07 Damper Circuit
07 Damper Circuit
RECOIL DAMPENING.
Long drill steel life High penetration rate Most of the Atlas Copco rock drills are equipped with the so-called double damper system. A built-in recoil dampener: Absorbs shock reflexes from the drill steel Reduces vibrations of the drill rods Reduces stress on rock drill feed and boom system. The damper also ensures that good contact is maintained between the drill bit and the rock. This is of great significance to penetration rate and drill steel economy.
feed force
4Drilling
floating position
Hydraulic damper, floating COP 1432 COP 1532 COP 1800 COP 2150 COP 2550 COP 4050
Protects the rock drill from rock recoils Provides good rock-bit contact Absorbs the energy of the recoils
2 and 3
3 only
position
Constant flow
Feed force
Impact position
floating position
Feed force
Impact position
damper piston and the rotation chuck bushing are pressed towards the shank adapater, The impact piston starts a new stroke
Constant flow
Feed force
Impact position
rock drill body moves forward due to the feed force. The equilibrium is reestablished.
Constant flow
Feed force
A recoil comes and forces the damper piston to the right. High inner stage damper pressure. The recoil energy is absorbed and transferred into heat.
Constant flow
Feed force
Feed force
damper piston stops at the equilibrium point. After the stroke, see slide no 1 again.
Constant flow
Feed force
+ penetratin rate + good joint-thread tightening + reduced need of feed force (see next slide) + the service life of the shank adapter + the service life of the drill steel + hole straightness
4Correct 4Energy
+ controlled impact velocity + the service life of the shank adapter + the service life of the drill steel
Customer 1
Button bit 51
COP1838ME II 230 bar HL550 Super 210 bar HL550 Super 230 bar
2,6 2,5 2,4 2,3 2,2 2,1 2,0 1,9 1,8 1,7 1,6 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Feed force [kN] P e n ra t e [ m /m in ]
Kin [mm/Joule]
2,3 2,2 2,1 2,0 1,9 1,8 1,7 1,6 1,5 1,4 1,3 1,2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
In this chart, COP1838, was run at lower Impact power than HL 550. No correct comparisation.
This is a more fair comparisation as the rock penetration efficiency vs the feed force is plotted.