Coca-Cola Vs Ilocos Prof and Tech Employees Union
Coca-Cola Vs Ilocos Prof and Tech Employees Union
Coca-Cola Vs Ilocos Prof and Tech Employees Union
7. COCA-COLA filed and registered a Protest arguing that: The SC defers to the findings of fact of the Mediator-Arbiter,
The 16 employees are confidential employees the SOLE, and CA. Certainly, access to vital labor information
There is already a bargaining unit who represents is the imperative consideration. An employee must assist or act
the rank-and-file, namely the Ilocos Monthlies in a confidential capacity and obtain confidential information
Union (IMU) relating to labor relations policies. Exposure to internal
business operations of the company is not per se a ground for
8. The Mediator-Arbiter denied CCBPI’s challenge to the 16 the exclusion in the bargaining unit.
votes. She found that the voters are rank-and-file
employees holding positions that are not confidential in
nature, and the 22 employees whom the IPTEU tends to Dispositive Portion:
represent are not members of the IMU. Consequently, the Wherefore, premises considered, petition is denied.
challenged votes were opened and canvassed.