CA IPCC Auditing Suggested Answer Nov 2015
CA IPCC Auditing Suggested Answer Nov 2015
CA IPCC Auditing Suggested Answer Nov 2015
in/
CA IPCC (Inter) Nov. 2015 Audit & Assurance
CA IPC (Inter) Nov. 2015 Examinations Suggested Answer (Compiled by CA. Pankaj Garg)
Paper 6 Auditing & Assurance
Marks
1 Discuss the following:
(a) With reference to SA 320 indicate the factors which may affect the identification of an 5
appropriate bench mark in determining materiality for the financial statement as a whole.
Answer: Factors affecting identification of appropriate benchmark as per SA 320:
Determining materiality involves the exercise of professional judgment. A percentage is
often applied to a chosen benchmark as a starting point in determining materiality for
the financial statements as a whole. Factors that may affect the identification of an
appropriate benchmark include the following:
1. The elements of the financial statements (for example, assets, liabilities, equity,
revenue, expenses);
2. Whether there are items on which the attention of the users of the particular entitys
financial statements tends to be focused (for example, for the purpose of evaluating
financial performance users may tend to focus on profit, revenue or net assets);
3. The nature of the entity, where the entity is at in its life cycle, and the industry and
economic environment in which the entity operates;
4. The entitys ownership structure and the way it is financed (for example, if an entity
is financed solely by debt rather than equity, users may put more emphasis on assets,
and claims on them, than on the entitys earnings); and
5. The relative volatility of the benchmark.
(b) The assertions used by auditor to consider potential misstatements about account 5
balances at the period end.
Answer: Assertions used by auditor about account balances at the period end:
SA 315 Identifying and Assessing Risk of Material Misstatements through
understanding the Entity and its Eenvironment requires the auditor to identify and
assess the risks of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at the
financial statement and assertion levels.
Risks of material misstatement at the assertion level for classes of transactions,
account balances, and disclosures need to be considered because such consideration
directly assists in determining the nature, timing, and extent of further audit
procedures at the assertion level necessary to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence. Assertions used by auditor with respect to account balances at the period
end are:
1. Existence assets and liabilities shown in the balance sheet exists.
2. Rights and obligations rights of the entity have been shown as assets and the
obligations have been shown as liabilities.
3. Completeness assets and liabilities have been recorded completely.
4. Valuation and allocation assets and liabilities are included in the financial
statements at appropriate amounts and any allocation adjustments are
appropriately recorded.
2. State with reasons (in short) whether the following statements are correct or incorrect. (Answer 8x2
any eight) =16
(i) AB & Co. is an audit firm having partners Mr. A and Mr. B Mr. C, the relative of Mr. is
holding securities having face value of Rs. 2,00,000 in XYZ Ltd. AB & Co. is qualified for an
auditor of XYZ Ltd.
Answer: Statement is Incorrect.
Sec. 141(3)(d)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013, disqualifies a person to be appointed as
auditor of a company if the person or his relative or his partner is holding securities
in the company. However Relative may hold securities of face value up to Rs.
1,00,000.
AB & Co. is disqualified to be appointed as auditor of XYZ Ltd. as relative of Mr. B, the
partner of the AB & Co. is holding securities of face value of Rs. 2,00,000.
(ii) Working papers are property of client, as it contains clients informations.
Answer: Statement is incorrect.
SA 230 Audit Documentation states that unless otherwise specified by law or
regulation, audit documentation is the property of the auditor. He may at his
discretion make portions of working papers available to client.
Working papers cannot be considered as property of the client, irrespective of the
matter that it contains clients infomration.
(iii) The auditor of A Ltd. Company wanted to refer to the minute books during audit but
boards of directors refused to show the minute books to the auditors.
Answer: Statement is Incorrect.
Sec. 141(3) of Companies Act 2013 provides that every auditor of a company shall
have a right of access at all times to the books of account and vouchers of the
company, whether kept at the registered office of the company or at any other place.
The term books of accounts and vouchers includes all books which have any
bearing, or are likely to have any bearing on the accounts, whether these be the usual
financial books or the statutory or statistical books.
(iv) The auditor has to report to Central Govt. within 90 days of his knowledge of an offence
involving fraud.
Answer: Statement is Incorrect.
Sec. 141(12) of Companies Act 2013 provides that if an auditor of a company, in the
course of the performance of his duties as auditor, has reason to believe that an
offence involving fraud is being or has been committed against the company by
officers or employees of the company, he shall immediately report the matter to the
CG within such time and in such manner as may be prescribed.
Rule 13 of companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2013 provides that if the auditor
has reason to believe for occurrence of fraud, he shall report the matter to the
Central Government immediately but not later than 60 days of his knowledge
(v) Manner of rotation of auditor will not be applicable to company A, which is having paid up
share capital of Rs. 15 crores and having public borrowing from nationalized bank of Rs.
50 crore because it is a Private Limited Company.
Answer: Statement is Incorrect.
Provisions related with rotation of auditors are applicable in case of private
companies having paid up capital of Rs. 20 Crore or more and to companies having
paid up capital below Rs. 20 Crore, but having public borrowings from financial
institutions, banks or public deposits of Rs. 50 Crore or More.
In the instant case, as borrowings is of Rs. 50 Crore, provisions related with rotation
of auditors are applicable.
(vi) The auditor should study the Memorandum and Articles of Association to see the validity
of his appointment.
Answer: Statement is Incorrect.
Memorandum of Association lays down the object to be carried on and Articles of
Associations reflects the regulations of the company to govern its internal
management and to regulate the rights of the members.
Auditor should ascertain whether the company has complied with provisions of
section 139 and 140 to ensure validity of his appointment.
(vii) Teeming and lading is one of the techniques of inflating cash payments.
Answer: Statement is incorrect.
Teeming and lading Is not a technique of inflating cash payment.
Teeming and lading is a technique of suppressing cash receipts by misappropriating
the amount received from a customer.
(viii) Managing director of A Ltd. himself appointed the first auditor of the company.
Answer: Statement is Incorrect.
Sec. 139(6) of Companies Act, 2013 provides that the first auditor of the company is to
be appointed by the Board of Directors within 30 days of registration of the company.
If the Board fails, members shall within 90 days appoint the auditor in EGM. In case of
Government company, the first auditor is to be appointed by CAG of India.
Appointment of first auditor by the managing director is not correct.
(ix) A Chartered Accountant holding securities of S Ltd. having face value of Rs. 950 is qualified
for appointment as an auditor of S Ltd.
Answer: Statement is Incorrect.
Sec. 141(3)(d)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013, disqualifies a person to be appointed as
auditor of a company if the person or his relative or his partner is holding securities in
the company.
Chartered accountant is disqualified to be appointed as auditor of S Ltd. as he is
holding securities of face value of Rs. 950.
(x) Mr. N, a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountant of England and Wales, is qualified
to be appointed as auditor of Indian Companies.
Answer: Statement is Incorrect.
As per Section 141(1) of Companies Act 2013, a person shall be eligible to be
appointed as auditor of an Indian company only if he is a Chartered Accountant.
Chartered Accountant implies the member of Institute of Chartered Accountant of
India holding certificate of practice.
Mr. N, member of Institute of Chartered Accountant of England and Wales is
disqualified to be appointed as auditor of Indian companies.
-----------------------