0042 207x 2861 2990206 8
0042 207x 2861 2990206 8
0042 207x 2861 2990206 8
EVELYN
M. ROBSON
Static tests
& in. pellets) under static equilibrium conditions was determined by measuring its equilibrium vapour pressure at
varying moisture contents.
Similar information on samples
f3\
,,Extro
bulb
Results
volume
Pironi
head
Water evaporated
On
to sample from heIe --
Desiccant
sample
test
II
III
u
Cold traps
6
Oil
manometer
% odsorbed
;-u
IO
12
14
moisture content
16
18
20
2.2
24
26
GRAPH 1
pentoxide
The general
arrangement of the apparatus is shown in Fig. 1.
The test procedure was to evaporate successive known
10
I
desiccants
Moisture content
at 0.1 Torr
(%)
/
Fi
/
14:5
I
( >25 at 0.01 Torr
Regenerable
Bulk
density
(lb/f@)
1:
43
I
)
33
Dynamic tests
Experimental
apparatus
gouge
Tao 2
Thermo-couple
Constcnt
temperature
Oil
FIG. 2.
Experimental
apparatus
for dynamic
manometer
adsorption
tests.
of glass, and was set up as shown in Fig. 2. A vessel containing water to be evaporated on to the sieve was connected
to the sieve column inlet via tap 1. The column was wound
with heating tape to enable the sieve to be regenerated in situ.
The wall of the column was dimpled in two places, each
dimple to house a thermocouple for temperature measurement
during regeneration, and to measure the heat of adsorption
of the sieve during the adsorption tests.
An oil manometer was placed across the column for
absolute pressure drop measurements, and a Pirani gauge
head was situated above the column to indicate the outlet
pressure.
The column was connected via tap 2 to a demountable cold
trap (-79 C) which condensed moisture at breakthrough.
The system was pumped via tap 3 by a two stage air ballasted
mechanical rotary pump with a free air displacement of
20 l/min.
11
Experimental procedure
The column was first filled with molecular
efficiency
12
EVELYN M. ROBSON
investigated
TABLE II
length
Water throughput
rate
@+/hr)
(Lrlsec)
Nil
2.63
8.5
14.4
16.2
18.6
oA Moisture
adsorbed before
breakthrough
Time breakthrough
occurred.
(Pressure 0.1 Torr at
column outlet)
0.69
2.22
3.78
4.25
4.88
10 hr
2 hr
1 hr
30
27
8
50
29.5
14.5*
12.5
9.5
7.4
6.2
4.2
min
min
min
min
min
linear relationship
water adsorption,
was found
by weight,
between
an average
pressure,
for
outlet
residual
I,, 6
Water
throughput,
sieve column
air pressure,
average
I, 12
IO
throughput
14
rote,
16
I8
20
of the column
efficiency,
1 22
the sieve.
: length-63
pressure
as the moisture
vapour
content
pressure
was
increased
the test
3 that the
IO
246
throughput
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
cm3/hr
rate,
GRAPH 3
pressure drop-throughput
only
on the dynamic
surface of
during
24
cm3/hf
length
to
rate,
This
the average
2.
GRAPH 2
water
test.
between
Water
4
each adsorption
constant
throughput
existing
I
h
the effect of
at various
the percentage
to compare
pressure drop
rates of water.
drop
on the column
slightly
greater
rates
in., diameter-l+
in.
The results
TABLE III
Water throughput
rate
(cms/hr)
(L&ec)
0.635
3.12
3.48
5.6
5.86
8.0
8.2
obtained
0.166
0.818
0.912
1.46
1.53
2.1
2.15
Time breakthrough
occurred.
(Pressure 0.1 Torr at
column outlet)
23 hr
2 hr
2 hr
lhr
50min
17min
48 min
23 min
27 min
on Graph
A Moisture
adsorbed before
breakthrough
13.3
8.05
6.7
6.54
4.26
2.79
3.36
and are also plotted
1
0
2 for comparison.
lengths (13 and 6.5 in.) were
Water
IO
throughput
12
14
rote,
GRAPH 4
16
cm3/hr
18
,
20
,
22
24
quantities
Increased adsorption
rotary pump
eficiency
dater
j
throughput
I
Curve A values taken after breakthrough
of 0,11cm3
Curve B values token at breakthrough
point
18
Total
13
1
I
-8
in
/ each test,=20cm3+-1
1
x
12
I
T
)
-1..
IO
I
0
I
2
I
4
Water
0
Water
throughput
rate,
IO
II
IO
throughput
12
14
rote,
16
1
22
24
cm3/hr
GRAPH 7
12
sample
odsorption
20
cm3/ hr
GRAPH 5
Water
18
time,
exposed
to o dry
atmosphere
Time,
hr
hr
GRAPH 6
GRAPH 8
for
I hr
14
EVELYN
1 hr
2 hr
4 hr
36
110
220
A typical moisture
removal
10 min
9.
20~
,
-
M. ROBSON
temperature of the sieve was exactly 300C the pressure
(Pirani) at the outlet of the column was below 0.4 Torr.
Thus regeneration was stopped when this pressure was
reached.
r
It should be noted that at the start of the regeneration
under vacuum, water vapour evaporated from the sieve at
a very fast rate, and caused the sieve pellets to become
violently agitated.
Discussion
Regeneration
time,
hr
GRAPH 9
15
Acknowledgements
APPENDIX
IN
(c)
Dry
phosphorus
6% in 2days
20%
Vopour
0.001
in 5 days
Tom
, (e)
(d)
/
pressure<
\
Phosphoric
pad
Phosphoric
30%
Vapour
pressure
in 7doys
0.109 Tom.
acid
34%
Vapour
in 6 days
pressure
0.256
FIG. A 1
34%
TOW.
Vopour
in 9 days
pressure
0.0044
Tow