Lisa's Reviews > Uncle Tom’s Cabin

Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
32532774
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: 1001-books-to-read-before-you-die

"Talk of the abuses of slavery! Humbug! The thing itself is the essence of all abuse!"

I remembered this quote from Uncle Tom's Cabin all of a sudden when I accidentally paraphrased it in a discussion on gun control at school. Some issues can't be solved by half-measures. They have to be abolished.

There are books that shape who you are. I remember when I first read Uncle Tom's Cabin as a young girl. Before that, I had only a vague idea of slavery in America as a historical phase, something I imagined as an evil that was no more. With this novel, I entered the world of rage. Literature has the power to engage where statistics leave you cold, it has the power to make you feel what other people feel, and to see what abstract terms mean in real, everyday life.

Decades later, teaching slave trade and abolitionist movements in Humanities classes, I still felt the anger, the sorrow, the shame. And I realised that literature does that to you - it gives you a social conscience if you are brave enough to compare notes and check your privileges.

The horrors of white supremacy can hardly be better told than in this tale of love and suffering and rage, so shocking to read as a young adult, and yet so necessary. I shudder when I think of our current political climate of hostility and intolerance towards any human beings that are distinctly different from our own tribe. And I feel both rage and sorrow as I know there are far too few adolescents today who are willing to put in the time and effort to read about historical brutality and injustice. I shudder when I think that Anne Frank's diary is considered boring by my students, too slow and lacking "action" (read: violence). Where are we heading if we don't listen to the literary voices of those who experienced past horrors? Where are we headed if we let profit and individual advantage stand above ethical behaviour and compassionate humanity? Where are we headed if we don't think our rights apply to others as well?

Make people desperate, and they won't be afraid to fight. Take away too much and they have nothing to lose, and nothing to fear. When it comes to human rights, there can be no grey zones, there can be no two class system, no discrimination. There can be no exemptions. We are all equally entitled to a life in freedom and dignity. Wherever we do not guarantee that, there will be rage. Beware of the signs in mainstream society:

"The country is almost ruined with pious white people: such pious politicians as we have just before elections, such pious goings on in all departments of church and state, that a fellow does not know who'll cheat him next."

Let's not be cheated. Let's look through the pious surface and see the egocentric hypocrites in their entitlement for what they are - instigators of violence. Let's do what is right by humankind rather than what is personally enriching or convenient.

Uncle Tom's Cabin taught me that. And I have been in a reading rage ever since!
119 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Uncle Tom’s Cabin.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

June 25, 2014 – Shelved
August 9, 2014 – Shelved as: 1001-books-to-read-before-you-die
Started Reading
March 22, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jan-Maat (new)

Jan-Maat "the world of rage", nice phrasing, iirc your blood pressure is low enough to endure it without severe risk to your heart.


Lisa Jan-Maat wrote: ""the world of rage", nice phrasing, iirc your blood pressure is low enough to endure it without severe risk to your heart."

Yep, my blood pressure is notoriously low. So low it makes me dizzy. Actually the rage might be a subconscious way of medicating.


message 3: by Y (new)

Y Unfortunately there is no consensus on what is "freedom and dignity"; we don't even know "what is personally enriching or convenient," let alone any idea on "what is right by humankind."


Julie We are headed in the right direction, Lisa, with teachers like you at the helm. I am certain that you have lit more than a few hearts on fire -- and that those students will step up to the plate when their time comes. It may not seem apparent to you today; and it may not even have dawned on some of them yet, but it will happen, of that you can be certain.

As just a brief example: years after a couple of my young students left me, I've come to hear wonderful tales of their success -- in terms that you and I would measure as such: taking on a positions in, of all things, community activism and promoting literacy! ... from those who back then couldn't find a redeeming syllable in any book. I was overwhelmed that they took the time to let me know I made a difference in their lives.

You just have to keep doing what you do, in your inimitable way, and that is enough.

I've been inspired by you through your reviews; I can't imagine being one of your students and *not* having my heart set on fire by your example and your passion. And your reading rage.

Thanks for this review.


Lisa Elie wrote: "Unfortunately there is no consensus on what is "freedom and dignity"; we don't even know "what is personally enriching or convenient," let alone any idea on "what is right by humankind.""

I agree that there is no consensus about anything in the world. To my however, a relativistic approach to human rights contains a tangible danger of playing into the hands of privileged and powerful groups supporting the status quo as they benefit from it, at the expense of the rights of people who are not in the same position of entitlement. Of course a white suprematist slave owner would define equality and freedom differently from the slave he exploits. But that does not take away the general fact that those two individuals do not share an equal amount of freedom and choice. So in order to bring fairness into the world, one has to disregard consensus and work for clear and universal rights - which includes the duty to respect other people's rights.


message 6: by Dolors (new)

Dolors Qutie a timely review for me, Ilse. I recently finished The Invention of Wings, a fictional recreation of the famous abolitionist Sarah Grimké, which mentions this book!


Lisa Julie wrote: "We are headed in the right direction, Lisa, with teachers like you at the helm. I am certain that you have lit more than a few hearts on fire -- and that those students will step up to the plate wh..."

I am pleased to hear you got to see some positive longterm effects, Julie! That is just what we need to believe in, isn't it? With the ridiculous thought in mind : "One day, you will understand!" we teach and teach. In the end, my colleagues and I agree that we can't reach all of them, but that each child we reach is a success in itself. I am worried about the new generation of kids, but as you say, one never knows how they will perceive their learning later. It is hard to see the butterflies inside the teenage cocoons.


message 8: by Czarny (last edited Mar 23, 2018 07:40AM) (new)

Czarny Pies Thanks for a very positive and compelling review. I have never read this book which was highly criticized during the 60's and 70's for being inauthentic. .This was the time when the self-appointed spokesmen of Black America were asserting that only Afro-Americans were entitled to speak on the slavery experience. Stowe's famiy and entourage however were active abolitionists and participated in the Underground Railway so she certainly talked to many fugitive slaves in her life time. I think it is time for me to read this book and make up my own mind about it.


Lisa Dolors wrote: "Qutie a timely review for me, Ilse. I recently finished The Invention of Wings, a fictional recreation of the famous abolitionist Sarah Grimké, which mentions this book!"

I will look into that one, Dolors. Sounds interesting!


message 10: by Y (last edited Mar 23, 2018 11:33AM) (new)

Y Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Unfortunately there is no consensus on what is "freedom and dignity"; we don't even know "what is personally enriching or convenient," let alone any idea on "what is right by humankind..."

I agree that we need to work for what we regard as good despite a lack of consensus. However, I don't agree with your denunciation of a relativistic approach to freedom and rights based on the fact that it plays "into the hands of privileged and powerful groups supporting the status quo"; I believe an absolutist or normative approach can also and does indeed play into the hands of other privileged, underprivileged, or simply normal people (one can be privileged and underprivileged simultaneously, and life/politics is all about compromise in some way). I personally support a more realistic approach which acknowledges the fact that human condition and psychology is too complicated to be reduced to definition or definitive statement. I can understand the benevolence behind your statement that "We are all equally entitled to a life in freedom and dignity. Wherever we do not guarantee that, there will be rage"; but based on what I have experienced and observed in the circumstance I grew up in and was familiar with, that is actually not true.


message 11: by Jaline (new)

Jaline Excellent review of this legendary classic, Lisa!


message 12: by Lisa (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lisa Elie wrote: "Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Unfortunately there is no consensus on what is "freedom and dignity"; we don't even know "what is personally enriching or convenient," let alone any idea on "what is right..."

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this, Elie. I guess I still believe that we need basic human right guarantees for everyone, but maybe you could give me an example of a situation when that is not to be strived for?


message 13: by Lisa (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lisa Czarny wrote: "Thanks for a very positive and compelling review. I have never read this book which was highly criticized during the 60's and 70's for being inauthentic. .This was the time when the self-appointed ..."

That is an interesting point, Czarny! I read it as a young adult, completely oblivious of any debates around it. In a way, I am now happy I did, as my opinion is based on the text rather than on literary critics. But I can see where they were coming from of course.


message 14: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala And I realised that literature does that to you - it gives you a social conscience if you are brave enough to compare notes and check your privileges.

Another of the great benefits of literature, Lisa. Very well stated.


message 15: by Ilse (new)

Ilse Literature has the power to engage where statistics leave you cold, it has the power to make you feel what other people feel, and to see what abstract terms mean in real, everyday life.
So true, Lisa. And each one of your students you could convince of this, even if not that many, was worth all your effort.


message 16: by Lisa (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lisa Jaline wrote: "Excellent review of this legendary classic, Lisa!"

Thank you, Jaline!


message 17: by Lisa (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lisa Fionnuala wrote: "And I realised that literature does that to you - it gives you a social conscience if you are brave enough to compare notes and check your privileges.

Another of the great benefits of literature, ..."


Thanks, Fionnuala!


message 18: by Y (new)

Y Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Unfortunately there is no consensus on what is "freedom and dignity"; we don't even know "what is personally enriching or convenient," let alone any idea on "..."

Lisa the example I am most familiar with is China and its ambivalence/indifference towards human rights. I'd like to recommend two books on this issue: The People's Republic of Amnesia: Tiananmen Revisited and Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China. Also about Realpolitik, I very much enjoy Reflections on the Revolution in France (Burke's conservative views are not without flaw but I like his argument for political realism)


message 19: by Czarny (new)

Czarny Pies During the Black Panther generation which gave us such figures as Eldridge Cleaver, the word "Uncle Tom" became a term of abuse used by aggressive black power militants towards other African Americans who were deemed to be too meek in their approach. I believe that the term is still used today for any Afro-American who does not fall the radical line in a contention with the white community. It is my recollection that this term was often directed towards Obama. What I do remember clearly is that Black Panthers and others of their ilk considered "Uncle Tom" to be the worst of Afro-Americans. This discouraged me from reading the book. I also accepted the notion that whites ought not to be writing about the slavery experience. I am sorry to say that even Toni Morrison has supported this last idea.


message 20: by Lisa (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lisa Elie wrote: "Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Unfortunately there is no consensus on what is "freedom and dignity"; we don't even know "what is personally enriching or convenient," let alone ..."

I am familiar with Burke's conservatism already. In the context of slavery, I find it hard to justify Realpolitik rather than a "revolutionary" fight for abolition. There may be compromises necessary in each society, but not in this context.


message 21: by Lisa (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lisa Ilse wrote: "Literature has the power to engage where statistics leave you cold, it has the power to make you feel what other people feel, and to see what abstract terms mean in real, everyday life.
So true, Li..."


I really hope so, Ilse! If we can see tiny changes for the better, the teaching profession is worth all the trouble!


message 22: by Y (last edited Mar 24, 2018 09:53PM) (new)

Y Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Unfortunately there is no consensus on what is "freedom and dignity"; we don't even know "what is personally enriching or convenient..."

I am not thinking specifically about the context of slavery. But even if we consider the history of the abolition of slavery, it involved some negotiation and compromise on both sides. If the result of some struggle is not negotiated by both sides and doesn't includes some degree of compromise on both sides, then the result is only maintained by sheer strength/force, and since that strength could weaken in the future, the result is fragile (ex: Paris Peace Conference of 1919). I think your review is very much about the political struggle today, and the point I want to make here is also related to the present context.


message 23: by Lisa (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lisa Elie wrote: "Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Lisa wrote: "Elie wrote: "Unfortunately there is no consensus on what is "freedom and dignity"; we don't even know "what is personally enriching ..."

One of the wonderful things in free and dignified and equal exchange of thoughts is that we can respect our different opinions, and that neither of us has to fear oppression for going against the grain of mainstream power ideas. I am happy to have the opportunity to disciss this with you, Elie, and in this case I really mean that we should agree to disagree :-)


message 24: by Ned (new)

Ned Brilliant review, I tried to read when I was 10-11 years old but was too young to appreciate. You make me want to go back now.


back to top