0% found this document useful (0 votes)
160 views2 pages

Joint Motion To Dismiss: Arnan Orris Ichols RSHT Unnell

The parties in the case of Delaware Display Group LLC and Innovative Display Technologies LLC vs Amazon.com, Inc. have resolved the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant and the defendant's claims against the plaintiffs. As a result, the plaintiffs and defendant jointly request that the court dismiss the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant with prejudice, and the defendant's claims against the plaintiffs without prejudice, with each party bearing their own costs and fees.

Uploaded by

sabatino123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
160 views2 pages

Joint Motion To Dismiss: Arnan Orris Ichols RSHT Unnell

The parties in the case of Delaware Display Group LLC and Innovative Display Technologies LLC vs Amazon.com, Inc. have resolved the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant and the defendant's claims against the plaintiffs. As a result, the plaintiffs and defendant jointly request that the court dismiss the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant with prejudice, and the defendant's claims against the plaintiffs without prejudice, with each party bearing their own costs and fees.

Uploaded by

sabatino123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE




DELAWARE DISPLAY GROUP LLC AND
INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES
LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
AMAZON.COM, INC.,

Defendant.




C.A. NO. 13-2106 RGA




JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Delaware Display Group LLC and Innovative Display
Technologies LLC (Plaintiffs) and Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon) have resolved
Plaintiffs claims for relief against Amazon and Amazons claims for relief and defenses against
Plaintiffs asserted in this case.
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Amazon, through their attorneys of record, request
this Court to dismiss Plaintiffs claims for relief against Amazon with prejudice, and Amazons
claims for relief and defenses against Plaintiffs without prejudice, and with all attorneys fees,
costs of court and expenses, with respect to all claims solely between them, borne by the party
incurring same.

Dated: September 4, 2014 Respectfully submitted,
FARNAN LLP

/s/ Brian E. Farnan
Brian E. Farnan (#4089)
Michael J . Farnan (#5165)
919 North Market Street, 12
th
Floor
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
(302) 777-0300
bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP

/s/ Karen J acobs
Karen J acobs (#2881)
Michael J . Flynn (#5333)
1201 North Market Street
P.O. Box 1347
Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
(302) 658-9200

Case 1:13-cv-02106-RGA Document 18 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 271


mfarnan@farnanlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
kjacobs@mnat.com
mflynn@mnat.com

Attorneys for Defendant










































Case 1:13-cv-02106-RGA Document 18 Filed 09/04/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 272

You might also like