Audible Voice To Skull PDF
Audible Voice To Skull PDF
Audible Voice To Skull PDF
LIMITATIONS....................................................... 3
II.
INTRODUCTION...................................................... 3
III. E-HARASSMENT
EFFECTS.............................................. 4
IV. MAJOR TECHNOLOGY
CLASSES.......................................... 9
V. PULSED
MICROWAVE.................................................. 12
VI. ULTRASOUND AND VOICE-
FM........................................... 15
VII. THROUGH-WALL
RADAR................................................ 19
VIII. THOUGHT
READING................................................... 21
IX. IMPLANTS
......................................................... 23
X.
CONCLUSION........................................................ 25
XI.
APPENDICES........................................................ 27
PM1.....THE OLD MEDICAL DEVICE, THE LIDA
MACHINE........................ 28
PM2.....DR. ALLAN FREY'S
PAPER.......................................... 32
PM3.....NASA
ARTICLE.................................................... 43
PM4.....SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES/KOHN'S
PROJECTS................ 46
PM5.....BIOLOGICAL AMPLIFICATION (OF EM
SIGNALS)........................ 48
PM6.....DR. DON R. JUSTESEN'S REPORT: 1974 VOICE TO SKULL
SUCCESS....... 52
PM7.....U.S. GOVT DOCUMENT RE: RUSSIAN MIND
CONTROL..................... 54
PM8.....OAK RIDGE LABS AND OTHER
BULLETINS...............................58
US1.....SILENT SOUND, BRITISH ITV & NEXUS
MAGAZINE...................... 64
US2.....U/SONIC MIND CONTROL COMMON, UNCLASSIFIED, MENSA EDITOR
FINDS... 76
US3.....U/SONIC U.S. ARMY WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT................... 87
US4.....SILENT HYPNOSIS, VOICE-FM COMMERCIAL
METHOD..................... 88
US5....."ACOUSTIC SPOTLIGHT", CAN TARGET ONE PERSON IN
CROWD............ 92
TWR1....THE LADS DEVICE................................................
100
TWR2....THE RADAR FLASHLIGHT...........................................
102
TWR3....MILLIVISION THRU-CLOTHING/WALL RADAR...........................
103
TWR4....GROUND [**OR HOME/APT WALL**] PENETRATING RADAR................
104
TR1.....COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE THOUGHT-READING DEVICES.................
108
TR2.....IMPLANTED RATS CAN CONTROL DEVICES WITH THOUGHT................
112
TR3.....THOUGHT READING BY RADIO SIGNAL................................
114
TR4.....ELECTRONICS SEES WHAT A CAT SEES...............................
117
TR5.....MIND SWITCH - THINK APPLIANCES ON, OFF, OR ADJUST..............
120
IMP1....PROMOTION OF HUMAN IMPLANTATION BY NIH.........................
123
IMP2....ITALIAN DOCTOR REPORTS HUMAN IMPLANTATION......................
126
IMP3....IMPLANT TRANSMITS PHYSIO- AND PSYCHO- PARAMETERS BY RADIO......
127
IMP4....DR JOSE DELGADO'S "STIMOCEIVER"/HUMAN IMPLANT EXPERIMENTS......
130
IMP5....UNCLASSIFIED SATELLITE TRACKING HUMAN IMPLANT SYSTEM...........
134
PS......POSTSCRIPT.....................................................
136
=======================================================================
====
I. LIMITATIONS
Up to Contents
=======================================================================
====
II. INTRODUCTION
It is hoped that government and media, who have shied away from this
topic for decades, preferring the warm fuzzy feelings that "this can't
be true", will read about the unclassified and commercial devices and
understand the implications of continued turning the other way.
Up to Contents
=======================================================================
====
III. E-HARASSMENT EFFECTS
Many targets are young seniors, and some in their 70s and 80s.
Some have children and the children are often subjected to the same
"testing" as their parent(s). Pets are not only tortured, but even
killed, painfully and violently.
Up to Contents
=======================================================================
====
IV. MAJOR TECHNOLOGY CLASSES
THOUGHT READING:
BRAIN ENTRAINMENT:
Up to Contents
=======================================================================
====
V. PULSED MICROWAVE
What Dr. Frey found was that single pulses of microwave could be heard
by some people as "pops" or "clicks", while a train of uniform pulses
could be heard as a buzz, without benefit of any type of receiver.
Dr. Frey also found that a wide range of frequencies, as low as 125 MHz
(well below microwave) worked for some combination of pulse power and
pulse width. Detailed unclassified studies mapped out those
frequencies
and pulse characteristics which are optimum for generation of
"microwave
hearing".
When you take into account that the pulse train is OFF (no signal) for
most of each cycle, the average power is so low as to be nearly
undetectable.
Appended articles:
Up to Contents
=======================================================================
====
VI. ULTRASOUND AND VOICE-FM
The brain CAN "hear" and understand this "inaudible voice", while the
ear
and conscious hearing cannot. Once you can convey hypnotic suggestion
which cannot be consciously heard, you have eliminated a major barrier
to
the subject's acceptance of the words being transmitted.
Appended articles:
Up to Contents
=======================================================================
====
VII. THROUGH-WALL RADAR
When "millimeter wave" microwave signals are received, the waves are so
small that they can display a two-dimensional outline of an object.
Lower
frequency radar can only show a "blip" which indicates an object's
presence
or motion, but not it's outline.
Up to Contents
=======================================================================
====
VIII. THOUGHT READING
The other kind of "thought reading", i.e. "MINING" someone's brain for
information from a distance is SPECULATIVE. We targetted individuals
have
no way to verify that is happening, however, we do know that we are
"fed"
hypnotic signals to force consistent "neutral" content (but of
different
character than prior to becoming test subjects,) DREAMS.
Appended articles:
Up to Contents
=======================================================================
====
IX. IMPLANTS
Implants are currently used, however, many of our group have had no
surgery, unexplained wounds, or missing time since becoming targets,
and
we suspect that both implant and non-implant technology may be in use.
Implants are significant for these reasons:
1. Their use, since World War II and continuing to the present day,
associated with MKULTRA atrocities, is a crystal clear indication
that a MOTIVE POOL of unethical researchers has existed through
the late 1970s. The same people, none jailed, are still working,
by and large. The reader can see that the existence of the same
motive pool is overwhelmingly likely, given that no social changes
have occurred which would prevent that.
2. The fact that to date (autumn 1999) no victim who has had implants
removed has ever been able to get custody of the removed implant
shows that research programmes using implants are still quite
active
and obviously quite important to someone. Implants, even though
not in the hands of the victim, were photographed and are quite
real:
See http://www.ritualabuse.net/MCF/,
the Mind Control Forum for details on involuntary experimentees'
implantation and removal experiences.
Appended articles:
Up to Contents
=======================================================================
====
X. CONCLUSION
Eleanor White
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX PM1 ... THE LIDA MACHINE
Associated Press (Exact date not shown on copy but tests took place
1982/83) Loma Linda (Veterans Hospital research unit)
San Bernardino County
The device has not been approved for use with humans in this
country, although the Russians have done so since at least
1960, Adey Said.
"The LIDA machine was made in the 1950's by the Soviets. The CIA
purchased one through a Canadian front for Dr. Ross Adey, but
didn't give him any funds to evaluate it.
"The guy said he had been brain-washed by a device like that when
he was in a POW camp. They placed the vertical plates alongside
his head and read questions and answers to him. He said he felt
like he was in a dream. Later when the Red Cross came and asked
questions, he responded with what had been read to him while under
the influence of the device. He said he seemed to have no control
over the answers.
"The LIDA is PATENTED IN THE US. Why? They are not sold in the
US--the only one I know that exists is the one that was at Loma
Linda Medical Center where Adey used to work. Eldon"
.................................................................
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX PM2 - FREY'S PAPER
The closest match occurred when the acoustic amplifier was driven by
the rf transmitter's modulator. Peak power density is a critical
factor and, with acoustic noise of approximately 80 db, a peak power
density of approximately 275 mw / rf is needed to induce the
perception at carrier frequencies 125 mc and 1,310 mc. The average
power density can be at rf as low as 400 _u_w/cm2. The evidence for
the various positive sites of the electromagnetic energy sensor are
discussed and locations peripheral to the cochlea are ruled out.
Since most of our data have been obtained of the "rf sound" and only
the visual system has previously been shown to respond to
electromagnetic energy, this paper will be concerned only with the
auditory effects data. As a further restriction, only data from
human subjects will be reported, since only this data can be
discussed meaningfully at the present time. The long series of
studies we performed to ascertain that we were dealing with a
biological significant phenomena (rather than broadcasts from sources
such as loose fillings in the teeth) are summarized in another paper
(2), which also reports on the measuring instruments used in this
work.
Some difficulty was experienced when the subjects tried to match the
rf sound to ordinary audio. They reported that it was not possible
to satisfactorily match the rf sound to a sine wave or to white
noise. An audio amplifier was connected to a variable bypass filter
and pulsed by the transmitter pulsing mechanism. The subjects, when
allowed to control the filter, reported a fairly satisfactory match.
The subjects were fairly well satisfied with all frequencies below
5-kc audio were eliminated and the high- frequency audio was extended
as much as possible. There was, however, always a demand for more
high-frequency components. Since our tweeter has a rather good
high-frequency response, it is possible that we have shown an
analogue of visual phenomenon in which people see farther into the
ultraviolet range when the lenses is eliminated from the eye. In
other words, this may be a demonstration that the mechanical
transmission system of the ossicles cannot respond to as high a
frequency as the rest of the auditory system. Since the rf bypasses
the ossicle system and the audio given the subject for matching does
not, this may explain the dissatisfaction of our subjects in the
matching.
-10|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
0|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--| A = RIGHT BONE
| | A | | | | | | | | |
|----|----B----A--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--| B = LEFT BONE
| | | B | A | | | | | | |
LOSS(db) 20|----|----|----B--B--AB-B--B--B--AB-|--| C = LEFT AIR
| | | | | | | A | | | |
|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--| D = RIGHT AIR
| | | | | | | | | | | C
40|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--C--|
| | C C C | | | | | C | |
|----C----|----D--|--C--C--C--|--D--D--D
| | D | D | | D | | | |
60|----D----|----|--|--D--|--|--|--|--|--|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
80|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
100|----|----|----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
FREQUENCY (cps)
|----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-|||
| | | | | | | ||| | | | |||
|----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-||| A = FLENTS
| | | | | | | ||| | | | |||
10|----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-||| B = THEORETICAL
LIMIT
| | | | | | | ||| | | | ||| OF
ATTENUATION BY
FUNCTION(db) |----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-||| EAR
PROTECTORS
A | | | | | | ||| | | | |||
|----A---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-|||
B | A A A | A AAA A| | | |||
|----B---B--|--|-A-|-|||----A---|--|-|||
| | | | B | | ||| | A | | |||
30|----|---|--|--|-|-|-B||----|---A--|-A||
| | | | | | | ||| | | A |A|
|----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||B---|---|--|-||A
| | | | | | | ||| B | | | |||
|----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-||B
| | | | | | | ||| B | | B||
|----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|-B|-|||
| | | | | | | ||| | B | | |||
50|----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-|||
| | | | | | | ||| | | | |||
|----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-|||
| | | | | | | ||| | | | |||
|----|---|--|--|-|-|-|||----|---|--|-|||
100 1000 10000
FREQUENCY
10000|---------|-------------|--------------|
|---------|-------------|--------------|
PEAK |---------|-------------|--------------|
POWER |---------|-------------|-------------*|
DENSITY |---------|-------------|------------*-|
(mw/cm2) | | | * |
|---------|-------------|---------*----|
| | | * |
|---------|-------------|------*-------|
| | | * |
| | | * |
| | | * |
1000|---------|-------------*--------------|
|---------|-----------*-|--------------|
|---------|---------*---|--------------|
| | * | |
|---------|-----*-------|--------------|
| * * * * * * * | |
|---------|-------------|--------------|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
100|---------|-------------|--------------|
200 1000 2000 3000
FREQUENCY (mc)
| REFLECTED ABSORBED
1.5|--- FREQUENCIES FREQUENCIES
| * *
| * * * = 10% OF INCIDENT
CENTIMETERS |Cortical * POWER
|Tissue *
| * @ = 20% OF INCIDENT
1.0|--- * POWER
| *
| * *
|Bone
| * *
|
0.5|--- * @ @ @ *
|Muscle * @ @
|Fat @ @ *
|Skin @ @ @
0|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|---
0 100 1000 10000 100000
FREQUENCY (mc)
* * * * * *
* *
* *
* * :::::: *
* * ::::::::: *
* O * :::::::: *
* * * *
* * *
* * *
*** ** *
* * *
* * * * *
* *
* *
* * * * * * * * *
THRESHOLDS
If: 1 mw/cm2 is set equal to o db, then 275 mw/cm2 is equal to 24 db.
Then: We can reduce the rf energy 50 db to -26 db as we reduce the
noise level energy from 50 db to o db. We found that -26 db rf
energy is approximately 3 _u_w/cm2.
Up to Contents
The third likely place for the detection mechanism is the brain. Burr
and Mauro (6) presented evidence that indicates that there is an
electrostatic field about neurons. Morrow and Sepiel (7) presented
evidence that indicates the existence of a magnetic field about
neurons. Becker (personal communication) has done some work
indicating that there is longitudinal flow of charged carriers in
neurons. Thus, it is reasonable to suspect that possibly the
electromagnetic field could interact with neuron fields. As yet,
evidence of this possibility is inconclusive. The strongest point
against it is that we have not found visual effects although we have
searched for them. On the other hand, we have obtained other
nonauditory effects and have found that the sensitive area for
detecting rf sounds is a region over the temporal lobe of the brain.
One can shield, with a 2-in.2 piece of fly screen, a portion of the
stippled area shown in Fig. 6 and completely cut off the rf sound.
REFERENCES:
Nifset, R., Pinneo R. Baus J. Fleming, & R. McAfee. Ann. Rept. USAF
Rome Air Development Command, TR-61-65, 1961.
Burr, H., & J. Seipel, J. Wash Acad. Sci. 21: 455, 1949.
Jones, R.C., S.S. Stevens, & M.H. Laurie. J. Acoust. Sci. Am. 12:
281, 1940.
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX PM3 - NASA ARTICLE
TITLE: Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral blood flow
of
conscious rats
..........................................................
Eleanor White's inserted note:
Authors:
Oscar, K. J. (Army Mobility Equipment Command)
Corporate Source:
Army Mobility Equipment Command (Fort Belvoir, VA, United States)
Pages: 10
Contract Number: None
Abstract:
AUDITORY PERCEPTION
BRAIN CIRCULATION
DECEPTION
MICROWAVES
PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
RADIATION EFFECTS
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
HEMODYNAMICS
MILITARY TECHNOLOGY
RADIATION DOSAGE
SOUND LOCALIZATION
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: 301-621-0390
FAX: 301-621-0134
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX PM4 - SEA/KOHN'S PROJECTS
Web address:
http://es.epa.gov/ncerqa_abstracts/sbir/other/monana/kohn.html
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
SBIR Contract Number: F41624-95-C-9007
Title: Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect
Principal Investigator: Mr. Brian Kohn
Company Name:
Science & Engineering Assoc, Inc.
6100 Uptown Blvd NE
Albuquerque, NM 87110
Telephone Number: 505-884-2300
Business Representative:
Project Period:
Project Amount: $739,995
Research Category: Monitoring/Analytical
Description:
Program: SBIR
Agency: AF Field
Office: AL
TOPIC Number: AF93-026
Control Number: 93AL -185
Contract Number: F41624-93-C-9013
Phase: 1
Awarded In: 93
Award Amount: $37,806
Award Start Date: 17 MAY 93
Award Completion Date: 17 DEC 93
Proposal Title: Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect
Principal Investigator Name:Brian Kohn
Principal Investigator Phone:505-884-2300
Firm SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ASSOC., INC.
SEA Plaza
6100 Uptown Blvd NE
SUITE 700
Albuquerque, NM 87110
Woman Owned: N
Minority Owned: N
Number of Employees: 95
Keywords:
MICROWAVE HEARING RF HEARING
BONE CONDUCTION THERMOELASTIC
COCHLEAR MICROPHONICS
Abstract:
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX PM5 - BIOLOGICAL AMPLIFICATION
Electromagnetic Interaction With Biological Systems
edited by Dr. James C. Lin, University of Illinois
1989 Plenum Press, New York
ISBN 0-306-43109-2
QP82.2.N64E44 1989
612.01448-dc19 88-38957
CIP
Much recent research cited below has shown that imposed weak
low frequency fields (and radiofrequency fields amplitude-
modulated at ELF frequencies) that are many orders of
magnitude weaker in the pericellular fluid [fluid between
adjacent cells] than the membrane potential gradient [voltage
across the membrane] can modulate actions of hormone, anti-
body neurotransmitter and cancer-promoter molecules at their
cell surface receptor sites.
Page 122:
Page 124:
...
Enzymes are protein molecules that function as catalysts,
initiating and enhancing chemical reactions that would not
otherwise occur at tissue temperatures. This ability resides
in the pattern of electrical charges on the molecular surface.
In the fashion of more familiar chemical catalysts, such as
the hydrocarbon oxidation systems which function only at very
high temperatures in automotive exhaust systems, a catalyst
emerges unchanged from these reactions and is thus able to
participate indefinitely in a specific reaction.
Page 131:
...
Stimulus Amplification in Cooperative Systems
...
It is therefore clear that OBSERVED EM field interactions
with cells and tissues based on oscillating ELF tissue gradients
between 10 E-7 and 10 E-1 volts per centimeter would involve
cooperativity MANY ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE GREATER than envisaged in
the examples just cited.
Page 95:
Magnetophosphenes
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX PM6 - VOICE TO SKULL, 1974 SUCCESS
Appendix PM2
...
The demonstration of sonic transduction of microwave energy
by materials lacking in water LESSENS the likelihood that a
thermohydraulic principle is operating in human perception
of the energy. Nonetheless, some form of thermoacoustic
transduction probably underlies perception. If so, it is
clear that simple heating is NOT a sufficient basis for the
Frey effect; the requirement for pulsing of radiations
appears to implicate a thermodynamic principle.
Frey and Messenger (1973) and Guy, Chou, Lin, and Christen-
sen (1975) confirmed that a microwave pulse with a slow rise
time is INeffective in producing an auditory response; only
if the rise time is SHORT, resulting in effect in a square
wave with respect to the leading edge of the envelope of
radiated radio-frequency energy, does the auditory response
occur.
...
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX PM7 - U.S. GOVT DOCUMENT RE: RUSSIAN MIND CONTROL
http://www.raven1.net/russvid.htm
......................................................................
Date sent: Fri, 10 May 1996 17:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Subject: MindNet Journal - Vol. 1, No. 73
Sender: [email protected]
The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
otherwise noted.
................................................................
MindNet Journal Archive Filename: [mn173.txt]
To receive the MindNet Journal via email:
[/pub/users/vericomm/mindnet/]
......................................................................
Los Angeles Herald Examiner, Section A, November 22, 1976
...
...
...
......................................................................
Microwave News, January-February 1987
ZAP!
......................................................................
Microwave News, January-February 1996
......................................................................
Microwave News, September-October 1996, page 19
...
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX US1 - SILENT SOUND
Eleanor White's comments:
......................................................................
NEXUS
Volume 5, Issue 6
October/November 1998
$25/6 issues/ 1 year
1998 Nexus New Times
888-909-7474
[email protected]
--------------------------
EXCERPT: More in magazine.
--------------------------
For years, rumours have persisted that the United States Department
of Defense has been engaged in research and development of
ultra-sophisticated mind- altering technology. Confirmation of this
came to me recently in the form of two ITV News Bureau Ltd (London)
wire service bulletins.[1]
I noticed that the ITV wire service was from outside the United
States. Readers of Resonance may recall that in the
Electromagnetic Weapons Timeline in issue no. 29, reference is made
to the documentary video, Waco: The Big Lie Continues, which
contained video footage of three EM weapons. This segment of the
film was from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). I
wondered if there was any significance to this.
"The American pilot who shot down the second Iraqi warplane in 48
hours said Friday that continued Iraqi flights suggested that US
warnings were not filtering down to Iraqi pilots He said he hopes
Saddam gets the message now. 'It's really too bad that these
people have to die for their unwillingness to heed our warnings...
What I really think is, they don't communicate down to the people,'
he said. 'If they have a communications problem, I suggest they fix
it.'"[3]
That may have been coincidence but two earlier news articles, dated
March 1, 1991, apparently have a common origin with the ITV news
bulletin. The first article[4] tells us that approximately 100
members of the US 101st Airborne Division, fluent in Arabic, talked
the enemy into surrendering. These soldiers rode in the Apache
helicopter gunships that were involved in the longest
helicopter-borne assault in history. They told the Iraqi troops
that they would be slaughtered if they didn't give up.
This all sounds very unremarkable, except when you read the
editor's note: "The following dispatch was subject to US military
censorship." Now why would they want to censor such a mundane
tactic, except out of embarrassment that the US Army fighting
forces had fallen to the level of a cheer-leading squad?
... in which case they would have nixed the thing entirely.
But upon re-reading the article, we may pick out certain key
phrases (emphasised in italics):
Irrational? Not if there was also a voice being beamed into his
head from that little flying toy, saying, "Give up, give up!"
Otherwise, how do we account for the editor's note at the beginning
of the article: "The following is based on pool dispatches that
were subject to military censorship." Without that note, we could
smugly think that the Iraqi soldiers were cowards or crazy, but why
censor that idea?
Up to Contents
OFFICIAL DENIALS
KGB PSYCHOTRONICS
We know that the former Soviet Union was actively engaged in this
type of research. In a previous article we reported that during the
1970s the Soviet KGB developed a Psychotronic Influence System
(PIS) that was used to turn soldiers into programmable 'human
weapons'. The system employed a combination of highfrequency
radiowaves and hypnosis. The PIS project was begun in response to a
similar training scheme launched in the US by President Carter,
according to Yuri Malin, former security adviser to USSR President
Gorbachev.[8]
"During the Cold War the United States not only engaged in a
relatively open nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union, but also
engaged in a secret race developing unconventional weapons. As the
intelligence agencies (which prior to the Second World War had
merely played a supporting role within the government) continued to
increase their power, so did the funds spent on developing
techniques designed to outsmart each other.
Jan goes on to quote one of the United States' most popular war
heroes: Dwight D. Eisenhower, who served as Supreme Commander of
Allied Forces during World War II and was later elected 34th
President of the United States. In his farewell address to the
nation in 1961, President Eisenhower said:
The United Nations was established in 1945 with the aim of "saving
succeeding generations from the scourge of war". In 1975 the
General Assembly considered a draft first proposed by .the Soviet
Union: "Prohibition of the Development and Manufacture of New Types
of Weapons of Mass Destruction and New Systems of Such Weapons".
In other words, weapons that are barred from use against our
country's worst enemies (notwithstanding the fact that the US did
use this weapon against Iraqi troops!) can now be used against our
own citizens by the local police departments against such groups as
peaceful protestors of US nuclear policies.
"Within the last two decades a potential has emerged which was
improbable, but which is now marginally feasible. This potential is
the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of
the approximately six billion brains of the human species, without
mediation through classical sensory modalities, by generating
neural information within a physical medium within which all
members of the species are immersed.
It doesn't get any plainer than that. And we do not have open
discussion because the US Government has totally denied the
existence of this technology.
Acknowledgements
I would like to give special thanks to: Jan Wiesemann for sending
the Silent Sounds[TM] statement and patents which were the keystone
of this article; Mike Coyle, whose computer search turned up many
more related patents; Harlan Girard, who has provided numerous
official government documents; and to the many who have provided
newsclippings and articles, moral and financial support to
Resonance, without which we'd have ceased publication long ago.
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX US2 ... ULTRASONIC MIND CONTROL COMMON, UNCLASSIFIED
Eleanor White's comments: This hard hitting article by Judy Wall, who
is NOT a mind control victim and in fact avoids victim testimonials in
favour
of only factual objective material, contains some POWERFUL items not
widely
known among involuntary mind control experimentees.
The most important facet of this article is that Judy Wall presents
evidence
unknown to most of the public IN SPITE OF ITS BEING UN-CLASSIFIED, and
in
the public domain for the past two decades.
.......................................................................
....
USAF COMMANDO SOLO: AERIAL MIND CONTROL BROADCASTS
The United States Air Force uses aerial mind-control broadcasts against
civilian population as well as enemy troops. Some of these actions
against
civilians are done with the intent of influencing public opinion and
the
outcome of elections.
To the Desert Storm offensive we can now add several other incidents.
Alex Horvat, editor of The Probe, calls to our attention the 1998
video, Exotic Weapons of Mass Control, produced by Bob Fletcher.
We were not at war with the citizens of Haiti, yet the U.S. Government
directed military weapons against this friendly, or at least neutral,
civilian population. The U.S. Government sanction the "rigging" of the
Haitian election by mental control of the people, programming them to
cast
their votes for the Americans' favored candidate. And they had the
nerve
to call it "Operation Uphold Democracy". Some sense of humor!
Stalin would have loved it. Hitler would have loved it. Why is the
U.S.
Government doing this? Who is behind this flagrant violation of civil
liberties? Is it the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) which has
a
long history of interfering in foreign government politics? Or has
this
become standard military procedure?
The rationale is always the same: "to make the world safe for
democracy".
Yet what is democracy if not freedom? Freedom to think your own
thoughts;
freedom to express your own opinions; freedome to vote for the
candidate
of your own choice.
Fletcher's video also mentions that the same technology was used
against
the Bosnia population for a week to influence their election. [4] This
was probably done during Operation Joint Guard in 1995. [5]
Just what is this EC-130E Commando Solo? The United States Air Force
has
helpfully published a fact sheet that describes the Lockheed built air-
craft. [6] This 1995 bulletin states that the "unit flyaway cost" is
more
than US $100 million each, and that there are eight in the inventory.
Its
primary function is "Psychological operations broadcasts". The crew
consists of four officers (pilot, copilot, navigator, control
chief/EWO)
and seven enlisted members (flight engineer, loadmaster, five mission
crew.)
"Air Force Background: Air National Guard EC-130 aircraft flown by the
193rd Special Operations Group were deployed to both Saudi Arabia and
Turkey in support of Desert Storm. Their missions included broadcasts
of
'Voice of the Gulf' and other programs intended to convince Iraqi
soldiers
to surrender.
I was told that it was all perfectly legal, having been approved by the
U.S. Congress (!). It may be okay by Congress, but I sincerely doubt
that
it would be approved by the recipient populations.
And I might add, we can asume that they have tried out the efficacy of
this
mind-control technology. Even the US military would not waste $800
million
on something unless it has been proven to work, and work effectively,
even
under the adverse situation of military combat. This is an important
point.
The initial research into mind control in the USA was conducted udner
the
auspices of the CIA. The flagrant abuse of human rights in
experimenting
on unsuspecting persons was based on the supposition that the veracity
of
experiments would be compromised if a subject knew that he was
participating
in an experiment. In the case of mind-control technology, tehis
supposition
might very well be true. But that does not justify its use -- or so
said
the Nuremburg Code, the tenets of which were used as a legal basis to
pro-
secute Nazi scientists for war crimes. However the US seems to have
excused its own military and scientific community from adhering to that
Code. [11]
It is obvious that they found the answer to that last question. If the
public does not know about a weapon system, it cannot prohibit its
deploy-
ment. This is the situtation that applies to mind-control technology.
A 1998 news item states that US Air Force General John Jumper "predicts
that the military will have the tools to make potential enemies see,
hear,
and believe things that do not exist" and that "The same idea was con-
tained in a 15-volume study by the USAF Scientific Advisory Board,
issued
in 1996, on how to maintain US air and space superiority on the battle-
fields of the 21st century". [16,17]
Notice that General Jumper predicts that mind control technology will
be
used against potential enemies. The military and government
agencies may apply this term to any group or individual they perceive
as
a threat to their own interests. Potential enemies may be counter-
culture
individuals, those of opposing political viewpoints, economic or
financial
competitors, biological undesirables, etc. It is part of the military
agenda to identify potential threats so as to be prepared to meet them.
Experience has shown that the US Government (the CIA and FBI, for
example)
has moved against these people or groups, slandering, harassing, even
killing them, without adequate cause or legal sanction.
"23. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new 'non-lethal'
weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also
covered
and regulated by international conventions...
You can intercept the [radio] waves in the aether and then
[subliminally]
modulate every conceivable suggestion into it. If this transpires over
a
long enough time period, it accumulates in the heads of people. And
even-
tually they can be artificially manipulated with other additional
measure-
ments, to do that which this perpetrator wants [them to do]. This is
why
[such technology] is rightfully feared." [20]
To return to the USAF Fact Sheet, it concludes: "In 1990 the EC-130
joined
the newly formed Air Force Special Operations Command and has since
been
designated Commando Solo, with no change in mission. This one of a
kind
aircraft is consistently improving its capabilities.
The next few years should see continued enhancements to the EC-130 and
its
worldwide mission."
About the Author:
Judy Wall is the Editor of RESONANCE, the newsletter of the
Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest Group of American MENSA Ltd.
Viewpoints expressed here are her own personal views.
ENDNOTES
FIRM:
CORPORATE OFFICIAL:
George D. Hughes Jr.
PHONE:
540-663-2137
TITLE:
Prametric Difference Waves for Low Frequency Acoustic Propagation
ABSTRACT/BENEFITS:
BENEFITS:
KEYWORDS:
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX US4 ... SILENT HYPNOSIS, VOICE-FM COMMERCIAL METHOD
The original commerical link from which the text below was
copied on March 22, 2000 is:
http://www.altered-states.co.nz/cgi-bin/reload.cgi?^/sub/silent.htm
SILENT SUBLIMINALS
Only your mind can hear. Your ears hear nothing but your mind
hears and accepts the powerful suggestions.
Examples of Suggestions:
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
US5....."ACOUSTIC SPOTLIGHT" CAN TARGET ONE PERSON IN CROWD
The ORIGINAL LINK FOR THIS PAGE (As of March 22, 2000):
http://sound.media.mit.edu/~pompei/spotlight/
Usage
Technology
Because it is impossible to generate extremely narrow beams of
audible sound without extremely large loudspeaker arrays, we
instead generate the sound indirectly, using the nonlinearity
of the air to convert a narrow beam of ultrasound into a
highly directive, audible beam of sound.
Hyperdirectivity
History
Background
Preprocessing
Transducer Design
References:
All content (c) 1999 F. Joseph Pompei, MIT Media Lab, except
where noted. B&W photo of early parametric array (c) 1983
Acoustical Society of America. Reproduction, archiving,
and/or redistribution of any part of this document prohibited
without written permission from Mr. Pompei or the MIT Media
Lab. Patents Pending.
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX TWR1 - THE LADS DEVICE
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX TWR2 - THE RADAR FLASHLIGHT
Project Description:
Status Report:
Contact:
E-mail: [email protected]
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX TWR3 - MILLIVISION RADAR
PM: TECH UPDATE: Frisking From Afar: OCT 95 Popular Mechanics magazine
The idea calls for measuring the time delay and intensity of
millimeter wave energy that radiates naturally. At millimeter
wavelengths, people are good emitters, while metals are very poor.
Dielectric objects, such as plastics, ceramics and powdered drugs,
are somewhere in between. Clothing and building materials, such as
wallboard, are virtually transparent.
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
TWR4.....GROUND [**OR HOME/APT WALL**] PENETRATING RADAR
The original link for this text (as of March 22, 2000) is:
http://www.ptsc.com/radar/index.html
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX TR1 - COMMERCIAL THOUGHT READING DEVICES
............................................................
http://www.mindmouse.com/ The Cyberlink Mind Mouse:
Hands-Free, Brain-Wave Control for your Computer
What is it?
I can do what...?
Pentium Processor
16 MB RAM
20 MB Disk Space
VGA or better Display
Windows 95
............................................................
The Times, Sept 2, 1996 p14 (1)
Title:the power of thought (innovations for paraplegics)
Author: anjana ahuja
abstract:
They were taught very simple commands, with one cone being
used to move the cursor up and down and the other from left
to right. If they could give more complex commands, disabled
people could use them to make the computer speak for them. Dr
Bakay warns that this could still be years off. But he has
secured funding from the US National Institutes of Health to
continue the research with three more patients.
............................................................
Communicating with 'thought power'
http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/
sci/tech/newsid_193000/193946.stm
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX TR2 - RATS CONTROL DEVICES WITH THOUGHT
[Eleanor White comments: This article shows clearly that the reading
of minds is almost accomplished in the UNclassified world. Since
CLASSIFIED technology is always a decade or two ahead of the
unclassified world, imagine what exists now in the black areas of
defense contractors and government labs!]
By Maggie Fox
Reuters
Whatever the rats are doing, they are controlling the robotic arm
without touching anything, said Chapin, who worked with colleagues
at Duke University in North Carolina.
''We trained the rat initially to put his paw on a lever and to
press the lever down. When the lever got pressed down there was a
robot arm that moved over to a water dropper and then brought the
water back to the animal's mouth,'' Chapin said.
The rats had to carefully control the lever -- if they only pushed
the lever halfway, it would only bring the arm halfway to them.
Chapin's team then recorded the brain activity associated with the
movement of pressing the lever.
Soon they disconnected the lever from the robot arm and hooked it
up to the converting device alone.
''When control of the robot arm was switched to the brain, the
robot arm went over and brought water to the animal's mouth before
the animal even started to move,'' Chapin said.
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX TR3 - THOUGHT READING BY RADIO SIGNAL
[pg 65]
[SNIP]
[pg 66]
[pg 67]
These observations tie in with the fact that some individuals can
detect
radio programs through fillings in their teeth. This phenomenon was
technically verified by interposing shields between respective
people who exhibited this effect and the modulated radio frequency
sources.
When the lower half of the head was covered, including the maxillary
dental area, the radio frequency sound was perceived. The sound ceased
on covering the top half of the head. While the mechanism responsible
for this phenomenon is only imperfectly understood, it can be assumed
to be
the result of DIRECT cortical stimulation.
[In other words, even when the sound seems to be coming from the teeth,
it
is actually being directly received and interpreted in the brain, not
the
teeth.]
[SNIP]
[pg 68]
Brain-Wave Detection. Some 40-odd years ago, university professor
F. Cazzamalli started publishing papers on the subject of brain-wave
detection [using radio signals] and implied that he had detected
radiations
from the mind. [See image above.]
His subjects could not see the dial. They were told to sound off as
soon
as they felt something unusual. At a certain frequency range - varying
between 380 MHz adn 500 MHz - the subjects repeatedly indicated points
with exact accuracy in as many as 14 out of 15 trials. At these
"individual" ...
[pg 69]
The oscillator's output power was only a few milliwatts, while the
oscillator itself was located several feet away from the subjects.
[Any experimenters out there want to try this? Milliwatts are quite
safe for short term expermiments. Kids' walkie talkies are 50 to 100
milliwatts, for example.]
[SNIP]
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX TR4 - ELECTRONICS SEES WHAT A CAT SEES
(** NOTE: While pondering the technology here, the reader should also
reflect on the apparent ease with which these experimenters can cut up
a cat's skull, restrain it, in obvious discomfort and extreme
unwilling-
ness, to obtain this data. We 300 victims would like to point this out
to show the world that this same callous attitude is what enables
similar covert experimenters to torture us around the clock and
complete-
ly shatter our lives.)
...................................................................
ELEKTRONSKI MAGAZIN ORIGINAL LINK:
http://www.sabac.co.yu/e-zine/technology/txt/kahney_cat_eye.html
If above link is broken
A Cat's Eye Marvel - EXCERPT:
by Leander Kahney
3:00 a.m. 7.Oct.99.PDT
...................................................................
Read ongoing Med-Tech coverage
...................................................................
.................................................................
BTW--the images they saw are posted
http://jase.deadbeets.com/recon_figure2.html
.................................................................
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
TR5.....MIND SWITCH - THINK APPLIANCES ON, OFF, OR ADJUST
OVERVIEW
BACKGROUND - General
BACKGROUND - Technical
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX IMP1 - PROMOTION OF HUMAN IMPLANTATION BY NIH
THIS TEXT WAS COPIED FROM THE ORIGINAL NIH/CNCT WEB SITE AT THIS
ADDRESS:
http://www.engin.umich.edu/center/cnct/orgind.html
The NIH NCRR requires that its Centers have several basic components:
internal research projects, collaborative research projects, and
service to external investigators in the form of distribution and
training. The organization of the Center for Neural Communication
Technology (CNCT) will be described here with links to more details
on individual projects.
The underlying goal for all of the work conducted by the CNCT is to
make multichannel recording and stimulation devices available to
researchers which will enable them to more efficiently communicate
with the brain. Micromachined electrodes offer the potential to
extend small ensemble studies to tissue volume studies consisting of
dozens if not hundreds of cells.
There are three internal research projects under the Center which are
designed to enhance the capability of the base technology:
http://osiris.rutgers.edu/Buzsaki.html
http://www.dbbs.wustl.edu/RIB/Highstein.html
http://msewww.engin.umich.edu/people/milty/protein_polymers.html
http://www.med.umich.edu/khri/censys/jmiddleb.htm
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX IMP2 - ITALIAN DOCTOR REPORTS HUMAN IMPLANTATION
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX IMP3 - IMPLANT TRANSMITS PHYSIO- AND PSYCHO- PARAMETERS BY
RADIO
People seeking to discredit us will say that such technology could not
possibly be in use now, or in some cases, even exist. Keeping in mind
the typical 20-year spread between classified and unclassified
technology,
as demonstrated by the SR-71 reconnaissance aircraft, it is clear that
classified military and intelligence programmes have highly advanced
methods of tracking a target's body functions.
.......................................................................
.
PROGRAM; SBIR (Small Business Initiative Research)
AGENCY; AF
FIELD OFFICE; AL
TOPIC NUMBER; AF93-023
CONTROL NUMBER; 93AL-226
CONTRACT NUMBER; F41624-93-C-2005
AWARDED IN; 93
AWARD STSRT DATE; 11MAY93
PHASE 1
AWARD COMPLETION DATE; 11DEC93
PROPOSAL TITLE; TELECTRODE SYSTEMS FOR UNOBSTRUSIVE
BIOPOTENTIAL RECORDING
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR NAME; RICHARD L. HORST, PhD
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR PHONE; 301-596-4915
WOMAN OWNED; N
MINORITY OWNED; N
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES; 6
.....................................................................
References
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX IMP4 ... DR DELGADO'S "STIMOCEIVER"/HUMAN IMPLANT EXPERIMENTS
PSYCHOTECHNOLOGY
Electronic Control of Mind and Behavior
edited by Schwitzgebel and Schwitzgebel
published Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.
[Each chapter is by a different author]
Chapter 15
page 184
During the last few years, methodology has been developed to stimulate
and record the electrical activity of the brain in completely
unrestrained
monkeys and chimpanzees (Delgado, 1967; Delgado and Mir, in press).
This
procedure should be of considerable clinical interest because it
permits
exploration of the brain for unlimited periods without disturbing their
rest or normal spontaneous activities. [EW: Dr. Delgado, you are all
heart!]
METHODS
page 185
Implantation of electrodes
Radio Stimulation
The signals from the depth electrodes are received by the amplifier.
The
output signal of the amplifier controls the frequency of the subcarrier
oscillator, and the oscillator output in turn controls the frequency of
the transmitter.
(2) After amplification of the received signal from the transmitter has
been demodulated, the composit subcarrier signals are connected to the
inputs of the three discriminators, which then separate and demodulate
their respective subcarriers to obtain the telemetered analog
information.
In the instrumentation used in this instance, a 100 microvolt signal at
the
input of EEG amplifier resulted in a 1-volt output from the
corresponding
discriminator in the receiver.
The analog output signals from the receiver were connected to the
inputs of
an EEG recorder and a magnetic tape recorder.. A microphone was also
mounted in the room with the subjects and conversation was also
recorded
along with the EEG on magnetic tape.
[EW: So much for the idea that human implantation and MILITARY
PARTICIPATION
therein is only a myth.]
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
APPENDIX IMP5 ... UNCLASSIFIED SATELLITE TRACKING HUMAN IMPLANT SYSTEM
SIGHTINGS
World's First Satellite-Tracked Human Implant Device
Applied Digital Solutions, Inc.
12-17-99
Unequivocally.
......................................................................
In the agreement signed last week, ADS acquired the right to develop
this unique product itself for all of its applications or to sublicense
the development of specific applications to other entities. A special
technology group has been formed within ADS to supervise the
development of the device.
http://www.adsx.com
Up to Contents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
POSTCRIPT
Declan Butler
Nature; Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 1998
Registered No. 785998 England.