Villegas and Lucas Conceptual
Villegas and Lucas Conceptual
Villegas and Lucas Conceptual
28
had to assume caretaking responsibilities for her younger brother and sister.
At only 8 years old, she was responsible
for getting ber siblings ready for school,
taking them there each morning, bringing them back home at the end of the
school day and caring for them until
her parents came home from work.
ing products prepared at home. She astutely negotiated prices with customers
and expertly bandied financial transactions. Belki often spoke enthusiastically
about having her own business in the
future. She spoke Spanish fluently at
home and in the community, and she
often served as tbe English language
translator for her parents.
Responsive Teacher
A Framework and a Vision
Successfully teaching students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgroundsespecially students from
historically marginalized groupsinvolves more than just applying specialized teaching techniques. It demands a
new way of looking at teaching that is
grounded in an understanding of the
role of culture and language in learning.
Six salient qualities (see Villegas &
Lucas, 2002) can serve as a coherent
framework for professional development
initiatives m schools seeking to respond
effectively to an increasingly diverse student population.
Understanding How
Learners Construct Knowledge
Our conception of culturally and linguistically responsive teaching is
grounded in constructivist views of
learning (National Research Council,
2000). From this perspective, learners
use their prior knowledge and beliefs to
make sense of the new ideas and experiences they encounter in school. A
central role of the culturally and linguistically responsive teacher is to support
students' learning by helping them
build bridges between what they alread)
know about a topic and what they need
to learn about it.
For example, Belki will learn more
from a social studies unit on immigralion if her teacher draws on her very
real experience as a newcomer to the
United States. The teacher might ask her
and other mimigrant students in tbe
class to describe their experiences learning a new language and compare living
in the United States to living in their
ASSOCIATION
I-OK S U P E R V I S I O N
.AND C U R R I C U L U M
DEVELOPMENT
29
30
teachers need to know about their students' lives. We are not suggesting that
teachers leam generic information about
specific cultural or social groups. Such
thinking leads to stereotypes that do not
apply to individual students.
Instead, teachers need to know something about tbeir students' family
makeup, immigration history, favorite
activities, concerns, and strengths.
Teachers should also be aware of their
students' perceptions of the value of
school knowledge, tbeir experiences
with the different subject matters in
their everyday settings, and their prior
knowledge of and experience with specific topics in the curriculum. For example, Belki's teachers would benefit from
knowing that she and her family are immigrants, thai she often serves as ibe
English language translator for her parents, that she aspires to own a business
To develop socioculturai consciousness, teachers need to took beyond individual students and families to
understand inequities in society. In all
social systems, some positions are accorded greater status than others, and
such status differentiation gives rise to
differential access to power. Teachers
need to be aware of the role that schools
play in both perpetuating and challenging those inequities. Professional development carried out in groups and
guided by an experienced facilitator
who is knowledgeable about multicultural issues can be instructive. Activities might involve reading about the dif-
settings (see Garcia, 1999; LadsonBillings, 1994; Nieto &r Rol6n, 1997),
teachers can develop a vision of how
schools can challenge such inequities.
Holding Affirming Views
Ahout Diversity
Unfortunately, evidence suggests that
many teachers see students from socially
subordinated groups from a deficit persp)ective (Nieto, 1996). Lacking faith in
the students' ability to achieve, these
teachers are more likely to have low academic expectations for the students and
ultimately treat them in ways that stifle
their learning. They are more apt to use
drill, practice, and rote-leaming activities at the expense of more challenging
work that demands the use of higherorder thinking skills. They are also less
likely to call on the students in class,
give them sufficient wait time to respond thoughtfully to questions, or
probe incomplete answers for clarity
Bv contrast, teachers who see stu-
31
lish teacher who helped students improve their writing skills through
researching Immigration did.
Teachers can also give English language leamers access to the curriculum
by drawing on the students native language resources. They can provide students who are literate in their native
language with material to read in that
language to help them build background knowledge for specific content
They can encourage students to use
bilingual dictionaries. They can prepare
study guides for instructional units that
32
are leaming little about the real experiences of slaves, they can read one of the
many published slave narratives to
deepen their understanding. As these
examples suggest, the job of the culturally and linguistically responsive teacher
involves engaging all students in learning for understanding.
Advocating for All Students
Numerous practices embedded in the
fabric of everyday schooling put students from nonmainstream groups at a
disadvantage. These Include a school
culture of low expectations for students
from low-status groups, inadequate general and multicultural leaming materials, large class sizes, assignment of the
least-experienced teachers to classes in
which students need the most help, insensitivity toward cultural differences,
questionable testing practices, and a
curriculum that does not reflect diverse
student perspectives.
To continue to move toward greater
cultural and linguistic responsiveness In
schools, teachers must see themselves as
part of a community of educators working to make schools more equitable for
all students. Teaching is an ethical activity, and teachers have an ethical obligation to help all students learn. To meet
this obligation, teachers need to ser\'e as
advocates for tbeir students, especially
those who have been traditionally marginalized in schools.
For example, teachers involved in
school- or district-level textbook review
committees could ensure that selected
textbooks and supplemental materials
appropriately reflect the diversity of experiences and perspectives in the student population. Those who have Input
Into the design of professional development activities could identify specific
areas in which the faculty might need
professional growth. Topics might include how to implement strategies for
References
Cenicr on Education Policy (2006). A public
Just Imagine
Certainly, individual teachers can enhance their success with students from
diverse backgrounds by working on
their ovwi to cultivate these qualities of
responsive teaching. However, the
framework that we have presented here
will have the greatest effect on a school
if teachers and school leaders develop a
shared vision of the culturally and linguistically responsive teacher.
Imagine Belki Alvarez's school life if
her teachers had explored these six
Teachers need to
serve as advocates
for their students.
qualities and shared ideas for applying
them in their teaching. They could have
capitalized on her entrepreneurial skills
to help her leam mathematical concepts. They would have seen her as a
capable learner and understood the relevance of her life experiences for her
school learning. They might have
tapped her experience as the English
translator for her family by having her
translate for other Spanish-speaking students in the class who spoke minimal
English. Approaching a students education in these culturally and linguistically
responsive waysrather than emphasizing deficitshas the potential to
truly engage all students in leaming,
both in school and beyond. IS
education primer: Basic (and sometimes surprising) facfs about the US. alucalion system. Washington, DC; Author.
Garcia, E. E. (1999). Student cultural diversity: Vndcr'iiandin^ and mcctin}; the challenge. Boston: Houghton MilTlin,
Kozol, J. (2006). The shame oj the nation: The
restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Ladson-Billings. G. (1994). The drcamkeepers: Successful teachers oj African American
children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
National Center for Education Statistics.
(2002). Digest for education statistics tables
and/igurvs. Washington, DC: U.S, Governincni Priming Office. Available:
http://nces.ed.gov/progranis/digest/d02/di
066.asp
National Center for Education Statistics,
(2005). Digest/or education s(a(is(ics tables
and figures. Washinglon, DC: U,S, Govemment Printing Office. Available: http:
//nces, ed u. gov/programs/dO 5/tables
/dtO5_O38.asp
National Research Council. (2000), How people leani- Washington. DC: National
Academies Press.
Natriello, G,, McDill, E. L., & Pallas, A. M.
(1990), Schooling disadvaniaged cfiildrt-n.Racing againsf catastrophe. New York:
Teachers College Press.
Nieto, S. (1996). Affinnmg diversity: The
sociopolitical context oj education. White
Plains, NY: Longman.
Nieto. S., &: RuIOn. C. (1997). Preparation
and professional development of teachers:
A perspective from two Latinas. In. J. J.
Irvine (Ed.), Criiical knowledge jor diverse
teachers and learners (pp. 89-123). Washingion, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Viliegas, A. M., & Lucas. T. (2002). Educating aiiturofly responsive teachers: A coherent
approach. Albany. NY: SUNY Press.
33