Elliott's Reviews > Daughter of the Blood

Daughter of the Blood by Anne Bishop
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3086661
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: sci-fi-fantasy

This book is incredibly awful. It's embarrassingly bad. The characters (with their ridiculous names) and the world are poorly developed. The author gives us variations of the same scenes again and again - Daemon is a sexy threat, dear old dad Saetan is old and tenderhearted, Jaenelle is very powerful and young, everyone else is amazed and afraid and/or 110% evil, full stop, no nuance. The plot? Languishes.

I never had a sense of where different "realms" existed in relation to one another, for all of the babbling about "webs" and "gates" -- honestly, as far as I can tell, each "realm" is like a city, and they all sort of float around in space and some of them are in Hell, where everyone's undead and they only drink blood, not liquor, except sometimes when they get totally wasted, also a horse vampire. ??? Some people can use magic, and some people are better at it or born with more power, but it's not really explained what the difference is, except that everyone we're concerned with is a) able to use magic, b) quite powerful or at least sort of special, and c) totally sexy. I mean, forget about any kind of description beyond "gold eyes" and "long black nails," all you're going to get is how handsome and attractive and slinky and attractive and scary Daemon is, and Saetan has a bad leg, and Lucivar has wings. Maybe bat wings? Not sure. Plus Jaenelle has blonde hair, which she fluffs all the day, and blue eyes, but sometimes she has a stupid expression, and sometimes she's totally intense and wise beyond her years. Everyone who's bad is fat or doesn't have an impressive bosom or whatever, and they're always hanging out in shadows cackling about their wicked schemes and drinking blood. I'm not even kidding. This book is a joke.

Daemon's always angry in a cold way, so he's always leaving frost where he goes. However, when he really gets his dander up, he's able to grotesquely torture and mutilate the people who are supposed to have control over him, so like... why does he allow them to boss him around and make him so miserable in the first place? Everyone's super passive-aggressive, like, I know you're awful and you're going to make me even more wretched, but I think I'll wait until you do and then I guess I'll retaliate. But until then I'm just going to be very sad and dark and call myself a whore and slink around being bitter and cold and sometimes putting on one earring and makeup.

And all of that would be fine, if the author seemed at all in on the joke, but the narrative takes itself so seriously. Every page is absolutely dripping with melodrama. YOU'VE COLLECTED ALL OF THE GEMS IN EVERY REALM? HOLY THUNDER CATS, BATMAN, NO ONE THOUGHT IT WAS POSSIBLE!! (hands trembling uncontrollably)

The most egregious element of this book, I think, is the author's use of sexual violence, abuse, slavery, and torture, just to write some kinky stuff and give her characters something to whine about. Everything fades to black or gets kind of hazy and abstract whenever something serious is going down, and honestly, instead of leaving it to the reader's imagination, I think it would have done the author some good to actually write the minutiae of the torment she piles onto her characters. By skipping the details, not only does Bishop not have to really confront the depravity she's imagined for us, she also doesn't have to deal with how unrealistic and bizarre so many things are.

Furthermore, as several people have pointed out, Daemon is totally sexually attracted to Jaenelle, who's twelve. And I think this is supposed to be not only acceptable but ROMANTIC, because he really loves her, like her SOUL, not just her BODY you guys. Kartane, who spends a lot of time thinking about how he's going to brutally rape young girls so that their lives are ruined, is a cartoon. This book isn't real, so he can think whatever Bishop wants. But Daemon justifies his attraction and repeatedly puts himself in a position to take advantage of Jaenelle in ways that he can justify ... which is not romantic, it's terrifying. Pretty much the last scene in the book is Jaenelle accusing Daemon of being like everyone else who just wants her body, so, to save her, he... uses his magical "seduction tendrils" to trick her into doing what he wants by destroying her willpower. If the book was like, yo that's pretty devastating, maybe this guy is not actually cool and a hero, maybe sometimes the bad guy really believes that he cares about you as he's destroying you - so we're going to deal with that by holding him accountable for his actions, that would be a neat twist that gave the story some kind of actual consequential meaning. But no, he just did that because he loved her so much omg!! Isn't he handsome and charming and tragic.

Also, if you thought that the matriarchal society was going to have anything to do with competent, awesome ladies, forget that noise. It's full of stereotypically catty and vain caricatures, the author uses their sexual aggressiveness to paint them as villains, and one of the most common cusses is "son of a whoring bitch." This book is awful.

There are so many problems that I could just keep going and going, but all I'm going to do is keep complaining about this disgusting, stupid book. I think a really serious editor could have been like hey lady this is a nice private fantasy but let's buckle down and write a challenging, compelling, and creative piece of literature, and this might have turned into something pretty interesting and powerful, but obviously that did not happen.
198 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Daughter of the Blood.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
September 26, 2013 – Shelved
September 26, 2013 – Finished Reading
May 28, 2016 – Shelved as: sci-fi-fantasy

Comments Showing 1-30 of 30 (30 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Kenterol Lovely review. I laughed aloud and you know what that means on the internet. Have you read other books by her? They get surprisingly better.


Elliott Kenterol wrote: "Lovely review. I laughed aloud and you know what that means on the internet. Have you read other books by her? They get surprisingly better."
This was me in pretty fine form haha... glad you enjoyed it. I've never felt even the slightest inclination to read anything else by Bishop, but if you have a specific rec, maybe someday I'll have time to check it out!?


message 3: by Erin (new) - rated it 1 star

Erin This! So much this. Thanks for encapsulating exactly what bothered me about this book. I laughed aloud too.


message 4: by Jen (new) - rated it 1 star

Jen Yes! I just read this book and felt exactly the same way! Plus, horse suicide? Nooooooo!


message 5: by Marie (last edited Aug 13, 2016 01:57PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Marie I tried this book after reading The Others (which is, in my opinion, amazing) and I was really disappointed by it. I agree with everything you said. But also, Jaenelle justifies sticking around her abusive family by claiming she's protecting her sister until she learns enough to get a Jewel or whatever. But she's been in and out of a mental institution for years and she's always off socializing with random people. How effective can she be as a protector, living like that? And wouldn't her sister be better off learning from the same people who are teaching her the Craft?


message 6: by Ilka (new)

Ilka what on earth is with those names?


Elliott Marie wrote: "I tried this book after reading The Others (which is, in my opinion, amazing) and I was really disappointed by it. I agree with everything you said. But also, Jaenelle justifies sticking around her..."

yeah, I went into the book excited to read it, and it was just so bizarre and heinous. so many things to drag on. major disappointment :(


Elliott Ilka wrote: "what on earth is with those names?"

right? what a joke


Becky Well I laughed all the way through your review.

I actually love these books, and have reread them a TON...but I can also see your points. Some of it is a bit egregious.

Bishop definitely has a thing for delicate flowers that have been trampled being saved by a sexy and sexual man. It's very much a theme in all of her books.

Since I tend to reread different series at different points of the year (I only reread about 4 authors, so the fact that all her series make my list about once a year is pretty high praise) but I think if I read too make in a row I'd get annoyed by it. Some authors are best in short chunks. *shrugs*

If you're looking for something with a bit more depth I'd go for the Tir Alainn books, still dark, still fantasy, still magical...but not quite as fantastical and less suspension of disbelief. IMO.


Elliott Becky wrote: "Well I laughed all the way through your review.

I actually love these books, and have reread them a TON...but I can also see your points. Some of it is a bit egregious.

Bishop definitely has a th..."


thanks for the thoughtful response! glad you could laugh about me trashing a book you enjoy. honestly if there's a trampled flower thing going on in all of her books, I've read enough Bishop for this lifetime. there are so many books in the world, we can all find something we enjoy :)


message 11: by Kim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kim Like Becky, I also laughed tons at your review and can see many of your points while adoring this series. I have reread it many times and don't plan on stopping.

"I mean, forget about any kind of description beyond..."
I have seen this criticism of Anne Bishop a lot and I think it must be a reader-personality thing, because I never even noticed and didn't think the story lacks from it.

As far as "if you thought that the matriarchal society was going to have anything to do with competent, awesome ladies, forget that noise," though, this is shown as the series progresses, Jaenelle grows up, and Kaeleer is fleshed out. The first book focuses mostly on Terreille, where all the baddies are. Just sayin'.


Elliott Kim wrote: "Like Becky, I also laughed tons at your review and can see many of your points while adoring this series. I have reread it many times and don't plan on stopping.

"I mean, forget about any kind of ..."


I am genuinely curious, what do you enjoy about this book? I remember being so upset/infuriated while reading it, I'm interested in how our experience was different.


message 13: by Kim (last edited Jun 24, 2017 09:49PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kim You did ask for a dissertation, right? =)

Since I have read all the Black Jewels books so many times, it's hard to think about them in isolation. So this is a reflection of the whole, rather than the parts. As I've become active on Goodreads this year, I intend to try to give standalone reviews of each during my next reread session. I have been reflecting on what makes a story great while considering writing my own fiction in the future, and have asked myself many times just what it is about this series that grips me so.

1) I love the rich high fantasy setting that relies not at all on the LotR archetype. This is my favorite genre so I have a weakness for it. The world-building is complex and unique.

2) The (living) realms are undoubtedly female-centric - and it does not force a sense of perfection for being so. Too often "feminism" is perceived or portrayed as infallible women on pedestals. That is not the point; the point is that women are human. Anne Bishop paints the full spectrum of women and their relationships: generous, cruel, loyal, jealous, humble, power-hungry, and more.

3) The story* is intricate and internally consistent. There are nuances and subtleties that are mentioned entire books before being fully revealed. I remember reading them for the first time thinking "These are never going to be as good again, because I know the surprises now." They are, however, still great, and I enjoy them immensely to this day. I can't imagine the conclusion of the original trilogy being any more perfect, and by the last page every loose end is tied.
(*There is, unfortunately, a big flaw in the last release of the Black Jewels, published over a decade after the original trilogy.)

4) I find Jaenelle like-able. We're not expected to fall in love with her the way I've seen some authors posit their main characters - simply because she IS the main character, or powerful, or different. She displays virtue: protector of the vulnerable, avenger of the betrayed, reluctant to use force but takes action when necessary.
Further, I relate to her in a lot of ways. Her familial (and especially maternal) conflicts, being different and wishing she could be normal, feeling betrayed by her body, being locked away.
I can't stand all the detractors crying "Mary Sue!" It's literally the premise of the trilogy. It's like getting upset at receiving a product that is EXACTLY as advertised.

5) I find Anne Bishop's writing style completely captivating. Entire books are a page-turner to me. I enjoy the witty and sarcastic banter between the characters. It doesn't bother me that it's "too perfect" or repetative as some criticize.

6) The story masterfully brings out all the feels for me. I'm hysterical with laughter, tense with dread, warm with joy, anxious with suspense, anguished with heartbreak, smug with triumph, hot with desire, cold with horror. I will literally be sitting outside in the sun on a 100° day and have goosebumps because some of her scenes are so moving. No books have ever even come close to striking me with such range and intensity of emotion.

Maybe I'll add to this list over time, but this is what I've come up with over the last year of reflection. Thanks for the great question. =)

Edit: I do want to add that this is my least favorite book of the trilogy. Most of what I've written can't be fully appreciated until later in the series. I still love them all though.


Elliott Kim wrote: "You did ask for a dissertation, right? =)

Since I have read all the Black Jewels books so many times, it's hard to think about them in isolation. So this is a reflection of the whole, rather than ..."


I have seen a few people discussing whether "Mary Sue" is even a relevant term any more - especially regarding feminism, why are we so critical of female characters for being powerful or charismatic or successful? So many male characters are described as physically attractive, exceptionally gifted, and liked/respected/feared by all who cross their path, but with men that's somehow less obnoxious?

I was kind of wondering if you enjoyed each book in the series independently, or more within the context of the entire series. It sounds like the overall series and where the characters go from here is what's enjoyable, more than this book particularly - and I can totally get behind that. I had such a bad experience reading this book, and I consider life short enough that I'm not willing to spend much time doing things I don't enjoy (if I have a choice), so I probably wouldn't continue reading the series. But it sounds like things really do improve. Thanks for giving me some insight!! =)

Somewhat tangentially, I wish that I were less fussy about what I enjoy. I cannot stand sexual violence - I won't watch Game of Thrones, haven't read "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" series, for example - and I feel like there are so many highly-rated books where the female characters are pretty much just props or conquests. If a character is ever introduced with a description of her breasts, I'm out. I would be happier if I could just enjoy things, but I can't.


message 15: by Kim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kim I had never even heard the term "Mary Sue" until reading reviews of this series, so while I can appreciate the philosophical implications of the discussion (and don't doubt a double standard as it applies to men), it doesn't have any interest for me. I also don't read enough books by or about men to have an opinion. Ironically, my second favorite trilogy is the Dark Elf Trilogy - and the first Goodreads review on the first book makes mention of the main character being a Mary Sue. Maybe I just have a thing for them.
But books are my entertainment - aside from the rare exception, I don't watch TV or movies. As it's my escape, I don't want it to be realistic, as long as it's believable within the context of the story.

I do enjoy each book of the trilogy independently. The only one I have to even consider the question with is this one. (The second and third totally blow me away.) But reflecting now, it still has a sufficent amount of the essential components to draw me in.

Honestly, if I picked up this book now instead of as a teenager, I have no idea if I could have gotten far enough to enjoy it. I do know that I had shelved the series for 10+ years, was deciding which books to keep while moving, and initially cringed rereading this to see if it would make the cut. But within the first couple of chapters, I found myself again pulled in by some combination of the writing style, characters, and plot. The books moved with me and now they're some of the only fiction I own. I read way too much to buy books these days.

You're welcome for any insight I could give, and thanks for the interesting discussion. I can relate to your sentiments of being "fussy," and know that I accept the indefensible parts of these books with a bias of one part nostalgia, two parts knowing where the story goes. I'd never try to convince someone to read them, and astute criticisms like yours help me sharpen my perspective for the future.


Elliott Kim wrote: "I had never even heard the term "Mary Sue" until reading reviews of this series, so while I can appreciate the philosophical implications of the discussion (and don't doubt a double standard as it ..."

Thanks for taking the time to go back and forth with me! I really appreciate that you were amused and not offended by my review - it's apparent that the series means a lot to you & I'm glad you shared that with me.


Serryn This review is almost exactly what I was thinking while trudging through this book. It was only my love of dark fantasy that got me through. I won't be continuing this series.


Andrea Brown Riley This is the best review I've ever read.


Elliott Raelli wrote: "This review is almost exactly what I was thinking while trudging through this book. It was only my love of dark fantasy that got me through. I won't be continuing this series."

ha! it's always good to know I'm not alone. are there any dark fantasy books that you would recommend?


Elliott Andrea wrote: "This is the best review I've ever read."

just me completely losing my mind :-o


Becky Rage wrote: "Becky wrote: "Well I laughed all the way through your review.

I actually love these books, and have reread them a TON...but I can also see your points. Some of it is a bit egregious.

Bishop defin..."


I need to log in more often! lol

The Tir Alainn books have much stronger female characters - her new series The Others (i think...) is definitely of the tampled flower variety, but the women in Tir Alainn are sturdy, tough, and allow men to help out sometimes rather than needing their help.


Taylor Woodhouse THIS. This says everything.


Rayne I don't think I have ever disagreed so passionately with a review. I am new to Anne Bishop. This novel, I heard, is her first publication ever. I admittedly had to adapt to her writing style, which I assume will get more fluent in the next installments (I do hope) but when you talk of the characters, the story... I oppose it all. I can see where the comments about the world-building come from, but I found them not even half as important and necessary for this journey she takes us on. She literally takes us through a spiral of abuse and neglect and unerringly expresses every feeling that can be uttered on its behalf. She spoke truer than any person I have ever heard and done so without shame or excuse. I can't know your past, but I know mine and she didn't lie. Not once. She just threw a fantasy cover over it and made it somewhat consumable for the general public. But maybe the general public isn't ready to consume. I have respect for your opinion, you are fully entitled to it. But I strongly object to the ridicule thrown at the author. She opened up a realm that is sadly very unexplored by those who weren't thrown in it to fend for themselves, it saddens me that this was overlooked.


message 24: by Reader2006 (new) - added it

Reader2006 I just started reading and i feel the same way. I wanted to scroll through some reviews to see if the book gets better or Jannelle gets older. Please tell me this book isnt romantisizing a relationship between a 7 year old and however old the other people are. Lucien, daemon, saeton. Whatever they're called. The names are all so confusing. Please tell me this gets better. Im only 50 pages in and the girl is still 7 years old. Also, why are there SO many characters. Also, do we get a POV from Jannelle. Also, is it a romance book? As you can see, i have alot of questions. Basically, im asking is this book worth my time? I'd apprieciate all opinions. thanks xxx


message 25: by Val (new) - added it

Val I’m 78 pages into this book and already hate it. 🤣 you said everything I don’t like about this book so far in your review


Elliott Val wrote: "I’m 78 pages into this book and already hate it. 🤣 you said everything I don’t like about this book so far in your review"

I wrote this review sooo long ago. if I wrote a review now, it would be written so differently. it's still nice to hear this feedback, glad you could relate


Marisoulreads I honestly was feeling the exact same about the creepiness of the wording at the beginning of the book. I felt shivers all over, especially in things like touching and hugging and "Lover's gentleness" as a descriptor for the Daemon's feelings regarding this CHILD... I could not get past this so I DNF it ... I could not read it and find it anything but creepy.
So I will not be able to read this relationship as anything but creepy and it gives me the ick.
It's not romantic it's borderline pushing to P********* (don't even know if I can use this term here or not)


message 28: by TAM (new) - rated it 2 stars

TAM i couldn’t agree more with your review. i felt like a crazy person reading this book, like it couldn’t possible be this awful.


message 29: by Tanya (new) - added it

Tanya Steinbach Thank you for this honest and candid review. I'm glad I wasn't the only one who found it creepy this grandpa was licking blood off a seven year olds neck.


message 30: by Sarah (new)

Sarah This is EXACTLY how I felt. I made it maybe a third into the book before I decided my time is too precious to finish it.


back to top