'Docslide - Us - Case Pricing Options Atlantic
'Docslide - Us - Case Pricing Options Atlantic
'Docslide - Us - Case Pricing Options Atlantic
Submitted To
Date of submission
Submitted By
PGP/13/249
Arnab Sarkar
PGP/13/259
Darpan Gupta
PGP/13/269
ManiKantha Garre
PGP/13/279
P Vignesh
PGP/13/289
Sailesh Kumar
PGP/13/299
Dinesh Joshi
PGP/13/309
Major Issues:
1. What price should Jowers charge Daytraderjournal.com do the Atlantic Bundle (i.e.,
Tronn Servers +PESA software tool)? Calculate the prices for alternative pricing
strategies. (Note from the Planning the Strategy section in the case that Jowers make a
conservative estimate that two Tronn servers plays PESA equals the performance of four
Ontario Zink servers.)
2. Anticipate the reactions to your recommendation and formulate plans to address them,
for the following individuals/groups: (a) Matzer (b) Cadena & salesforce (c) Sr.
Management at Atlantic (d) Customers (e) competition (Ontario Zinks Sr. Management)
3. Compare the topline revenue implications of alternative pricing strategies to the firm over
the next three years?
Pricing Options:
Status Quo Pricing: Consider cost of Server only and PESA for free
Price of one Tronn Server = $2000
2 Tronn Servers + PESA software free = 2*2000 = $4000
Total Price of 2 Atlantic Bundles to Daytradejournal.com = $4000
Per Atlantic Bundle = $2000
Competition Based Pricing: Pricing the Tronn servers based on price of competitor
server (Zink by Ontario) and PESA for free. Since 2 Tronn Server with PESA
software is equivalent to 4 Zink servers
Price of one Zink Server = $1700
2 Tronn Servers + PESA software free = 4*1700 = $6800
Total Price of 2 Atlantic Bundles for Daytradejournal.com = $6800
Price of 1 Atlantic Bundle = $3400
2001
2002
2003
50000
4
70000
9
92000
14
2000
6300
12880
21180
1000
3150
6440
10590
Total
30% Markup
($)
188.8
6
1538
56.658
461.4
Total
($)
245.518
1999.4
Amount
($)
500
1500
4000
2800
8800
4400
8400
4200
Based on the analysis performed for pricing strategy using 4 different approaches, it is
recommended to go with second pricing approach Competition Based Pricing because
1) This approach takes into consideration competitors prices and provides superior
services at same rate. Since competition being talked about already owns 50% of
the market share in basic server category, initially prices needs to be highly
competitive and in accordance with other players.
2) If prices are too low, or the software PESA is given free with hardware, then
consumer may perceive Atlantic Bundle as a low quality product. And also
competitors may reduce their prices, because they already have a consumer base
in this market, and have a superior operational excellence.
3) If prices are too high as given in Value in Use Pricing, then consumer may not get
motivated to buy the product in first place. Instead of one Atlantic Bundle,
consumer may prefer to buy two Zink servers, which will come at lower price.
Reaction to Recommendation by various stakeholders:
Matzer, Head of Server Division: There can be two reactions from Matzer on the
above stated pricing strategy:
Status
Quo
Estimated Number of Units
over 3 years
Price Per Atlantic Bundle ($)
Total Revenue from Sales
($)
Variable Cost per unit ($)
Competition
Based
Cost Plus
Approach
21180
2000
21180
3400
21180
2245
42360000
1538
72012000
1538
47549100
1538
32574840
32574840
32574840
2000000
2000000
2000000
34574840
34574840
34574840
7785160
37437160
12974260
Profit (in $)
Value in
use
21180
4200
8895600
0
1538
3257484
0
2000000
3457484
0
5438116
0
It can be observed from above revenue calculation for different pricing strategies that profits
earned are highest when the pricing strategy of Value in Use is followed. However, due to
reasons stated above, using competition based pricing strategy; profit of about $37 million
can be reached.