Matthew's Reviews > Anna Karenina

Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
16254355
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: 2021, audible, audio, classic, completist-book-club, historical-fiction

Another classic in the books!

I have to say, Anna Karenina is the most spoiled book I have ever encountered. I was not surprised by the ending because I have seen dozens of books, movies, etc. where the climax of this book is discussed with reckless abandon. If this book has not been spoiled for you yet, and if your luck is anything like mine, read it soon!

Russian names:

Have you read any Russian authors before? If so, you know that not only are names repeated over and over, they are also often said in totality and they have several variations – some of which are nothing like each other. Because of this, if you try this one, get ready for lots of names and possible confusion over which character is being discussed. But, don’t worry! In general, the key players are easy to follow.

Russian politics and labor:

While this large tome has lots of story, it also has a lot of discussion on Russian politics and the labor climate at the time it was written. This could prove to be either interesting for you or boring depending on what you are looking for in a book. I did not mind it much; it did not end up being my favorite part of the book, but I do think it added a lot to the atmosphere and setting.

The role of Women:

Overall, I was left with the impression that during the time this was written, women were treated very unfairly in Russia (and, I am sure, all around the world). No matter what happened or who was at fault, a woman paid the price. I know this still goes on today with women being considered “sluts” if they sleep around, but men are considered “studs”. Shows that in some respects we have not advanced very much as a society! If a story based on unequal treatment based on gender interests you, this is a good one to read and analyze.

Overall impression:

I enjoyed this book a lot. I have seen many fawn over it as some of the greatest literature ever. I don’t feel like I was quite that enamored with it, but it was an enjoyable, easy to read, follow, and appreciate. I am very glad I took the time to read this classic and if you are looking to take on a big, famous book, this one would not be a bad choice.
196 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Anna Karenina.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

July 4, 2018 – Shelved
July 4, 2018 – Shelved as: to-read
January 1, 2021 – Started Reading
January 1, 2021 – Shelved as: 2021
January 1, 2021 – Shelved as: audible
January 1, 2021 – Shelved as: audio
January 1, 2021 – Shelved as: classic
January 1, 2021 – Shelved as: completist-book-club
January 1, 2021 – Shelved as: historical-fiction
January 2, 2021 –
2.0% "The affair"
January 3, 2021 –
4.0% "Brothers"
January 5, 2021 –
7.0% "Rivals"
January 8, 2021 –
9.0% "Not an affair of the heart (and, finally, Anna!)"
January 9, 2021 –
10.0% "Ball"
January 10, 2021 –
13.0% ""I have come to be where you are""
January 11, 2021 –
14.0% "End of Part 1"
January 12, 2021 –
16.0% "The glorification of adultery"
January 13, 2021 –
18.0% "“They ought to find out how to vaccinate for love, like smallpox.”"
January 14, 2021 –
20.0% "The study of women"
January 15, 2021 –
22.0% "Counting trees"
January 17, 2021 –
24.0% "Off to the races"
January 18, 2021 –
26.0% "Husband and lover"
January 19, 2021 –
28.0% "Invalids"
January 22, 2021 –
29.0% "The end of Part Two"
January 23, 2021 –
30.0% "Only caring about issues that affect you"
January 24, 2021 –
31.0% "Mowing"
January 25, 2021 –
33.0% "French"
January 26, 2021 –
35.0% "Dear Anna . . ."
January 27, 2021 –
37.0% "The end of life as you know it"
January 28, 2021 –
38.0% "An old friend"
January 29, 2021 –
41.0% "Land and Labor Management"
January 30, 2021 –
43.0% "How to live vs Death"
January 31, 2021 –
44.0% "A bad divorce"
February 1, 2021 –
46.0% "Brother-in-law"
February 2, 2021 –
48.0% "The education of women"
February 3, 2021 –
49.0% "Kitty and Levin"
February 4, 2021 –
51.0% "Revolver"
February 5, 2021 –
53.0% "No good options going forward"
February 6, 2021 –
54.0% "The doubting groom"
February 7, 2021 –
56.0% "Holy Matrimony"
February 8, 2021 –
57.0% "Painting"
February 9, 2021 –
59.0% "Portrait of a Lady"
February 10, 2021 –
60.0% "Domestic life"
February 11, 2021 –
62.0% "Extreme unction"
February 12, 2021 –
63.0% "Delusion of salvation"
February 13, 2021 –
65.0% "Alive . . . but dead to society"
February 14, 2021 –
67.0% "Opera"
February 15, 2021 –
71.0% "Mushrooms and guns"
February 16, 2021 –
73.0% "Snipe and grouse"
February 17, 2021 –
75.0% ""Am I any better than Anna?""
February 19, 2021 –
77.0% "A question of heirs"
February 21, 2021 –
81.0% "Elections"
February 22, 2021 –
82.0% "Divorce talk . . . again"
February 23, 2021 –
84.0% "Public meeting"
February 24, 2021 –
86.0% "Obstinacy"
February 26, 2021 –
92.0% "Jealousy, anger, reconciliation, more anger, quarreling"
February 27, 2021 –
95.0% "Too much for Anna"
February 28, 2021 –
96.0% "Spiritual questions"
March 2, 2021 –
98.0% "Bees"
March 4, 2021 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-27 of 27 (27 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Loretta Enjoyable book Matthew. Hope you’re finding it so! 😊


Lesle At times I wanted to smack Anna and other times I felt sorry for her in a weird way!


Theresa (bookbliss925) Great review. Thanks for the heads up about the names. I plan to read this soon and will keep that in mind.


Ginnie I don’t know how i didn’t have the ending spoiled for me when Ib read it a year ago but since then I’ve heard people discuss it or seen it spoiled in books.


Matthew Loretta wrote: "Enjoyable book Matthew. Hope you’re finding it so! 😊"

It was, Loretta! Glad you enjoyed it, too! :D


Matthew Lesle wrote: "At times I wanted to smack Anna and other times I felt sorry for her in a weird way!"

I can see that, Lesle! I felt that way about several of the characters.


Paula W Russian names are so much fun! There’s a Wikipedia article on it that helped me out quite a bit. There’s your name, then another name that means son of/daughter of, and often a nickname. I had a conversation recently with a person for whom English isn’t a primary language and realized that we do it, too. We are just used to it. Edward becomes Teddy or even Ned. Margaret becomes Meg and Maggie. Elizabeth becomes any number of things. Anyway, I loved This book and am glad you did, too!


message 8: by Ginger (last edited Mar 09, 2021 03:42PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ginger Great review Matthew!! I'm agreeing with all that you've said in this review as I'm about half way through.

I do think the farming parts are a bit boring but I'm still invested into Levin's life and being the best farmer/land owner he can be! LOL!
I'm looking forward to finishing this since I'm one of the few (I think there's like 5 of us in the world) who does not know how it ends for Anna.


Matthew Theresa (bookbliss925) wrote: "Great review. Thanks for the heads up about the names. I plan to read this soon and will keep that in mind."

Thanks, Theresa! And, no problem! Good luck with the names when you try it. 😁


Matthew Ginnie wrote: "I don’t know how i didn’t have the ending spoiled for me when Ib read it a year ago but since then I’ve heard people discuss it or seen it spoiled in books."

Glad to hear someone else noticed it, too! Also glad you managed to read this one before you noticed it.


message 11: by Girish (new) - added it

Girish Gowda keira Knightly herself spoiled the ending for me in an interview. It happened so quickly.


Brian Fagan I'm guessing the host did most of the spoiling.


Willow Croft Luckily for me I read it back when I was about ten or eleven...no risk of spoilers back then! :-)


Matthew Paula W wrote: "Russian names are so much fun! There’s a Wikipedia article on it that helped me out quite a bit. There’s your name, then another name that means son of/daughter of, and often a nickname. I had a co..."

Help from another source like Wikipedia would be useful for these Russian classics!

I am also glad to see you liked it, Paula! 😁


message 15: by Matthew (last edited Mar 10, 2021 01:06PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Matthew Ginger wrote: "Great review Matthew!! I'm agreeing with all that you've said in this review as I'm about half way through.

I do think the farming parts are a bit boring but I'm still invested into Levin's life a..."


Thank you, Ginger! Lucky you not getting spoiled - you will probably start noticing it everywhere once you finish.

And, yes, so much mowing . . . 🤣🤣🤣


Matthew Girish wrote: "keira Knightly herself spoiled the ending for me in an interview. It happened so quickly."

Ugh! That's the worst - you would think an actor or actress would be more careful with spoilers!


Matthew Willow wrote: "Luckily for me I read it back when I was about ten or eleven...no risk of spoilers back then! :-)"

Yes - the internet and social media have greatly increased the chance of spoilers! When a new book or movie comes out, I go on lockdown to avoid hearing or seeing anything.

However, I do remember Back to the Future II being spoiled for me the week it came out when I was a kid because I didn't go and watch it fast enough. When Part III came out, I had my Mom take me to see it right after school.


Lesle Nice points in your review Matthew!


Jeffrey Keeten Is there a reason why you went with the old Garnett translation instead of the much superior (IMHO) Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky edition? I know you listen to books instead of reading them and maybe there isn't an audible of P&V yet.

This is without a doubt, for me, one of the best books ever written. It is epic and considering that it was written in 1878 the themes of the book are just as relevant today as they were 140 years ago. You made me laugh when you wrote that the book had been discussed with reckless abandonment. haha! When one thinks about the influence of this book and how much it has been studied and written about your comment made me think you were confusing this with the latest episode of Outlander or Discovery of Witches...don't tell me anything or it will be RUINED. I knew the complete plot of this book before I read it and it did not take anything away from my experience. I'm not a big believer in spoilers though. Experiencing the craft of the novelist is as important as the plot devices. Anyway I'm glad you at least tepidly enjoyed your experience. I'm sure Maggie was a good narrator. I still smile every time I think of her in the movie The Secretary.


Matthew Lesle wrote: "Nice points in your review Matthew!"

Thanks, Leslie! 😁


message 21: by Matthew (last edited Mar 11, 2021 10:51AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Matthew Jeffrey wrote: "Is there a reason why you went with the old Garnett translation instead of the much superior (IMHO) Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky edition? I know you listen to books instead of reading the..."

The only reason I chose this translation is that Audible was advertising it as available with my subscription. I had not seen any discussion about translations, but figured if Audible got Maggie Gyllenhaal to read this one, it had to be decent! 😁

Yeah, I have often said that there is a statute of limitations for how long something has been available for general consumption before it can no longer truly be spoiled (i.e. Darth Vader - if you don't know by now . . .). But, it was amazing how often I would see or hear (view spoiler). I can truly say that knowing did not ruin my overall experience, I was just not shocked or surprised and could see where things were headed with her the entire time. Kind of like when you watch or read a mystery a second time and pick up on hints you missed - I was catching the first time around!

And, 3 stars is tepid for me. This was quite a bit more than 3 stars for me. Just not quite the 5 star experience. But, I can easily tell why it is a 5 star for many.

Thanks for the feedback and discussion points, Jeffrey! 😃


Jeffrey Keeten Matthew wrote: "Jeffrey wrote: "Is there a reason why you went with the old Garnett translation instead of the much superior (IMHO) Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky edition? I know you listen to books instea..."

I would always suggest that readers or in your case listeners should take at least a bit of time researching what translations are available for classics. Depending on the time period in which they were translated they could be heavily edited or even altered to remove anything deemed "offensive". Also, some translators are just more gifted at interpreting the intention of the writer. P&V have always been a good experience for me when reading Russian translations. Garnett was the standard translation for many, many decades, and I'm sure it was fine, but P&V add that extra special sauce that really brought Tolstoy's words to life for me.

Reckless abandon...your still giving me a chuckle over that one. :-) Those damn critics, professors, students of literature always spoiling the best literature by discussing it!!!


Ginger Jeffrey wrote: "Is there a reason why you went with the old Garnett translation instead of the much superior (IMHO) Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky edition? I know you listen to books instead of reading them and maybe there isn't an audible of P&V yet."

Thank you for the feedback Jeffrey! I've been reading the Garnett translation and have decided to switch to see if the reading experience will be better. I appreciate knowing that there are many translations out there for this book.


message 24: by Matthew (last edited Mar 11, 2021 12:38PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Matthew Jeffrey wrote: "Matthew wrote: "Jeffrey wrote: "Is there a reason why you went with the old Garnett translation instead of the much superior (IMHO) Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky edition? I know you listen..."

I guess I am too cheap - I see "Free Audible Exclusive" and I jump on it! 😉

And, hey, reckless abandon is way hyperbolic for sure (I adore and overuse hyperbole - my wife hates it, but it's who I am), but I am not talking about it getting spoiled by reading an expose on Russian literature or a review of the book. I am just saying I have never seen the climax of a book so often discussed in seemingly unrelated books, movies, etc. The type of spoiling I am talking about is a cutscene in Family Guy talking about it (not that they did, maybe they did . . . but that is the type of spoilage that comes to mind, not Russian professors having a scholarly debate). And, overall, it is just an observation and not a complaint (just in case you thought it was me complaining - I thought it would bring a little levity to start my review) 😁😁😁 <----all the smileys so you know the levity is in these lines I wrote 😃


message 25: by Feli (new) - rated it 5 stars

Feli Great review, Matthew. I am glad to hear that you liked this one. I was surprised at how much I loved it when I read this a few years ago. I knew the ending as well, but it wasn't a big problem, I still enjoyed reading the book. The Russian names and their variations nearly killed me in the beginning but after a few (hundred) pages I got used to it 😂


Matthew Feli wrote: "Great review, Matthew. I am glad to hear that you liked this one. I was surprised at how much I loved it when I read this a few years ago. I knew the ending as well, but it wasn't a big problem, I ..."

Thank you, Feli! Sounds like we had a very similar experience with this one. Glad you enjoyed it! :)


message 27: by Dawn (new) - added it

Dawn I had been looking forward to reading this until Jeopardy, of all places, spoiled the ending for me! Knowing that it has such an ending, I'm reluctant to read it now.


back to top