2006 Approved and Adopted Damascus Master Plan: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
2006 Approved and Adopted Damascus Master Plan: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
A comprehensive amendment to the Damascus Master Plan, 1982; the 1993 Amendment to the
Damascus Master Plan; the Functional Master Plan for the Preservation of Agriculture and Rural Open
Space, 1980; The General Plan (On Wedges and Corridors) for the Physical Development of the
Maryland-Washington Regional District within Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties; the
Countywide Park Trails Plan; the Master Plan of Highways within Montgomery County; and the 1993
Functional Master Plan for the Patuxent River Watershed.
Prepared by:
THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION
Approved by:
THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL
May 25, 2006
Adopted by:
THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION
June 21, 2006
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission is a bi-county agency created by the
General Assembly of Maryland in 1927. The Commission’s geographic authority extends to the great
majority of Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties; the Maryland-Washington Regional District (M-
NCPPC planning jurisdiction) comprises 1,001 square miles, while the Metropolitan District (parks)
comprises 919 square miles, in the two counties.
1. The preparation, adoption, and, from time to time, amendment or extension of The General Plan
(On Wedges and Corridors) for the Physical Development of the Maryland-Washington Regional
District in Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties;
2. The acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of a public park system; and
3. In Prince George’s County only, the operation of the entire County public recreation program.
The Commission operates in each county through a Planning Board appointed by and responsible to
the county government. All local plans, recommendations on zoning amendments, administration of
subdivision regulations, and general administration of parks are responsibilities of the Planning Boards.
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission encourages the involvement and
participation of individuals with disabilities, and its facilities are accessible. For assistance with
special needs (e.g. large print materials, listening devices, sign language interpretation, and others),
please contact the Community Relations Office, 301-495-4600 or TDD 301-495-1331.
COUNTY COUNCIL
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
Douglas M. Duncan
COMMISSIONERS
This area Master Plan, after approval by the County Council and adoption by The Maryland-National
Capital Park and Planning Commission, constitutes an amendment to the General Plan for Montgomery
County. It provides a set of comprehensive recommendations and guidelines for the use of publicly
and privately owned land within its plan area. This Master Plan provides a vision of future development
that responds to the unique character of the local community within the context of a countywide
perspective. Together with relevant countywide functional master plans, this master plan should be
referred to by public officials and private individuals when decisions are made that affect the use of land
within the Plan’s boundaries.
Master plans generally look ahead 20 years from the date of adoption, although they should be updated
and revised every ten to fifteen years. Maintaining relevance is important, as the circumstances at the
time of plan adoption will change, and specific elements of any master plan will become less relevant
as time passes.
STAFF DRAFT PLAN — This document is prepared by the Montgomery County Department of Park
and Planning for presentation to the Montgomery County Planning Board. The Planning Board reviews
the Staff Draft Plan, makes preliminary changes as appropriate, and approves the Plan for public
hearing. When the Planning Board’s changes are made, the document becomes the Public Hearing
(Preliminary) Draft Plan.
PUBLIC HEARING (PRELIMINARY) DRAFT PLAN — This document is a formal proposal to amend
an adopted master plan or sector plan. Its recommendations are not necessarily those of the Planning
Board; it is prepared for the purpose of receiving public hearing testimony. The Planning Board holds a
public hearing and receives testimony on the Draft Plan. After the public hearing record is closed, the
Planning Board holds public worksessions to review the testimony and to revise the Public Hearing
(Preliminary) Draft Plan as appropriate. When the Planning Board’s changes are made, the document
becomes the Planning Board (Final) Draft Plan.
PLANNING BOARD (FINAL) DRAFT PLAN — This document is the Planning Board's recommended
Plan and it reflects the revisions made by the Board in its worksessions on the Public Hearing
(Preliminary) Draft Plan. The Regional District Act requires the Planning Board to transmit the Master
Plan directly to the County Council with copies to the County Executive. The Regional District Act then
requires the County Executive, within sixty days, to prepare and transmit a fiscal impact analysis of the
Planning Board (Final) Draft Plan to the County Council. The County Executive may also forward to the
County Council other comments and recommendations regarding the Planning Board (Final) Draft Plan
within the sixty-day period.
After receiving the Executive's fiscal impact analysis and comments, the County Council may hold a
public hearing to receive public testimony on the Master Plan. After the record of this public hearing is
closed, the Council's Planning, Housing, and Economic Development (PHED) Committee holds public
worksessions to review the testimony and then makes recommendations to the County Council. The
Council holds its own worksessions, then adopts a resolution approving the Planning Board (Final)
Draft Plan, as revised.
ADOPTED PLAN — The Master Plan approved by the County Council is forwarded to The Maryland-
National Capital Park and Planning Commission for adoption. Once adopted by the Commission, the
Plan officially amends the various master or sector plans cited in the Commission's adoption resolution.
Community participation in the Damascus Master Plan was achieved through a series of Task Forces
that addressed various elements. Membership on all of these Task Forces was open to any interested
participant. Each Task Force held two to four meetings. Over 100 participants, many participating in
multiple Task Forces, cumulatively comprised the Master Plan Review Committee. The Task Force
groups included:
Participants
▪ Town Center Charrette 58
▪ Land Use, Housing, and Historic Preservation Task Force 56
▪ Environment Task Force 33
▪ Transportation Task Force 53
▪ Parks, Trails, Open Space, and Community Facilities Task Force 44
This Master Plan specifically recognizes the contributions and commitment of David Bernard, Wayne
and Pamela Bussard, Michael Cohn, Chris and Nancy Doyle, Bruce Hall, Katie Junghans, Dan King,
Jane King, Mary King, Douglas King, Bernard and Melanie Lauer, Charles Limparis, George and Alice
Moy, Sara and Joseph Rice, J.R. Smart, Joan Snow, John and Cindy Snow, Frank Stodolsky, James
Varley, Debbie Weinman, Mary White, and especially Gary Richard (who attended the most meetings),
all of whom participated in 4 or 5 Task Forces.
The listing or names of members of the Master Plan Review Committee (MPR) and Task Forces does
not indicate approval or disapproval of this document by any MPR Committee or individual Task Force
member. The Master Plan Review Committee and Task Forces provided recommendations regarding
the problems, needs, and views of individuals, groups or areas. These views were considered by the
staff in its deliberations regarding the Master Plan.
INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................... 1
Community Vision .............................................................................................................................. 1
Plan Highlights ................................................................................................................................... 3
Description of Master Plan Area......................................................................................................... 5
Master Plan Framework ..................................................................................................................... 8
HOUSING ............................................................................................................................................................... 43
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 43
Residential Development Opportunities ........................................................................................... 44
Housing Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 46
Demographic Trends ....................................................................................................................... 47
TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................................................................. 49
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 49
Roadway Network and Classifications ............................................................................................. 49
Air Transportation ............................................................................................................................ 58
Bikeway and Pedestrian Improvements ........................................................................................... 58
Transit and Travel Demand Management ........................................................................................ 62