Untitled
Untitled
ISSN: 0975-8232
(Research Article)
Received on 04 June, 2012; received in revised form, 26 February, 2013; accepted, 13 March, 2013
ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF COW URINE AGAINST SOME PATHOGENIC AND NONPATHOGENIC BACTERIA
S. Raad 1, D.V. Deshmukh*2, S. N. Harke 2 and M.S. Kachole 1
Department of Biochemistry, Dr. Babasaheb Amberdkar Marathwada University 1, Aurangabad, Maharashtra,
India
MGMs, Institute of Biosciences and Technology 2, Auranagabad, Maharashtra, India
Keywords:
Cow urine, Antibacterial activity, Zone
of inhibition, Antimicrobial Peptides
Correspondence to Author:
Dr. Devendra V. Deshmukh
Assistant Professor, MGMs, Institute
of Biosciences and Technology, N-6,
CIDCO, Aurangabad, India
E-mail: [email protected]
IJPSR:
ICV (2011)- 5.07
Article can be accessed
online on:
www.ijpsr.com
1534
Antimicrobial activity:
Test bacterial cultures: Fourteen bacterial cultures
from laboratory repository viz. Escherichia coli
NCIM 2345, Escherichia coli NCIM 2065,
Escherichia coli NCIM 2310, Bacillus subtilis NCIM
2113, Bacillus licheniformis NCIM 2015, Bacillus
megaterium NCIM 2083, Staphylococcus aureus
NCIM 2124, Staphylococcus aureus NCIM 2079,
Staphylococcus aureus NCIM 2125, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa NCIM 2945, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
NCIM 2053, Proteus vulgaris NCIM 2857, Kebshella
pneumonie NCIM 2957 and Salmonella typhimurium
NCIM 2501 were used in the study. Freshly grown
12 h old cultures in nutrient broth were used as the
inoculum in antibacterial assays.
Disc Preparation: Paper disc of filter paper
Whattman No. 1 were prepared. The discs were
sterilized by autoclave at 121C. After the
sterilization the moisture discs were dried on hot air
oven at 50C. The sterile discs were kept in a
presetrilized container until further use.
1535
TABLE 2: ZONE OF INHIBITIONS (IN CM) OBSERVED AGAINST 14 BACTERIAL CULTURES FROM 10
DIFFERENT COW URINE SAMPLES
Urine samples
Bacterial
cultures
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
E. coli
0.5*(0.25) 1.2(0.30)
R
R
1.0(0.15)
1.5(0.5)
1.5(0.30) 1.0 (0.45)
1.5 (0.5)
0.5(0.12)
NCIM 2345
E. coli
0.3 (0.5)
1.0(0.45) 0.5(0.15) 1.5(0.15) 0.9(0.12) 0.5(0.15) 1.2(0.27)
1.0(0.5)
1.0(0.12)
1.2(0.35)
NCIM 2065
E. coli
0.8 (0.30) 0.7(0.15) 1.5(0.20) 0.5(0.20) 0.7(0.20) 0.5(0.75) 0.8(0.36) 0.7 (0.30) 0.7 (0.55)
R
NCIM 2015
B subtilis
R
0.5(1.0)
0.8(0.30)
R
0.5(0.15) 0.7(0.30) 1.0(0.15) 0.5 (0.12) 0.5 (0.35)
R
NCIM 2113
B licheniformis
0.5 (1.0)
R
0.8(0.15)
R
R
0.7(0.12) 1.2(0.30)
0.5 (0.5)
1.0 (0.36)
0.5
NCIM 2015
B megaterium
0.9
R
R
R
R
1.0 (0.5)
1.1 (0.5)
R
0.5 (0.34)
0.3
NCIM 2083
(0.30)
S aureus
0.5
R
R
R
R
R
0.9(0.11)
R
R
R
NCIM 2124
(0.75)
S aureus
R
R
R
R
0.6(0.12)
R
0.8(0.25)
R
R
R
NCIM 2125
S aureus
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.5(0.45)
R
0.6 (0.22)
0.6
NCIM 2079
P aeruginosa
R
1.0(0.30) 1.2(0.15) 0.6(0.12)
R
1.0(0.15) 1.8(0.12) 1.0 (0.15) 1.0 (0.45)
0.7
NCIM 2945
P aeruginosa
0.4(0.4)
0.5(0.12)
R
0.8(0.30)
0.5(0.5)
0.7(0.12) 1.0(0.36) 0.7 (0.25) 0.5 (0.12)
1.0
NCIM 2053
P vulgaris
0.8 (0.75)
R
1.1(0.25) 1.0(0.12) 1.0(0.12) 1.5 (0.5) 0.8(0.47) 0.6 (0.12)
R
0.4
NCIM 2857
K pneumonie
0.5 (1.0)
R
0.5(0.30) 0.5 (0.5)
1.1 (0.5) 0.8(0.30) 0.9(0.12)
R
0.5 (0.45)
1.2
NCIM 2957
S typhimurium
1.0 (0.5)
R
R
0.5(0.15) 0.5(0.12) 0.6(0.25) 1.5(0.12)
R
R
0.6
NCIM 2501
Cumulative
4.8
4.9
7.3
5.4
6.8
10
15
6
7.8
7
Inhibition
* Zone of inhibitions in centimeters, Values in the parenthesis is standard deviations, R- Resistant.
1536
1537
1538
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
1539
Pharmaceutical Biology
Article views: 19
Pharmaceutical Biology
2008, Vol. 46, Nos. 1011, pp. 789792
Herbal Drug Research Lab, B. R. Nahata College of Pharmacy and Research Centre, Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh, India
Abstract
An herbal preparation prepared by the traditional healers of Mandsaur using cow urine and Gymnema sylvestre
R. Br. (Asclepiadaceae), Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae), Eugenia jambolana Lam. (Myrtaceae), Aegle marmelos Correa (Rutaceae), Cinnamomum tamala
Buch.-Ham. (Lauraceae), Aloe barbadensis Linn. (Liliaceae), and Trigonella foenum-graecum L. (Leguminosae)
is being used in the treatment of diabetes. In order to scientifically appraise the claim, this preparation was studied for antidiabetic activity and also compared with the
herbal preparation prepared using water. Fresh cow urine
was also used in the study to identify the synergistic effect. The preparations were tested for antidiabetic activity
in alloxan-induced diabetic rats at two dose level, 200 and
400 mg/kg, respectively. The study was done for a period of
21 days. The activity was compared with reference standard,
insulin (1 unit/kg, i.p.) and control. The herbal preparations
significantly (P< 0.05, P < 0.01) lowered the blood sugar
level of hyperglycemic rats in a dose-dependent manner.
Comparatively, the cow urine preparation showed better activity than did the preparation prepared using water. Fresh
cow urine also exhibited significant antidiabetic effect. This
study supports the claim of the local traditional healers.
Keywords: Alloxan monohydrate, antidiabetic, cow urine,
herbal preparation.
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic diseases characterized by hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercholesterolemia, resulting from defects in insulin se-
C
790
Preparation of extracts
The herbal preparations using cow urine and distilled water were made using the above-mentioned different plant
species. Equal quantities of air-dried samples of each plant
species were ground and mixed with 10-times the equivalent volume of cow urine and water separately and boiled
for 4 h. The extracts were filtered and evaporated in a distillation assembly to get the residue. The percentage yield of
extracts prepared using cow urine and distilled water was
12.5% and 11.0%, w/w, respectively. Preliminary chemical investigation was carried out in the extracts to identify
the nature of constituents present in the extracts (Brain &
Turner, 1975; Khandelwal, 2005).
Results
The phytochemical investigations performed in the extracts
revealed the presence of alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, carbohydrates, and saponins in both the extracts. The results
of antidiabetic activity of cow urine and herbal preparations
prepared using cow urine and water are presented in Table 1.
The basal blood glucose levels of all the groups were
statistically not different from each other. Three days after
alloxan administration, blood glucose values were 5-fold
higher in all the groups and were not statistically different
from each other. After 21 days, values of blood glucose were
decreased in all the treatment groups (P < 0.05, P < 0.01).
The value in diabetic control group remained stable. The
preparations exhibited activity in a dose-dependent manner.
The activities of the preparations were found significant
from the 7th day onwards, whereas the activity of cow urine
was found significant only after 21 days of treatment. Normal rats treated with cow urine for 21 days did not show any
elevation in their blood glucose levels. Comparatively, the
preparations containing cow urine were found to be better
than the herbal preparation prepared using distilled water.
791
Treatment
Insulin
Diabetic control
CUP
CUP
AP
AP
CU
CU
CU control
0th day
7th day
14th day
21st day
1 unit/kg
200
400
200
400
200
400
400
83.2 3.01
93.4 4.23
79.50 2.01
84.00 3.04
84.10 3.54
88.50 4.65
84.62 5.00
80.92 7.01
85.20 3.46
451.22 19.30
439.54 15.90
451.22 13.40
458.80 14.00
478.44 12.16
439.42 14.18
480.42 16.22
430.45 17.92
88.54 2.40
349.42 19.2
538.22 20.40
380.44 12.42
360.45 11.18
399.12 13.03
369.72 10.90
490.88 10.30
450.88 17.89
84.22 4.80
201.44 12.50
517.98 22.21
318.60 11.30
279.80 11.08
330.45 13.55
298.24 14.50
465.45 13.82
410.12 12.56
87.70 3.40
133.10 16.52
530.54 15.20
235.55 12.25
203.34 15.10
240.86 18.22
220.67 17.55
380.20 18.00
262.40 17.92
84.92 4.20
CUP, cow urine Preparation; AP, aqueous preparation; CU, fresh cow urine; CU control, non diabetic rats treated with fresh cow urine.
Values are expressed as mean SEM for six observations.
Statistical analysis was done by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnets multiple comparison test. Significant at p < 0.05, p < 0.01,
Discussion
Cow, Bos indicus is a most valuable animal in all Veda;
it is called the Mother of all. A composition containing
cows excretionsurine, dung, milk, curd, and gheefive
ingredients together known as panchagawya, is given to
women after delivering a baby. Panchagawya is the main ingredient of many Ayurvedic preparations (Pathak & Kumar,
2003b). Cow urine, one of the ingredients in panchagawya,
is believed to have many therapeutic values. In India, cow
urine is used by the majority of the rural population as a
folklore remedy in almost all the states. Agencies in Gujarat
have been marketing cow urine preparations from multiple
outlets, advertising that they are sterilized and completely
fresh, with prices ranging from Rs. 20 to Rs. 30 per bottle. Keeping in view the enormous role of cows urine in
medicinal and veterinary medicine, a scientific experiment
was performed in rats to elucidate the effect of cow urine
and cow urine containing preparation as an antidiabetic.
Alloxan produces hyperglycemia by a selective cytotoxic
effect on pancreatic beta cells. One of the intracellular
phenomena for its cytotoxicity is through generation of
free radicals demonstrated both in vivo and in vitro (Yadav
et al., 2002). Our investigations indicate the efficiency of
the herbal preparations in maintaining blood glucose levels in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. The glucose-lowering
activity observed in diabetic animals may be due to stimulation of beta cells of pancreatic islets or stimulation of
glycogenesis (Miura et al., 2001). This may be due to the
presence of some hypoglycemic principles in the plants
used in these preparations because all these plants are well
known for their antidiabetic action (Grover et al., 2002;
Kar et al., 2003; Mohamed et al., 2006; Pulok et al., 2006),
and these plants have different types of mechanisms in
reducing blood glucose levels. Comparatively, the preparation using cow urine was found to exhibit better activity
than did the one prepared using distilled water. This could
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to Gayathri Parivar (local traditional healers) for providing the necessary information to
carry out this research work.
792
References
Ainapure SS, Arjaria PD, Sawant VR, Baid PS, Maste SS, Varda
AB (1985): Hypoglycemic activity of an indigenous preparation. Indian J Pharmacol 17: 238239.
Brain KR, Turner TD (1975): The Practical Evaluation of
Phytopharmaceuticals. Bristol, Wright-Scientechnica,
pp. 1030.
Gowenlock AH, McMurray RJ (1988): Varleys Practical Clinical
Biochemistry. New Dehli, CBS Publishers and Distributors,
pp. 149153.
Grover JK, Yadav S, Vats V (2002): Medicinal plants of India with
anti-diabetic potential. J Ethnopharmacol 81: 81100.
Kar A, Choudhary BK, Bandyopadhyay NG (2003): Comparative
evaluation of hypoglycaemic activity of some Indian medicinal plants in alloxan diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol 84:
105108.
Khandelwal KR (2005): Practical Pharmacognosy. Pune, Nirali
Prakashan, pp. 152154.
Krishnamurthi K, Dutta D, Devi SS, Chakrabarti T (2004): Protective effect of distillate and redistillate of cows urine in human
polymorphonuclear leukocytes challenged with established
genotoxic chemicals. Biomed Environ Sci 17: 5766.
Miura T, Itoh C, Iwamoto N, Aato M, Kawai M, Park SR, Suziki I
(2001): Hypoglycemic activity of the fruit of the Momordica
charantia in Type 2 diabetic mice. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol
(Tokyo) 47: 340344.
Mohamed B, Abderrahim Z, Hassane M, Abdelhafid T,
Abdelkhaleq L (2006): Medicinal plants with potential antidiabetic activityA review of ten years of herbal medicine
research (19902000): Int J Diabetes Metab 14: 125.
Abstract: From the ancient period cows urine has been used as a medicine. In India, drinking of cow urine has
been practiced for thousands of years. Panchagavya is a term used in Ayurveda to describe five important
substances obtained from cow namely Urine, Dung, Milk, Ghee and Curd. The present study analyzes the
antibacterial and antifungal activity of Cow Urine Distillate against the clinical pathogenic microorganisms.
Antibacterial activity of Cow Urine Distillate (5, 10 and 15l) was analyzed against the Bacillus subtilis,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella typhi. Maximum antibacterial activity was
observed in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7.060.05, 8.080.18 and 10.41.23, mm in diameter, respectively) and
Salmonella typhi (6.31.23, 8.060.17 and 10.41.2, mm in diameter, respectively). Antifungal activity of cow
urine distillate was analysed against Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus flavus. When the two fungal organisms
were compared, maximum growth suppression was observed in Aspergillus niger (30.14, 6.31.2 and 7.060.04,
mm in diameter) than Aspergillus flavus (2.030.25, 4.90.26 and 6.31.2, mm in diameter, respectively).
Finally concluded that the cow urine distillate has antibacterial and antifungal activities and the inhibitory
activity can be used in the control of bacteria and fungi of various origins.
Key words: Cow Urine Distillate
INTRODUCTION
In Veda, cows urine was compared to the nectar. In
substrata, several medicinal properties of cows urine
have been mentioned and are known to cause weight loss,
reversal of certain cardiac and kidney problems,
indigestion, stomach ache, edema, etc. Cow urine has a
unique place in Ayurveda and has been described in
Sushrita Sumhita and Ashtanga Sangraha to be the
most effective substance secretion of animal origin with
innumerable therapeutic values. It has been recognized as
water of life or Amrita (Beverages of immortality), the
nectar of the God. In India, drinking of cow urine has been
practiced for thousands of years. Panchagavya is a term
used in Ayurveda to describe five important substances
obtained from cow namely Urine, Dung, Milk, Ghee and
Curd. A number of formulations mentioned in Ayurveda
describe the use of Panchagavya components either alone
or in combination with drugs of herbal, animal or mineral
origin [1].
An exhaustive reference of cows urine having
curative properties in skin diseases, especially leprosy,
is referred to in Caraka samhita. Furthermore, in the
Corresponding Author:
41
S.NO.
Bacteria
1.
2.
3.
4.
Bacillus subtilis
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Salmonella typhi
8.60.17
13.60.17
7.30.25
13.60.17
8.80.17
15.41.23
110.14
15.41.23
7.10.01
11.20.01
9.50.05
9.60.02
S.NO.
Fungi
1.
2.
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus flavus
11.31.2
100.25
42
12.60.04
111.2
16
14
12
10
5l
10l
15l
Amp*
2
0
Klebsiella
pneumoniae
Salmonella
typhi
10l
15l
4
2
0
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus flavus
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
44
Review Article
www.jicep.com
DOI: 10.5455/jice.2015022210032
ABSTRACT
In the grim scenario where presently about 70% of pathogenic bacteria are resistant to at least one of the
drugs for the treatment, cue is to be taken from traditional/indigenous medicine to tackle it urgently. The Indian
traditional knowledge emanates from ayurveda, where Bos indicus is placed at a high pedestal for numerous
uses of its various products. Urine is one of the products of a cow with many benefits and without toxicity.
Various studies have found good antimicrobial activity of cows urine (CU) comparable with standard drugs such
as ofloxacin, cefpodoxime, and gentamycin, against a vast number of pathogenic bacteria, more so against
Gram-positive than negative bacteria. Interestingly antimicrobial activity has also been found against some
resistant strains such as multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrobial
action is enhanced still further by it being an immune-enhancer and bioenhancer of some antibiotic drugs.
Antifungal activity was comparable to amphotericin B. CU also has anthelmintic and antineoplastic action. CU
has, in addition, antioxidant properties, and it can prevent the damage to DNA caused by the environmental
stress. In the management of infectious diseases, CU can be used alone or as an adjunctive to prevent the
development of resistance and enhance the effect of standard antibiotics.
INTRODUCTION
Infectious diseases remain a major threat to the public
health despite tremendous progress in human medicine.
Emergence of widespread drug resistance to the currently
available antimicrobials is a matter of deep concern. A high
percentage of nosocomial infections are caused by highly
resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus or multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria.
Each year in the United States, about 2 million people
become infected with antibiotic resistant bacteria and at
least 23,000 people die every year as a consequence of these
infections. Many more people die from other conditions that
are complicated by an antibiotic-resistant infection [1]. In
2012, there were about 450000 new cases of MDR tuberculosis.
Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis has been identified
in 92 countries. Development of resistance to oral drug of
choice fluoroquinolones, for urinary tract infections caused
by Escherichia coli is very widespread, often sensitivity
remains only for injectables [2]. Infections caused by
resistant microorganisms often fail to respond to the standard
treatment, resulting in prolonged illness, higher health care
expenditures, and a greater risk of death. There is a dire
need for the development of new antimicrobial agents with
sensitivity intact against microorganisms [3,4]. The rational
designing of novel drugs from traditional medicines to treat
180
MECHANISM OF ACTION OF CU
Different fractions of CU possess antimicrobial activity due to
the presence of certain components like volatile and nonvolatile
ones [10-13]. Presence of urea, creatinine, swarn kshar (aurum
hydroxide), carbolic acid, phenols, calcium, and manganese has
strongly explained the antimicrobial and germicidal properties of
CU [14-16]. Presence of amino acids and urinary peptides may
enhance the bactericidal effect [17] by increasing the bacterial
cell surface hydrophobicity. CU enhances the phagocytic activity
of macrophages. Higher amounts of phenols in fresh CU than
CU distillate (CUD) makes it more effective against microbes.
After photo-activation, few biogenic volatile inorganic and
organic compounds such as CO 2, NH3, CH4, methanol,
propanol and acetone, and some metabolic secondary
nitrogenous products are also formed [18]. Photo-activated
CU (PhCU) becomes highly acidic in comparison to fresh CU.
An increase in bactericidal action may be due to a significant
decrease in pH [12], presence of inorganic phosphorus, chloride
and dimethylamine may also play an important role [19],
along with increased formation of some reactive compounds
like formaldehyde, sulfinol, ketones and some amines during
photo-activation and long term storage [20]. CU prevents the
development of antibacterial resistance by blocking the R-factor,
a part of plasmid genome of bacteria [21].
CU contains phenolic acids (gallic, caffeic, ferulic, o-coumaric,
cinnamic, and salicylic acids) which have antifungal
characteristics [22].
Antioxidant property of uric acid and allantoin present in CU
correlates with its anticancer effect. CU reduces apoptosis in
lymphocytes and helps them to survive better [5]. This action
may be due to the free radical scavenging activity of the urine
components, and these components may prevent the process of
aging [10]. It efficiently repairs the damaged DNA [5].
Daily consumption of CU improves immunity due to the presence
of swarn kshar and fastens the wound healing process, which
is due to allantoin [8]. CU enhances the immunocompetence
by facilitating the synthesis of interleukin-1 and -2 [23,24],
augments B - and T- lymphocyte blastogenesis, and IgA, IgM
and IgG antibody titers [25].
AS ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT
181
Table 1: Antimicrobial activity of CU, CUD (Gujrati Geer cow) in comparison to standard drug Ofloxacin [10]
FCU
CUD
Ofloxacin
E. coli
S. epidermidis
S. aureus
K. pneumoniae
P. vulgaris
B. subtilis
23
20
30
22
20
28
24
18
25
25
20
28
23
20
28
24
21
32
E. coli: Escherichia coli, K. pneumonia: Klebsiella pneumonia, P. vulgaris: Proteus vulgaris, B. subtilis: Bacillus subtilis, S. epidermidis: Staphylococcus
epidermidis, FCU: Fresh cow urine, CUD: Cow urine distillate, CU: Cow urine
ANTISEPTIC
Sanganal et al. observed the enhanced wound healing activity
of CU in Wistar albino rats [43]. On 4th day, the external
application of CU showed significant and progressive increase
in wound healing in rats compared to different concentrations
of CU and 1% w/w nitrofurazone ointment locally. Similar
findings were also observed by Maheshwary et al. [44].
ANTHELMINTIC ACTIVITY
CUC was found to be more effective than piperazine citrate
as anthelmintic agent at both 1% and 5% concentrations.
For anthelmintic activity, adult Indian earthworm Pheretima
posthuma was studied due to its anatomical and physiological
resemblance with the intestinal roundworm parasite of human
J Intercult Ethnopharmacol Apr-Jun 2015 Vol 4 Issue 2
BIOENHANCER
A bioenhancer/biopotentiator is an agent capable of
enhancing the bioavailability and efficacy of a drug with which
it is co-administered, without any pharmacological activity of
its own at the therapeutic dose used. In ayurveda, this concept
is known as yogvahi and is used to increase the effect of
medicines by increasing the oral bioavailability (especially of
medicines with poor oral bioavailability), decreasing their dose
and adverse effects, and were used to circumvent the parentral
routes of drug administration. We can develop more such useful
and economically viable drug combinations, by integrating the
knowledge of time tested ayurveda with modern methods of
research [8]. CU is the only agent of animal origin which acts
as bioenhancer of antimicrobial, antifungal, and anticancer
agents [30]. The indigenous CU contains Rasayana tatva,
which is responsible for modulation of the immune system and
also act as a bioenhancer [21].
CUD is more effective bioenhancer than CU [30,46].
CUD enhances the transport of antibiotics like rifampicin,
tetracycline and ampicillin across the gut wall by 2-7 folds
[47]. It also enhances the potency of taxol against MCF-7 cell
lines [48]. It enhances the bioavailability of rifampicin by 80
fold in 0.05 microgm/ml concentrations, ampicillin by 11.6
fold in 0.05 g/ml concentrations and clotrimazole by 5 fold
in 0.88 g/ml concentration [49]. The activity of rifampicin
increases by about 5-7 folds against E. coli and 3-11 folds against
Gram-positive bacteria, when used along with CU [50]. Potency
of paclitaxel has been observed to increase against MCF-7,
a human breast cancer cell line in in-vitro assays [49]. The
bioenhancing ability is by facilitating the absorption of drugs
across the cell membrane. The CU has been granted US Patents
for its medicinal properties, particularly as a bioenhancer along
with antibiotics, antifungal and anticancer drugs (6896907,
6410059).
CUD alone caused more inhibition of Gram-positive bacteria.
Inhibition caused by streptomycin (1 mg/ml) alone was higher
(31-34 mm) than that of CUD alone (19-22 mm). With the
183
ANTICANCER PROPERTIES
CU has antioxidant properties and is a free radical scavenger,
and thus it neutralizes the oxidative stress. Scientists proved
that the pesticides even at very low doses cause apoptosis
of lymphocytes and tissues through fragmentation of DNA
while CU helps the lymphocytes to survive by inhibiting their
apoptosis and by repairing the damaged DNA and is, therefore,
effective as anti-cancer therapy [52,53].
Chemopreventive potential of CU was observed in a study,
which was conducted on 70 Swiss albino mice for 16 weeks.
Papillomas were induced by 7, 12 dimethyl benzanthracene and
later promoted by repeated application of croton oil. In mice
treated with CU, the incidence of tumor (papillomas), tumor
yield, and its burden was statistically less than the untreated
group [54].
Jain et al. studied the effect of CU therapy on various types
of cancers in Mandsaur area. The severity of symptoms (pain,
inflammation, burning sensation, difficulty in swallowing, and
irritation) decreased from day 1 to day 8 with CU therapy.
Percent of patients with severe symptoms decreased from 82.16
to 7.9 on day 8, patients with moderate symptoms increased
from 15.8 to 55.3 and with mild symptoms, patients increased
from 1.58 to 36.34. The severity of symptoms decreased further
with continued CU therapy [15].
Dutta et al. reported the anti-clastogenic and anti-genotoxic
effect of redistilled CUD (RCUD) in human peripheral
lymphocytes, which have been challenged with manganese
dioxide (MnO2) and hexavalent chromium (Cr+6). Protection
in number of chromosomal aberrations and frequency of
micronuclei were more prominent when these cells were
pretreated with CU than simultaneous treatment with
CU [55].
184
IMMUNOSTIMULANT
The use of herbs and minerals (like chavanprash and
panchgavya) for improving the overall resistance of the body
against common infections and pathogens has been a guiding
principal of Ayurveda. Ancient books on Ayurveda state that
consuming CU daily increases the resistance to diseases by
up to 104%. CU enhances the humoral, and cell-mediated
immune response in mice [5]. CUD was found to augment
B- and T-lymphocyte blastogenesis; IgG, IgA and IgM antibody
titers in mice. It has been observed that CU also increases the
phagocytic activity of macrophages and is thus helpful in the
prevention and control of bacterial infections. The level of
both interleukins -1 and - 2 in mice was increased by 30.9%
and 11.0%, respectively, and in rats these levels were increased
significantly by 14.75% and 33.6%, respectively [52]. CUD
has been reported to be a potent and safe immunomodulator,
which increases both humoral, and cell-mediated immunity
in mice.
Cell-mediated immune response was evaluated on various
parameters in a study by Verma et al. using CU for 30 days.
There was a 55% increase in phagocytic index, and a significant
increase (16%) in neutrophil adhesion on regular use of whole
freeze dried CU. CU has the potential to boost the immune
functions by increasing the white blood cells counts and
subsequently reducing the red blood cells count to a certain
extent [56].
Traditional uses of CU
Some of the traditional uses of CU are in fever, where CU along
with pepper, curd and ghee is used; in leprosy, CU is used along
with dhruhardi and in deformities associated with leprosy, it is
used with Nimbuchal, whereas in chronic leprosy, CU is used
along with leaves of Vasaka and kanar, and bark of kuraila and
neem [11]. Local traditional healers in Mandsaur prescribe CU
for worm infestations, to develop immunity and to avoid aging.
They suggest 10-25 ml of CU to be taken on an empty stomach
for the same [15].
CONCLUSIONS
On analyzing the effect of different preparations of CU, FCU
had better activity than CUD [27-32]. Activity of FCU and
CUD from indigenous cows was similar to streptomycin and
tetracycline. Ayurveda also mentions that FCU of indigenous
cows is the best.
More well-planned studies in human subjects are required to
fully assess its potential as an effective antimicrobial agent as
most of the studies quoted are in vitro studies. Comparative
studies between CU obtained from indigenous breeds and of
inbred strains may be undertaken, as ayurveda was written when
inbred strains of cows were not present. Future development of
newer drugs can involve CU in its repository.
J Intercult Ethnopharmacol Apr-Jun 2015 Vol 4 Issue 2
REFERENCES
1.
185
55.
56.
186
Received: 5 December 2012 / Accepted: 4 January 2014 / Published online: 16 January 2014
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
Introduction
Kidney is vital organ of the body responsible for segregating the metabolic waste products from the blood.
Accumulation of metabolites of xenobiotics contributes
significantly to its susceptibility to damage kidney [24].
Any nephrotoxic insult would result in accumulation of
waste materials in the blood which in turn may lead to
other toxic manifestations in the body. Toxic injury to the
kidney is known to occur as a result of exposures to halogenated hydrocarbons, such as lindane, carbon tetrachloride and trichloroethylene, and the heavy metals cadmium
and lead [3, 35, 36, 48, 59]. Some of these toxicants cause
acute injury to the kidney, while others produce chronic
changes that can lead to end-stage renal failure or cancer.
Lindane, the gamma isomer of HCH possesses the property of persistence, bioaccumulation and long term toxicity
[32] and fulfills the criteria of POPs i.e., persistent organochlorine pesticides. India has total installed capacity of lindane (technical) production of 1,300 tonnes per annum (tpa),
with two companies producing: Kanoria Chemicals and
Industries Ltd with a capacity of 1,000 tpa, and India Pesticides Limited with 300 tpa capacity. According to data
available from Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, between 1995
and 2005, India has produced 5,387 tonnes of technical grade
lindane. In India, lindane formulations are registered for use
in pharmaceutical products for control of head lice and
scabies on people, to control fly, flea, cockroach, mosquito,
bed bug, and beetle populations and for the control of pests in
cotton, sugarcane, pumpkin, cabbage, onion, apple, walnut,
maize, okhra, potato, tomato, cauliflower, radish, cucumber
and beans [15]. Lindane is highly lipophilic and absorbed by
the respiratory, digestive or cutaneous pathways. Its accumulation depends on the duration of the exposure and affect
123
1968
123
1969
Biochemical analysis
The kidney tissue homogenate was used for the estimation
of lipid peroxidation (LPO) [68], superoxide dismutase
(SOD) [30], catalase (CAT) [16], glutathione peroxidase
(GPx) [54], glutathione (GSH) [40], protein [38], vitamin E
(a-tocopherol) [18] and vitamin C (ascorbic acid) [45].
Statistical evaluation
Experimental protocol
A sub chronic study was done for 60 days and oral route of
dose administration was chosen for all treatments. Mice
were divided into eight groups with minimum of 810
animals in each group.
S. no.
Group no.
Group code
Treatment
1
2
II
III
Dose
Duration
60 days
Lindane
40 mg/kg b.w.
60 days
Antioxidants alone
60 days
IV
A?L
Antioxidants?lindane
60 days
60 days
VI
U?L
Cow urine?lindane
60 days
VII
U?A
Cow urine?antioxidants
60 days
VIII
U?A?L
Cow urine?antioxidants?lindane
60 days
123
1970
Results
The changes in various biochemical parameters in different
groups have been presented in Graphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.
Effect on LPO (Graph 1)
A significant increase (P \ 0.01) of 32.21 % was observed in
the LPO levels after lindane intoxication as compared to control. All the pretreatment groups showed a significant decline
(P \ 0.01) in the LPO levels. 29.21, 27.66, and 29.47 %
decline was observed in the A?L, U?L, and U?A?L groups
respectively as compared to lindane group. The increasing
order of the LPO levels in various groups was as follow:
L [ C [ U?L [ A?L [ U?A?L [ U?A [ U [ A.
123
1971
123
1972
Discussion
The results of the present study clearly demonstrate that
LPO significantly increased in kidney after in vivo treatment of lindane. Thus, results of the present study are in
agreement with previous reports where increase in LPO
was also observed due to lindane in different tissues [11,
22, 42, 48, 67]. Moreover, renal LPO levels also increase
due to aflatoxin [61], CCl4 [7], chlorpryfos-ethyl [46], lead
[55], cisplatin [4] and gentamicin [1] toxicity. The increase
in LPO results owing to increase in ROS or alternatively
lindane might inhibit antioxidant molecules and antioxidant enzymes. The support for such an assumption comes
from the findings that lindane reduces antioxidant molecules and antioxidant enzymes [8, 42, 48] which is also
observed in the present study.
The pretreatment with vitamin C, E, lipoic acid and cow
urine in the groups A?L, U?L and U?A?L significantly
123
1973
123
1974
123
References
1. Abdel-Raheem IT, Abdel-Ghany AA, Mohamed GA (2009)
Protective effect of quercetin against gentamicin induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Biol Pharm Bull 32(1):6167
2. Achliya GS, Kotagale NR, Wadodkar SG, Dorle AK (2003)
Hepatoprotective activity of Panchagavya Ghrita against carbon
tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Ind J Pharmacol
35:308311
3. Adewole SO, Salako AA, Doherty OW, Naicker T (2007) Effect
of melatonin on carbon tetrachloride-induced kidney injury in
Wistar rats. Afr J Biomed Res 10:153164
4. Ajith TA, Usha S, Nivith AV (2007) Ascorbic acid and atocopherol protect anticancer drug cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity in mice: a comparative study. Clin Chim Acta 375:8286
5. Anbarasi K, Vani G, Balakrishna K, Shyamala CSD (2006) Effect
of bacoside A on brain antioxidant status in cigarette smoke
exposed rats. Life Sci 78:13781384
6. Bae EH, Lee JU, Kwon Ma S, Kim IJ, Frokiaer J, Nielsen S, Kim
SY, Kim SW (2009) a-Lipoic acid prevents cisplatin-induced acute
kidney injury in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24:26922700
7. Balahoroglu R, Dulger H, Ozbek H, Bayram I, Sekeroglu MR
(2008) Protective effects of antioxidants on the experimental liver
and kidney toxicity in mice. Eur J Gen Med 5(3):157164
8. Bano M, Bhatt DK (2007) Neuroprotective role of a novel
combination of certain antioxidants on lindane (c-HCH) induced
toxicity in cerebrum of mice. Res J Agric Bio Sci 3:664669
9. Bano M, Bhatt DK (2010) Ameliorative effect of a combination
of vitamin E, vitamin C, alpha-lipoic acid and stilbene resveratrol
on lindane induced toxicity in mice olfactory lobe and cerebrum.
Indian J Exp Biol 48:150158
10. Bast A, Haenen GRMM, Doelman CJA (1991) Oxidants and
antioxidants: state of the art. Am J Med 91:25135
11. Bist R, Bhatt DK (2009) The evaluation of effect of alpha- lipoic
acid and vitamin E on the lipid peroxidation, gamma-amino
butyric acid and serotonin level in the brain of mice (Mus musculus) acutely intoxicated with lindane. J Neurol Sci 276:99102
12. Blum J, Fridovich I (1985) Inactivation of glutathione peroxidase
by superoxide radical. Arch Biochem Biophys 240:500508
13. Brzoska MM, Moniuszko-Jakoniuk J, Pilat-Marcinkiewicz B,
Sawicki B (2003) Liver and kidney function and histology in rats
exposed to cadmium and ethanol. Alcohol Alcohol 38(1):210
14. Chauhan RS, Singh BP, Singhal LK (2001) Immunomodulation
with kamdhenu Ark in mice. J Immunol Immunopathol 71:8992
15. CIBRC (2005) Central Insecticide Board and Registration
Committee, Dept. Of Plant Protection and Quarantine, Ministry
of Agriculture, India. http://www.ipen.org/ipenweb/documents/
work%20documents/lindanes%20dirty%20secret.pdf
1975
37. Lightboy JH, Stevenson LM, Jackson F, Donaldson K, Jones DG
(2001) Comparative aspects of plasma antioxidant status in sheep
and goats and the influence of experimental abomasal nematode
infection. J Comp Pathol 124:192199
38. Lowry OH, Roesborough MJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein
measurement with FolinPhenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265
39. Lynch MJ, Raphael SS, Miller LD, Spare DD, Inwood MJH (1969)
Medical laboratory technology and clinical pathology. W.B. Saunders Co., Igaku shoin Ltd, Philadelphia, Tokyo, pp 2629
40. Moron MA, Depierre JW, Mannervick B (1979) Levels of glutathione, glutathione redutase, glutathione S-transferase activities
in rat lung and liver. Biochem Biophys Acta 582:6778
41. Muzakova V, Kandar R, Vojtisek P, Skalicky J, Vankova R,
Cegan A, Cervinkova Z (2001) Antioxidant vitamin levels and
glutathione peroxidase activity during ischemia/reperfusion in
myocardial infarction. Physiol Res 50:389396
42. Nagda G, Bhatt DK (2011) Alleviation of lindane induced toxicity in testis of Swiss mice (Mus musculus) by combined treatment with vitamin C, vitamin E and a-Lipoic acid. Indian J Exp
Biol 49:191199
43. Nouri M, Rahbani-Nobar M, Argani H, Rokhforooz F (1999)
Superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase in hemodialyzed patients and renal transplant recipients and their relationship to osmotic fragility. Med J Islam Acad Sci 12(2):3338
44. Ojewole JA, Olusi SO (1976) Effects of cows urine concoction
on plasma glucose concentration in fasted rats. Trans R Soc Trop
Med Hyg 71:241245
45. Omaye ST, Turbull TP, Sauberchich HC (1979) Selected methods for determination of ascorbic acid in cells, tissues and fluids.
Methods Enzymol 6:311
46. Oncu M, Gultekin F, Karaoz E, Altuntas I, Delibas N (2002)
Nephrotoxicity in rats induced by chlorpyrifos-ethyl and ameliorating effects of antioxidants. Hum Exp Toxicol 21(4):223230
47. Osfor MMH, Ibrahim HS, Mohamed YA, Ahmed SM, Abd El
Azeem AS, Hegazy AM (2010) Effect of alpha lipoic acid and
vitamin E on heavy metals intoxication in male albino rats. J Am
Sci 6(80):5663
48. Padma VV, Sowmya P, Felix TA, Baskaran R, Poornima P
(2011) Protective effect of gallic acid against lindane induced
toxicity in experimental rats. Food Chem Toxicol 49:991998
49. Pathak ML, Kumar A (2003) Gomutra a descriptive study.
Sachitra Ayurveda 7:8184
50. Poirier B, L-Bournville M, Conti M (2000) Oxidative stress occur
in absence of hyperglycemia and inflammation in the onset of
kidney lesions in normotensive obese rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15:467476
51. Prabhakaran S, Devi KS (1993) Impact of protein deficiency and
exposure to HCH or malathione on lipid metabolism in pregnant
rats. Indian J Biochem Biophys 30:234238
52. Raja W, Agarwal RC (2010) Chemoprotective potential of cow
urine against 7, 12-dimethylbenz(a) antracene-induced skin papillomagenesis in mice. Acad J Can Res 3(1):710
53. Ray G, Hussain SA (2002) Oxidants, antioxidants and carcinogenesis. Indian J Exp Biol 42:12131232
54. Rotruck JT, Pope AL, Ganther HE, Swanson AB (1973) Selenium: biochemical roles as a component of glutathione peroxidise. Science 179:588590
55. Salawu EO, Adeleke AA, Oyewo OO, Ashamu EA, Ishola OO,
Afolabi AO, Adesanya TA (2009) Prevention of renal toxicity
from lead exposure by oral administration of Lycopersicon esculentum. J Toxicol Environ Health Sci 1(2):022027
56. Sauviat MP, Pages N (2002) Cardiotoxicity of lindane: a gamma
isomer of hexachlorohexane. J Soc Biol 196:339348
57. Scibior D, Skrzycki M, Podsiad M, Czeczot H (2008) Glutathione
level and glutathione-dependent enzyme activities in blood serum of
patients with gastrointestinal tract tumors. Clin Biochem 41:852858
123
1976
58. Searle AJ, Wilson RL (1980) Glutathione peroxidase: effect of
superoxide, hydroxyl and bromine free radicals on enzyme
activity. Int J Radiant Biol 37:213217
59. Shaikh ZA, Vu TT, Zaman K (1999) Oxidative stress as a mechanism
of chronic cadmium-induced hepatotoxicity and renal toxicity and
protection by antioxidants. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 154(3):256263
60. Shanmugam KR, Ramakrishna CH, Mallikarjuna K, Reddy KS
(2010) Protective effect of ginger against alcohol-induced renal
damage and antioxidant enzymes in male albino rats. Indian J
Exp Biol 48:143149
61. Sivanesan D, Begum H (2007) Preventive role of Gyanandropsis
gynandra L., against aflatoxin B1 induced lipid peroxidation and
defense mechanism in rat. Indian J Exp Biol 45(3):299303
62. Sozmen EY, Sozmen B, Delen Y, Onat T (2001) Catalase/superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase/paraoxonase (PON) ratios may
implicate poor glycemic control. Arch Med Res 32:283287
63. Srivastava A, Shivanandappa T (2005) Hexachlorocyclohexane
differentially alters the antioxidant status of the brain regions in
rat. Toxicology 214:123130
123
ISSN NO 2320-5407
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF ADVANCED RESEARCH
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Evaluation of Anticancer properties of Taxusbaccata and Badri cow urine in mice: Clinicohematological
study
Ankita Joshi, and R.S. Chauha
1. Post Doctoral Fellow, Cell Culture Laboratory, Institute of Biotechnology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture
and Technology, Patwadangar-263128, Nainital, Uttarakhand, INDIA.
2. Campus Director, Institute of Biotechnology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Patwadangar263128, Nainital, Uttarakhand, INDIA.
Manuscript Info
Abstract
Manuscript History:
Key words:
Badricow urine,
Taxusbaccata, Mice,
Body weight, hematology.
Introduction
Cancer is a disease involving dynamic changes in
genome and is characterized by the uncontrolled,
uncoordinated and purposeless proliferation of
malignant cells and their ability to spread, either by
growth in the adjacent tissue through invasion or by
implantation at distant sites through metastasis.
World cancer report issued by International Agency
for Research on Cancer (IARC) reported in 2003 that
cancer rate is set to increase at an alarming rate
globally. The 5-year relative survival rate for all
cancers diagnosed between 1999-2005 is 68%, up
from 50% in 1975-1977. (Kinzler and Vogelstein,
2002)(Jemal et al., 2011).
In India about 70% of population obtains medical
help from private practitioners and half of those who
seek medicinal help obtain it from alternative and
traditional medicine (Kumar et al., 2004). Poverty
and socioeconomic status are other hurdles in
treatment (Pal and Mittal, 2004). American cancer
society defines complementary and alternative
medicines (CAM) simply as anything which is not
71
ISSN NO 2320-5407
4 m probably only being reached in around 2,0004,000 years. Thuner is the oldest plant at high altitude
region of Uttarakhand. Most parts of the tree are
toxic, except the bright aril surrounding the seed,
enabling ingestion and dispersal by birds. The major
toxin is the alkaloid taxane. Phytochemical analysis
of extracts of leaves and bark showed the presence of
lignans, flavonoid, glycosides, sterols, sugar, amino
acid, and triterpenoid, alkaloids, steroids, tannins,
mucilage, fixed oil, phenolic compounds and
protein.The leaves are the principal source of taxol;
the anti-cancer drug, but has not been widely
exploited in this connection (Hartzell, 2003).
Considering the severity of cancer as a
disease of man and animals and complexity of
therapeutic approaches and their harmful side effects,
it was planned to study the effect of Taxusbaccata
preparation along with cow urine distillate in mice as
measured through clinical haematology
Extract preparation
Results
In-vivo study was carried out in mice using DEN as
carcinogen and plant extracts alone and/or
combination with CUD as test material for a period
six month.
Body Weight
Body weight of mice were taken in gram at an
interval of 15 days till the end of experiment. Data of
body weight change during experiment were givens
in table-1. Initially, the mean bodyweight of control
was 21.471.21 gm and after 6 month the mean body
weight of mice was 25.861.87 gm. In DEN
(negative control) treated group the initial mean body
weight at zero day of experiment was 22.731.33 gm,
which decreased to 19.161.81 gm at the end of
experiment. But in CUD treated group mean body
weight at zero day was 22.431.36 gm and at the end
of experiment it was 23.911.21 gm.CUD treated
group in which the carcinogen has been given, the
initial mean body weight at zero day was 21.421.56
gm. After the end of experiment, the mean body
weight was 21.061.91 gm. In test group A, the zero
day mean body weight 23.131.54 gm, which
marginally increased at the end of experiment to
23.521.01gm.In the group CUD+A the mean in
body weight at zero day was 21.361.47 gm which
was 26.480.902 at the end of experiment. In the
group CUD+B, the mean body weight was
22.761.44 gm at zero day and was 24.801.09 gm at
the end of experiment. In CUD+G and CUD+H
groups, the mean body weight at zero day was
22.971.37 gm and 22.811.21 gm which was
increased to 24.670.941 gm and 24.601.01 gm at
the end of the experiment. In group B, G and H, the
mean body weight at zero day was found 22.811.26
gm, 22.411.32 gm and 22.511.28 gm respectively
and at the end of experiment the body weight reaches
72
ISSN NO 2320-5407
to
Groups/Days
0 Day
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
165
180
Control
CUD (no
DEN)
DEN
21.471.21*
22.431.36*
22.521.32
22.481.29*
22.921.47
22.511.33
23.171.07
22.541.42*
23.191.36
22.611.62**
24.311.41
22.791.46
24.561.53
22.941.53
25.071.43
23.081.67*
25.190.947
23.481.82
25.371.12
23.541.29*
25.691.49
23.671.68
25.720.989
23.821.92
25.861.87
23.911.21**
22.731.33**
23.121.42
23.491.36*
23.791.21*
24.011.36
24.671.17**
24.921.07*
25.160.941
24.011.21*
23.721.06
22.091.09*
21.871.31*
19.161.81
CUD
21.421.56*
21.621.41*
21.711.52*
22.071.02
22.671.17**
22.891.19
23.121.23*
22.921.16
22.660.941
22.521.12
22.261.07
22.121.13*
21.061.91*
23.131.54*
23.631.71
24.761.23
24.931.32**
25.111.16*
25.721.21
25.911.47
24.371.41**
24.871.31
23.851.03**
23.711.07
23.681.13
23.521.01*
22.811.26
23.121.21**
23.711.28
23.911.17
24.111.24*
24.521.31**
25.031.28*
24.761.19*
24.101.07*
23.811.23
23.711.16*
23.671.09
23.401.02*
22.411.32
22.911.61*
23.141.10**
23.571.17
23.871.36*
24.101.30
24.471.28
24.321.21*
24.101.07
23.731.22*
23.640.940
23.501.11
23.331.91*
22.511.28*
22.681.31
22.911.12*
23.411.21**
23.621.31
23.821.40*
23.981.33
23.901.21
23.811.17
23.631.07
23.481.21
23.391.07**
23.281.89
A+CUD
21.361.47**
21.731.32*
22.071.12**
22.391.39
22.871.42*
23.011.25
23.931.61**
24.031.71*
24.180.981**
25.811.42*
25.911.07*
26.361.03
26.480.902**
B+CUD
22.761.44*
22.911.51*
23.571.07
23.911.40**
23.961.31
24.031.61
24.181.42*
24.431.27
24.891.19
24.971.36*
24.911.17
24.881.13
24.801.09
G+CUD
22.971.37
23.071.27
23.461.21*
23.711.41**
23.961.31*
24.101.31*
24.571.19
24.811.17**
24.951.16*
24.891.27*
24.841.11
24.721.08*
24.670.941
H+CUD
22.811.21*
22.901.20*
22.961.17
23.071.31
23.481.32**
23.691.20
23.841.23
23.961.19
24.971.23
24.901.21
24.781.31**
24.671.08
24.601.01*
Table 2: Total erythrocyte count (TEC) (x 106/cumm) of experimental mice at an interval of 15 days (MeanSE).
Groups/Days
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
165
180
Control
6.820.13
6.860.17
6.920.27
6.970.16
7.060.31
7.140.24
7.160.41
7.180.37
7.190.34
7.200.17
7.210.19
7.230.23
7.250.27
CUD (NO
DEN)
6.290.52*
6.360.41*
6.520.63
6.700.13*
6.830.46
6.940.32
7.030.21**
7.190.61*
7.220.73*
7.250.49*
7.290.36
7.340.51**
7.400.42
DEN
6.870.51
6.890.62**
6.960.71*
6.980.18*
7.080.42*
7.110.52*
7.010.63
6.940.87*
6.660.33*
6.060.61
5.040.12**
4.710.43
3.610.46*
CUD
6.420.83
6.480.17
6.630.21*
6.690.47*
6.780.82*
6.830.27*
6.910.16*
7.030.51*
7.140.21
7.010.32**
6.810.27
6.710.61
6.680.53
6.310.37**
6.380.41
6.480.28*
6.630.46*
6.890.72*
6.960.69
7.090.33*
7.470.38
7.340.28
7.120.48
7.190.59*
7.230.72
7.320.58
6.330.61
6.450.42*
6.610.47
6.750.51
6.950.80
7.080.72**
7.220.61
7.450.56
7.290.51*
7.090.62
7.150.68*
7.210.52*
7.290.57**
6.390.41
6.410.39
6.540.41*
6.710.43
6.900.53
7.050.62**
7.170.47
7.390.54**
7.060.57
6.890.62
7.050.41*
7.150.46
7.200.37
6.370.52*
6.390.59*
6.530.47
6.680.45
6.700.52**
6.720.58
6.960.43
7.150.48
7.410.51**
7.690.48
7.350.61
7.230.42*
7.180.41**
A+CUD
6.310.97**
6.460.818
6.790.17*
6.980.42**
7.090.78
7.350.18*
7.490.19**
7.830.63*
7.980.76
8.380.84
8.730.39**
8.830.36*
8.900.47
B+CUD
6.370.53
6.400.61**
6.660.59
6.770.41*
6.810.47*
6.960.53
7.090.12
7.180.35
7.210.61*
7.400.69**
7.770.63
8.150.71
8.590.62*
G+CUD
6.420.59*
6.440.53
6.790.49
6.830.50
6.930.60
7.070.59*
7.180.57
7.310.51
7.770.53
7.860.59
7.720.47*
8.190.44
8.510.42
H+CUD
6.350.61
6.400.57
6.550.64**
6.720.51*
7.130.57
7.450.63
7.680.53*
7.880.56*
8.040.47**
8.130.52
8.290.56
8.440.48**
8.480.43*
Haematological parameters
Data of TEC is expressed in number of
cellsx106/cumm and is mentioned in Table 2. Initially
the TEC of control was 6.820.13 x 106/cumm and
after 6 month, TEC of experimental mice was
7.250.27 x 106/cumm. In DEN treated (negative
control) group the initial TEC at zero day of
experiments was 6.870.51 x 106/cumm which
73
ISSN NO 2320-5407
74
ISSN NO 2320-5407
Table 3: Total leucocyte count (TLC) (x 103/cumm) count of experimental mice at an interval of 15 days (MeanSE).
Groups/Days
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
165
180
Control
8.910.30
9.060.17
9.380.32
9.910.37
10.080.51
10.210.62
10.530.02
10.730.12
11.050.81
11.320.91
11.510.07
11.870.47
12.110.04
CUD (NO
DEN)
DEN
8.654.31
8.714.36**
8.864.51*
8.934.70
9.085.01*
9.135.21
9.183.24*
9.204.22
9.274.56**
9.324.61
9.384.28
9.464.39*
9.534.67
9.123.20**
9.213.52*
9.434.07**
9.893.81
8.073.61
7.423.82
6.412.01
6.123.10*
5.872.12*
4.313.19
4.162.16
4.081.87*
3.021.45*
CUD
9.025.31*
9.135.27
9.315.17
9.674.81**
9.894.72
10.074.55
9.914.31**
9.734.24
9.414.27*
9.013.69
8.233.16**
8.113.08*
7.813.11
9.085.68*
9.155.51*
9.285.42
9.575.23
9.795.05**
9.984.93
9.784.61*
9.614.34
9.324.21*
8.914.07
8.833.21
8.793.12
8.643.08
9.016.81*
9.116.72
9.196.61**
9.416.52
9.616.37*
9.775.83*
9.585.61
8.915.37
8.875.21*
8.815.08
8.794.61*
8.684.52
8.593.19**
9.106.07
9.165.91*
9.245.82
9.335.74**
9.515.41*
9.675.34*
9.485.28
8.875.05
8.764.81
8.694.23*
8.594.07
8.413.82
8.333.61
9.077.03
9.116.87
9.156.67**
9.216.41
9.385.91
9.475.80
9.315.47*
8.835.32**
8.735.16
8.624.77*
8.574.41*
8.464.21*
8.304.10
A+CUD
8.974.02**
9.214.47
9.493.32
9.893.77*
10.082.01*
10.332.61*
10.693.16*
10.934.03
11.312.12**
11.673.41*
11.914.91*
12.253.53*
12.612.17**
B+CUD
8.896.31*
9.126.27*
9.256.08
9.495.61*
9.685.32*
9.875.17*
9.675.03
9.474.71
9.734.57
9.844.31
10.084.17
10.674.08*
10.553.18
G+CUD
9.115.98
9.185.81*
9.275.61
9.395.47*
9.595.27
9.715.17
9.515.09**
9.304.81
9.264.67
9.424.51
10.024.41**
10.174.32*
10.213.81*
H+CUD
9.036.19
9.136.01
9.195.81**
9.275.72
9.445.51
9.595.42*
9.405.31
9.315.06*
9.124.87*
9.094.62*
9.514.41
9.884.17
10.053.14
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
165
180
Control
4.300.69
4.410.42
4.590.24
4.810.49
4.920.19
4.980.33
5.170.54
5.230.68
5.410.57
5.530.28
5.620.31
5.810.73
5.920.98
CUD (NO
DEN)
DEN
4.130.70*
4.240.72
4.310.69*
4.370.58*
4.430.42
4.450.39*
4.480.69**
4.490.84
4.520.92*
4.540.14
4.550.28*
4.610.63*
4.630.43
4.410.81*
4.430.61
4.560.71
4.860.24*
3.920.92**
3.590.43*
3.050.64
2.940.59
2.810.36
2.080.31*
1.920.27*
1.900.17
1.360.47*
CUD
4.430.84*
4.410.64
4.540.84
4.740.18
4.830.29
4.850.36
4.850.47*
4.720.53*
4.590.61
4.350.74*
3.960.89
3.890.92
3.760.53
4.420.91
4.440.738
4.510.42**
4.670.75
4.780.94*
4.860.86
4.780.73
4.660.21**
4.530.28*
4.360.69
4.280.74**
4.250.18**
4.190.27*
4.400.94
4.420.57
4.440.55
4.600.85
4.690.69
4.770.54**
4.650.22*
4.330.51
4.340.49*
4.260.16
4.240.21*
4.220.86
4.180.94*
4.480.73*
4.410.82**
4.510.98*
4.560.37
4.640.76
4.760.41
4.620.47*
4.320.53
4.270.84
4.230.61
4.150.65
4.100.21*
4.010.37*
4.440.84
4.400.34*
4.480.76
4.500.26**
4.540.86*
4.630.16
4.560.36
4.300.61*
4.240.42*
4.150.69**
4.160.48
4.090.59*
3.980.77
A+CUD
4.390.87
4.490.29
4.620.59
4.840.43*
4.900.33
5.020.77
5.210.61
5.330.98
4.550.71
5.710.14
5.830.21*
5.980.63
6.160.42**
B+CUD
4.360.89**
4.470.19*
4.510.41**
4.620.82*
4.740.27
4.830.87*
4.720.91**
4.610.84**
4.730.16**
4.760.72
4.910.18
5.210.68*
5.160.80
G+CUD
4.410.80*
4.480.47
4.530.63
4.580.92
4.650.46**
4.740.18*
4.660.78
4.560.20
4.520.91
4.570.39*
4.870.65*
4.910.21
4.900.28
H+CUD
4.420.79
4.450.77
4.480.27*
4.520.39
4.610.65
4.690.23
4.590.88
4.540.49
4.460.64*
4.430.72*
4.630.47
4.860.30*
4.890.11*
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
165
180
Control
4.570.72
4.500.43
4.670.29
4.900.51
5.000.23
5.070.38
5.220.55
5.320.69
5.500.59
5.610.37
5.710.37
5.900.77
6.000.99
CUD (NO
DEN)
DEN
4.380.78**
4.330.74**
4.400.72
4.440.60
4.520.45*
4.530.43
4.560.72
4.570.86*
4.600.97
4.620.19
4.670.34
4.700.65
4.710.47*
4.690.83
4.560.65**
4.680.75
4.920.26
4.010.96
3.680.46
3.140.67**
3.000.61*
2.900.41
2.130.34
2.000.31
1.990.23*
1.490.52
CUD
4.510.87
4.500.69*
4.600.89*
4.810.21
4.920.31
4.990.37
4.930.49
4.830.57
4.670.66**
4.470.77
4.070.92**
3.990.95*
3.880.56**
4.600.97*
4.530.79
4.610.46
4.750.77
4.870.98
4.960.89*
4.860.74**
4.780.26
4.610.32
4.420.75*
4.390.77
4.360.23
4.300.31
4.580.99*
4.510.58**
4.560.57**
4.680.87*
4.780.69*
4.850.56
4.770.26
4.400.55
4.400.51
4.380.19*
4.350.26
4.310.89
4.260.96
4.560.75
4.540.86
4.620.99
4.640.39*
4.730.79*
4.800.43**
4.710.49
4.410.54**
4.350.85*
4.310.66*
4.260.66
4.180.24
4.110.38
4.510.87**
4.520.37
4.530.80*
4.580.29
4.660.88
4.710.17*
4.610.38
4.390.63
4.320.46
4.270.74
4.250.53*
4.200.61
4.090.79
A+CUD
4.460.89*
4.580.31*
4.700.61**
4.920.45*
4.990.35**
5.110.78*
5.320.64*
5.410.99*
5.620.74*
5.800.15**
5.910.23
6.100.65**
6.250.45*
B+CUD
4.410.92
4.510.23
4.630.46
4.730.86
4.800.29*
4.910.89
4.800.93
4.700.86
4.810.18
4.890.74*
5.000.20*
5.300.69
5.240.82
75
ISSN NO 2320-5407
G+CUD
4.520.84
4.560.49
4.610.66*
4.670.95*
4.770.48
4.800.20
4.730.79**
4.620.23
4.600.95*
4.680.44
4.980.67
5.000.24*
5.010.29*
H+CUD
4.500.85*
4.540.81*
4.560.29
4.610.40
4.700.66*
4.750.25
4.670.90
4.610.50*
4.530.65
4.510.73
4.720.49**
4.950.32
4.960.12
Table 6: Haemoglobin content (Hb) of experimental mice at regular interval of 15 days (gm%, meanSE).
Groups/Days
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
165
180
Control
12.451.42
12.471.51
12.531.52
12.511.42
12.551.47
12.501.44
12.521.41
12.551.37
12.561.35
12.581.39
12.621.34
12.661.21
12.681.36
CUD(NO
DEN)
12.191.31*
12.211.42
12.271.51*
12.491.36
12.621.47*
12.851.51
12.991.62*
13.411.73*
13.531.81*
13.661.74*
13.701.32
13.761.21*
13.781.19
DEN
12.401.36*
12.421.38
12.431.29
12.451.31**
12.461.33
12.251.36*
12.081.39
11.821.36*
11.651.30
10.521.32*
10.091.21
9.361.19*
8.021.07
CUD
12.321.31
12.451.28**
12.861.33
12.901.37
13.061.29*
13.401.42
13.871.47
13.671.40*
13.461.33**
13.221.28*
12.791.21*
12.091.19**
12.271.17**
12.431.27
12.841.29
12.871.32*
13.071.33
13.381.38*
13.851.41
14.041.43
13.951.47
13.801.27
13.761.23*
12.341.28
13.711.19
12.311.40
12.391.35*
12.791.25
12.831.38**
13.031.27
13.301.30
13.791.37**
14.021.39*
13.951.41*
13.751.26
13.711.19**
13.671.21**
13.561.18
12.341.28*
12.371.21
12.721.24**
12.791.41
13.041.32**
13.251.19**
13.721.29
13.961.26
13.911.25*
13.701.32*
13.651.27
13.611.21
13.491.29
12.341.42
12.361.40
12.681.23**
12.741.21
12.951.31*
13.101.22
13.671.28
13.871.27
13.821.30
13.651.33*
13.591.24**
13.551.32*
13.401.25
A+CUD
12.411.48*
12.481.47
12.891.36**
12.941.39
13.081.33*
13.421.41*
13.891.52*
14.061.47**
14.641.37
14.821.42
15.071.37
15.211.27
15.381.31*
B+CUD
12.291.42*
12.401.37
12.811.27
12.851.36**
13.051.31
13.351.32
13.811.39
14.011.41
14.221.42
14.481.25
14.741.21*
14.891.22*
14.901.17*
G+CUD
12.271.41
12.361.39**
12.761.21
12.801.29*
13.011.25
13.271.28
13.761.31*
13.981.30*
14.031.27*
14.331.21**
14.691.23
14.741.17
14.861.14
H+CUD
12.301.39*
12.351.35
12.701.27*
12.761.23
12.981.33**
13.121.29*
13.701.20
13.901.24
13.971.26
14.081.31
14.621.28*
14.701.22
14.781.11**
76
13.631.13
ISSN NO 2320-5407
Discussion
In-vivo study with T. baccata leaves and bark extracts
alone and in combination with CUD were carried out
in experimental mice for a period of six months. With
an observation at 15 days interval in mice, an attempt
was made to produce cancer using DEN and various
clinicohematological parameters were observed. The
body weight of mice was decreased substantially in
DEN treated mice indicating in the development of
cancer, due to DEN.Ramji and You, (1992) reported
that aflatoxin has been directly related to under
weight status in children in Benin and Togo. Bedi et
al.,(1996) reported decreased in body weight in
Guinea fowl fed on aflatoxin B1. In present study
body weight in DEN treated mice was decreased at
the end of experiment. However, there was increase
in body weight in other test groups. This study
showed that the weight loss in DEN treated group
may be due to the carcinogenic effect of DEN;
however, herbal formulations of extracts and CUD
were found to be a preventive agent against the
carcinogenic effects of DEN. DEN is already known
chemical carcinogen.Increased immunocompetence
of an individual is a very essential parameter to
prevent the development of cancers by several
mechanisms, of which the upregulation of
lymphocyte proliferation and stimulation activity,
increased macrophage activity, higher antibody
production and increased synthesis and secretion of
cytokines (IL-1, Il-2) plays significant role by
enhancing the recognition of tumor cells by the
immune cells of the body and cytotoxic activities of
the tumor killing cells, the lymphocytes. Using herbs
for cancer treatment can help the body to support its
77
ISSN NO 2320-5407
References
78
Lipid-lowering activity of Cow urine ark in guinea pigs fed with a high
cholesterol diet
Chawda Hiren Manubhai1, Mandavia Divyesh Rasiklal1, Baxi Seema Natvarlal2, Vadgama
Vishalkumar Kishorbhai1, Tripathi Chandrabhanu Rajkishor1*
1
2
Article history:
Received: Sep 28, 2013
Received in revised form:
Apr 5, 2014
Accepted: May 14, 2014
Vol. 4, No. 5, Sep-Oct 2014,
354-363.
* Corresponding Author:
Tel: +919825951678
Fax: +9102782422011
[email protected]
Keywords:
Antioxidant activity
Cow urine ark
Dyslipidemia
Hypolipidemia
Guinea pig
Statin
Abstract
Objectives: Cow urine ark (CUA), known as Amrita as
mentioned in Ayurveda, contains anti-hyperglycemic and
antioxidant effects. Therefore, we designed the present study to
evaluate the lipid lowering activity of CUA and its possible
implication in metabolic syndrome.
Materials and Methods: Thirty guinea pigs of either sex were
divided into five groups: Group 1 and 2 serving as a vehicle and
sham control, received normal and high fat diet for 60 days
respectively; Group 3, 4 and 5 received high fat diet for 60 days
with CUA 0.8 ml/kg, 1.6 ml/kg and rosuvastatin (1.5 mg/kg) on
thelast 30 days of study period, respectively. Serum lipid profile
(total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, VLDL-C, HDL-C, total
Cholesterol/HDL-C) and serum enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP, LDH
and CK-MB) were performed in each group at the beginning and
end of the study. Histological study of liver and kidney was done
in each group.
Results: CUA (0.8 ml/kg) significantly decreased the serum
triglycerides and VLDL-C, but CUA (1.6 ml/kg) decreased the
total serum Cholesterol, triglycerides and VLDL-C (p < 0.05).
Higher dose (1.6 ml/kg) of CUA also increased HDL-C level,
significantly (p < 0.05). CUA reduced serum AST, ALP and LDH
level, which was statistically significant as well, while it also
decreased the accumulation of lipid in hepatocytes as compared to
sham control.
Conclusions: CUA reduced triglycerides, increased HDL-C and
found to be hepatoprotective in animals that are on a high fat diet.
Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are
emerging problem in developing countries
(Freedman, 2003; Badimon et al., 2010).
CVD may become the reason for the loss
354
355
Methodology
The study was conducted in Animal
room, Department of Pharmacology,
Government Medical College, Bhavnagar,
Gujarat, after approval from the
Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of
the same institute. The baseline blood
sample was collected from a lateral
saphenous vein of the hind paw of each
guinea pig in overnight fasting state.
Blood samples were sent to Clinical
Biochemistry Laboratory of our institute
which is accredited by National
Accreditation Board for Testing and
Calibration Laboratories (NABL), for the
serum lipid profile, liver and cardiac
enzymes. Animals were separated into
groups as mentioned above. Throughout
the study period in each group, diet was
given according to the respective group
diet plan. During the last 30 days of the
experiment, animals of group I and II were
given distilled water daily, animals of
group III, IV and IV were given a lower
dose of CUA, higher dose of CUA and
rosuvastatin (1.5 mg/kg), respectively.
Distilled water, CUA and rosuvastatin
calcium were given orally by gavages
feeding tube in a daily basis on mornings
in fasting state to ensure maximum
absorption. Animals of all groups were
sacrificed after blood collection from the
lateral saphenous vein in the overnight
fasting stat at the end of 60 days.
Bloodsmples were sent to labratory for the
analysis of the serum lipid profile, liver
and cardiac enzymes. We obtained the
liver and kidney from each animal of the
five groups for histopathological analysis,
which was done by senior faculty from the
Pathology department of our institute.
Serum lipid profile
The serum levels of triglycerides, total
cholesterol and high density lipoprotein
cholesterol (HDL-C) and Low density
lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were
analyzed by GPO PAP METHOD, CHOD
PAP METHOD, IMMUNOINHIBITION
356
Result
Serum lipid profile
The baseline serum level of total
cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL-C, LDL-C
and VLDL-C are 46.33 4.04, 92 5.24,
4.5 0.9, 23.56 2.6 and 19.2 1.16,
respectively in vehicle control (Table 1).
There are not statistically significant
differences in the baseline values of each
variable in different treatment groups. The
serum level of the total cholesterol,
triglyceride, HDL-C, LDL-C and VLDL-C
were 82.6 4.65, 109.2 7.63, 3.9 0.8,
54.38 7.1 and 22.5 3.5, respectively at
the end of 60 days, which were statistically
significant as compared to the baseline
lipid profile, in Sham control [p<0.05;
Table 1. Effect of each treatment strategy on serum lipid profile in guinea pigs
Treatment Groups
(n = 6)
Time
Period
Total
Cholesterol
(mg/dl)
Triglycerides
(mg/dl)
HDL
Cholesterol
(mg/dl)
LDL
Cholesterol
(mg/dl)
VLDL
Cholesterol
(mg/dl)
Total
Cholesterol/
HDL-C
Vehicle control
(Group 1)
Base line
46.33 4.04
92 5.24
4.5 0.9
23.56 2.6
19.2 1.16
11.4 0.8
60 Days
Base line
60 Days
Base line
46.53 5.02
46.2 7.03
82.6 4.65**
47.8 3.43
88.7 6.65
87.38 6.2
109.2 7.63**
75 9.25
4.4 0.5
4.1 0.8
3.9 0.8
4.5 0.6
24.17 2.13
23.26 3.47
54.38 7.1**
28.33 2.7
18.7 1.22
17.3 1.24
22.5 3.5**
15 1.85
12.02 0.6
9.78 1.5
15.39 7.48
12.53 3.19
60 Days
64.9 7.92
49.5 2.65*
7.16 1.6
47.6 6.4
9.9 0.5*
10.44 1.86
Base line
46.23 2.24
75.3 6.01
4.3 0.42
26.83 4.26
15.06 1.2
Sham control
(Group 2)
High fat diet plus
CUA (0.8 ml/kg)
(Group 3)
High fat diet plus
CUA (1.6 ml/kg)
(Group 4)
High fat diet plus
rosuvastatin
(1.5 mg/kg)
( (Group 5)
45.3 3.21
**
11.2 1.45
*
60 Days
57.53 2.9
6.3 0.6
42.1 1.9
9.06 0.64
Base line
42.09 8.64
86.83 2.14
5.8 0.7
26 2.57
15.57 2.3
9.29 0.52
8.8 0.6
60 Days
46.32 5.21*
76.42 4.6*
9.6 0.9*
28 5.15*
15.08 2.3*
4.55 0.65*
Values are expressed as Mean standard error of mean; LDL: low density lipoprotein, VLDL: very low density
lipoprotein, HDL: high density lipoprotein; CUA: Cow urine ark; * p< 0.05 as compared to sham control,
ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer Multiple comparison test; ** p< 0.05 as compared to baseline level, paired
t-test.
357
Treatment Groups(n = 6)
Time
Period
Total
Cholesterol
(mg/dl)
Triglycerides
(mg/dl)
HDL
Cholesterol
(mg/dl)
LDL
Cholesterol
(mg/dl)
VLDL
Cholesterol
(mg/dl)
Total
Cholesterol/
HDL-C
60
Days
- 2.4 1.8
- 2.4 1.8
- 2.4 2.4
- 2.8 3.8
- 2.3 1.8
0.3 3.4
60
Days
92 22.8*
29.8 7.5*
63.2 45.4
60
Days
42.9 25.3
- 26. 5 12.7#
70.8 36##
78.9 34.9
- 26.5 12.7#
5.9 30
60
Days
27.2 8.5
- 37.1 8.2#
50.5 16##
72 21.7
- 37.1 8.2#
- 8.85 13.2
60
Days
4.5 4.9**
- 8.82 2.3**
234 31**
- 18.9 3.9**
- 8.8 2.3**
- 67.9 2.1**
54.2 30.7
Values are expressed as Mean standard error of mean; LDL: low density lipoprotein, VLDL: very low density
lipoprotein, HDL: high density lipoprotein; CUA: Cow urine ark; * p< 0.05 as compared to vehicle control,
ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer Multiple comparison test; ** p< 0.05 as compared to sham control,
ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer Multiple comparison test;# p< 0.001 as compared to sham control,
ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer Multiple comparison test; ## p< 0.05 as compared to rosuvastatin
treatment group, ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer Multiple comparison test.
358
Treatment Groups
(n = 6)
Time Period
ALT
(U/L)
AST
(U/L)
ALP
(U/L)
LDH
(U/L)
CKMB
(U/L)
Base line
53.46 1.86
61.33 7.95
94.8 12.67
372.83 44.03
268.8 11.5
60 Days
55.81 2.86
63.33 7.6
97.5 9.5
377.16 46.12
267.7 17.6
Base line
61.17 6.21
50.33 5.3
85.83 11.7
311.5 39.05
285 34.74
60 Days
104 12.72**
162.4 25.4**
145.6 9.6**
456.5 56.8**
360.23 27.1**
Base line
57.14 4.3
63.76 14.9
126.5 18.8
345.3 22.6
433.56 22.1
60 Days
50.83 9.9*
72.66 22.1*
139.9 9.07
194.16 28.12*
353.8 36.5
Base line
51 1.3
73 14.7
86.6 15
283.6 27.2
317.33 22.5
60 Days
63.8 6.5
96.8 14.6
124.3 12.73
243.5 37.4*
297.6 17.5
Base line
63.26 13.2
62.26 9.65
103.6 12.3
241 46.64
374.5 42.25
60 Days
64.34 5.5
169 12.68**
Vehicle control
(Group 1)
Sham control
(Group 2)
392.19 28.3
Values are expressed as Mean standard error of mean; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase, AST: Aspartate
aminotransferase,AP: Akaline phosphatase , LDH: Lactate dehyrogenase, CK-MB: Creatine kinase-MB, CUA:
Cow urine ark; *p<0.05 as compared to sham control, ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer Multiple
comparison test;**p< 0.05 as compared to baseline level, paired t-test.
B
C
A
359
60 days
Vehicle control
540.66 6.14
554.16 15.97
Sham control
632.33 44.3
667.82 45.32*
602.3 29.3
637.6 17.8*
604.3 9.2
630.1 4.6*
658 36.8
682.5 22.02*
Values are expressed as Mean standard error of mean; CUA: Cow urine ark; *p< 0.05 as compared to baseline
value, paired t-test.
Discussion
In the present study, we selected guinea
pig as the experimental animal for the
evaluation of lipid lowering activity of
Cow urine ark (CUA). Lipoprotein
metabolism of guinea pigs is closest to
human and several lines of evidence
proved that guinea pigs are admirable
models to assess hypolipidemic activity
and lipoprotein metabolism of drugs
(Fernandez and Volek, 2006).
The present study showed that 60 days
of high cholesterol diet feeding, raised the
serum lipid profile (total cholesterol,
triglyceride, LDL-C and VLDL-C) and
induced the histopathological changes in
liver (Table 1, Figure 1 B). The liver plays
a major role in equilibrium cholesterol
homeostasis (Suanarunsawat et al., 2011).
High cholesterol diet increases the hepatic
cholesterol content and is responsible for
the elevated triglyceride synthesis and
cholesteryl ester-rich VLDL-C production
(Patel Y et al., 2011; Goldstein et al.,
1983; Demacker et al., 1991). The
reduction in the amount ofhepatic LDL-C
receptors is caused by high fat diet which
diminishes cholesterol removal rate from it
(Patel et al., 2011; Goldstein et al., 1983;
Demacker et al., 1991). We opted a study
period, 60 days, which is sufficient to
produce fatty changes in guinea pigs, also
supported by previous studies (Patel et al.,
2011; Ahmad-Raus et al., 2001).
In the present study, CUA therapy for 30
days was found to be highly effective to
360
361
References
Achliya GS, Kotagale NR, Wadodkar SG,
Dorle AK. 2003. Hepatoprotective activity
of panchagavyaghrita against carbon
tetrachloride induced hepatotoxicity in rats.
Indian J Pharmacol, 35: 308-311.
Ahmad-Raus
RR,
Abdul-Latif
ES,
Mohammad JJ. 2001. Lowering of lipid
composition in aorta of guinea pigs by
Curcuma domestica. BMC Complement
Altern Med, 1: 6-11.
Anchala R, Pant H, Prabhakaran D, Franco
OH.2012. Decision support system (DSS)
for prevention of cardiovascular disease
(CVD) among hypertensive (HTN) patients
in Andhra Pradesh, India--a cluster
randomised community intervention trial.
BMC Public Health, 12: 393-399.
Badimon L, Vilahur G, Padro T.2010.
Nutraceuticalsandatherosclerosis:human
trials.CardiovasTher, 28: 202-215.
Bo S, Durazzo M, Gambino R, Berutti C,
Milanesio N, Caropreso A, Gentile L,
CassaderM, Cavallo-Perin P, Pagano
G.2008. Associations of dietaryand serum
copper with inflammation, oxidativestress,
and metabolic variables in adults. J Nutr,
138: 305-310.
Botham KM, Moore EH, De Pascale C, Bejta
F. 2007.The induction of macrophage foam
cell
formation
by
chylomicron
remnants.BiochemSoc Trans, 35: 454-458.
Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al.
Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering
with statins after acute coronary
syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350:
1495-1504.
Demacker PN, Reijnen IG, Katan MB, Stuyt
PM, Stalenhoef AF.1991. Increased
removal of remnants of triglyceride-rich
lipoproteins
on a
diet
rich
in
polyunsaturated fatty acids. EurJ Clin
Invest, 21: 197-203.
Dhama K, Chauhan RS, Singhal L.2005. AntiCancer activity of cow urine: Current status
and future directions. Int J Cow Sci, 1: 125.
Fernandez ML, Volek JS.2006. Guinea pigs: a
suitable animal model to study lipoprotein
metabolism,
atherosclerosis
and
inflammation. NutrMetab (Lond), 3: 17-23.
Freedman JE.2003.High-fat diets and
cardiovascular disease.Jacc, 41: 1750-
1752.
AJP, Vol. 4, No. 5, Sep-Oct 2014
362
363
INTRODUCTION
Nature has provided us with all Natural Amenities like Air,
Water, Sun light etc., which are essential for our Body. It has
also provided us with Divine Nectar known as Urine
which flows from our Body. Urine has a Natural Healing
Power to Control and Cure all kinds of Diseases. Just like
Nature has provided milk in the mothers breast for
nourishment of the infant child, similarly Nature has also
provided Urine in human body for preservations of their
health and cure of various diseases. Urine Therapy is the
Most Effective Natural Remedy and the safest method of
treatment which does not have any side effects. It can
Prevent, Control and Cure all kinds of chronic diseases such
as Cancer, Diabetes, Blood Pressure HIV / AIDS, Kidney
failure, Muscular Dystrophy, Arthritis, Psoriasis, Hair loss,
Mental Retardation and Cerebral Palsy etc. It can boost the
Immune System, Improve Nervous Disorder, Dissolves and
Removes the Toxins Accumulated in our body. It can revive
dead Tissues, Rebuilds Resistance Power of the Vital Organs
like, Brain, Heart, Lungs, Pancreas, Liver and Intestine etc. It
rejuvenates our body and safe guards the general Health of
the people. The whole world at large can get rid of dreadful
diseases and blessed with the Natural healing Power by
Urine Therapy. The very feeling that the Devine Panacea
the solution for all Ailments is within us can fill your life
with immense pleasure. Persons self confidence and positive
attitude can solve all their problems and they will be able to
maintain healthy and happy life. Lord Shiva has himself
narrated the Benefits of Urine Therapy to Mother Parvati
which has been referred in the ancient book Dammar
Tantra in Vedas. In Ancient Books and Vedas Urine is
referred as Shivambu (Auto Urine) meaning Water of
Shiva. Urine Therapy is the ancient method of treatment. The
Powerful practice for healing Self-Urine Therapy has been
referred in Shivambu Kalpa Vidhi part of 5000 years old
document called Damar Tantra linking this practice to Vedas
Dose Selection
Evaluations of the anti-diabetic activity of the cow urine
distillate, three dose levels were selected. The rat dose was
calculated from the human dose (60 ml per day), multiplied
by a factor of 0.018 5 which is equal to 5.4 ml / kg body
weight (first dose)8. The second dose selected was twice that
of the first dose, i.e. 10.8 ml / kg body weight and the third
dose were selected as 50 % of the first dose i.e. 2.7 ml / kg
body weight.
Animal Treatment
Healthy Wistar albino rats (150 to 180 g) Animals were
housed in a room with temperature maintained at 22 20C
and humidity 55 4 %. They were fed with standard
laboratory diet (SKS Feed, India). Rats were divided into 6
groups each containing 8 animals and allowed food and water
ad libitum throughout the investigation. All the procedures
are approved by the institutional animal ethics committee.
Preparation of Streptozotocin Solution
Preparation of 0.1 M citrate buffer solution of pH = 4.5: An
accurately weighed quantity of Trisodium citrate (14.9 g) was
dissolved in sufficient distilled water to produce 1000 ml and
the pH was adjusted to 4.5 using conc. HCl. The solution of
streptozotocin was prepared by dissolving the weighed
quantity of streptozotocin in 0.1 M freshly prepared ice -cold
citrate buffer (pH 4.5).
Experimental Induction of Diabetes
Diabetes was induced in rats by streptozotocin
intraperitoneally injection at a dose level of 50 mg / kg b.wt.
It is dissolved in citrate buffer (0.1M, pH 4.5) in the volume
of 1 ml / kg. In order to prevent hypoglycemia during the first
day after the streptozotocin administration, the diabetic rats
were given 5 % w/v glucose solution orally. Three days after
the injection, the blood glucose levels were measured and the
animals with blood glucose levels above 300 mg/dl were
considered to be diabetic and were used in the subsequent
experiments. In all the experiments, rats were fasted for 16 h
prior to streptozotocin injection. Animals were divided into
six groups of 8 rats per group. The test samples were
administered orally for 2 weeks9.
Group I: Normal control group-Animals received only
vehicle
Group II: Diabetic control group (streptozotocin treated) Animals received only vehicle.
Group III: Standard drug group-Diabetic animals received
daily a single oral dose of the reference drug glibenclamide
(0.25 mg / kg) from day 1 to14.
Group IV: Diabetic animals received daily a single oral dose
of Cow urine distillate 2.7 ml / kg body weight from day 1
to14.
Group V: Diabetic animals received daily a single oral dose
of Cow urine distillate 5.4 ml / kg body weight from day 1 to
14.
Group VI: Diabetic animals received daily a single oral dose
of Cow urine distillate 10.8 ml / kg body weight from day 1
to 14.
The effects of administration of cow urine distillate to
diabetic rats were determined by measuring the fasting blood
glucose levels, serum lipid profiles, liver glycogen levels and
initial and final changes in body weight. Day 3 of induction
was designated as day 1 for administration of the test sample
Page 165
Table 1: Effect of Cow Urine Distillate on Blood Glucose Levels in Streptozotocin-treated Diabetic Rats
Group
Dose
REFERENCES
1. Jagdish R. Bhurani. Case history of some Patients. The Testimonial and
the recorded Statements of the patients are evidence of the scientific
proof. For more details and video recording of the patients who have
achieved benefits from Urine Therapy log on to: Web site: www.urinetherapy.in
2. Chauhan RS, Singh DD, Singhal LK and Kumar R. Effect of cow Urine
on IL-1 and IL-2. Journal of immunology and Immunopathology 2004;
6(S-1): 38-39.
3. Chauhan RS, Singh BP and Singhal LK. Immunomodulation with
Kamdhenu ark in mice. Journal of immunology and Immunopathology
2001; 3: 74-77.
4. Kumar P, Singh GK, Chauhan RS and Singh DD. Effect of cow urine on
lymphocyte proliferation in developing stages of chicks. The Indian
Cow 2004; 1(2): 3-5.
5. Vijayakumar M, Govindarajan R, Rao GMM, Shirwaikar A, Rao Ch V,
Mehrotra S. Action of Hygrophila auriculata against streptozotocin
induced oxidative stress. J Ethano Pharmacol 2006; 104(3): 356-361.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.09.030 PMid:16289604
6. Chauhan RS. Panchagavya therapy (Cowpathy). Current status and
future directions. The Indian Cow 2004; 1: 3-7.
7. Krishna Murthi K, Dipanwita Dutta, Sivanesan SD, Chakrabarti T.
Protective effect of distillate and re distillate of cows urine in Human
polymorphonuclear leukocytes challenged with established genotoxic
chemicals. Biomed and Environmental sciences 2004; 17: 247-256.
8. Ghosh MN. Fundaments of experimental Pharmacology, 3rded.
Hiltonand company, Kolkatta; 2005. p. 190.
9. Annie Shirwaikar, Rajendran K, Rakesh Barik. Effect of aqueous bark
extracts of Garuga pinnata in streptozotocin nicotinamide induced
type-II diabetes mellitus. J Ethno Pharmacol 2006; 107(2): 285-290.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.03.012 PMid:16644162
10. Szkudelski T. The mechanism of alloxan and streptozotocin action in B
cells of the rat pancreas. Physiol Res 2001; 50(6): 537-546.
PMid:11829314
11. Latner A. Carbohydrate Metabolism, Abnormalities of Post Absorptive
Blood Sugar Level. In. Clinical Biochemistry, 2nded. W.B. Saunders and
Co., Philadelphia; 1958. p. 48.
12. Swanston Flatt SK, Day C, Bailey CJ, Flat PR. Traditional plant
treatments for diabetes: studies in normal and streptozotocin diabetic
mice. Diabetologia 1990; 33(8): 462-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007
/BF00405106 PMid:2210118
13. Nikkila EA, Kekki M. Plasma Transport kinetics in diabetes mellitus.
Metabolism 1973; 22: 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(73)900243
14. Huang X, Vaag A, Hanson M, Weng J, Goop L. Impaired insulin
stimulated expression of the glycogen synthase gene in skeletal muscle
of type 2 diabetic patients is acquired rather than inherited. J Clin.
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000; 85: 1584. http://dx.doi.org
/10.1210/jc.85.4.1584
15. John WB. Role of Oxidative Stress in Development of Complications in
diabetes. Diabetes 1991; 40(4): 405. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/
diabetes.40.4.405
16. Donald Armstrong, Sohal RS, Richard G Cutler, Trevor F Slater. Free
radicals in molecular biology, aging and disease. Aging series 1984; 2:
307.
17. Edwin Jarald, Sheeja Edwin, Vaibhav Tivari, Rajesh Garg, Emmanuel
Toppo. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of cow urine. Global
Journal of Pharmacology 2008; 2(2): 20-22.
Cite this article as:
M. Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy, A. Karthik, P. Sasikala. Protective role of
Punganur cow urine on streptozotocin induced diabetes in rats. Int. Res. J.
Pharm. 2013; 4(8):164-167 http://dx.doi.org/10.7897/2230-8407.04832
Page 167