee (2012), the Best Book of Ideas Prize Nominee (2012), the Samuel Johnson Prize for Non-Fiction Nominee (2012), and the Cundill History Prize Nominee for Recognition of Excellence (2012). There are also numerous reviews from people who’ve read the whole book. See Tim Radford at The Guardian; and (notably) Peter Singer at the NYT. The admiration seemed to be universal so of course I went looking for another PoV—actually, I went looking for a female reviewer and couldn’t find one, (strange, eh?) but did find John Gray at The Guardian and include him here for balance. And I do that because I found a couple of examples of intemperate language (such as referring to ‘proclamations from bully pulpits such as the United Nations and its member governments on page 414) which made me feel uneasy about The Better Angels, but not enough to make me want to read the whole book… So… I read the prescribed chapter, but for good measure, I also read the Preface, which I summarise thus: Pinker argues that contrary to popular opinion and the impression we get from mass media or our own experiences,
…violence has declined over long stretches of time and today we may be living in the most peaceable era in our species’ existence. The decline, to be sure, is not smooth; it has not brought violence down to zero; and it is not guaranteed to continue. But it is an unmistakable development, visible on scales from millennia to years, from the waging of wars to the spanking of children. (p.xxi)
He maps the decline of violence by identifying six trends, five inner demons, four better angels and five historical forces: Six trends (chapters 2-7) consists of *the Pacification Process (from the anarchy of the hunting, gathering, and horticultural societies…[…] to the first agricultural civilisations with cities and governments, beginning around five thousand years ago. (p.2)] Yes, I hear you. Pinker has consigned Aboriginal societies from the oldest living civilisation on earth* to the category of ‘anarchy’. *the Civilising Process between the late Middle Ages and the 20th century best documented in Europe: the consolidation of a patchwork of feudal territories into large kingdoms …[…] … with centralised authority and an infrastructure of commerce. *the Humanitarian Revolution, beginning in the Age of Reason and the European Enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. This brought the first organised attempts to abolish socially sanctioned forms of violence like despotism, slavery, duelling, judicial torture, superstitious killing, sadistic punishment and cruelty to animals. *the Long Peace, dating from the end of WW2. Pinker says this is unprecedented: the great powers, and developed states in general, have stopped waging war on one another. [John Gray in his review refutes this because of the number of proxy wars that have taken place]. *the New Peace, since the end of the Cold War in 1989: a decline in organised conflicts of all kinds—civil wars, genocides, repression by autocratic governments, and terrorist attacks. *the Rights Revolutions, symbolically inaugurated by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, has seen a growing revulsion against aggression on smaller scales, including violence against ethnic minorities, women, homosexuals, and animals which has led to a cascade of movements from the late 1950s to the present day. It was this last chapter, and the chapter about violence against women that I was asked to read. *The Five Inner Demons are predatory or instrumental violence; dominance; revenge; sadism and ideology; *The Four Better Angels are empathy; self-control; moral sense; and reason. *The Five Historical Forces are those which favour our peaceable motives and that have driven the multiple declines in violence: *the Leviathan (a state and judiciary with a monopoly on the legitimate use of force); *Commerce (trading partners who are more valuable alive than dead); *Feminisation (moving away from the glorification of violence); *Cosmopolitanism (embracing the perspective of the Other); and *Escalating Reason (applying knowledge and rationality to human affairs). So, to ‘Womens Rights and the Decline of Rape and Battering’ in the chapter about the Rights Revolutions… The difficulty I have with Pinker’s approach (in this chapter that I’ve read) is that it is reliant on statistics, and mostly US statistics at that. On this topic, having anything meaningful to say about the prevalence of rape in the past (whether the near past or very long ago) is problematic. So Pinker leaps over centuries of past violence with this:
The prevalence of rape in human history and the invisibility of the victim in the legal treatment of rape are incomprehensible from the vantage point of contemporary moral sensibilities. But they are all too comprehensible from the vantage point of the genetic interests that shaped human desires and sentiments over the course of evolution, before our sensibilities were shaped by Enlightenment humanism. A rape entangles three parties, each with a different set of interests: the rapist, the men who take a proprietary interest in the woman, and the woman herself. (p. 395)
See, I have a problem just with this paragraph. Why is the woman placed last in that last sentence, eh? And there’s a curious slide in the logic: *rape is hard to understand now that we have contemporary moral sensibilities *rape is not hard to understand from a genetic/evolutionary PoV *we have outgrown those desires and sentiments since the Enlightenment *but now I, Pinker, using the present tense ‘entangles’ include the men with a proprietary interest in women, as if we have not outgrown those pre-Enlightenment views…
Awww, I thought I was going to love this book! I love writing letters, and one of the things that keeps my grief raw is that I can't write to my parenAwww, I thought I was going to love this book! I love writing letters, and one of the things that keeps my grief raw is that I can't write to my parents any more. (They died within 18 months of each other, just a little while ago). 25 years ago they moved interstate and although of course we visited and chatted on the phone, the real way we kept in touch was through regular letters. I would potter about my daily life storing up little titbits of news to share in my letters, which always brought a reply from my father who took pride in answering every letter he ever received. Even though it's nearly a year since my father died, I still find myself composing a paragraph about the pumpkin vine bursting out of the vegie patch, or a meetup with friends, or how beautiful the roses are this year, or the latest book I've read, or some mischief of my dog's. So this book, about a woman in Cambridge who writes anonymous kindly letters to people she doesn't know because she has a sort of sixth sense about them, really appealed to me. I found myself mentally composing a letter to the man up the street who has planted the most lush and beautiful flower garden we've ever had in the avenue, and one for a mother of three whose partner shot through just before Christmas. It's a nice concept for a book. But... Oh dear, it didn't take long to become nauseatingly twee. Magic. Ghosts. No. What a pity!...more
Reading this book, though I didn't finish it, made me realise how much patience Anna Clark must have had to have completed her ground-breaking researcReading this book, though I didn't finish it, made me realise how much patience Anna Clark must have had to have completed her ground-breaking research into student attitudes to Australian history. In this book she extends the research to the indifference of Australian adults to their own history, trying to make a connection between the history that they are interested in (i.e. their own family history and the stories behind family heirlooms) and the wider historical context. And if the comments that she reports in this book are any indication, it must have been incredibly boring for her to sift through the same pseudo-history time and time again. I can only salute her efforts to make something of the intimate stories of her research participants. Before long, she admits that she worries about nostalgia and enthusiasm of popular history as a substitute for actual knowledge. Although they must have been taught it at school, most of her participants know nothing about Australian history and they don't think it matters. And while they might have a fuzzy idea about history being subjective and in some cases contested, again, they're not very bothered about it. I found it too depressing to finish. I look out onto my quiet street and I think, how does it happen that I get to live in a city with clean water and electricity, with adequate food and shelter for most of us, and that I can vote to chuck out a government that fails me on critical issues? Why is it that the landmass that I live on is one coherent stable political and social entity, while the same-sized landmass in Europe or Africa is a muddle of competing entities, with a horrid history of being absorbed in brutal conflict, with the idea of democracy still a distant dream in some places? Why do Americans kill each other and we don't? It's public history that tells me the answers to these questions, it's knowing about colonisation, and federation, and economic events like the Gold Rush and the Depression. It's understanding that Australia inherited a lot of British institutions and had on the one hand the imagination to improve them, with innovations like giving women the vote, and on the other hand, the lack of imagination and an atrophied sense of the fair go, with its awful record of racial discrimination against the First Australians. It's just too, too depressing to read about people who don't know, and don't care that they don't know, about what's good and bad about our nation's past... ...more
I didn't finish this. I set it aside to read something else, and couldn't muster the enthusiasm to return to it. It's not the fractured narrative, it'I didn't finish this. I set it aside to read something else, and couldn't muster the enthusiasm to return to it. It's not the fractured narrative, it's the sense that there's 519 pages of nothing really happening. I don't need a plot, I don't need characters to like, but I do need something to think about.
My first attempt to read this novel was with this 1956 Elek edition, translated by Alec Brown. It was unbearable. The dialogue of the working class chMy first attempt to read this novel was with this 1956 Elek edition, translated by Alec Brown. It was unbearable. The dialogue of the working class characters were like excruciating caricatures. Within five pages I was checking a French edition to see what had been done with it and I was appalled. Just don't. Don't.
Please note that I abandoned this book only because of the translation and that is why I haven't rated it. I have since read a new translation by Roger Pearson (Oxford World's Classics) and rated that 5 stars. ...more