Lousberg B Sped775 M7fba
Lousberg B Sped775 M7fba
Lousberg B Sped775 M7fba
Britany Lousberg
University of Kansas
Table of Contents
FBA Student Information....3
Identifying the Problem: Defining Target and Replacement Behaviors..6
Baseline Data...8
Determining the Function of Behavior.10
Hypothesized Function..12
Behavioral Objective.13
Finding Analysis........14
References..18
Appendix A: Baseline Data Collection Tables..19
Table 1: ABCR Data Observation 1..20
Table 2: Baseline Data Collection 1......21
Table 3: Baseline Data Collection 2..22
Table 4: Baseline Data Collection 3..23
Table 5: Baseline Data Collection 4..24
Table 6: Scatterplot of Baseline Data by Activity 25
Appendix B: Motivation Assessment Scale (Durand & Crimmins, 1992)29
Student Information
Description of Student. Austin H. is an eighth grade student who is currently attending
The Joshua School, Boulder Campus. He is an energetic and friendly 14 year old boy who enjoys
constructing things with his hands and sharing his creations with others. He is a dedicated worker
and strives on knowing the rules and expectations of his surroundings. Austin enjoys being given
options to do work and knows when he does work, he can choose to do an activity that is student
driven. Austin does struggle with changes that occur to his schedule unless he is primed for them.
He was diagnosed when he was 8 with PDD-NOS. Since this diagnosis, his parents have been in
a constant struggle with the school district to find the right programming or placement to help
him. Finally, in February of 2015, Austin was placed at The Joshua School-Boulder, which is a
treatment facility, to help him be more successful in school as well as decrease his problem
behaviors.
Student Selection. During observation he was on task for a max of 10 minutes. He
requested bathroom, drink, snacks, or would talk about an idea, memory, etc. Breaks in attentions
ranged from a few seconds to a few minutes. He gets easily distracted from other peers and likes
to share information about anything but what he is currently working on. When he is doing
something he is not particularly into, he will try to avoid it at all costs. He will dig in his desk,
get up and try and talk to other teachers and peers, exit the room without permission, or try and
get a snack (elopement). When he is redirected to his desk, he needs to be prompted to get to
work and stay on task. He struggles when he has to be corrected and hates being asked to redo a
problem. He has done a very nice job of not having any meltdowns or problem behaviors from
having to re-work a problem with a teacher but does not self correct unless you help him. When
he is done with his work, he will say he needs a break and will usually ask to play on the
computer or will get a snack from his lunch box. Parents reported the most success with giving
him space/time to calm down when upset and has access to food and drinks all day (grazes) at
home. The entire team feels that it is most important to help Austin with his elopement behavior
through this FBA.
Student Strenghts: Austin has many strengths. He states in the student interview (A.
Hudson, personal communication, March 10, 2015) that his favorite subject is math. He is great
with his hands and loves to work with legos and small engines. He does a great job with
structured routines but with his familys busy life, it can be hard to get this accomplished at
home. He loves being helpful especially in the kitchen and his mom would like to see this
carryover into a more healthy goal/routine for him. He is very sociable but he tends to only
talk about things he is really interested in or is perseverating on. He wants to have friends but
struggles with the communication piece.
Student Needs: Austin struggles with functional communication to share his feelings and
emotions thus when he is upset or feeling anxious with new staff and environments, he will elope
from the location or task to evade his feelings. All observations and interviews between the
student, parents, and staff confirm this. Both classroom teacher and supporting staff shared that
Austin will get overwhelmed by new staff-subs, and thus begins to shut down. He will become
very quiet and then will get up from his seat and leave or has even crawled away from his seat.
When regular staff re-affirm that his feelings of anxiousness or overwhelm are valid and can
verbally de-escalate him, he typically is able to come back into the room and share his feelings
about new staff or change and staff can accommodate his needs.
In addition, Austin is behind in his academic work, for the last 5 years have been a
constant struggle to manage his behaviors. He is currently working at a second grade reading,
writing, and math level.
Examples of Behavior:
Non-examples of Behavior:
Replacement Behavior:
To do work
Operational Definition:
Examples of Behavior:
Non-examples of Behavior:
Rationale. The reason for choosing elopement behavior is that Austin is eloping from
situations that make him feel anxious, overwhelmed or scared when he is working with new staff or
new tasks. When eloping, Austin is seeking attention or escaping from a non-preferred situation or a
demand. Staff has seen that when his elopement is not managed appropriately, more problem behaviors
may arise such as aggression, property destruction, verbal threats, and eliminating. When he is
engaging in this initial antecedent, if not managed correctly, students and staff can become targets and
thus their safety and academic success is jeopardized. The rules board is a variation of a level
system that requires Austin to complete work sessions and engage in appropriate
behavior before earning his reinforcers. Using the rules board, Austin will be
allowed to earn reinforcement breaks when he engages in his replacement
behavior. This also allows him to work on expressing his feelings and engage in
better social emotional skills to help get his wants and needs met. This increases
the overall well being of the classroom and increases the success of the classroom
as a whole.
Baseline Data
Data Recording System. We implemented a rules board (level system) with Austin. The
way this system worked was every half hour and hour, Austin was awarded a check mark on his
gas gage when he stayed in the green and yellow levels. This was done when he did not engage
in elopement (along with his other challenging behaviors) and did his teacher directed work.
Warnings bumped him down to yellow but he was still eligible to earn his check mark. Then on
the hour and half hour, he was given 12 minutes of reinforcement if he stayed in his allowed
zones and then went back into a teacher directed task. He also reset every 30 minutes regardless
of the zone he was in.
Total Duration. This reporting period, data was collected for a month starting April 6th
until May 6th (Appendix B).
Baseline. Austin eloped from the classroom and other designated work areas with staff 1.6
times over 4 consecutive school days (Figure 1. Graph of target behavior by frequency each
day).
Baseline Products. Please see Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, and Table 6 for the data collected
during the baseline observations. Please keep in mind that each table is a total count for the week
and then an average. Please see Table 7 for a Scatterplot of the data.
Baseline Graph. Please see Figure 1 for the Baseline Data Graph.
Figure 1. Observations of Target Behavior. This figure illustrates the baseline observations of
the target behavior graphed.
Sensory
Outcome of Function Matrix (adapted fromUmbreit, Ferro, Liaupsin, & Lane, 2007)
Positive Reinforcement
Negative Reinforcement
2/4
(Access Something)
While engaging in property
destruction, Austin has a
tendency to hit things very
hard and throw himself into
things. He is not a huge
3/4
3/4
3/4
(Avoid Something)
2/14
3/4
3/4
3/4
Outcome of the Function Matrix: Hypothesized Function. After examining the data,
reviewing the interviews, and observing Austin, it has been hypothesized that his behaviors are
escape maintained and avoidance of non-preferred tasks. He engages in these behaviors to escape
and avoid teacher directives that he finds to be arduous or too difficult for him. His old school
did not want to believe that he had autism so they did everything they could to keep his problem
behaviors under control without implementing a behavior plan. This caused Austin to have a
decreased trust in his staff and therefore he struggled with his academic work. He would do
anything he could to get away from this location.
Over the last few weeks, given Austin the time to adapt to our school and staff, he has
tested his boundaries when it comes to problem behaviors. He has engaged in elopement,
aggression, property destruction, and verbal threats to see where we draw the line. Since we were
getting to know him, we have taken ABC data for 3 weeks to see what behaviors he engages in
as well a what he struggles with. The data shows that being denied access to items he is
perseverating on tends to increase his behaviors. When he is able to be verbally de-escalated,
then he is more prone to decrease his behaviors independently. When verbal de-escalation does
not work, this is when we see an increase and intensity of his behavior.
Based on observation, it has been made pretty apparent that he is trying to gain attention
from staff when he elopes for he in constantly looking back over his shoulder to see where we
are when we are following him. He will also chase staff away from him (like a game of tag)
when staff get too close. When you ignore his elopement, within reason, he has a tendency to
come back to his chair and wait for you to work with him. The other function of his elopement is
to escape work he does not want to do. This was made evident in observation as well when he
would get up from writing and spelling. After talking to Austin, he said that his tremor makes
writing very difficult for him. So we have discussed typing his assignments instead of writing
them out.
Behavioral Objective. Austin will decrease his elopements from a baseline average of
17% of school block activity to 100% of school activity blacks as measures by collecting TIME
data across 4 consecutive school days.
have been working with him for long enough to see that when he starts to go quiet or making
animal noises, we need to go over and problem solve with him. He typically is getting
overwhelmed with all the changes going on in the classroom and just wants to work with familiar
staff that knows his behavior plan and how to run his programming with the most fidelity.
Since we know what his biggest trigger or antecedent area is, we try to prep him the day
before if we know who the sub is going to be. We also have each new sub start the morning
doing rapport building with him. This gives him a little more knowledge of who is working with
and they can come to a common ground. He likes being able to explain his rule board. Giving
him more independence and showing him that he can be successful is a great skill for him to
continue to build on.
Since implementing this system, for not only his elopements, but also for his other problem
behaviors of verbal threats, aggressions, and property destruction, we have seen a massive
decrease in behaviors. He has earned 18 days of green/yellow behaviors. The last 10 days have
been all green days meaning that he has had zero problem behaviors at all. He is rocking his
Behavior Intervention Plan and his parents couldnt be happier. Things as home have become a
lot better. He does have a tendency to hold in all his anxiety or unpredictable problems from
school and can unleash it at home, however, he is much easier to get back on track. Due to his
success at school, his mother is also starting to implement a home system in similar fashion to
keep the moment rolling. It has shown small gains in only 2 short weeks.
In Austins case, I think the biggest thing I can gleam from his experience with him, is that
when you put the right interventions in place, you can see huge success in a kiddo who was
thought to be only a behavior problem.
Results:
Findings:Overthelastmonth,wehaveseenadrasticdropinAustinsbehaviors.Evenwith
staffchangesandstudentsleaving,Austinhasdoneafabulousdropexpressinghisfrustrations
andconcerns,eventellinguswhenheneedsspaceorneedstoleavetheclassroomtobesafefor
himselfandothers.Icanonlyhypothesizethatwewillseeasmallbehaviorburstwhenwe
changehisworktoreinforcementratio,butwesawthatwhenwefirststartingputtingthisplan
intoplaceaswell.Ifwecontinuetobeopenwithhimaboutwhatwearedoingandhowgreathe
isdoing,alongwithfindingreinforcementthatismeaningfulenoughforhim,Ithinkhewill
continuetobesuccessfulinourprogram.
References
Durand, M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1992). The motivation assessment scale administration guide.
Topeka, KS: Monaco and Associates.
Hudson, A. Personal communication, March 10, 2015.
Umbreit, J., Ferro, J., Liaupsin, C. J., & Lane, K. L. (2007). Functional behavior assessment and
function-based intervention: An effective, practical approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Press.
AppendixA
BaselineDataCollectionTables
Table1:ABCRDataObservation1
Table2:BaselineDataCollection1
Table3:BaselineDataCollection2
Table4:BaselineDataCollection3
Table5:BaselineDataCollection4
Table6:ScatterplotofBaselineDatabyActivity
Table1
ABCRDataCollectionforAustin
Frequency recording. Mark every act or attempt that meets definition with a tally. Mark
interval with a 0 if the behavior does not occur
Table 2
Baseline Data Collection Week 1
Date
4/6
4/7
4/8
4/9
4/10
Time
8:50-9:30
9:30-10
10-10:30
10:30-11
11:30-12
12-12:30
12:30-1
1-1:30
1:30-2
2-2:30
2:30-3:10
Totals
12
Frequency recording. Mark every act or attempt that meets definition with a tally. Mark
interval with a 0 if the behavior does not occur
Table 3
Baseline Data Collection Week 2
Date
4/13
4/14
4/15
4/16
4/17
8:50-9:30
9:30-10
10-10:30
10:30-11
11:30-12
12-12:30
12:30-1
1-1:30
1:30-2
2-2:30
2:30-3:10
Totals
Time
Table 4
Frequency recording. Mark every act or attempt that meets definition with a tally. Mark
interval with a 0 if the behavior does not occur
4/20
Time
4/21
4/22
4/23
4/24
ABS
8:50-9:30
9:30-10
10-10:30
10:30-11
11:30-12
12-12:30
12:30-1
1-1:30
1:30-2
2-2:30
2:30-3:10
Totals
Table 5
Frequency recording. Mark every act or attempt that meets definition with a tally. Mark
interval with a 0 if the behavior does not occur
4/27
Time
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/1
ABS
8:50-9:30
9:30-10
10-10:30
10:30-11
11:30-12
12-12:30
12:30-1
1-1:30
1:30-2
2-2:30
2:30-3:10
Totals
Table6
ScatterplotofBaselineData
Appendix B
Motivation Assessment Scale
By V. Mark Durand and Daniel Crimmins
Name: Austin H.
Rater:
Enter the name of the person filling out the scale or being interviewed.
Behavior Description:
Enter a specific behavior (e.g., hits his head) rather than a more general
description of the individuals behavior (e.g., he gets upset).
Setting Description:
Specify the situation where the behavior is a problem (e.g., at home after dinner,
during lunch, during one-on-one teaching).
INSTRUCTIONS TO RATERS: Rate each of the 16 items on the following two pages by
circling the number that corresponds to about how often the individual engages in the behavior
indicated, in the setting which has been select
ITEM
1. Would the behavior occur continuously, over
and over, if this person was left alone for long
periods of time? (For example, several hours.)
RESPONSE
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Half the
Time
3
Half the
Time
Usually
Almost
Always
Usually
Almost
Always
Alw
Alw
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Half the
Time
Usually
Almost
Always
Usually
Almost
Always
Usually
Almost
Always
Usually
Almost
Always
Usually
Almost
Always
Usually
Almost
Always
Half the
Time
3
Half the
Time
3
Half the
Time
3
Half the
Time
3
Half the
Time
3
Alw
Alw
Alw
Alw
Alw
Alw
ITEM
9. Does it appear to you that this person enjoys
performing the behavior? (It feels, tastes,
looks, smells, and/or sounds pleasing.)
RESPONSE
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Half the
Time
Usually
Almost
Always
Half the
Time
Usually
Almost
Always
Alw
Alw
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Half the
Time
Usually
Almost
Always
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Half the
Time
Usually
Almost
Always
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Half the
Time
Usually
Almost
Always
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Half the
Time
Usually
Almost
Always
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Half the
Time
Usually
Almost
Always
Never
Almost
Never
Seldom
Half the
Time
Usually
Almost
Always
SCORING
Transfer the numeric Response for each Item to the blanks below. Scores are organized into
columns by type of motivation. Total each column of numbers (Total Score) and calculate the
mean Score (Total Score divided by 4) for each motivation. Determine the Relative Ranking for
each motivation by assigning the number 1 to the motivation with the highest Mean Score, 2
to the motivation with the second-highest Mean Score, and so forth.
Alw
Alw
Alw
Alw
Alw
Alw
Sensory
Escape
Attention
Tangible
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Total Score =
Mean Score =
Relative Ranking=
8
2
13
3
11
10
3
2
MONACO
& ASSOCIATES
Copyright 1992