|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1668015358
| 9781668015353
| B0CL5FF663
| 3.56
| 36
| unknown
| Aug 06, 2024
|
really liked it
| neither neither As a Bosnian who emigrated as a youth to the United States during the Yugoslav Wars, Ismet Prcic no doubt has plenty of trauma to unpack. Unspeakable Home reads as an autofictional account of just such a young man’s journey — containing stories of his shame-filled childhood, teenage years as a drunken orange-mohawked punk, a short-lived stint with his paternal uncle in California, and his college/young adult/married years with the Beloved — and the format is highly self-aware and unconventional by design. Prcic starts with a fan letter to the comedian Bill Burr, bemoaning his recent marital breakup (You wonder whether she would have filed for divorce if, instead of PTSD and alcoholism, your diagnosis had been diabetes or cancer, if your maladies were visible, measurable, if they didn’t have to be communicated by words, if they didn’t have to be believed to be true.) and then proceeds to describe how he intends to write this novel as a sort of mix tape of two halves. Throughout, details are hinted at in these letters to Bill Burr, and then stories are told about those details, often from different angles, and by the end, an entire, trauma-filled life has been explored in a precisely crafted work of art that knowingly exposes the craftsmanship. I truly do admire Prcic’s craft, and I am grateful for what I learned here about the Bosnian war experience, but I don’t always perfectly connect emotionally with this kind of postmodern MFA-trained writing style: art is subjective, and while I can recognise the skill on display here, it wasn’t entirely to my own tastes; I will understand every five star review or award this garners. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) Historically, the Balkans — that gorgeous, ungovernable, godforsaken peninsula always in turmoil, always on the fringes of civilizations, always a broken-up borderland — had for centuries been a place to survive, endure. It had also been a place to fail to escape from and — both because and in spite of this — to love fiercely. If you were from this lush volatility, chances were you’d in some way participate in at least one war — two or even three if God really had it in for you and gave you a long life. Coming from a centrally planned childhood with seaside vacations — surrounded by family and comrades — and huffing glue on bombed out streets with his punk gang (always afraid of being called up early to the country’s underequipped, undermanned army), the narrator was of two minds when his family decided to send him to America: relief at escaping the chaos, and survivor’s guilt for leaving everyone else behind. He describes this as PTSD (and when he eventually reveals some secrets about his childhood, we learn why he was always kind of broken), and this leads to alcoholism (with many stories of hiding and sneaking and scrounging for alcohol), and this leads to him losing everything. This is a novel of vignettes, framed between the fan letters to Burr, with self-aware metanarration, as when he quotes an article by Marina Biti and Iva Rosanda Žigo (“The Silenced Narrator and the Notion of ‘Proto-Narrative'”) that references Prcic’s first novel Shards: The complexity of the narrative structure that involves not only multiple levels of diegesis and various diegetic combinations discussed by Genette but also an unusual correlation between verifiable reality and fiction, invites theoretical speculation primarily concerning elements that can be qualified as ‘disruptive’ to the memoir, related to trauma. So, I guess he’s telling us that that’s what he’s doing here, too? Prcic later writes: I’m not writing a biopic here; this is not that kind of story and mine is not that kind of life. I’ve got my conciliatory designs on the synapses between life and story of life — my own timid, wide-eyed attempt at living it — which is why I’m compelled to leave my sketches in, to show the work, as it were. If you spend your time on Earth trying to understand how you fit in life instead of living it, then to you, trying to understand is living, and what you’re reading is that hard admittance. And so: This is obviously a well-written novel, crafted by a skilled and self-reflective author — and it also did give me a sense of what living through and escaping a conflict like this can do to a mind — so it is undeniably a worthwhile and artful read; another reader will want exactly this. This reader, as a matter of taste, prefers a novel that pretends to be only what it is. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 29, 2024
|
Apr 03, 2024
|
Mar 29, 2024
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1788738713
| 9781788738712
| 1788738713
| 4.36
| 1,528
| May 04, 2016
| Feb 23, 2021
|
it was amazing
| In the fortress of our bodies A novelisation In the fortress of our bodies A novelisation of the true story of Fernand Iveton — a “pied-noir” Communist who acted against the ruling colonial government during Algeria’s first civil war — Tomorrow They Won’t Dare to Murder Us is a remarkable act of witnessing of shameful historical events. Although short, this wasn’t a quick read for me: between heart-stopping depictions of torture, a frustrating show trial, and intermittent discussions of the societal issues at play, there was a lot to digest here and I took my time with it. Incidentally: I understand that the author’s name, Joseph Andras, is considered a pseudonym, and when this novel won the prestigious Prix Goncourt (for a first novel), “Andras” refused to accept it, stating that prizes distract from the making of art (and as his next book, Kanaky, concerned another real man’s fight against France’s continuing occupation of New Caledonia, Andras appears to be committed to important work, and perhaps anonymity is vital to that). This is a meaningful act of witnessing, incredibly well written, and I am grateful that this exists (and that I was alerted to its existence; thank you, Joy!) All of his torturers sound the same, Fernand can’t distinguish between their voices anymore: similar timbre, just a lot of noise, goddamn hertz. What Fernand does not know is that the general secretary of police in Algiers, Paul Teitgen, made it explicitly clear, two hours ago, that he forbade anyone from touching the suspect. Teitgen had been deported and tortured by the Germans during the war. He could not understand why the police, his police, that of the France for which he’d fought, the France of the Republic, Voltaire, Hugo, Clemenceau, the France of human rights, of Human Rights (he was never sure when to capitalize), this France, la France, would use torture as well. No one here had taken any notice: Teitgen was a gentle soul, a pencil pusher offloaded from the metropolis just three months ago. He had brought his dainty ways along in his little suitcase, you should’ve seen, duty, probity, righteousness, ethics even — ethics my ass, he knows nothing about this place, nothing at all, do what you have to do with Iveton and I’ll cover for you, or so the chief had decided without hesitation. You can’t fight a war with principles and boy-scout sermons. Fernand Iveton, a pied-noir — of European descent — Algerian Communist, was sympathetic to the indigenous side in the Algerian Civil War: thinking of it as more of a class war than a true struggle for independence, it was because Iveton loved France, and its ideals of “liberté, égalité, fraternité”, that he joined the militant National Liberation Front in order to gain the attention of the ruling class. Not willing to actually hurt anyone, however, he did agree to plant a small bomb in an unused shed at the factory where he worked (set to go off after hours); but the authorities were watching the NLF and the bomb was recovered beforehand and Iveton was arrested, tortured, and charged with a capital offence. The writing flits around between characters (note that the second passage I quoted moves between three different people in one paragraph), and chapters alternate between those detailing Iveton’s experience as an activist (from taking possession of the bomb onward through his imprisonment and trial) and chapters that depict his time in France (receiving treatment for TB) where he met the woman who would become his wife, Hélène. Andras contrasts harrowing accounts of electrocution and waterboarding with a truly sweet love story, and in either timeline, striking nature writing can occur at any time: The River Marne sticks out a green tongue to the sky’s peaceful blue…The moon yawns, its white breath a veil to the darkness. A star-formed meshwork — thousands of little keys opening the night…Green wavelets lapping on a mossy stone, the shapes of yellow snakes. Iveton does have several conversations that outline the class struggle that he believes he is participating in, and through incidental details (the lynching of any nearby “Arabs” whenever there’s an attack on a member of the ruling class, the fact that Iveton is given twice as many blankets and opportunities to wash as compared to his indigenous cellmates, etc), Andras clearly makes the anti-colonial case: Iveton seems to have been fighting on the right side of history. He thinks of her every day. He cannot keep from doing it. Cannot keep from picking up the scattered pieces of their story, as if he had to put them in order between these walls, give them a meaning in this gray shithole, bulb on the ceiling, bunk stained by former inmates, one toilet between three. Give them a direction, a solid outline, thick, drawn in chalk or charcoal. Three and a half years together: one with the other, one through and for the other. Fernand collects whatever pieces his memory more or less readily restores to him, to form a brick — a cinderblock of love alone capable, in the face of an uncertain future, to break the bones and jaws of his tormentors. The love story helps to make Iveton feel like a real and relatable person, and although from the beginning it’s clear that the authorities want to “make an example” of him, I did not previously know Iveton’s ultimate fate and there was much narrative tension as his case played out. Algeria would eventually gain its independence, Sartre and Camus would write about Iveton’s treatment in their day, an anonymous correspondent would pen the verses that inspired the title of this novel, and François Mitterrand — who had been Interior Minister during the conflict — would eventually attempt to atone for his draconian stance on Algerian freedom-fighters when he became President of France in 1981. In the face of “the silence of the State” over the years, Andras brings attention here to a voice that refuses to fade into oblivion and I am enlarged for having encountered both the author and his subject. Wonderful, if hard, read. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 08, 2024
|
Feb 10, 2024
|
Feb 08, 2024
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
039363504X
| 9780393635041
| 039363504X
| 3.62
| 2,282
| unknown
| May 14, 2024
|
liked it
| This strange eventful history that made a life. Not good or bad — rather, both good and bad — but that was not the point. Above all, they had been, This strange eventful history that made a life. Not good or bad — rather, both good and bad — but that was not the point. Above all, they had been, for so long, wildly curious. Just to see, to experience all that they could, to set foot anywhere, to speak to anyone, taste anything, to learn, to know. This Strange Eventful History is “inspired by” the stories of author Claire Messud’s family (she stresses in an afterword that this is a work of fiction, but that “the Cassar family’s movements hew closely to those of my own family”), and initially, I thought that that would be fascinating: the novel begins with a mother fleeing with her children back to the Algeria of their birth at the dawn of WWII as her Navy officer husband watches France fall to the Nazis and awaits orders from his diplomatic posting in Greece. There was a nugget of something very interesting in that — a white family whose ancestors had been in Algeria for over a hundred years, and who thought of themselves as 100% belonging there and also 100% French citizens — and after the African country gained independence in 1962, these “pieds-noirs” had to make a home elsewhere in the world (along with the “harkis”: the reviled indigenous Algerians who had fought on the side of France in the war of independence), and this was a history I didn’t know and was eager to explore. But that’s not really what this novel is about. Instead, this reads like a domestic drama as we follow three generations of the Cassar family — from France to Australia, Argentina, and Canada — and delve into their educations and relationships and careers; flitting among a largish cast of characters in a book that ultimately felt too long. I was often bored, recognised that many long stories were probably included because they were based on real events (although with little literary or entertainment value), and when something startling did happen, I recognised it as one of those “truth is stranger than fiction” situations that probably shouldn’t be included in a novel. This might have worked better as a straight memoir — with plenty of Algerian history included — and while I can’t deny that Messud writes lovely sentences, this was, overall, just okay for me. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) I’m a writer; I tell stories. I want to tell the stories of their lives. It doesn’t really matter where I start. We’re always in the middle; wherever we stand, we see only partially. I know also that everything is connected, the constellations of our lives moving together in harmony and disharmony. The past swirls along with and inside the present, and all time exists at once, around us. The ebb and flow, the harmonies and dissonance — the music happens, whether or not we describe it. A story is not a line; it is a richer thing, one that circles and eddies, rises and falls, repeats upon itself. François was eight when he travelled with his mother and younger sister to Algeria to wait out the war, his father writing to him that, “it was their place, the part of France where they belonged, that they were still building and perfecting.” And although François would eventually move to Paris for his education, when he received a Fullbright scholarship to Harvard, he was determined to perfect his American accent and reject his Frenchness; eventually marrying a Canadian woman and (after several other adventures) settling down in the States. François aspired to an academic career, and although he made it to grad school, having a wife and responsibilities forced him to compromise his dreams; becoming a corporate stooge, an alcoholic, and an unhappy bully to his wife and daughters. Meanwhile, his parents — who had a perfect, storybook marriage — joined the expat community in Argentina with the daughter who felt responsible for taking care of them, and when they visited François’ family in America, it gave the only opportunity to revisit the question of the French in Algeria. François’ teenaged daughter Chloe (as “the writer of the family”, I assume she’s a stand-in for Claire Messud herself) “volunteered the accepted truism that the French presence in Algeria had been fundamentally wrong”, and while her Aunt Denise would bristle, “De Gaulle threw away our lives and our history because it was expedient, because of public opinion, the opinion polls of arrogant people in the metropole who couldn’t find Algeria on a map, who didn’t even know we spoke French, for God’s sake,” Denise and François’ father, Gaston, had a more provocative response: “When France embarked upon the Algerian undertaking, it was in the spirit, exactly, of the British in America or Australia…Might we not acknowledge that Australia and the United States are simply more successful examples of settler colonialism — no less unjust, no less brutal, simply with a fuller obliteration of the native cultures?” Naturally, like all of us in North America (and, one presumes, in the antipodes as well), Chloe doesn’t like this comparison, but that’s pretty much the end of the debate — and I would have liked much more of it. Again: what we do get is a lot of writing on the domestic; from the lingering death of François’ father-in-law to Denise’s secret diaries (found by Chloe after her aunt’s death and shared with us here because, “surely she’d hidden the notebook there for someone to find, the stuff of novels: if she’d wanted it never to be found, then she would have thrown it away. What was writing for, if not to communicate? There was no such thing as writing that did not signify.”) There was a mundanity to it all that gave the sense of real life: and although in the prologue Messud writes that bit about constellations and connections and everything repeating upon itself, there were just too many “characters” swirling about in this, doing ordinary things despite an extraordinary backstory, for a wholly satisfying novel (and, again, I would not have minded all of the minutiae if this was a straightforward biography.) To be sixty-five was to know that you dreamed the lazy lunch beneath the plane trees and window shopping along the Croisette, but that death was what was real; to be thirty-two, as Chloe was, meant you could still pretend the inverse was true. And still, why not, for the afternoon, dream? As the novel ends, the fourth generation is running around while their forebears wink out one by one: this is a long way from WWII and Algeria and France — these kids are fully American and divorced from their pieds-noirs roots. For this reason, I can appreciate why Messud would want to memorialise her family’s history for future generations — and why she would want to include so many people who don’t really affect the “plot” — but I found it a bit of a slog to get through. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 06, 2024
|
Jan 13, 2024
|
Jan 06, 2024
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1908745908
| 9781908745903
| 1908745908
| 3.92
| 47,010
| Aug 04, 2022
| Aug 04, 2022
|
really liked it
| Please do not get lost. If you haven’t had an Ear Check, don’t come here. Level Forty-Two will be open tomorrow. Come back then. Remember you have Please do not get lost. If you haven’t had an Ear Check, don’t come here. Level Forty-Two will be open tomorrow. Come back then. Remember you have seven moons. You must reach The Light before the last one rises. I just barely squeaked in reading 2022’s winner of the Booker Prize (it took so long to be released here in Canada), and while I can see how the themes and writing in The Seven Moons of Maali Almeida would have appealed to the Booker judges (and especially as its mordant tone in describing horrific political reality appears in other novels on this year’s shortlist), it wasn’t my personal favourite of this year’s list, nor even my favourite novel exploring Sri Lanka’s long years of deadly internal conflict (for that see Michael Ondaatje’s Anil’s Ghost). It might be unfair to author Shehan Karunatilaka for me to rate this fine novel in comparison to others instead of solely on its own merits, but that was the experience its winning the Booker imposed on me, so all this is simply meant to explain why my reaction might be a bit muted. Seven Moons is undeniably good, probably not great, and four stars is a rounding up Lankans can’t queue. Unless you define a queue as an amorphous curve with multiple entry points. This appears to be a gathering point for those with questions about their death. There are multiple counters and irate customers clamour over grills to shout abuse at the few behind the bars. The afterlife is a tax office and everyone wants their rebate. The year is 1990 and Sri Lankan war photographer Maali Almeida learns he is dead when he finds himself in the chaos of a bureaucratic office with only one sandal on his feet and his camera lens cracked and filled with mud. From a Helper, he learns that he has seven moons (days) to make his way to the Light or risk being trapped in the In Between forever. As he finds his bearings, Maali is determined to get a message to his roommates — his best friend Jaki and her male cousin DD; Maali’s secret gay lover — and have them release a stash of photographs that would have been too dangerous for him to share while still alive. There’s a mystery/thriller vibe to this novel as Maali strains to remember the details that led to his death, and while the clock ticks down those seven moons, Maali finds himself torn between obeying the Helper who is encouraging him to go the the Light and a more nebulous creature who promises Maali revenge upon those who had hurt him in life if he remains in the In Between. Throughout, Maali’s remembered experiences as a photojournalist in the ‘80s — one who was willing to work for any of the alphabet soup of factions who paid the best in the moment — allows Karunatilaka to describe horrific scenes from Sri Lanka’s Civil War; and as Maali was a resident of the capital city, Colombo, Karunatilaka is able to immerse us in its unsettled setting of systemic corruption, income disparity, and rolling curfews. I appreciated that Maali’s afterlife is populated with unfamiliar-to-me creatures from Sri Lankan lore and Buddhist belief. All of this was good stuff. On the other hand, I didn’t much care for the character of Maali himself: A gambling addict with Mommy issues and a self-described “slut”, I didn’t understand all the scenes of him being pleasured by pretty young men while holding conversations with other guys (not only was this meant to be blatantly provocative at the height of the AIDS scare while Maali assured DD that he was always faithful while on assignments, but as Karunatilaka thanked his wife during his Booker acceptance speech, I don’t think this was based on lived experience, and it kind of shows). Others have noted that this feels too long, and at nearly 400 pages, it really does; there is much repetition, and I don’t think it needed the gambling or Maali’s dramatic family of origin subplots. And as for the satiric tone, the vibe is more resigned than humourous: • The Afterlife is as confusing as the Before Death, the In Between is as arbitrary as the Down There. So we make up stories because we’re afraid of the dark. Ultimately, this does feel like an important read: any light shone on a government controlling and killing its own people deserves to be amplified and I appreciate the craft and passion that Karunatilaka brought to this project. I am happy to have squeaked this in before the end of the year, if only to end it contemplating the following: You think of dead lakes overflowing with corpses, of police stations where the rich lock up the poor, of palaces where those who follow orders torture those who refuse to. You think of distraught lovers, abandoned friends and absent parents. Of lapsed treaties and photographs that are seen and forgotten, regardless of the walls they hang on. How the world will go on without you and will forget you were even here. You think of the mother, the old man and the dog, of the things you did, or failed to do, for the ones you loved. You think about evil causes and about worthy ones. That the chances of violence ending violence are one in nothing, one in nada, one in squat. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 29, 2022
|
Dec 30, 2022
|
Dec 31, 2022
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1989555802
| 9781989555804
| 3.04
| 48
| unknown
| Nov 09, 2022
|
really liked it
| Shortly before midnight Bruno Perzenowski and Heinrich Busch climbed up the thirteen steps. Once there, Branchaud led each man, his final stride pl Shortly before midnight Bruno Perzenowski and Heinrich Busch climbed up the thirteen steps. Once there, Branchaud led each man, his final stride placing him above one of the two steel trapdoors. As December 17 ended and the new day began, the hangman still waited, but no telegram arrived with a reprieve. At 12:10 a.m., the hangman with practiced hand “pinion[ed] their legs, dropped the hoods [over their faces], adjusted the ropes and pulled the lever.” Twenty minutes later, Perzenowski’s and Busch’s bodies were cut down, examined by the coroner, pronounced dead, and carried directly to the common grave they had been forced to dig the previous day. At 12:45, Walter Wolf and Willy Müeller were executed. Their bodies too were brought to the common grave. The child murderer, Donald Sherman Staley, was hanged at 1: 30 p.m., bringing an end to what would be the last mass hanging in Canadian history. Hanged in Medicine Hat is a book I requested more or less on a whim — I spent my teenaged years on the “bald prairies” of Southern Alberta without ever hearing the story of the Nazi POW camp that once was there, let alone the story of the last mass execution in Canadian history, so my interest was piqued — and historian Nathan Greenfield’s account is well-researched, well-told, and presents a nuanced question: In the immediate aftermath of WWII, what should justice have looked like in the handling of unrepentant Nazis who killed some of their own “within the wires” of Medicine Hat’s Camp 132? (tl;dr: we blew it.) Full of fascinating details, shining a light on a near-forgotten episode in Canadian history, what’s not to like? Opened early in 1943 and representing a sizeable increase in employment and economic activity for the city, Camp 132 was welcomed by Hatters. That the prisoners were available for farm labour and the occasional hockey game only made their presence more welcome. The locals treated the captives with courtesy, and their manners were reciprocated. The existence of Camp 132 was as positive an experience as could be expected for both sides, except for the shocking killings of Private August Plaszek in 1943 and Sergeant Dr. Karl Lehmann a year later. Along with the interesting history behind how German POWs (including members of Rommel’s Afrika Korps, surrendered to British troops) ended up in Medicine Hat, Alberta, I was fascinated to learn that, because Canada had signed the Geneva Convention, not only did these POWs receive 3500 calories a day (most prisoners would gain fifteen pounds over the course of their detainment), but they would have complete control of their own leadership and policing (which meant senior Nazis and the Gestapo ran the show within the camp). With coded messages and a secret radio bringing orders straight from Berlin, the POWs remained under German military command, and as the Russians marched on their capital and things began to look dire in the Fatherland, any POW who whispered that Germany might lose the war could be accused of treason and risk being dealt with by military tribunal. So when prisoners were found murdered within Camp 132 — and the Canadian government decided to treat it as a civil matter and subject the perpetrators to our civil justice system — was that a miscarriage of justice? Should the Germans, per the Geneva Convention, have had the right to administer punishment according to their own military rules? This is the crux of Hanged in Medicine Hat and with the presentation of court transcripts, newspaper articles, and interviews with eyewitnesses, Greenfield makes a persuasive case that the Canadian government didn’t have the right to bring these men to civil trial, let alone subject them to capital punishment. The government’s intention and the appeals court’s decisions may have settled the matter in 1946 but they do not do so today. The violation of the Geneva Convention and the War Measures Act may seem to be technical legal points. They are not. For, by trying the POWs in civilian court, Canadian authorities deprived them of something vitally important: jurors of their peers, that is jurors who understood military ethos. On the other hand: I was telling my family about this story over dinner last night and both my husband (an old conservative) and my daughter (a young progressive) said that the Nazis murdered within the camp and the Nazis hanged for their crimes were simply fewer Nazis in the world and they couldn’t get worked up about their deaths. I tried to explain that Greenfield presented some of the POWs as radicalised youth who had never known another way of life (which I thought might sway my daughter’s stance, but she just said it was less likely someone like that could be reformed after the war), and while at least one of the hanged men went to his death calling out, “My Führer, I follow thee”, Greenfield didn’t believe any of them deserved the death penalty (and especially not as the consequence of a civil trial). Perhaps it takes a book length explanation to be persuaded by Greenfield’s position (as I was), but at any rate, I found the whole thing utterly fascinating. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 20, 2022
|
Aug 22, 2022
|
Dec 06, 2022
|
Hardcover
| ||||||||||||||||
0451495209
| 9780451495204
| 0451495209
| 3.67
| 11,755
| Jul 19, 2022
| Aug 02, 2022
|
liked it
| “Here, I have an idea.” In the lower right corner, under the Produced By credit, Artie crossed out the John in John Doe and wrote Jane. “Jane Doe. No “Here, I have an idea.” In the lower right corner, under the Produced By credit, Artie crossed out the John in John Doe and wrote Jane. “Jane Doe. No one, and I mean no one, will have any doubt who Jane Doe really is. Satisfied?” Maria might have been had she not noticed the one non-anonymized name on the poster. It appeared right above the title, in small but legible cursive: Art Feldman and Mercury Pictures Presents … I’m going to go with: It’s not the book, it’s me. Mercury Pictures Presents has plenty of five star reviews, and I have raved about author Anthony Marra’s work before, but this time? I was kind of bored; unmoved by the writing and unsurprised by the plot and its details. I have zero interest in stories about Hollywood and moviemaking, and I feel like everything important that can be said about WWII in fiction was written by the people who lived through it, and although there was the potential for something interesting about Hollywood propaganda drumming up fascistic control over those “resident aliens” who had fled rising fascism in their birth countries, it didn’t much pay off for me. Marra draws some fine characters, gives them some snappy lines, puts them in singular circumstances, and none of it really touched me. I acknowledge this failure to connect is on me; another reader’s experience may be totally different. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) “People like you and me, Art? The sons of furriers and cobblers and glovers who’ve been in the business since the battles with the Edison Trust? We came out here to build ourselves a broken kingdom where only the broken prosper, and then, our children, they hold it against us when we make them whole.” Mercury Pictures is a small-time movie studio — owned and run by twin Jewish brothers who emigrated from Poland long before Hitler was a threat — and as America enters WWII, they hit it big with military training films and jingoistic agitprop created through their hastily assembled Propaganda Unit. The storyline of Mercury Pictures Presents follows the fortunes of this studio and the (mostly) immigrant artists who staff it. We see the fate of Italian antifascists who were sent into internal exile (confino) by Mussilini, unable to leave a certain radius within San Lorenzo. We then witness the fate of those antifascists who fled Italy or Germany ahead of WWII — forced to register as resident aliens when the US declared war on Europe, unable to travel beyond a two mile radius of their homes, subject to curfews and the confiscation of goods. We see expat German architects engaged to recreate Berlin in the Utah desert for the USAF to test incendiary bombs for use against the actual city (and this part may have been shocking if I hadn’t read about it recently in Malcolm Gladwell’s The Bomber Mafia). We see a Chinese-American actor reduced to playing a caricature of a bellicose Japanese bogeyman (and the racism that he provokes in the role is so successful that he finds himself in danger on the streets of L.A.) There’s a goldmine of irony in the idea of Hollywood (and its German- and Italian-born immigrant artists) manufacturing the face of an enemy for the country to set its sights on — even more irony in the eventual McCarthy Hearings trying to root out those Hollywood Communists who had been antifascists “too early” — but while the elements of something interesting were here, I simply didn’t find it terribly engaging. A taste of the snappy writing: • For years, Maria had devised strategies for smuggling the profane beneath the most sensitive censorial snouts. At her best, she passed more colorful bullshit than Babe the Blue Ox. And there were many grasps at meaning-making: A dark inkling deepens to certainty. This parched patch of Utah is indeed the farthest outpost of the Third Reich, alike in the immodesty of its vision and narrowness of its humanity. But I think that, overall, this experience just confirms my disinterest in WWII novels. This was a fresh angle (I didn’t know about the confino before), and Marra has a large and colourful cast of characters intersect in complex ways, but the story didn’t surprise or move me. And I so don’t care about Hollywood that the setting neither charmed or intrigued me. And as mine seems to be a minority opinion, no one should take my word on this one. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 29, 2022
|
Apr 02, 2022
|
Mar 29, 2022
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1982174145
| 9781982174149
| 1982174145
| 3.67
| 5,645
| Feb 04, 2021
| May 18, 2021
|
liked it
| Come, other future. Come, mercy not manifest in time; come knowledge not obtainable in time. Come, other chances. Come, unsounded deep. Come, undiv Come, other future. Come, mercy not manifest in time; come knowledge not obtainable in time. Come, other chances. Come, unsounded deep. Come, undivided light. At the sentence level, Light Perpetual feels kind of remarkable — the language is lyrical, the scenes rich in specific detail, fates ebbing and flowing like the roar of a crowd at a football match — but overall, as a novel, it feels kind of pointless. I understand why Francis Spufford wrote this book (daily walking past a memorial plaque at the site of a London Woolworths that had been bombed during WWII — killing 168 people, including 15 children — Spufford decided to bring a fictional five of those children back to life and explore what those lives might have been had that bomb never landed), but beyond the satisfaction of playing God and resurrecting dead innocents, there’s really no literary payoff in this novel. Spufford imagines five ordinary, often unhappy, fates for these children — none of them goes on to cure cancer or prevent 9/11; the world seems utterly unaffected whether they live or not — and with just the one timeline given, with no contrast with how the world would have looked if they had died as children, the central concept feels like a big so what? (By contrast, Paul Auster’s 4 3 2 1 describes four different lives that might have played out for one character had small differences occurred in his surroundings; and while I might have found it a bit dull and self-indulgent, I understood the point of it.) This book is fine; I didn’t find it literarily strong enough to have been a real contender for this year’s Man Booker Prize, am not surprised it didn’t make the shortlist, and I could have skipped it without feeling poorer for it. Had some lovely sentences, though. He gazes. A rose-coloured scratch is travelling on the blue, high and far. The last plane of daylight. The celestial clock is evolving and bringing on the night. Even happiness can’t stop it. Time is his friend now, but it goes by so fast. There’s a truly surreal prologue in which the destruction of the Woolworths is described and then we are invited to imagine an alternate reality in which some hiccup, failure, some tiny alteration, sent that bomb off course. The novel then starts properly five years later, in 1949, with a class of schoolchildren having their Singing Class and we are first introduced to the five: Jo has a beautiful singing voice, and synaesthetically, sees music as colours; her twin, Val, is more interested in boys than singing; Vernon is a piggish bully who wishes he had a good singing voice because he is helplessly in thrall to music’s beauty; Alec is clever and smart-mouthed; and in a separate scene, we meet poor little Ben, undersized and scatterbrained, as he attends the footie with his Da. From here, the timeline jumps ahead fifteen years at a go (to 1964, 1979, 1994, and 2009), and in each period, the characters’ basic traits are pretty much what they had been as children. Spufford does add some incredibly detailed scenes that must have been the result of extensive research — the operation of a linotype machine at a major newspaper, the mechanics of writing a song and laying down multiple tracks, the routine of a double-decker bus conductor in London’s core — but they were more like impressive vignettes than scenes integral to the story. And Spufford introduces a bunch of issues — schizophrenia (which can apparently be cured by the love of a good woman, and an exorcism), labour strikes during the Thatcher era (but are we honestly meant to support the typesetters’ right to do their job forever at the dawn of the digital era?), neo-Naziism (but does anyone buy the explanation for Mike’s need to crack skulls or Val’s inability to leave him?), and bulimia (and honestly, this granddaughter seemed written into the plot just so Spufford could make her sick. Why?) — but these seemed more for colour than as points of entry into exploring the changing social scene over the decades. There are stories here, but not a satisfying novel. People say the world gets smaller when you’re dying: but there it still is, as astonishingly much of it as ever. It’s you who shrinks. Or you who can grasp the world less, who can take hold of less and less of it, until you’re only peeping at one burning-bright corner of the whole immense fabric. And then not even that. Einstein said that we can live our lives as though nothing is a miracle, or as though everything is, and that may have ultimately been Spufford’s intention with Light Perpetual: He writes five incredibly ordinary lives here, maybe daring me to say that these lives were not important enough to write about. Either all of our lives matter or none of them do; we are either all miracles or none of us are. We all amount to dust in the end and the world is poorer for it. There’s a nugget of something interesting there, but it didn’t carry the novel for me. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 22, 2021
|
Oct 24, 2021
|
Oct 22, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0593230701
| 9780593230701
| 0593230701
| 3.71
| 8,156
| Jul 13, 2021
| Jul 13, 2021
|
really liked it
| He couldn’t help thinking, as the train hurtled closer toward his destination, that he’d traversed not any physical distance that day but rather so He couldn’t help thinking, as the train hurtled closer toward his destination, that he’d traversed not any physical distance that day but rather some vast psychic distance inside him, that he’d been advancing not from the island’s south to its north but from the south of his mind to its own distant northern reaches. Author Anuk Arudpragasam has a PhD in Philosophy from Columbia University, and in a very pointed way, his novel A Passage North feels more like a framework for Arudpragasam to display his philosophies than a standard work of fiction — and that was okay with me. There’s not much plot here — a young Tamil man, physically and emotionally disconnected from the Sri Lankan civil war by his bourgeois upbringing, receives word that his grandmother’s caregiver has passed away and decides to travel to the heart of the recently ended conflict in order to attend her funeral — but with a narrative that is centered entirely in this Krishan’s mind as he learns the news and makes his journey, in a meandering style that has no dialogue and features paragraphs that last for pages, this is a dense and serious book of ideas with little entertainment value (and again, that was okay with me). Arudpragasam has Krishan muse on big ideas (trauma, history, memory) but also the mundane (the roots of addiction, the violence inherent in the male gaze), and throughout it all, Arudpragasam prods the reader into witnessing the effects of Sri Lanka’s recent history as Krishan is forced to do the same. Not every reader will have the patience or interest for this one, but as the most weighty novel on the 2021 Man Booker shortlist, I wouldn’t be upset if it won. On the same day that Krishan learns about Rani’s death, he also receives a surprise email from his former lover, Anjum; a beautiful and serious activist whom he met while studying in Delhi. These two separate events send Krishan’s ruminations into different directions; and while I wouldn’t say that his memories of this love affair add much emotion to the story, I do want to note that Arudpragasam is one of those rare authors who writes sex scenes meaningfully (probably because he focusses on the mental progression instead of the mechanics). As for the philosophising, the following might have been a nice sound bite if I chopped it after “unveiled”, but I want to give a sense of how densely Arudpragasam writes (and should also note that this paragraph started a page earlier but I couldn’t put it all in): Falling in love, or what deserved to be called falling in love, he had realized that night, was not so much an emotional or psychological condition as an epistemological condition, a condition in which two people held hands and watched in silent amazement as the world around them was slowly unveiled, as the falsities of ordinary life began to thin and dissolve before their eyes, the furrowed eyebrows and clenched jaws, the bright colors and loud noises, the surface excitements and disturbances all dropping away so that what remained — time stripped bare -— was the only way the world could truly be apprehended, so that even if this condition did not last, even if it was lost, as eventually it is always lost, to habit or circumstance or simply the slow, sad passage of the years, the knowledge that it has imparted remains, the knowledge that the world we ordinarily partake in is somehow not quite real, that time does not need to pass the way we usually experience it passing, that somehow it is possible to live and breathe and move in a single moment, that a single moment could be not a bead on an abacus of finite length but an ocean that can be entered into, whose distant shores can never be reached. In addition to Krishan’s thoughts and personal memories, Arudpragasam also includes him recalling, in detail, the plots of several books, films, and traditional poems. I might have found this to be annoying or strange if this were a standard novel, but as an act of witnessing, I found it appropriate to understand the specifics of what influences the author, through Krishan, was using to evaluate his reality. There was much on eyes and vision and witnessing (including some disturbing historical details and interesting funeral practise) and the following contrasts Krishan’s thoughts about Anjum’s beauty and the horrors that Rani experienced during the war: Maybe it was for this reason, it had occurred to him at that moment, that eyesight weakened with the passing of the years, not because of old age or disease, not because of the deterioration of the cornea or the lenses or the finely tuned muscles that controlled them but because, rather, of the accumulation of a few such images over the course of one’s brief sojourn on earth, images of great beauty that pierced the eyes and superimposed themselves over everything one saw afterward, making it harder over time to see and pay attention to the outside world, though perhaps, it occurred to him now, four years later in the country of his birth, walking at the back of the procession bearing Rani’s body for cremation, Rani who’d seen so much that she had never been able to forget, perhaps he’d been naive back then, perhaps it was not just images of beauty that clouded one’s vision over time but images of violence too, those moments of violence that for some people were just as much a part of life as the moments of beauty, both kinds of image appearing when we least expected it and both continuing to haunt us thereafter, both of which marked and branded us, limiting how far we were subsequently able to see. Again, so much philosophising felt like Arudpragasam was speaking directly to me instead of filtering his ideas through the experiences of an invented character, and I was okay with that; I found it all interesting and maybe this is the most authentic way to write about atrocity. Further reading that I found interesting: an admiring interview with the author in The Paris Review and a more critical review in The Guardian. Definitely not for everyone but it feels like A Passage North will remain relevant into the future; and that's no small thing. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 2021
|
Oct 03, 2021
|
Oct 01, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1644211165
| 9781644211168
| B08QMBF3WK
| 4.11
| 6,110
| Nov 02, 2020
| Sep 21, 2021
|
really liked it
| The word em refers to the little brother or little sister in a family; or the younger of two friends; or the woman in a couple. I like to think that t The word em refers to the little brother or little sister in a family; or the younger of two friends; or the woman in a couple. I like to think that the word em is the homonym of the verb aimer, “to love,” in French, in the imperative: aime. There is a painting reproduced in Em by the Quebecois artist Louis Boudreault (an image used on the cover of the novel’s original French language release) that depicts a cardboard box with many threads coming out of its flaps; the threads twisted and tangled hopelessly together. Author Kim Thúy writes, “If I knew how to end a conversation, if I could distinguish true truths, personal truths from instinctive truths, I would have disentangled the threads for you before tying them up or arranging them so that the story of this book would be clear between us.” If that sounds a little confusing, it’s clearly by design: Em has the feeling of nonfiction — of a biographical investigation into the history of some specific people who survived the Vietnam War; where they came from and where they ended up — and chapters follow a thread of connection from one character to another and another; twisting back and entangling with people we’ve met earlier. And because this format has the feeling of real and messy life, and because Thúy includes information from the historical record, everything about this novel feels true; which is horrifying in the wartime details and often uplifting, as in the care that orphans would show to one another on the streets of Saigon (“In every conflict zone, good steals in and edges its way right into the cracks of evil.”) This is not a long work, the chapters are short and waste no words, and I believed every bit of it. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) The Americans speak of the “Vietnam War,” the Vietnamese of the “American War.” This distinction is perhaps what explains the cause of that war. The novel begins on a rubber plantation in what was once known as Indochina, with a white overseer falling in love with the young girl he plucked from the fields to share his bed. The daughter who was born of this union, Tâm, “grew up between Alexandre’s privilege and power, and the shame of Mai’s betrayal of her patriotic cause”. Orphaned when her parents found themselves trapped between rival warring camps, I was actually relieved to read that Tâm’s nurse smuggled her to Saigon and enrolled the girl in school, settling in to normal life. But when the nurse’s first grandchild is born, and Tâm accompanies her back to their old village of My Lai to celebrate his first month of life, they are present when Charlie Company shows up: The night before, Tâm had lain down a child; the next day, she awoke with no family. She went from artless laughter to the silence of adults whose tongues have been cut out. In four hours, her long, girlish tresses were undone, as she faced the spectre of scalped heads. Threads twist and tangle and the story visits with orphans in Saigon, with the tragedy associated with Operation Babylift, with half-American orphans being adopted in the States, with these refugees finding one another, and falling in love, and some of them, opening nail salons. (Fun fact: Half of the women who have had nail salon manicures have received them at a salon operated by a Vietnamese refugee. Less fun fact: Those Vietnamese refugees who didn’t contract cancer from the Agent Orange and other defoliants sprayed on their childhood homes probably developed cancer from exposure to the carcinogenic components of nail polish.) But no matter what life brings, how could anyone forget such a traumatising childhood? Tâm can describe in detail how the soldiers slipped the ace of spades into their helmet straps, sleeves rolled up above their elbows, the cuffs of their pant legs tucked into their boots. On the other hand, she remembers no soldier’s face. Maybe war machines don’t have a human face. Em isn’t a book of history — it’s a book of people and connections — and although I couldn’t personally say what started the Vietnamese War (or, the American War if one prefers), Thúy presumes some such knowledge on the part of the reader. In the end, though, I got the sense that Thúy was writing for her own community; to remind the Vietnamese people, wherever they find themselves, that although global events had once set the north and south against one another, in the lead up to the fiftieth anniversary of the war’s end, they would be better served remembering how interwoven their threads remain: This fiftieth anniversary will confirm in all likelihood that memory is a faculty of forgetfulness. It forgets that all Vietnamese, no matter where they live, descend from a love story between a woman of the immortal race of fairies and a man of the blood of dragons. It forgets that their country was surrounded by barbed wire that transformed it into an arena and that they found themselves adversaries, forced to fight each other. Memory forgets the distant hands that pulled the strings and the triggers. It only remembers the blows, the aching pain of those blows that bruised roots, snapped ancestral bonds, and destroyed the family of immortals. Again, this novel is quite short, the chapters like snapshots, but I found it incredibly impactful. It may not be to everyone’s tastes, but I have long been a fan of Kim Thúy and Em is a valuable piece in the overall puzzle of her work. Loved it. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 25, 2021
|
May 25, 2021
|
May 26, 2021
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||
1984853848
| 9781984853844
| 1984853848
| 3.69
| 2,609
| Jun 01, 2021
| Jun 01, 2021
|
really liked it
| Besides chronicling one of the most ingenious hoaxes ever perpetrated (and one of the only known examples of a con game being used for good instead of Besides chronicling one of the most ingenious hoaxes ever perpetrated (and one of the only known examples of a con game being used for good instead of ill), The Confidence Men explores the strategy that underpins all confidence schemes: the subtle process of mind control called coercive persuasion, colloquially known as brainwashing. The answers to this book’s central questions — How does a master manipulator create and sustain faith? Why do his converts persist in believing things that are patently false? — also illuminate the behavior of present-day figures such as advertisers, cult leaders, and political demagogues. Above all, The Confidence Men is the story of the profound friendship of two men who almost certainly would not have met otherwise: Jones, the Oxford-educated son of a British lord, and Hill, a mechanic on an Australian sheep station. Vowing to see the scheme through if it cost them their lives, each was sustained throughout its myriad hardships by the steadfastness of the other. In the introduction to The Confidence Men, author Margalit Fox explains that even years after having read Elias Henry “Bones” Jones’ 1919 memoir, The Road to En-dor (in which Jones details his incredible escape from a Turkish POW camp during WWI with co-conspirator Cedric Waters Hill, whose own memoir The Spook and the Commandant was published shortly after his death in 1975), she was transfixed by the “how” of the pair’s escape, but couldn’t understand the “why”: just why did their captors fall for a long con that involved malevolent spirits, buried treasure, and faked insanity? By quoting Jones and Hill’s own accounts at length, backing up their assertions with quotes from other memoirs and historical reports, and layering on research from incredibly diverse fields, Fox tells a riveting fact-is-stranger-than-fiction tale that gets to the heart of her “why”. This is a fascinating, thorough, and accessible read about war, cunning, and friendship; it contains lessons that are relevant to our modern world and would make a compelling movie. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) This is the true story of the most singular prison break ever recorded — a clandestine wartime operation that involved no tunneling, no weapons, and no violence of any kind. Conceived during World War I, it relied on a scheme so outrageous it should never have worked: Two British officers escaped from an isolated Turkish prison camp by means of a Ouija board. Turkey’s Yozgad prison camp in the Anatolian mountains was considered escape-proof: not only was its location remote, forbidding, and surrounded by marauding brigands, but it was well known within the camp that any attempt to escape would bring swift and severe punishment down on those left behind. Two of the prison’s inmates — the aristocratic E. H. Jones (a British officer who surrendered to the Turks after the siege of Kut) and C. W. Hill (a downed Australian airman who flew for the RAF) — were so focussed on escape that they conceived of a plan that would not only see them making their way to freedom, but would actually improve conditions for the men who remained at Yozgad. Hill had spent years honing the skills of magic and mentalism, and as a lawyer, “Jones had been schooled in the verbal seduction that is the con man’s foremost asset”, and between the two of them and a homemade spirit board, they had all the tools they needed to persuade their captors to set them free. (The plan would also include starving themselves, a nearly successful “attempt” at a double suicide, and a six month stay in an insane asylum; but they did get out of Yozgad just as planned.) And again, as fascinating as the “how” was, Fox elevates what is essentially an adventure tale with her multidisciplinary research into “why” it worked: In the end, what aided the mediums most of all were the times, for it was only in that liminal era, poised at the nexus of the scientific and the spiritual, that this particular con could have stood a chance. The period saw the resurgence of the Victorian ardor for spiritualism, a movement, itself founded in fakery, that has been called “conjuring in disguise.” It was a time when cutting-edge technologies such as the phonograph, radio, and telephone were making disembodied voices audible to an enchanted but largely uncomprehending public, rendering the idea of discourse with the dead an authentic empirical question. It was an age, suspended between alienism and Freudianism, when the observed symptoms of mental disorders had been neatly codified and could thus be well emulated. It was a time when orthodox psychiatry endorsed the belief that mediumship could result in madness. And it was a time of sustained, widespread social upheaval, when many stood ready to grasp at whatever straw might offer succor. Perhaps this particular con would no longer work, but while times change, people don’t; we’re all capable of being conned and gaslit, attracted to cults and strongmen, and it’s always worthwhile to read a cautionary tale about such “coercive persuasion”. I enjoyed everything about The Confidence Men and the only thing lacking would have been a deeper dive into who Jones and Hill were as people; Fox shares plenty of their biographical details, but I’m left not really knowing them or understanding their desperate drive to escape (and especially after they had used their con to vastly improve conditions in the prison camp.) Still a solid read, rounding up to four stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 2021
|
May 02, 2021
|
May 01, 2021
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0316296619
| 9780316296618
| 0316296619
| 4.03
| 55,597
| Apr 27, 2021
| Apr 27, 2021
|
really liked it
| Because airpower was young, the faculty of the Tactical School was young — in their twenties and thirties, full of the ambition of youth. They got dru Because airpower was young, the faculty of the Tactical School was young — in their twenties and thirties, full of the ambition of youth. They got drunk on the weekends, flew warplanes for fun, and raced each other in their cars. Their motto was: Proficimus more irretenti: “We make progress unhindered by custom.” The leaders of the Air Corps Tactical School were labeled “the Bomber Mafia.” It was not intended as a compliment — these were the days of Al Capone and Lucky Luciano and shoot-outs on the streets. But the Air Corps faculty thought the outcast label quite suited them. And it stuck. The Bomber Mafia is a different kind of book from the magpie mind of Malcolm Gladwell: Although there are several fascinating digressions*, this is primarily the straightforward story of the birth of the US Air Force in the aftermath of WWI, how they strove to perfect precision bombing before the American entry into WWII, and how the realities of battle can trump philosophical best intentions. I’m no aficionado of WWII trivia and there were many stories here I hadn’t heard before; much was fascinating. Still, this felt a little light for Gladwell; his conclusions a little pat. He explains in the intro that he has had a lifelong obsession with war histories (and with bombers in particular), so it might just be that Gladwell is too close-up with this material to see a bigger picture? And I see from other reviews that this was originally an audiobook (with audio clips of interviews, music, and sound effects), so that might be the better format in which to experience this? But at any rate, I was not disappointed overall: Gladwell cracks open some interesting nuts of history here and I was happy to squirrel it all away in my own generalist’s mind. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) The Bomber Mafia is a case study in how dreams go awry. And how, when some new, shiny idea drops down from the heavens, it does not land, softly, in our laps. It lands hard, on the ground, and shatters. The story I’m about to tell is not really a war story. Although it mostly takes place in wartime. It is the story of a Dutch genius and his homemade computer. A band of brothers in central Alabama. A British psychopath. Pyromaniacal chemists in a basement lab at Harvard. It’s a story about the messiness of our intentions, because we always forget the mess when we look back. And at the heart of it all are Haywood Hansell and Curtis LeMay, who squared off in the jungles of Guam. One was sent home. One stayed on, with a result that would lead to the darkest night of the Second World War. Consider their story and ask yourself — What would I have done? Which side would I have been on? Gladwell starts with the birth of the US Air Force at the Air Corps Tactical School in Montgomery, Alabama (the aviation version of the Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, or the Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island.) In the wake of WWI’s devastation for infantrymen, these early dreamers, the “Bomber Mafia”, conceived of a world in which airplanes could replace soldiers on the ground, flying into the heart of enemy territory and disabling “chokepoints” of war manufactury. There’s interesting bits about Carl Norden and his invention of the first bombsights that would allow for precision bombing (the legend goes that with a Norden bombsight, you could drop a bomb into a pickle barrel from six miles up), and what Gladwell stresses most of all, is that the founding philosophy of the US Air Force was that precision bombing would reduce the deaths of soldiers and civilians by solely targeting munitions factories and refineries and the like. Action moves to WWII, and in the European theatre, Churchill expects the USAF to join the RAF in their “morale bombing” operations (targeting Dresden and Münster to force German surrender despite the Blitz on London having not broken English resolve), and when the story moves to the Marianas islands in the Pacific, the real heart of the Air Force’s philosophical dilemma is reached: Japan must be defeated at any cost, and when General Haywood Hansell’s precision bombing runs prove to be costly and ineffective, he will be replaced by General Curtis LeMay; a commander unafraid to fill his men’s bombers with weaponised napalm and burn Japan to the ground. The full attack lasted almost three hours; 1,665 tons of napalm were dropped. LeMay’s planners had worked out in advance that this many firebombs, dropped in such tight proximity, would create a firestorm — a conflagration of such intensity that it would create and sustain its own wind system. They were correct. Everything burned for sixteen square miles. Buildings burst into flame before the fire ever reached them. Mothers ran from the fire with their babies strapped to their backs only to discover — when they stopped to rest — that their babies were on fire. People jumped into the canals off the Sumida River, only to drown when the tide came in or when hundreds of others jumped on top of them. People tried to hang on to steel bridges until the metal grew too hot to the touch, and then they fell to their deaths. General LeMay would say after the war that the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had been superfluous; the real work had already been done to force Japan’s surrender. And in a fascinating twist, the Japanese government would eventually bestow on LeMay their highest honor for a foreigner — the First-Class Order of Merit of the Grand Cordon of the Rising Sun — in appreciation for his help in rebuilding the Japanese Air Force. A Japanese historian is quoted as saying that he wanted to thank the Americans for the firebombing and the atomic bombs; if the Japanese government hadn’t been forced to surrender, there would have been a devastating land invasion, the Soviets would have carved the country up, and there would have been mass starvation in the winter of 1945 if General MacArthur hadn’t mobilised massive amounts of food aid. Despite it being concluded of the first night of firebombing that “Probably more persons lost their lives by fire at Tokyo in a six-hour period than at any time in the history of man”, the point can be made that this subversion of the precision-bombing-to-avoid-deaths philosophy went on to save countless more lives. So, as Gladwell asks in the beginning, put in the position of General Hansell (morally opposed to firebombing) or LeMay (reluctantly accepting of), what would you do? There is a lot to fascinate in this narrative — Gladwell pulls threads from many directions to weave a unified whole — but it’s not a very long read and didn’t grip me with the moral quandary at its heart. A little slight, a little pat, but definitely interesting while it lasted. Rounding up to four stars. *Digressions of note: The stunning architecture of the Air Force Academy Chapel that reinforces that branch of the military’s commitment to the unconventional; the western approach to bombing Japan started from India and travelled over the Himalayas (a route known as the “Hump” or “the aluminum trail” for the scattered debris from hundreds of airplane crashes); although the jet stream over Tokyo was unknown to American pilots in 1945, it had been discovered in the ‘20s by Japanese scientist Wasaburo Ooishi, but he only published his findings in Esperanto (ha!). ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 28, 2021
|
Apr 29, 2021
|
Apr 28, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0771070551
| 9780771070556
| 0771070551
| 4.11
| 1,037
| Sep 14, 2021
| Jan 01, 2021
|
really liked it
| Ernie Sickert, the etiolated young man who had brought them news of the break‑in, had appeared out of nowhere. He was wearing what had become a uni Ernie Sickert, the etiolated young man who had brought them news of the break‑in, had appeared out of nowhere. He was wearing what had become a uniform for him, grey flannel trousers, starched white shirt, and mulberry bow tie. Tall and so lanky that he verged on emaciation, Sickert had both hands up on the top of the door frame from which he hung like human drapery. An elaborate stack of towering pompadour crowned his narrow head, a hairdo that he had adopted during his days when he had played tenor sax for the Rhythm Alligators, a local dance band. Ernie had an expectant air, an I’m‑preparing‑to‑lick‑ice‑cream look on his face. Guy Vanderhaeghe is a reliably excellent writer and his literary hallmarks are on full display in August into Winter — this is a very manly historical fiction, set firmly on the Saskatchewan prairie as only he can describe it, with good guys and bad guys, heart-thumping action and heart-touching drama — and I am delighted to have had an early read of this fine novel; I have no doubt it will be up for all the Canadian literary awards this year. Slightly spoilery from here, but not much beyond the publisher’s blurb. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) “I’ve got a problem. A big one. The storm has cut Connaught off from the outside world. Completely. Telephone, telegraph lines, they’re all down. Roads are impassable.The foreman of the section gang came in on a handcar at six o’clock and said that the railway trestle bridge over Cutbank Creek to the east is ready to collapse and that the embankment on the west line has washed out. There’ll be no trains running to Connaught for days. Which means that I can’t contact any other detachments to let them know what’s happened here, can’t warn them that Ernie Sickert is on the loose. It all falls on me. I’ve got no one to turn to for help.” It’s August of 1939 and Ernie Sickert — the twenty-one-year-old pompadour-wearing, hepcat-talking, sax-playing, commando-wannabe — has gone from playing bizarre pranks on his neighbours in the village of Connaught to committing an unspeakable act of violence. Thinking himself smarter than everyone around him and basically untouchable, the psychopathic Sickert picks up his “girlfriend” Loretta (a twelve-year-old orphan with stick legs and a threadbare hand-me-down dress) and drives his mother’s Oldsmobile into the heart of a torrential rainstorm. Once the car inevitably breaks down, Ernie and Loretta make a run for it and the town’s rookie cop enlists the help of a couple of locals to track them down. These locals, Oliver and Jack Dill, are WWI veterans who still carry the mental aftereffects of their time in combat (Jack is a religious obsessive, writing an interminable opus on The City of God, and the reclusive Oliver is a recent widower whose dead wife had befriended the Sickert boy when he was a child), but with their horse skills, knowledge of the area, and combat experience, the Dill brothers are soon in hot pursuit of the runaways. The great glacier of anger that was Oliver Dill was grinding the bedrock of his being to gravel. The pressure of it was inescapable; sometimes he felt it a little less, sometimes a little more, but it was always present. For the last three years the glacier had been moving toward some unknown destination the way an icefield moves, inch by inch. This afternoon it had brought him to this point: Would he act as Judith would want him to act and try to spare the boy’s life? Or would the glacier follow the natural course of its inclinations, implacably inch forward and crush Ernie Sickert? Along the way, the posse adds the local schoolteacher to their number (Vidalia was a recent transplant from Winnipeg; a fiercely independent woman who finds herself stranded in Connaught after the schoolhouse burns down), and as her history unspools, we learn that she is mourning the death of her lover: a Communist intellectual who was recently killed when he joined the Canadian Mackenzie–Papineau Battalion to fight the Fascists in the Spanish Civil War. As the action of this novel mainly takes place from August into November of 1939 (hence the title) — the timeframe in which Europe was bracing for another World War and Bolshevik sympathisers like Vidalia were stunned by Hitler and Stalin’s nonaggression pact and subsequent carving up of Poland — the very specific moment in history affects everything that happens (and as each chapter opens with a headline and news snippet from the Winnipeg Evening Tribune, we are always aware of the larger events playing out in the background of the very local drama). When Oliver Dill eventually offers Vidalia a job typing up his brother’s manuscript, we are treated to long passages of Jack’s religious mania; and when Vidalia then decides to spend some of her time typing up the diary that her dead lover had kept in Spain, we then intimately learn of the unimaginable hardships faced by the Mac-Paps. Vidalia was stalled. Coming to the end of Dov’s journal left her wondering if life wasn’t a court convened and presided over by idiots. Left her wondering why she had clung so tenaciously to optimism, to belief in a better future if those things could be taken away as easily as they had been taken from Dov, by an accident, a stumble in the dark, by a politically motivated arrest. All of Vanderhaeghe’s characters in this novel are incredibly complex — with complicated histories revealed at length — and I found them, for the most part, to be frustratingly unknowable. Vidalia is prickly and standoffish — a self-satisfied intellectual and a feminist whose ambition outstrips her opportunities — but Oliver Dill falls for her, acting puppyish and playful in a way that I wouldn’t have predicted from the gruff loner we meet in the beginning. Vidalia does not want to be taken care of (even if she has few options), Dill can’t help but be a caregiver (he has taken care of Jack for twenty years, took care of his late wife in her final years), and I’m not certain that I loved (or completely bought) how their storyline ended. For many years, in his mind Dill had been trying to correct the past. But the past was beyond correction. If the past led to death then death was surely beyond correction too. You carried the past into the future on your back, its knees and arms hugging you tighter with every step. His heart was where it was. This is a longish novel (my kindle app clocked it at around eleven hours for me), and with so much at play — Oliver’s memories from WWI, Dov’s account of the Spanish Civil War, the news from Europe on the eve of WWII, everyone’s personal backstories, and Jack’s manuscript — it got to feel like a bit much. But the muchness is rather the point: Everyone is carrying their pasts into the future, and it’s undeniably a burden. The plot of August Into Winter has plenty of truly heart-in-your-throat moments and I found the conclusion to the main conflict to be perfectly satisfying. This is a long road and definitely worth the trip; that Ernie Sickert is one creepy piece of work. Take your lead from me, Mayfield. Do as I do. Creative havoc, well‑played, leads to victory. Creative havoc is the jazz of war. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 20, 2021
|
Apr 26, 2021
|
Apr 20, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0735281637
| 9780735281639
| 0735281637
| 3.94
| 505
| unknown
| Sep 21, 2021
|
really liked it
| In any case, they soon come back. The flickering along the wrack continues until morning comes. The sirens, now that night is done, must go back to In any case, they soon come back. The flickering along the wrack continues until morning comes. The sirens, now that night is done, must go back to the sea and hide — they lost their voices when they died. They cannot sing their secret song, “The Mystery of Right and Wrong”; they know the words but no one who would sing them truthfully to you. In the publisher’s blurb, it states that in The Mystery of Right and Wrong, critically acclaimed and beloved Canadian author Wayne Johnston “reveals haunting family secrets he's kept for more than 30 years”. With a main character named “Wade Jackson” — an aspiring young novelist from a Newfoundland outport — it is immediately reinforced that Johnston will be cutting close to the bone with this book. What follows is rather harrowing: this is a story of domestic abuse, systemic abuse (from the Nazi occupation of Holland to South African apartheid), intergenerational trauma, and mental illness. It is also a love story, a coming of age story, and an inquiry into whether, in the aftermath of abuse, either evil or free will can exist; the titular “mystery” of right and wrong. In a lengthy afterword, Johnston explains which parts are true (and how they played out in real life), and that part gobsmacked me; I can totally see how a masterclass on Johnston’s work can now be taught, with this novel serving as the key that unlocks it all. This book is courageous and important and compelling, and to be fair, it was also a bit too long, and although Johnston explains the reasons for the segments in verse, I found them, as they went on, exasperating. I am grateful to have received an advanced reading copy of this book five months before publication and I am daunted by the idea of being the first to review and “rate” it, but here goes: based on its importance and artistry, five stars; based on my personal “enjoyment” of the reading experience, I’m knocking it back to four. (Note: I read an ARC through NetGalley and passages quoted may not be in their final forms. Note especially, there was no particular formatting for the segments in verse and I reckon that could change.) I wasn’t sure if the book was making me worse or if it was all that was holding me together. My supposedly secret illness. But it somehow reassured me to think about the ways my sisters coped. Carmen had her drugs. Gloria had her hypersexuality, though not many people called it that at the time. Bethany had her anorexia. I had my diary and Het Achterhuis, which I kept reading even after I knew it by heart. The thought that we were all freaks made me feel less like one. Wade Jackson — a recent university graduate, working as a newspaper reporter while he plans his first novel — meets a young woman in the university library, which they both frequent as a quiet place to work. Wade will be so struck with this Rachel van Hout — beautiful and quirky, born in South Africa and brought along with her family to St. John’s as a teenager when her professor father took a job there — that despite some alarming proclivities, Wade will immediately throw his lot in with her. No matter how odd, damaging, or dangerous Rachel and her three sisters’ self-harming behaviours become, Wade commits to the long haul. There is a real heaviness and dread to the plot — what will the sisters do next and how did they get this way? — as POV skips through time and rotates between Wade, Rachel, the encoded diary she keeps, and long snippets from the epic verse Rachel’s father wrote and forced the girls to memorise as children, The Ballad of the Clan van Hout: Girls, get used to contradictions, truthful lies and false non-fictions. What isn’t there is everywhere; the things which are, are not, you see, however much they seem to be — and what is not is what will be as long as you and I agree. In the moment I could understand why these sections are set apart in verse — and in the afterword Johnston further, intriguingly, explains the impetus behind his use of poetry — but as I began with, and perhaps it comes down to the novel’s length, it eventually became just too much as a reading experience. However, the insight these sections allow into the mind of the girls’ father, Hans van Hout, are integral to the plot and allow us to take his self-mythologising with a grain of salt. (But honestly, less would be more for me.) As the action moves from Newfoundland to South Africa, and back home again through Amsterdam, Hans’ origin story will morph and change; but everywhere and in every time we are forced to consider what is and isn’t credible, defensible, or justifiable. It struck me that Rachel had been right when she said that history happened not in some nebulous, exceptional elsewhere, but in ordinary concrete places, to commonplace people. My world shrank to this pair of unexceptional streets, to Hans and his family, to Anne Frank and hers. History, the war, the fate of the Franks, were personal, local, terrifyingly actual and immediate. I imagined Hans as a teenager looking out of one of the windows of the house, his hands pressed to the glass as the Nazis marched past, their boots clumping on the cobblestones, row after row of bluff and bravado and menace without purpose, a lethal behemoth composed of men just like the ones who ran South Africa and those who supported them, greater only in number, driven to savagery by a group of men whose madness they need not have fallen for but did for reasons that flattered none of humankind. There is a lot of disturbing material in this book, reflecting the fact that there is a lot of disturbing material in life (certainly there has been enough in Johnston’s life that he claims to never be surprised by anything of which a person can be accused or to which they might confess). To make a novel out of this kind of material — a novel that employs that material to explore nuanced questions of right and wrong with artistry — is no small feat; to learn that the author is using this vehicle to expose and explore close-held secrets and pathologies is breathtaking. I have no doubt that The Mystery of Right and Wrong will make a big stir upon its release and I am looking forward to reading what others make of it. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 13, 2021
|
Apr 18, 2021
|
Apr 13, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0374266972
| 9780374266974
| 0374266972
| 3.82
| 24,729
| Aug 16, 2018
| Nov 10, 2020
|
really liked it
| In the cold of night, I took off my regulation trench coat and my shirt. I slid my shirt onto your body and tied the sleeves against your stomach, In the cold of night, I took off my regulation trench coat and my shirt. I slid my shirt onto your body and tied the sleeves against your stomach, a very, very tight double knot that became stained with your black blood. I picked you up and brought you back to the trench. I held you in my arms like a child, my more-than-brother, my friend, and I walked and walked in the mud, in the crevices carved out by mortar shells, filled with blood-stained water, dispersing the rats that had left their burrows to feed on human flesh. And as I carried you in my arms, I began to think for myself, by asking for your forgiveness. I knew, I understood too late what I should have done when you asked me, eyes dry, the way one asks a favor of a childhood friend, like a debt owed, without ceremony, sweetly. Forgive me. In At Night All Blood is Black, French-Sengalese author David Diop centres the voice of those who fought mostly unremembered by history — the West African soldiers who served in the trenches under the command of their French colonisers during WWI. Following an inner monologue that circles and meanders and splinters unpredictably, Diop places us in the fractured mind of one such Sengalese soldier: twenty-year-old Alfa Ndiaye, who signed up with his more-than-brother best friend, Mademba Diop; and after having Mademba die in his arms in the opening scene of the book, Alfa enacts a type of ritualised revenge against his German enemies (after all, at night all blood is black) that will at first be commended by his comrades, and eventually feared. When Alfa is ultimately relieved of active duty in order to “rest”, his memories of a childhood in a small Sengalese village add texture and context to his horrific experience of war in the present. This is a short novel that packs a hefty punch, and despite finding the whole thing disturbing and bordering on distasteful, I think that Diop does a service to history by telling this story. The rumor spread. It spread, and as it spread it shed its clothes and, eventually, its shame. Well dressed at the beginning, well appointed at the beginning, well outfitted, well medaled, the brazen rumor ended up with her legs spread, her ass in the air. I didn’t notice it right away, I didn’t recognize the change, I didn’t know what she was plotting. Everyone had seen her but no one described her to me. I finally caught wind of the whispers and learned that my strangeness had been transformed into madness, and madness into witchcraft. Soldier sorcerer. Alfa and Mademba are in a mixed unit, with Chocolat and Toubab soldiers serving side by side; and although there’s no real overt racism between these brothers in arms, “Chocolat” seems to have derogatory overtones and a quick Google search tells me that the West African term “Toubab” (for a white European) is negatively associated with colonialism. When their Captain orders the African soldiers to attack like “savages” — with a rifle in one hand and a machete in the other as they cross the No Man’s Land in order to cause maximum fear in their German opponents — it is this play-acting at savagery that will lead to Mademba’s death. And when Alfa then decides to embrace the caricature of the savage — to be the Germans’ worst nightmare and marvel at the fantastical prejudices behind their frightened blue eyes — he will cross a line that makes his own side fear that he has become a dëmm; a devourer of souls. The longer Alfa plays this role, the looser his own grip on reality: I am the shadow that devours rocks, mountains, forests, and rivers, the flesh of beasts and of men. I slice skin, I empty skulls and bodies. I cut off arms, legs, and hands. I smash bones and I suck out their marrow. But I am also the red moon that rises over the river, I am the evening air that rustles the tender acacia trees. I am the wasp and the flower. I am as much the wriggling fish as the still canoe, as much the net as the fisherman. I am the prisoner and his guard. I am the tree and the seed that grew into it. I am father and son. I am assassin and judge. I am the sowing and the harvest. I am mother and daughter. I am night and day. I am fire and the wood it devours. I am innocent and guilty. I am the beginning and the end. I am the creator and the destroyer. I am double. This notion of doubling/mirroring/twinning is present throughout — the mixing of white and Black soldiers, Alfa and Mademba are physical and intellectual opposites, Alfa’s parents (his mother a beautiful young Fula migratory shepherd, his father an old sedentary peasant) are “exact opposites”, there is consensual and nonconsenual sex — and it’s unclear whether Alfa might be suffering from the kind of mental disorder that a French doctor can “wipe away”, or perhaps his condition is straight out of Sengalese mythology. Either way, shell-shocked or possessed, Alfa is left broken in a way particular to his experience as an African soldier serving in a unit commanded by his country’s colonial rulers. This was a tough read of war and a descent into madness — as gutting as a bayonet to the abdomen — and I was often turned off by the depiction and treatment of women characters, but there’s the ring of truth here and I applaud Diop for bringing this story forward. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 02, 2021
|
Apr 04, 2021
|
Apr 03, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1101947187
| 9781101947180
| 1101947187
| 3.67
| 1,625
| May 10, 2016
| May 17, 2016
|
really liked it
| He feels the press of his own thoughts, the swell of the dark space at the back of the head from where the images start to spill. He's lost: the br He feels the press of his own thoughts, the swell of the dark space at the back of the head from where the images start to spill. He's lost: the broken boots, the stiffening limbs, the sun sinking, a country road, a tree. This is a waterfall that he is falling with, these are dream-thoughts on the edge of sleep; they slip away and turn to mist when he looks at them directly. I knew that the title of A Country Road, A Tree came from the opening stage directions for Waiting for Godot, but it wasn't until I finished reading this novel, and then started reading Goodreads reviews, that I learned there had ever been any mystery that the unnamed protagonist in the book was meant to be Samuel Beckett (that can't be a spoiler at this point, right?) I also didn't realise – having never actually read any Beckett, and certainly no biographies of his life – was that this would be, essentially, a WWII novel, and that's a good thing; I've come to realise that I don't much care for fiction set in the world wars – they seem a lazy way for a modern day author to evoke unearned emotion – and I may not have read this if I had known. But I have to admit that this book is an exception to my peevish rule – that a biographical novel that explores an author's influences, which happens to have involved a setting in Occupied France and Beckett's efforts with the Resistance, makes for a dramatic, informative, and wholly satisfying read. I also hadn't read Jo Baker before, and right from the dreamy prologue, I admired her voice and craft; I will definitely read her again. Bottom line is: I liked this far more than I expected to, and as I was then prompted to read Waiting for Godot and Google around for a few hours exploring the play and its reception and Beckett himself, I was drawn into a pleasurable interdisciplinary bubble of learning that leaves me richer for the experience. And it all started with a country road, a tree. What alarms him is the time that it implies. The waiting. That the seasons will have slid along from winter through spring and summer and back to autumn once more, and they'll be stuck here, eating garden peas and tomatoes and cooking their own onions in a stew. That by then the worst will not have happened, but then neither will anything else. I learned that Samuel Beckett was a part of the famed Paris literary scene in the 1930s – he even served as secretary for James Joyce and helped him to edit Finnegan's Wake, reading out every comma and period as Joyce's vision grew ever dimmer – and although Beckett could have waited out WWII in his comfortably safe Irish home country, when France declared war on Germany in 1939, Beckett hurried back to Paris from visiting his mother's house to continue his writing and to be with his friends (and especially his lover, Suzanne Déchevaux-Dumesnil). The narrative that follows – the danger and deprivations during the Occupation, working with the Resistance, narrow escapes, strained love, and moral quandaries – is the kind of story that might normally bounce off my jaded heart, but I did find it fascinating because it actually all happened to Beckett, and because Jo Baker uses a light hand to draw connections between what the man experienced and how he would later use those experiences in his art. With really lovely writing, I thought that Baker did a fantastic job of turning obviously deep research into a satisfying novel. His handwriting shrinks too and becomes more careful. Everything is reduced, condensed. He commits just the essence of the thing to paper. Anything more than that would be a waste. And when he surfaces to a cramped hand, a crick in the neck, the sunlight shifted across the floor, a sore blink, he knows that even to have written this little is an excess, it is an overflowing, an excretion. Too many words. There are just too many words. Nobody wants them; nobody needs them. And still they keep on, keep on, keep on coming. Although I had thoroughly enjoyed the reading of this novel on its own merits, I recommend following up A Country Road, A Tree with a reading of Waiting for Godot: Baker salts her novel with plenty of small details from the play (making for a fun Easter Egg hunt in either direction), and if her broad biographical information is all to be trusted, it makes sense of the play's Absurdist philosophy. Taken together, I feel gratifyingly enriched by the entire experience. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 08, 2020
|
Apr 10, 2020
|
Apr 08, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0062562681
| 9780062562685
| 0062562681
| 4.15
| 20,939
| Oct 03, 2017
| Oct 03, 2017
|
it was ok
| P.S. I had a dream last night that we were in Paris for Christmas. You, me, Will, Alice. The snow fell in thick fat flakes as we strolled along the P.S. I had a dream last night that we were in Paris for Christmas. You, me, Will, Alice. The snow fell in thick fat flakes as we strolled along the Champs-Élysées, the lights of the Eiffel Tower twinkling in the distance. It was the most perfect dream, Thomas. I know we will get there one day. I promise we will. Last Christmas in Paris was a book club pick for me, and while it's not the sort of thing I'd typically pick up, I am always game to read something outside of my comfort zone. Unfortunately, I simply didn't think that this “Novel of World War I” – a romance told in letters – was very good at all. With florid and maudlin writing, the storyline reveals nothing new about the Great War or the lives of the people affected by it, and honestly, I found the whole endeavor pointless; I have no idea why this book was written (or why it took two authors, Hazel Gaynor and Heather Webb, to complete). Not for me, but judging by its high rating on Goodreads, admittedly of value to others. I don't have much to say about this one, but I do want to voice (once again) my complaint that I find novels set in the big wars to be a lazy and easy appeal to sentimentality; the author needn't work too hard at setting the physical and emotional scene when we all have mental pictures and readily accessible reactions from watching news reels and films; and where the work is half-done like that, I expect an author to have something new or important to say by using those settings. I wasn't a huge fan of The Nightingale or All the Light We Cannot See, but at least their authors were attempting to tell stories about little-known groups or situations within WWII. With Last Christmas in Paris, we follow the correspondence of some upper-crust Brits as their attitude turns from “What jolly good fun is training camp! I do hope we see some decent action with the Hun, but they say this will all be over before Christmas!” to “Real war is terrifying and there's nothing more pitiable than watching a soldier crying out for his mother as he dies in the mud.” What's new in that? As the years go by, we are told about mustard gas and the sinking of the Lusitania and the Spanish Flu, and what's new about that? And as for the romantic angle – and its constant complications – I couldn't connect with that relationship either. Simply not my cuppa vin chaud. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 13, 2019
|
Nov 15, 2019
|
Nov 13, 2019
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0735236763
| 9780735236769
| 0735236763
| 3.58
| 7,780
| 2018
| Jan 01, 2019
|
liked it
| Do you see how things can turn out? Do you see that the world is big enough to make certain things possible? That thirty-six years ago the German S Do you see how things can turn out? Do you see that the world is big enough to make certain things possible? That thirty-six years ago the German Student Union could hold a rally in Opernplatz, Berlin, and burn twenty-five thousand books, many written by Jews, the students rejoicing in their festival of loathing, and now this, in Hometown. Hannah’s bookshop of the broken hearted, a thing of beauty. In a letter from the author at the beginning of my ARC of The Bookshop of the Broken Hearted, Robert Hillman explains that the two main characters in the novel are based, vaguely, on people he knew in the small Australian town where he grew up (that town, vaguely, represented here as the fictional “Hometown”). The local bumpkin Tom Hope is based on a young farmer Hillman knew as a kid, and the exotic foreigner, Hannah Babel, is based on a music teacher who arrived at his high school in 1961 (the era in which this book is primarily set). Hillman fleshes out this Hannah's Holocaust survival narrative with details from two such survivors' stories that he helped to write; two women “who walked out of the gates of hell and found the courage to embrace life again”. I liked everything about Tom Hope and his struggles with work and love, I liked the idea of the slightly mad but charming Madame Babel coming to rural Australia and shaking things up with a doomed-to-fail bookshop, but as with The Tattooist of Auschwitz or even Sophie's Choice, I'm not really comfortable with modern-day novelists imagining a person's experiences in the Nazi concentration camps; I especially don't like it when a man describes what that must have been like for a woman. Bearing witness is vital – I appreciate that Hillman used his skills to help actual Holocaust survivors to capture their stories – but this felt like misguided appropriation and the flashback scenes in Auschwitz spoiled the whole thing for me. (As noted, I read an ARC and passages quoted may not be in their final forms.) An hour before he appeared in the shop, he had been covered in muck, rounding up the sheep, shouting at cows, putting his fingers to his teeth to whistle up Beau, and now he stood with a big smile telling farmers' wives where to find the Georgette Heyers. In a shirt and tie. Polished shoes. Black slacks with a pleat down each leg. If you loved a woman, this is how you might well end up. Dear God. At midday, he kissed Hannah good-bye and skittered back to the farm with a hundred things to attend to. The book begins with the story of Tom Hope: a young man who only became a farmer when his uncle left him his spread, and as with his working life, everything just sort of happens to Tom – an unloving woman agrees to marry him, she leaves for a while, she comes back pregnant with another man's baby, Tom accepts it, she runs away again and Tom raises the toddler as his own, and when she returns yet again to take the boy away, Tom can only throw up his hands and try to heal his broken heart by throwing himself harder into caring for his sheep and cows and fields and orchards (all of this happens in the first few chapters, and it promised an intriguing and affecting story). When Hannah Babel (an older, exotically beautiful and eccentric foreigner) arrives in town and hires Tom to craft some bookshelves for her new shop, it doesn't take long for her to seduce him, and despite the large parts of herself that she keeps walled off, and despite some superior airs and an obvious intellectual mismatching, Tom accepts the relationship and they are soon married. Through alternating flashback scenes, we learn how Hannah lost her husband and son in Auschwitz, and it's understandable that she doesn't want any more children; that she never again wants to be responsible for a young life that she might not be able to protect. But when the boy that Tom still thinks of as his son escapes the commune/cult where his mother has brought him, finding his way back to Tom despite all odds, the couple is pushed to the brink – whose needs and pains will win out in this competition of the broken hearted? (At one point, Hannah gives Tom A Christmas Carol to read – she gives him several books to “improve” him, and that's about as meaningful as the presence of the bookshop gets – and Tom likes the book and especially its happy ending, “In life itself, you didn't get the chance to choose an ending; but if a writer could give Bob Cratchit a Merry Christmas, then that's what a writer should do.” I liked that Hillman acknowledged this early and it made it more intriguing to learn how he would tie up his own characters' tales.) She came to Australia with the bookshop still in her imagination and thought: How much farther can I go? This is where I stop. A very long way west of Budapest, of Auschwitz. She had read enough to know that we cannot speak of things that are “meant to be.” If her long journey from Europe to Hometown, to Tom Hope, to the bookshop of the broken hearted was meant to be, then Mein Kampf was meant to be, and the cleansing, the säuberung of the students in Opernplatz were meant to be. She said: “Too bad about that.” Hannah's happiness was great enough to embrace contradictions. It was without doubt meant to be, this bookshop that would bankrupt her, this love for a man who would one day notice her gray hair and her wrinkles more keenly than he did now. Too bad about that. For now, a little taste of paradise. Tom and Hannah are both intriguing characters and there's plenty of potential in throwing these two mismatched and broken souls together. But while we accept that Tom is focussed, hardworking, and uncomplaining without more than a few references to his developing years, Hillman gives us Hannah's entire life story (through thoughts and flashbacks), and that feels like the author doesn't trust the reader to have an understanding of the baggage that a cosmopolitan Holocaust-survivor might be carrying with her as she flees to the furthest reaches of the Earth. It was interesting for me to read of the young men in Hometown who were itching to get conscripted to fight in the Vietnam War (I didn't realise that Australia was a major combatant, and as a Canadian, I've never read stories before of anyone who wanted to join that fight), but I don't know how realistic it was for Tom to have been portrayed as someone who had never heard of the Holocaust (because Australia had fought in the Pacific during WWII, did they really never get news from the European front? Or is this just further proof of what a bumpkin Tom himself was?) I didn't like that the waiting-for-better-days character's name was Hope, that the multilingual foreigner was named Babel, or that their hometown was named Hometown, and as I started with, I really didn't like the scenes set in Auschwitz. On the other hand, there was much lovely writing here, and especially with Hannah's character, some really intriguing personality choices – she's messed up and every word and thought suggests that brokenness; it's compelling that Tom would be drawn to that. An uneven read with pluses and minuses; solid three stars. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 17, 2019
|
Apr 19, 2019
|
Apr 17, 2019
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
3.90
| 97,014
| Aug 30, 2018
| Sep 04, 2018
|
liked it
| “Silence becomes a woman.” Every woman I’ve ever known was brought up on that saying. I've recently been enjoying those books that put women's voic “Silence becomes a woman.” Every woman I’ve ever known was brought up on that saying. I've recently been enjoying those books that put women's voices into the epics – from Colm Tóibín's House of Names to Madeline Miller's Circe – and although I had been warned that The Silence of the Girls has some literary failings, I was still interested in reading how Pat Barker would handle the story of the enslaved females held by the Greek army during the siege of Troy. I now see these failings – and would agree that the storytelling here didn't reach the potential of the idea – but I'm still glad to have read this; to have participated in breaking the silence for these girls and women. Looking back, it seemed to me I'd been trying to escape not just from the camp, but from Achilles's story; and I'd failed. Because, make no mistake, this was his story – his anger, his grief, his story. I was angry, I was grieving, but somehow that didn't matter. Here I was, again, waiting for Achilles to decide when it was time for bed, still trapped, still stuck inside his story, and yet with no real part to play in it. The story is initially told from the first person perspective of Briseis: she was the wife of King Mynes, ruler of the Trojan city of Lyrnessus, when the city was sacked by Achilles and his men. As so often happens in these heroic battles of yore, every man and boy in the city was killed, along with every pregnant woman in case she was carrying a future soldier, and all of the girls and women were placed into slavery – the pretty ones becoming concubines; Briseis herself a special war prize for Achilles's own uses. Raised in this world, Briseis accepts her fate with silence, but she does initially wonder if she would have been better off throwing herself from the ramparts as the Greeks overran Lyrnessus, as did some of the other frightened women. Because we're essentially being retold The Iliad from Briseis' perspective, we get to see what the women in the camp were up to while their captors went off to battle – the weaving, the laundry, the care of the wounded (and how hard would it be not to cheer for every Trojan arrow sticking out of your rapists' bodies?) – but because Briseis was royalty and now lives with “the greatest of the Greeks”, hers isn't quite the common fate. Those familiar with The Iliad will recognise when a dispute over the ownership of Briseis causes a rift between Achilles and the commander of the Greek forces, Agamemnon, and in order to show what the men were up to while Briseis couldn't possibly bear witness to the action, the narrative eventually shifts to a third person POV that rotates between several men (including Achilles and his close confidante, Patroclus, Agamemnon, and King Priam of Troy) and then back to Briseis. I didn't really like the effect of this, and especially because as Briseis is obviously telling her story to someone long after the fact (and using frequently jarring effects like, “I’d survived. We-ell, in a manner of speaking I’d survived.”), she uses a passive voice while the men – most of whom are soon to die – have thoughts that are active and urgent: this does little to make Briseis the most interesting character in her own story. I thought: Suppose, suppose just once, once, in all these centuries, the slippery gods keep their word and Achilles is granted eternal glory in return for his early death under the walls of Troy...? What will they make of us, the people of those unimaginably distant times? One thing I do know: they won't want the brutal reality of conquest and slavery. They won't want to be told about the massacres of men and boys, the enslavement of women and girls. They won't want to know we were living in a rape camp. No, they'll go for something altogether softer. A love story, perhaps? I just hope they manage to work out who the lovers were. For a book that seems intentioned to bear witness to the “rape camps”, the sexual violence in this story is more implied than shown (except for some weird Oedipal rage that Achilles works out for his mother – the sea goddess Thetis – against Briseis' body when she comes to bed smelling of the sea). And even Briseis' reaction to being passed on to Agamemnon (not that she had a choice) was frustratingly passive in her later retelling: “So what did he do that was so terrible? Nothing much, I suppose, nothing I hadn't been expecting.” It's one thing to have chosen survival and act compliant and silent in the moment, but where's the anger in the retelling years later? What I loved about books like Circe or Ursula K. Le Guin's Lavinia is that their authors took female characters from the epics and, based on only the few lines afforded to them, stretched these women out to human form with entire childhoods, personalities, and interior lives. Barker gives us Briseis' viewpoint on the final months of the Trojan War, but we never really learn who she is; she never becomes the main character in her own story and that's wasted potential to me. We’re going to survive – our songs, our stories. They’ll never be able to forget us. Decades after the last man who fought at Troy is dead, their sons will remember the songs their Trojan mothers sang to them. We’ll be in their dreams – and in their worst nightmares too. So I suppose that's the point of not throwing oneself off the ramparts: the raped women will give birth to Greek sons, but raise them on Trojan lullabies; the women were never silent after all, just quietly keeping their stories alive in the dim of the nurseries where the heroes deign not to tread. I am happy to have read this book, as it adds to an area of personal interest, but I do think it could have been done better. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 08, 2019
|
Feb 10, 2019
|
Feb 08, 2019
|
Hardcover
| ||||||||||||||||||
0345812093
| 9780345812094
| 0345812093
| 4.27
| 217
| Mar 13, 2018
| Mar 13, 2018
|
it was amazing
| It seemed that the RPF could now commit crimes out in the open and still receive billions of dollars in aid. And Kagame could continue to receive h It seemed that the RPF could now commit crimes out in the open and still receive billions of dollars in aid. And Kagame could continue to receive human rights awards despite these murders, the Spanish indictment and Amnesty's reports – buoyed by propaganda and protected by powerful friends in the West. What were these Western allies supporting? From the point of view of the RPF's victims, it all seemed to be in praise of blood, an endorsement of mass murder. The brief and accepted version of the Rwandan genocide that occurred over 100 days from April 7 to mid-July of 1994: In a country made up of a Hutu majority and Tutsi minority populations, after enduring a Tutsi monarchy under Belgian colonisation, a Hutu-led rebellion saw Rwandan independence in 1962 and the fleeing of Tutsi refugees into Uganda. After years of the ensuing Hutu rule and Tutsi oppression, rebel forces from the Uganda refugee bases – Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) under the leadership of Paul Kagame – engaged the Rwandan government in a Civil War starting in 1990, and during a peace accord in 1993, President Juvénal Habyarimana's plane was shot down by (what was concluded to be) Hutu extremists who were opposed to the ceasefire. The killings began the next day, with Hutu murdering Tutsi wherever they found them; neighbour against neighbour, egged on by military forces and radical radio stations. Up to a million Tutsi would be killed, seventy per cent of their population, in an event rightly called genocide. Hamstringed UN forces, under the leadership of Canadian General Roméo Dallaire, were helpless to stop the violence, and Paul Kagame and the RPF were eventually credited with bringing stability to the country; he has been president since 2000, with a mandate to continue his rule through 2034. But this isn't the whole story as journalist Judi Rever would eventually discover and reveal in her explosive and essential work of reporting, In Praise of Blood. In October, 1996, Kagame's army and Ugandan allies invaded what was then known as Zaire and attacked Hutu refugee camps; a move the West deemed totally justified as the new Rwandan leader committed to tracking down “génocidaires” and bringing them to justice. What Rever discovered at these camps were mostly starving and exhausted women and children who told of fleeing through the jungle just steps ahead of massacring death squads. This experience would set the journalist on a years-long path of inquiry that would put her in touch with wary Rwandan expats throughout Africa and Europe (many of whom would end up murdered); that would see her receiving confidential reports and documents that were forwarded to her at great risk; and that would see her health and personal life suffer. Meanwhile, Kagame and his allies would oust Zaire's longstanding dictator Mobutu Sese Seko and deliver the country into the hands of someone who would ensure its resources (and especially the coltan necessary for high tech equipment) were “open for business”. To what degree was the West behind Seko's ouster? It turns out that Bechtel – a mining giant based out of Hope, Arkansas – was assembling a “master development plan” for the new Democratic Republic of the Congo before its old government was even toppled; satellite images that Bechtel was using to identify the country's mineral potential were given to the invading rebels for military purposes, and in return, Bechtel was first in line to win mining contracts with the Congo's new government. Although the Congo's new leader Laurent Kabila, Kagame, and some of their top officials have become immensely wealthy from their share of these mining profits, this couldn't have been accomplished without international complicity. “Bechtel's links to U.S. intelligence officials, former politicians and military personnel have made it one of the most powerful and secretive corporate entities in the world. The company has been accused of being a US shadow government.” Rever mentions only in passing that Bechtel's base of Hope, Arkansas is the hometown of Bill Clinton. It's clear that the evidence of RPF crimes was everywhere in the days and months after the genocide. So why did the image of Kagame and his forces as the heroes who put an end to the killing of innocents persist? I believe it is because so many institutions and governments needed the story of the genocide to be one of good and evil, with the evildoers simply defined. But the UN in particular cannot claim ignorance when it comes to these crimes. In Praise of Blood can be a little meandering, with Rever going back to events over and over again as she collects more evidence and testimony over the years, but it's probably a necessary format as she eventually convinced me that: • Kagame and the RPF instigated the genocide against their own Tutsi people by having a fifth column inside Rwanda, ready to start and promote the bloodletting • Kagame and the RPF fired the missile that brought down President Habyarimana's plane (killing also Burundian President Cyprien Ntaryamira and ten others in the process) • The RPF committed a simultaneous genocide against the Hutu people – killing people inside their homes within the areas they controlled, tracking down escapees and luring them to public places with offers of food and supplies and then killing them en masse, trucking refugees back from Uganda to be murdered, cremated, and dispersed – and that, where the West has recognised these deeds, they have been excused in the name of revenge • From the UN's and national governments' lack of action at the time (attributed to US pressure), to their refusal to investigate evidence or follow through with what investigations there have been, the world is complicit in the genocide of both peoples This book is packed full of evidence (and footnotes and appendices) that support these findings, and still, Paul Kagame and the RPF are referred to on Wikipedia as the liberators of Rwanda; the country has been the recipient of billions of dollars in foreign aid; the Clinton Foundation gave Kagame their Global Citizen Award in 2009, saying, “From crisis, President Kagame has forged a strong, unified and growing nation with the potential to become a model for the rest of Africa and the world.” I can't imagine what the Rwandan people – those on both sides who experienced genocide and who now live under a strongman-surveillance government – think of the rest of us. However, despite In Praise of Blood being such a necessary light in the darkness, I fear it's one that hasn't caught enough attention as yet; what will it take for the world to demand the truth? ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 12, 2019
|
Jan 15, 2019
|
Jan 12, 2019
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0735273596
| 9780735273597
| 0735273596
| 3.49
| 1,487
| unknown
| Aug 28, 2018
|
really liked it
| Now, the man told his son, you're sixteen – old enough to become a member of the Society. The Hellfire Society, the father added. He switched on th Now, the man told his son, you're sixteen – old enough to become a member of the Society. The Hellfire Society, the father added. He switched on the car radio, and drove towards the coast and then up into the mountains of Lebanon. In the prologue to Beirut Hellfire Society, an undertaker introduces his teenaged son, Pavlov, to a secret crematorium in the mountains surrounding Beirut – burial is the only officially sanctioned method for cadaver disposal, although both the Christians and the Muslims of the city deny it to their outcasts – and as the book begins, it is several years later, the father is dead, and Pavlov is enlisted to take over the work of cremating the atheists, hedonists, homosexuals, and other “undesirables” of the community. Having grown up in a house beside the Christian cemetery, Pavlov has spent his entire life watching parades of mourners go by from an upper balcony, and as the city's civil war escalates (this is the 1970's) and as the priest leads an unending stream of mourners for dead militiamen to their gravesites, Pavlov starts to suffer from mounting nihilism: Just what is the point of this war? What is the point of life itself? Told in short, episodic chapters, we are introduced to a wide variety of characters – with only a couple of threads stretching throughout the whole book – and written in Rawi Hage's typically lyrical and engaging style, I immensely enjoyed this return to the world of Hage's knockout debut, De Niro's Game. I was struck by the short, quirky observations: Women in black gowns dragged their ponderous heels on the unpaved road, and men in sombre colours shortened, with their breath, white cigarettes trapped between their scissor-like fingers and lead-filled teeth. I was intrigued by the details that Pavlov observes from his balcony: pallbearers dancing with the coffins of unmarried young men to give them a combination wedding/funeral; the ironic dangers of having a funeral parade as bombs are falling all around; the dwindling availability of pallbearers as the young men die off, Christians emigrate, and family lines are extinguished. And I was enchanted by longer passages and their mixed imagery about the banality of constant warfare: Poor terrestrial dead, Pavlov thought, miserable cadavers confined to their rectangular demarcation. They have to endure the crushing weight of the earth, and the bird's-eye-view of apathetic gravediggers pouring earth into their eyes. He hurried back home, lit a cigarette and stood on his balcony. He inhaled and exhaled with force, and bade farewell to the smoke on this day of light rain and blossoming trees and the shameless appearance of flowers, pink pirouettes exuberant with scent and colour that mingled with bullets falling from weapons in the hands of fighters wearing cheap white sneakers with green rubber soles made in China. In the main part of the book, the stream of people with alternative beliefs and lifestyles who come to Pavlov's door to prearrange their own cremations demonstrates the Beirut of the time to have been a safe haven for intellectuals, Bohemians, and sexual adventurers. Yet in a modern day epilogue, when Pavlov's heir moves into the family home overlooking the Christian cemetery, the now Muslim-dominated neighbourhood isn't quite so tolerant of Westernised values. So what were all those young men fighting and dying for during Lebanon's civil war? This article in Maclean's points out the book's key inspiration from an interview with Rawi Hage: In the epilogue, when the story moves briefly to the present, Beirut Hellfire Society’s underlying connective thread – a kind of geocultural determinism – becomes fully visible. Pavlov’s half-Swedish great-niece comes upon the scene and starts to morph into Pavlov. “Yes, it’s a story about families and lineages,” says Hage, “that asks how people are transformed by their geographies. How important is it to stay in one space? Maybe we should all become wanderers. I just don’t know.” And based on that information, I reckon this is the key passage from the book itself: These few left-over Christians in the Middle East should leave, the Bohemian said. They should leave this land and spread out all over the earth. The world is vast and these early converts are holding on, in vain, to their mythologies, religion, and a handful of picturesque valleys and mountains. Who and what are they fighting for? They should leave. Leave this country to the Muslims, and then the Muslims will leave it to someone else one day. I have never understood attachments to land and culture. Look at them, sliding one coffin after another into the pit! They wasted the little life they could have had elsewhere. They were never tolerated, and they tolerated no one. The Gods of these lands are cruel, jealous, petty, and archaic. These converts should leave and roam the planet... There's plenty to think about here, and with scenes and language that consistently intrigued me, I found this rather non-traditional novel to be thoroughly captivating. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 08, 2018
|
Oct 10, 2018
|
Oct 09, 2018
|
Hardcover
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.56
|
really liked it
|
Apr 03, 2024
|
Mar 29, 2024
|
||||||
4.36
|
it was amazing
|
Feb 10, 2024
|
Feb 08, 2024
|
||||||
3.62
|
liked it
|
Jan 13, 2024
|
Jan 06, 2024
|
||||||
3.92
|
really liked it
|
Dec 30, 2022
|
Dec 31, 2022
|
||||||
3.04
|
really liked it
|
Aug 22, 2022
|
Dec 06, 2022
|
||||||
3.67
|
liked it
|
Apr 02, 2022
|
Mar 29, 2022
|
||||||
3.67
|
liked it
|
Oct 24, 2021
|
Oct 22, 2021
|
||||||
3.71
|
really liked it
|
Oct 03, 2021
|
Oct 01, 2021
|
||||||
4.11
|
really liked it
|
May 25, 2021
|
May 26, 2021
|
||||||
3.69
|
really liked it
|
May 02, 2021
|
May 01, 2021
|
||||||
4.03
|
really liked it
|
Apr 29, 2021
|
Apr 28, 2021
|
||||||
4.11
|
really liked it
|
Apr 26, 2021
|
Apr 20, 2021
|
||||||
3.94
|
really liked it
|
Apr 18, 2021
|
Apr 13, 2021
|
||||||
3.82
|
really liked it
|
Apr 04, 2021
|
Apr 03, 2021
|
||||||
3.67
|
really liked it
|
Apr 10, 2020
|
Apr 08, 2020
|
||||||
4.15
|
it was ok
|
Nov 15, 2019
|
Nov 13, 2019
|
||||||
3.58
|
liked it
|
Apr 19, 2019
|
Apr 17, 2019
|
||||||
3.90
|
liked it
|
Feb 10, 2019
|
Feb 08, 2019
|
||||||
4.27
|
it was amazing
|
Jan 15, 2019
|
Jan 12, 2019
|
||||||
3.49
|
really liked it
|
Oct 10, 2018
|
Oct 09, 2018
|