MECHANISATION IN OIL PALM PLANTATIONS:

ACHIEVEMENT AND CHALLENGES

Teo Leng
EPA Management Sdn. Bhd
[Presented at OFIC2000, September 4, 2000, Kuala Lumpur]

Abstract: Mechanisation has become a buzz word in oil palm industry of Malaysia over the last two decades. It is
commonly recognised as a means of solving increasingly acute shortage of labour in the plantation sector. The situation
has been all the more critical to plantations in the southern Peninsular Malaysia due in part to establishment of
industrial parks throughout the state of Johore and close proximity to Singapore where relatively higher wages prevail
in its labour market.
All the 28 oil palm plantations managed by EPA Management Sdn. Bhd. are located in Johore. The management
recognised the urgent need to mechanise major field operations that are labour intensive, in addition to many aspects of
land preparation, road and drainage construction that have been mechanised since rubber cultivation in Malaysia. Based
on evaluation of machines and work methods carried out in the 1980s the Group embarked on an extensive
mechanisation programme with zeal and commitment particularly during the 1990s. Overall labour : land ratio in the
early 1980s was 1:6 or 7 ha. To date the Group achieves a ratio of 1:10 ha. In plantation without replanting and
immature fields a ratio of 1:12ha is attainable.
Mechanised harvesting was attempted without success. A major achievement has been in the area of mechanised
in-field FFB collection. The Group adopted a unique gotong royong (co-operative) system in using mechanical buffalo
(MB, a 3-wheeler manufactured in-house) for this purpose after a thorough comparative evaluation with mini-tractor
(MT) system. In 1999 some 67% or 0.914m. tonnes FFB of the Group was collected by MB. Mean harvesters’ and
machine productivities were at 2.08 tons/day and 10.08 tons/day respectively. Crops collected are evacuated either
directly to palm oil mill or ramps by Kulim system. Both lorry and tractor-trailer systems with crane are used for crop
evacuation. Contract lorries are used for external transport to mills.
Mechanical spreader is used for fertiliser application in all areas with paths that have been prepared for in-field
FFB collection. Maintenance of these paths are by mean of rotoslashing instead of herbicide spraying as in the past.
Labour and cost saving are significant in mechanical spreading of fertiliser. In plantations where mills are located all
EFB and POME are recycled back to fields. Cost of POME application by tractor tanker system averaged at
RM117/ha/year in 1999. Cost of EFB mulching ranged from RM192 to RM594 per ha depending on the distance
travelled and quantity applied. Labour saving has also been achieved in the adoption of CDA/low volume sprayer/mist
blower for weed management.
Zero burn technique for replanting has been adopted by the Group since 1984. In 1999 the Group became the first
company to try a local innovation, a Palm Eater, for pulverization of oil palm trunk into fibres instead of shredding it
into chips.
Cost saving achieved by the Group due to improved productivity as a result of mechanisation has been completely
eroded due to escalation of machine cost. Productivities derived from the prevailing mechanised systems are
stagnating. Better systems would have to be developed. The development of a mechanical harvester cum pruner must
be given top priority and urgency by Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB). The issue of capital substitution for labour
(be it local or foreign) needs to be addressed. The government is strongly urged to provide tax incentive for a greater
degree of mechanisation lest a greater reliance on foreign workers may expose the industry to vulnerability and pose
social and security threat to the nation.

Introduction aggressive industralisation programme as a means of

achieving the national goal. Such policy coupled with
The oil palm and rubber industries form the backbone improved educational level among the population since
of Malaysian agriculture. Since the 1980s rubber was independence has led to a general dislike of manual
gradually losing its relative importance to oil palm due labour particularly in plantations by local populace.
in part to lower profitability and higher labour Increasingly the plantation sector relies on foreign
requirement. Oil palm hectarages increase steadily via workers to fill the void. It is estimated that foreign
conversion of logged over forest and from rubber and workers account for some 65% and 90% of the
cocoa land. The total area under oil palm at the end of plantation work force in Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah
1999 was 3.31m ha a dramatic 149% increase since respectively. Labour is increasingly scarce due to rapid
1984. The pressure for labour in the oil palm sector is absorption in the manufacture and/or service sector. The
therefore very obvious. deteriorating situation has been repeatedly highlighted.1-2
With the aim of achieving the status of a developed Consequently mechanisation has become a buzz word in
nation the Malaysian government has embarked on an

Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2002 Vol. 11 No. 2 70

 Mechanisation in Oil Palm Plantations: Achievement and Challenges

the oil palm industry during the last 2 decades as a plantation vehicles in all weather conditions. Details of a
means to solving labour shortage. proper road and drainage system construction are
EPA Management Sdn. Bhd, a plantation company provided by Teo.7
that manages 28 estates in the state of Johore, encounters
ever increasingly the impact of labour shortage. The In-Field FFB Collection
mushrooming of industrial estates throughout the state
and the attraction of higher wages in Singapore led the Wheelbarrow was the standard tool used in the past in
company to commit itself to mechanisation since the late transporting FFB from palm bases to collection road.
1980s. This paper discusses the Group’s achievement to Based on a comparative study between mechanical
date and highlights challenges ahead in mechanisation in buffalo (a three-wheeler with a payload of 400 kg) and
oil palm plantations. mini-tractor (with a trailer having a payload of 1.0 ton)
carried out by Teo et. al.5 the company has adopted the
Background to Mechanisation former as a standard vehicle for in-field FFB collection
for the following reasons :
The company started a series of trials in the 1980s to
evaluate suitable machines for harvesting, in-field FFB i. MB is useable in almost all terrains, and easy to
collection, fertiliser application and weeding. These are operate and maintain.
major field operations that demand higher labour and ii. Harvester’s productivity in MB system is
cost inputs.3 comparable to mini-tractor system; and
iii. MB is cheaper than mini-tractor and hence it
From the inception the objectives of mechanisation involves a lower capital outlay.
programmes were:
Mechanical buffalo (or badang as it is now named)
i. To increase labour productivity; and is manufactured by the company. Over the years the
ii. To decrease cost of production machine has been improved among other things, from a
4 hp to a 6 hp engine to provide more power in steeper
Workers’ income was expected to increase with terrain. A 9 hp engine is installed in a recent model of
labour productivity and the cost of mechanisation to be mechanical buffalo fixed with a high lift for direct
paid for from cost saving due to increased productivity. unloading of crop.
Cost saving was possible during the initial years upon Details for successful implementation of MB
introduction of mechanisation programme. As can be assisted in-field FFB collection are given by Teo et. al.5
seen in later sections the rising cost of machinery has Estates within the group are advised to follow the
eroded any possible cost saving due to higher guidelines closely and their harvesters and machine
productivity. productivity are also monitored closely by all levels of
A prototype harvesting machine with hydraulically management. As a Group the main harvesters’ and
elevated platform was tried with little success. It could machine productivity were at 2.08 tons/day and 10.08
not out compete the speed of a human harvester. The tons/day respectively. The overall results in 1999 are
project was discontinued as the machine productivity compared to those obtained during the initial evaluation
was extremely low. period and subsequent commercial adoption period
Results of evaluation on machines and work (1988 till 1990) as given in Table 1.5 There is no obvious
methods as reported by Teo et. al.4,5 and Han and improvement of productivity over time due partly to
Maclean6 form the bases of commercial adoption frequent turnover of foreign workers. However it is to be
throughout all the estates managed by the company. noted that the present productivity performance is
achieved with the inclusion of maintenance pruning as
Mechanical Path and Road System part of the concurrent duty of harvesters. Maintenance
pruning, in contrast to seasonal pruning, facilitates
A prerequisite to successful mechanisation in oil palm harvesting and hence crop recovery in older fields with
plantation is a proper system of mechanical paths and
tall palms. The average earning of harvesters has
roads. In all areas with straight line planting harvesters
improved significantly.
paths are converted to mechanical paths using bulldozer.
Based on our experience a higher productivity can
This work was carried out in existing fields and is now
only be achieved provided the estate management pays
practised right at the time of land preparation during
very close attention to details such as cropping level,
replanting. In terrace areas mechanical paths linking
harvesting intervals, yield and weather trend and
terraces and inter-terrace paths are constructed to
machine maintenance and makes the necessary
facilitate the access of mechanical buffalo (MB), mini
adjustment on team size (ranging from 4 to 6 harvesters
tractor (MT) and sometime big tractor as well.
per MB) and the number of machines (120 to 150 ha per
In both new and replanting areas a grid network of
machine) to be used. The objectives are to minimise
road system is planned and constructed wherever
machine down time, maximise harvesters working hours
possible. The objective is to ensure trafficability of

Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2002 Vol. 11 No. 2 71

 Mechanisation in Oil Palm Plantations: Achievement and Challenges

throughout the year, and balance between harvester’s system is preferred for minimising fertiliser loss along
productivity and machine productivity. mechanical paths due to surface runoff.
Taking two estates with similar terrain as an In 1999 there were 52 units of mechanical spreaders
illustration (Table 2). Estate A and B yielded 28.35 and in use in 28 estates (Table 4). Cumulative areas covered
23.46 tons/ha respectively in 1999. With a higher exceeded 180,000 ha. This represented some 37,000 ha
cropping level Estate A should by right achieved a of physical land area or about 67% of total mature fields.
higher productivity. This was not the case because Estate The average cost of application (not inclusive of capital
A was having a larger team size (5/6 harvesters) and an depreciation) was RM3.37/ha or RM15.09/ton. Each
extra machine. Whereas Estate B constantly adjusted the machine applied an average of 8.5 tons of fertiliser per
team size (from 4 to 6) to cropping level and kept the day over 37 ha. This was in agreement with result
optimal number of MB needed. Constant monitoring of obtained previously and by Ooi & Sim.4,9 While
operational details is obviously essential in ensuring reduction in labour usage remained the same, cost of
higher productivity not only in MB system but also in application has risen by more than 25% due to a higher
mini-tractor system as well. It is to be noted that increase cost of tractor and mechanical spreader.
in the number of harvesters per team can increase the Mechanical buffalo (MB) assisted manuring was
machine productivity but in turn reduces the harvester’s carried out in 12 estates with immature fields. In this
productivity and hence their income. There should be an case MBs were used as transporter of fertiliser into these
optimal balance between machine and harvesters output fields.5 More than 18,000 ha were covered by this means
so that harvesters do not leave due to low income. with an average cost of RM5.09/ha or RM28.12/ton
(Table 5)
Mainline Transport Apart from aerial manuring all other mechanical
mean of fertiliser application are more cost effective
For mainline transport of FFB the Group continues
than manual application. The use of mechanical spreader
to use the Kulim System developed by the company
reduces the requirement for workers by more than 50%.
many years ago. The prime mover used is either lorry
The standard of fertiliser application is also far superior
(6/7 ton capacity) with crane or tractor (65 to 85 hp) with
to manual application.
crane. Nets are used in this system for holding FFB
unloaded from MB along collection road. FFB in the net
are then lifted by crane and emptied onto the prime EFB Mulching
mover before delivery to either nearby ramp or directly Unlike its sister company in PNG which has flat terrain,
to palm oil mill. Shunting system is adopted in case of mechanical spreading of EFB in avenue of oil palm rows
tractor. This system requires only one crane for every 2 is not practical in EPA-managed estates. However,
tractors. Big grabber has also been tried to load FFB tractor-trailer and lorry are used where appropriate as
directly onto lorry without using net. transporter of EFB. In 1999 a total of 324,564 tons of
Performances of these various systems are EFB was applied over 7728 ha in 13 estates (Table 6).
summarised in Table 3. Lorry is preferred over tractor in This represented nearly 98% of the total EFB available
estates having good field roads and gentle terrain. Big for our Group mills. Cost of application ranged from
grabber appeared to be less efficient than the original RM6.00 to RM11.55 per ton depending on distance from
crane and net system. palm oil mill. Over the years the cost of application has
increased steadily from RM2 to 3 per ton some 10 years
Fertiliser Application ago. Higher cost of application is basically due to higher
From the point of view of reduced labour usage and cost of tractor/lorry and their maintenance.
speedy work aerial manuring would serve to achieve the In view of rising cost in application and difficulty to
objectives.8 However the cost of aerial application is fully mechanise the field operation EPA has embarked
prohibitive. It has increased from RM65/ton previously on composting of EFB. The final product or compost can
to the present cost of RM94/ton. then be mechanically spread like inorganic fertiliser. The
EPA group of estates prefers to make use of problem of EFB mulch as breeding site for Oryctes will
mechanical spreader mounted on tractor (>70hp) for also be non-existent by then.
fertiliser application due to cost effectiveness. Moreover
mechanical paths prepared for mechanical spreader POME Application
could be used for mechanical buffalo in in-field FFB
evacuation and vice-versa. In areas with rolling terrain
EPA managed mills adopted the policy of recycling not
only solid “waste” but POME as well. POME is applied
inter-terrace paths are also prepared to allow access of
by way of tractor-tanker system.10,11 As a Group 18
tractor. Mini-tractor is used in soggy flats. Over the
tractor-tanker units were deployed to apply POME over
years we have changed from Vicon spreader, Bezzecchi
10661 ha cumulatively (or 2665 ha of field) in 6 estates.
spreader to Turbo Spin Spreader. The former two models
Average cost of application was RM29.27/ha/application
apply the bulk of fertiliser onto mechanical paths while
or RM117.08/ha/year (Table 7). The average
the latter model away from mechanical paths. The latter
productivity of the system was 2.31 ha/day.

Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2002 Vol. 11 No. 2 72

 Mechanisation in Oil Palm Plantations: Achievement and Challenges

Rotoslashing of Mechanical Paths adopted in all the 28 estates. It helps to reduce the
requirement of weeders.
To minimise the use of herbicide in plantation all Table 8 summaries the cumulative area covered in 1999.
harvesters’ paths upon converting to mechanical paths It works out to a frequency of more than 3 times per
are maintained by tractor mounted rotoslasher This is year. Generally younger fields would require more
frequent rounds than 3. The system has an average

Table 1. Comparison of harvesters’ and machine (MB) productivity in different periods

Harvester Machine Average Operational
Output Output Earning Cost
(ton/day) (ton/day) RM/day (RM/ton)
Pre-mechanisation 1.23 - 12.81
Post-mechanisation :
Initial evaluation period * 1.54 7.45 16.29 1.63
1988 till 1990 2.10 10.30 23.87 1.60
1999 (28 estates) 2.08 10.08 47.70 2.00
* September 1987 till August 1988

Table 2. Comparison of harvesters’ and machine (MB) productivity between two estates (1999)
Estate A Estate B
Yield (tons/ha) 28.35 23.46
Harvester Output (ton/day) 2.03 2.30
Machine Output (ton/day) 10.07 10.62

Table 3. Performances of Kulim systems

Cost/Ton
Vehicle
Field To Ramp To Total
Prime Mover Productivity
Ramp Mill (Field to Mill)
(tons/day)
Lorry (crane net) 61.49 - - 6.23
Tractor (crane net) 52.07 - - 8.85
Tractor (shunting) 52.78 - - 6.35
Lorry (crane + net) 93.46 4.29 8.30* 12.59
Lorry (with big grabber) 65.32 4.80 8.60* 13.40
* Contract transport rate by lorry

Table 4. Summary of manuring by mechanical spreader in 1999

East a Central b North c South d Total/Mean
Units of Spreader 15 17 11 9 52
Cumm Area Covered (Ha) 56052.91 57676.69 37499.48 35286.01 186515.09
Ha/Spreader/day Mean 37.98 38.64 35.55 36.05 37.06
Rang 24.92-40.32 32.20-43.78 32.32-38.74 30.15-40.60 24.92-43.78
e
Fertiliser Applied/day (ton) Mean 8.84 9.12 8.16 7.83 8.49
Rang 6.83-13.50 7.13-10.70 6.05-9.48 6.09-11.64 6.05-13.50
e
Cost : RM/Ha Mean 3.22 3.41 3.41 3.43 3.37
Range 2.75-3.90 3.00-4.40 3.28-3.63 3.15-3.59 2.75-4.40
RM/ton Mean 13.84 14.44 15.65 16.43 15.09
Range 12.13-15.46 12.58-19.34 12.95-19.40 10.98-21.31 10.98-21.31
a. 7 estates
b. 9 estates
c. 6 estates

Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2002 Vol. 11 No. 2 73

 Mechanisation in Oil Palm Plantations: Achievement and Challenges

d. 6 estates
28 estates

Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2002 Vol. 11 No. 2 74

 Mechanisation in Oil Palm Plantations: Achievement and Challenges

Table 5. Summary of MB-assisted manuring in 1999

Ha Fertiliser
Units Covered Ha/Day Tons/day RM/Ha RM/Ton
LSS 1 839.81 22.1 3.14 3.96 27.92
LM 1 686.00 14.60 2.84 5.07 26.07
LTU 1 2345.00 20.75 2.73 3.75 28.50
LPP 1 637.91 17.72 6.17 6.19 17.78
LBK 1 1758.00 18.31 4.67 5.41 21.62
UTE 1 395.52 16.48 2.79 5.41 31.94
REM 2 667.74 15.18 3.66 5.61 23.24
NHC 1 5345.44 26.59 3.10 5.24 44.67
RE 1 926.58 25.74 5.36 4.20 20.16
TE 1 988.21 17.98 3.22 5.48 30.57
LM 1 1739.81 21.44 5.15 4.42 18.42
LLB 1 2125.00 24.71 3.37 6.35 46.51
Total/Mean 13 18,455.02 20.13 3.86 5.09 28.12
No. of estates involved: 12

Table 6. Summary of EFB mulching in 1999

East Central North South Total/Mean
EFB available (ton) 102207 96282 47117 86556 332162
EFB applied (ton) 101434 95089 46878 81163 324564
Area Applied (Ha) 2050 2905 938 1835 7728
Cost of Application
RM/Ton - Mean 7.31 6.90 8.58 9.03 8.34
- Range 6.00-11.00 6.30-8.00 6.33-11.88 5.78-10.89 6.00-11.55
RM/Ha - Mean 362 265 492 399 350
- Range 275-498 192-400 316-594 290-452 192-594
No. of estates involved: 13

productivity of 33.21 ha/day at an average cost of burn technique of replanting since 1984. Hydraulic
RM1.86/ha (machine depreciation is not included in the excavator fitted with locally fabricated chipping bucket
costing). was used for shredding old oil palm trunks into chips (of
10 cm thickness, 50 to 150 cm length). The shredded
Weed Management chips were normally heaped in inter-rows and allow to
decompose in the field.
EPA was the first company in the country to introduce This method of replanting has a major
commercially the use of controlled droplet applicator drawback as the decomposing material serves as
(CDA) for herbicide application in weed control.6 There breeding site for Oryctes. Oryctes is a major insect pest
was tremendous saving in the cost of application due to of oil palm particularly during the immature period after
reduced water usage and higher labour productivity. planting. To partially overcome this problem EPA
Subsequent to this, many sprayers (e.g. CP15, solo pioneered the use of a local innovation called Palm
sprayer, Osatu sprayer, samurai sprayer, etc) with lower Eater. Instead of a chipping bucket, a hydraulic
water usage as compared to the conventional knapsack excavator fitted with a hammermill is used to pulverise
sprayer (CKS) have been introduced. Mist blower is also the whole trunk into fibres. The machine is capable of
now adapted for weed control. As compared to CKS, pulverising oil palm trunk in both standing and
labour productivity can be increased 1 to 3 fold horizontal positions.12 Pulverised materials rot faster
depending on weed coverage and types of sprayer used. than shredded chips and pose a lesser risk of Oryctes
EPA is now able to reduce labour requirement for weed outbreak. Also the material may be used for in-situ
management from 1:25-30 ha to over 1:50 ha. composting and thus nutrients are recycled back to the
field more efficiently. Or they may be processed for
Zero Burn Technique of Replanting other biomass utilization.
Machineries used in land preparation during replanting
remain essentially the same over time and a mere
extension from rubber replanting. A notable change is
the zero burn technique of replanting. EPA adopted zero

Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2002 Vol. 11 No. 2 75

 Mechanisation in Oil Palm Plantations: Achievement and Challenges

The overall labour : land ratio in the 1980s was in

the region of l:6 ha to 1:7 ha. With the introduction and
Labour:Land Ratio adoption of the various mechanisation methods
Table 7. Summary of POME application in 1999
LTL LS SE UTE LTS LK TOTAL/
MEAN
No. of tractor-tanker unit 2 3 3 3 5 2 18
Total Effluent applied (Ton) 28070 28424 25465 32237 58770 22592 195558
Cumm. Area (Ha) Applied 1388.60 1372.65 1453.15 1666.53 3451.56 1328.94 10661.43
Cost : RM/Ton 1.35 1.62 1.86 1.61 1.68 1.33 1.58
RM/Ha 27.29 33.50 32.54 31.16 28.60 22.54 29.27
Vehicle output Ha/day 2.41 1.60 2.11 1.87 2.99 2.90 2.31
No. of estates involved : 6
Frequency of application: 4 times/year
Quantity applied: 125 to 150 L/palm/application

Table 8. Summary of rotoslashing of paths in 1999

East Central North South Total/Mean
No of units 14 14 8 11 47
Total Area
Covered(Ha) 43301.52 37189.31 26178.88 33025.15 139694.86
Area Covered-(Ha/Day)
Mean 32.63 35.44 30.44 34.31 33.21
Range 28.02-39.81 28.08-49.00 14.40-37.99 25.56-37.81 14.40-49.00
Cost (RM/Ha)
Mean 1.89 1.67 1.84 2.02 1.86
Range 1.56-2.75 1.41-1.89 1.61-2.34 1.85-2.14 1.41-2.35
No. of estates involved : 28

Table 9. Comparison between 1990 & 1999 prices of some common machineries used in oil palm plantations
1990 1999
In-Field FFB Collection
MB System L 40 6,500
L 60 - 11,600
MB System (L90) with high lift - 23,500
MT System (20 hp) 15,000 27,000
(25-28 hp) - 38,000-40,000
MT System + highlift + grabber - 65,000
Mechanical Fertiliser Spreader
Tractor (72 hp) 48,000 88,000
Fertiliser Spreader
800 kg capacity 4,200 85,000-8,990
Mainline Transport
Nissan lorry (6/7 ton) 75,000-80,000 123,000
Crane (1.5 tons) 27,000-30,000 48,000-51,000
Rotoslashing of Paths
Rotoslasher 70” 5,500 7,000

particularly with respect to in-field FFB collection, ratio of 1:12 ha. There are prospects of achieving 1:15 ha
mechanical spreading of fertiliser and CDA/mist blower through more detailed planning and monitoring.
method of weeding, EPA managed estates have been
able to reduce labour:land ratio to 1:10 ha. Estates Challenges Ahead
without replanting and immature fields can achieve a
Oil palm plantation owners are at a cross road,
confronted with the following major issues:
Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2002 Vol. 11 No. 2 76
 Mechanisation in Oil Palm Plantations: Achievement and Challenges

mechanisation and less dependence on foreign workers

i. Rising cost of machineries government can perhaps provide tax incentive for
ii. Stagnation in labour and machine productivity mechanisation to the plantation industry. Concurrently
for estates that have already introduced quota for employment of foreign workers must be
mechanisation. curtailed progressively with time. In this way one can
iii. The dilemma of capital substitution for labour. expect a more concerted effort by all concerned to look
iv. Absence of mechanical harvesting/pruning for labour saving technology under the pull and push
machine. scenario. The objective of achieving a labour:land ratio
There is not much scope in further expansion of of 1:20 ha or perhaps 1:25 ha can then be realised
existing mechanised activities. Fine tuning in the current sooner.
work systems using existing machineries may perhaps Training of worker is vital in any mechanised
improve productivities by up to 20%. This would call for operation. Having foreign workers with a 2-year work
total commitment from all levels of management. Any contract does not augur well for high productivity. Estate
further improvement in productivity is unlikely with the is saddled with the problem of training new workers all
current mechanised systems. Better systems would have the time. A standardised 5-year employment agreement
to be developed. between the two parties is preferable.
The cost escalation of machineries (Table 9) is
indeed worrisome under a situation of productivity Conclusion
stagnation. Prices of machineries currently used for field Whilst the oil palm plantation sector has over the years
operations in plantations have almost doubled in 10 achieved evolutionary progresses in mechanisation of
years. This has been partly due to a very significant almost all field operations except harvesting and
devaluation of Malaysian currency. pruning, the labour:land ratio of 1:10 ha is still
When MB was first introduced in 1987 cost of MB undesirable in comparison with any annual oil seed crop.
could be recovered through 30% increase in harvesters’ The industry and the government are confronted with the
productivity as compared to wheel barrow system. Now dilemma of inefficient capital substitution for labour on
machine cost (be it MB or MT) cannot be recovered the one hand and the social and security disruptions of
fully due to drastic price increase over the years. foreign workers on the other. A balance between the two
Presently estate would have to incur an extra cost of factors (i.e. mechanisation vs foreign workers) would be
about RM1.00/ton of FFB evacuated by MB system (and necessary to ensure the competitiveness of the industry.
likely to be more in the case of MT due to higher capital Meanwhile national research bodies such as MPOB in
outlay). This is in addition to the average operational collaboration with the industry must endeavour by all
cost of RM2.00/ton. The average operational cost in the means to develop a viable mechanical harvesting and
past was only RM1.60/ton.5 pruning system as soon as possible.
National research institution like Malaysian Palm
Oil Board (MPOB) and universities must work closely
with the industry to develop a mechanical harvester and
Acknowledgments
pruning machine as soon as possible. Forecast made by The writer wishes to thank the Managing Director of
Jalani for this to materialise in 2025 is very EPA Management Sdn. Bhd for the permission to
discouraging.13 It is hoped that with a very substantial present this paper. The success of mechanisation is due
allocation of research fund under IRPA for this project to the commitment of all the planters. Assistance given
the period for the realisation of a viable mechanised by Mdm. Kamala Devi and Puan Kalthom Abdul
harvester will be sooner. Should there be a lack of Rahman in the preparation of the paper is gratefully
expertise/technology it must be out sourced from a acknowledged.
centre of excellence. At the least a mechanical pruner
would have to be developed lest crop be rotted away References
when left unharvested from tall palms in particular.
Despite escalation of cost of machineries on the one 1. Abdul Aziz AR and Mat Nazir S (1993).
hand and the burdensome administrative/regulatory Agricultural labour force in Malaysia: Outlook and
procedures in employing foreign workers on the other implications. Proc National Conf On Mechanised
there is no turning back in pressing forward to a greater Agriculture, 1993, pp 23-34.
mechanisation. At a glance it is cheaper to make use of 2. Navamukundan A (1999). Changing labour
foreign workers instead of a greater degree of use on trends in the plantation sector. Paper presented at
machinery. However, the social cost and disruption that National Seminar on Innovations in Plantation
is inevitable when foreign workers are too numerous is Management. The Incorporated Society of Planters,
never computed. Kuantan, 9 May 1999, 25 pp.
As there is still the option of engaging foreign 3. Clendon JH (1990). The need for mechanisation
workers there may still be reluctance in some quarters to on oil palm estates, The Planter, 66 (773): 412-419.
implement the existing mechanisation technology as 4. Teo L, Ee KW, Maclean RJ and Abdul Rashid
fully as possible. As a means to encourage more S (1988). Mechanical spreading of fertiliser in an

Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2002 Vol. 11 No. 2 77

 Mechanisation in Oil Palm Plantations: Achievement and Challenges

inland oil palm estate. National Oil Palm/Palm Oil 9. Ooi LH and Sim BS (1997). Impact of two
Conference Current Developments. October 11-15, improved practices on labour requirement. In:
1988, Kuala Lumpur. Pushparajah E (ed) Plantation Management for the
5. Teo L, Tiong SKK, Abdul Rashid S and Ee KW 21st Century (Vol 1). The Incorporated Society of
(1993). EPA”s experiences on the use of mechanical Planters, Kuala Lumpur.
buffalo for in-field FFB collection and assisted 10. Teo L (1998). Mechanisation in oil palm
manuring. 1991 PORIM International Palm Oil plantations. Paper presented at MOSTA Symposium
Conference – Agriculture (Module 1), pp 179 – 187. 5: Recent Advances in Oil Palm Sector, October 15-
6. Han KJ & Maclean RJ (1983). Commercial 17, 1998 – Lumut, Perak, 36 pp.
evaluation of ultra-low volume technique for weed 11. Mohd Hashim T (1993). Treated POME as
control on plantations in Johore. Proc. Rubber nutrient source for oil palm. 1991 PORIM
Research. Institute Malaysia Planters Conference, International Palm Oil Conference – Agriculture
Kuala Lumpur 1983, pp 245 – 260. (Module 1) pp 244 – 260.
7. Teo L (1999). Mechanisation in oil palm 12. Amir Salleh and Ng TW (2000). In-situ
plantation; some practical considerations. The processing of oil palm trees using a palm eater. 5th
Planter, 75 (875): 233 – 244. National Seminar on Utilization of Oil Palm Tree.
8. Johnston TJM, Singh G and Loh HP (1994). Oil Palm Biomass: Opportunities and Challenges in
On-ground experiences of aerial fertiliser Commercial Exploitation, Bangi, 9-11 May 2000.
application in Malaysia. In: Chee KH (ed.). 13. Jalani BS (1998). Research and development of
Management for Enhanced Profitability in oil palm towards the next millennium. International
Plantations. The Incorporated Society of Planters, Oil Palm Conference, Bali, 1998, Paper GL/09.
Kuala Lumpur, pp 307 – 313.

Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2002 Vol. 11 No. 2 78