BlackOxford's Reviews > The Queen's Gambit

The Queen's Gambit by Walter Tevis
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
17744555
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: american

The Tragedy of Success

The Queens Gambit is about professional chess in the same way that David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest is about professional tennis. That is to say, the core of the book is about how we use our talents to destroy ourselves. In this it is sImilar to Stefan Zweig’s Chess Story which, although written three quarters of a century ago, carries the same warning about the same game.

Beth is a chess prodigy. The first impression of her story might be that she is another Billy Eliot or a Mozart, a rerun of talent triumphing over adversity. But Walter Tevis has done something unusual. Although the book is written on the third person, the reader gets to know very little about Beth from the outside. The perspective is that of Beth from the inside - what she, feels, thinks. But what she is to herself is opaque. She, like most of us, has no idea that she is neurotic.

Beth is an Objective Introvert in Jungian terms. That is, she is particularly sensitive to the social environment in which she finds herself; and she tends to adapt herself in a variety of ways to that environment. I think it’s fair to say that Objective Introverts are the permanently oppressed in modern society. In ages past, they might end up in monasteries or as quiet functionaries in a family business. But in a competitive corporate society their lack of aggressiveness and apparent malleability makes them seem weak and unserious, unfit for commercial adventure.

Unless, of course, they have some significant talent that allows them to shine - like playing chess. In that case the talent is perceived - by its possessor as well as the rest of society - as a compensation for an otherwise unfortunate personality. Like the autistic savant who can sketch an entire cityscape from memory, the talent is not only a way to fit in but also a route to fame and fortune. Or so it might seem.

Beth compensates for her psychic imbalance using two strategies: chess and dope. Chess provides a focus from which the constant pressure generated by the the world can be mitigated. The dope dulls what’s left of the world and eases the pressure between matches. Outstanding therapy therefore.

The problem of course, as in any self-help regime, is that the remedy quickly becomes part of the problem. As Beth is successful professionally, chess promotes even greater introversion. And the dope becomes a greater intrusion than the rest of the world had ever been. Together they drive her further into what becomes obsessive addiction.

Beth’s personality is not her problem. What gets her in trouble is her compulsion to ‘fix’ her personality. If she could realise that there is no need to do so, she might not be so driven to find competitive success. But she’d probably enjoy chess - and life in general - much more.
183 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Queen's Gambit.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 27, 2020 – Shelved
November 27, 2020 – Shelved as: to-read
Started Reading
December 8, 2020 – Shelved as: american
December 8, 2020 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Blair Nice review sir. You got more from the book than I did. The netflix series, I thought did a better job of exploring Beth's psyche. You definitely gave it alot of thought. Much appreciated.


BlackOxford Blair wrote: "Nice review sir. You got more from the book than I did. The netflix series, I thought did a better job of exploring Beth's psyche. You definitely gave it alot of thought. Much appreciated."

Thanks, Blair. I didn’t know about the series until I read some reviews. I’ll have to search it out.


message 3: by Terence M - [Quot libros, quam breve tempus!] (last edited Dec 09, 2020 12:33AM) (new) - added it

Terence M - [Quot libros, quam breve tempus!] A very fine review BO, thank you!

Many years ago, when I was taking my first steps in serious acting within a theatre group in which I had a personal/financial interest, one of my fellow actors was Alan Hardy, son of Aussie author, Frank Hardy. A lovely chap, he was a little younger than me, with a smaller role than mine (of course!), and we were both confined to the dressing room during acts II and III, with little to do but wait.

Seeing a chess board, Alan asked if I played chess. I replied 'yes', because I thought I knew how to do so - after all, I had a dozen books on the subject. We played a few games, during which he thrashed me unmercifully, and Alan said, kindly, "you don't know how to play chess, but you do know how the pieces are moved and some of the basics. Would you like me to teach you?", and by way of confirming his own experience, he told me that some time earlier in his life he had been the "Victorian Junior Chess Champion" for about five years.

The play's season was eight weeks, if I remember correctly, and Alan introduced me to serious, competitive chess playing. We played every night and continued two or three times a week after the play finished. Eventually, after an untold number of lessons/games, I finally won, in my own right, my first and only game against him.

I decided to retire from playing such competitive chess with Alan and started playing against my father-in-law, whose playing experience and skill level more-or-less matched my own, (now enhanced by Alan's teaching of course!). We recorded (in chess notation) every game we played and after many hundreds of games, as our own experience and skills improved, I was only one win ahead of him when he died in 1996.

I have ordered the audiobook "The Queen's Gambit" from Audible and I look forward to listening to it. I have no desire, at this time, to watch the Netflix series.


BlackOxford Terence M (Spring is in My Step!) wrote: "A very fine review BO, thank you!

Many years ago, when I was taking my first steps in serious acting within a theatre group in which I had a personal/financial interest, one of my fellow actors wa..."


What a fabulous story Terence. It sounds a great scenario for a play in its own tight. What a terrific and generally relevant distinction between knowing how to play and knowing how to move the pieces. An important life-lesson. Don’t we all need exactly that kind of mentor!? Thanks so much.


message 5: by Terence M - [Quot libros, quam breve tempus!] (last edited Dec 09, 2020 12:31AM) (new) - added it

Terence M - [Quot libros, quam breve tempus!] BlackOxford wrote: "What a fabulous story Terence. It sounds a great scenario for a play in its own tight. What a terrific and generally relevant distinction between knowing how to play and knowing how to move the pieces. An important life-lesson. Don’t we all need exactly that kind of mentor!? Thanks so much...."

Thank you for your very charitable comment, BO! It is very much appreciated! And, yes, a mentor like Alan Hardy, if you are ever lucky enough to find one in life, is pure gold😊.


message 6: by Ingrid (new)

Ingrid Great review! I'm watching the series at the moment.


BlackOxford Ingrid wrote: "Great review! I'm watching the series at the moment."

I just learned about it. I must research where to get it.


fourtriplezed I spent good money on chess books that I got a little way into and gave up on as they made not one difference to my ability (or lack thereof) in my short-lived pursuit of trying to be what I was in truth never going to be. Books such as this about the possible mild psychosis of the player may actually be better for me than the game/sport itself.

(I do sit and look at those books wonderingly though. "If only if only" I delusionally ponder.)


BlackOxford fourtriplezed wrote: "I spent good money on chess books that I got a little way into and gave up on as they made not one difference to my ability (or lack thereof) in my short-lived pursuit of trying to be what I was in..."

I hear you. Hence my conviction that a mentor is really necessary, at least for most of us.


message 10: by Dmitri (new)

Dmitri The series is on Netflix in the US. It's pretty good. I made it through six of seven first season episodes. I'm sure there's more to come.


BlackOxford Dmitri wrote: "The series is on Netflix in the US. It's pretty good. I made it through six of seven first season episodes. I'm sure there's more to come."

👍


message 12: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan Having seen the TV series it's intersting to read your review, as usual the adaptation sounds like a travesty of the book. The series started well but wore thin as the perfect main character with the super model looks (as well as anorexic looking) and always-perfect make-up blankly and mysteriously fulfilled her pretty-girl destiny. Left me very irritable!


BlackOxford Jonathan wrote: "Having seen the TV series it's intersting to read your review, as usual the adaptation sounds like a travesty of the book. The series started well but wore thin as the perfect main character with t..."

Sounds dreadful. I’m happy not to have seen before reading.


message 14: by E2c (new) - rated it 4 stars

E2c The TV series is (imo) a good adaptation of the book and has an excellent cast. Top chess coaches like Bruce Pandolfini consulted, along with more than a few grandmasters.

Don't let a handful of negative appraisals here put you off the show. And fwiw, i honestly do see them as being separate things. Very little was altered for the scripts.


message 15: by E2c (new) - rated it 4 stars

E2c The series does a great deal with a minimal setting, in terms of how tension was built during the games/tournaments and related. There was a bit of a switch with the timeline in one case, but it works very well as adapted. (Keeping in mind that novels work very different than theater, films and TV shows.)

The TV series does present a compelling portrait of a person who's addicted to alcohol and tranquilizers, more so than the book, i think. Her addictions aren't sensationalized, but Anya Taylor-Joy is excellent as Beth and conveys so much with her eyes alone.


message 16: by E2c (new) - rated it 4 stars

E2c * very differently


BlackOxford E2c wrote: "* very differently"

I recently watched it. You’re right: it’s faithful to the book and very well produced. The settings were like a stage play. Taylor-Joy was indeed excellent. A fine actress.


message 18: by Fiah (new) - rated it 3 stars

Fiah I wouldn't agree about 'complete lack of aggessiveness'. For someone devoid of aggression (which, generally speaking, I don't think is possible), she had too many instances feeling angry. Her anger against those opponents who dared make the game difficult for her was referenced many times, and her overpowering desire to win stems from aggression, like all competitiveness. At the end, when Russian grand masters are nice toward her and accept their defeat graciously, it is clear she is surprised.
This trait could be explained with her childhood trauma and life in an orphanage, though.


BlackOxford Fiah wrote: "I wouldn't agree about 'complete lack of aggessiveness'. For someone devoid of aggression (which, generally speaking, I don't think is possible), she had too many instances feeling angry. Her anger..."

You misquote me and then present a theory of the protagonist’s anger, which I didn’t even mention. You clearly want to say something but not to me.


back to top