A. G. D. E. G. L. N. M. Vaxevanidis and W.: Johnson$
A. G. D. E. G. L. N. M. Vaxevanidis and W.: Johnson$
A. G. D. E. G. L. N. M. Vaxevanidis and W.: Johnson$
00
Printed in Great Britain PergamonJournalsLtd
NOTATION
INTRODUCTION
41
42 A. (; M..~M~11set a/
In this paper we report on theoretical and experimental investigations into the quasi-
static plastic collapse of a certain structural component, namely a thin-walled tube con-
taining a number of geometrical discontinuities in the form of a groove of constant depth
and axial length, with the aim of providing information about its behaviour as an energy-
absorbing device, e.g. details of the failure modes, load-deflection characteristics and
the influence of the plastic properties of the plastically collapsing material. An incx-
tensional collapse mechanism for folding the shell in a non-axisymmetrical diamond fold
mode, taking into account the concept of stationary, circumferential and inclined, travel-
ling plastic hinges, is considered. The plastically dissipated energy and the mean post-
buckling load necessary to perform the operation are estimated.
Experiments were carried out to verify the theoretical model developed. The shells,
made of rigid polyvinylchloride (PVC), were subjected to quasi-static compressive
loading; the modes of failure and the load-deflection characteristics were determined
and compared with the theoretical ones.
The work reported here is limited in as far as the results obtained are for PVC behav-
ing quasi-statically, and not dynamically, as would be the case for an impact energy
absorber.
~E
E 0-04
z
m"
m 0.03
o
2m
0.02
E
0.01
@
1 Cylinder 41.7 48 -- 127 127.0 1 0.0 7.3 26.6 10.2 10.7 0.060 0.371 0.389
Grooved 21.6 6.6 6.8 0.065 0.320 0.330
2 41.7 48 46.5 127 25.4 4 12.7 11.3
~ ~ ~" Cylinder
3 " 41.5 48 47.0 127 19.3 5 16.0 7.1 22.4 10.7 10.3 0.059 0.451 0.435
4 " 41.6 48 46.7 127 12.7 7 15.4 9.5 22.5 7.7 7.5 0.064 0.351 0.342 O
5 " 41.7 48 46.7 127 6.35 13 2.8 7.9 22.1 9.2 8.6 0.064 0.427 0.400
" o ~ = ~ ~ 6 " 41.3 48 46.9 127 3.175 19 5.3 9.7 22.6 7.3 7.2 0.058 0.304 0.299
~ ; ~ ' ~ ~
7 Cylinder 41.6 48 46.2 127 0.0 -- 0.0 12.5 20.0 6.5 6.3 0.063 0.331 0.320
O
Ycomp. =0.062 kN mm 2. A=~(D2g-D2i)/4. Axial length of groove: /g=3.175 mm. O
Yt.... = 0.048 kN/mm w2. Pv = YcompA. Depth of groove : z = 0.75 mm. g.
~.. r~ O"t~ O ~" O
=,
TABLE l b .
i
ll p
Or -- irlc[ined
J xij ~ hinge l i n e s
fEJlg
grooves(
IP
(o) b
i I I z'z
I I ..Jr"
~.J hi
(c)
Fro, 2. (a) A schematic diagram of grooved tubes in axial loading. (h) Assumed deformation
mode for inextensional collapse. (c) Simplified travelling hinge, showing formation of stationary
horizontal hinges in inextensional collapse.
1 2 3 4 5
100
Hinge
tines
50
0
mrn 6 7 8 9
Z~L
10 , , 11
2¢m
Ca)
FIG. 3(a). Buckling modes for spec. 2, see Table 1 for details, 1-8, views of progressive collapse;
9, the 'as recovered' side view, 10, a top view; 11, a bottom view.
X Top end
ring 1
groove 1
ring 2
groove2
/
ring3 \
groove3
ring/-,
groove4
/
ring 5
Bottom end
(b)
1 2 3 4 5
100
Hinge
tines
0
mm 6 7 8 9
Ak
10 11
¢m
(a)
Fl(~. 4(a).Buckling modes for spec. 3, see Table 1 for details. 1-8, views of progressive collapse
9, the 'as recovered' side view; 10, a top view; 11, a bottom view.
Topend
ringl ~ ~ ]
groove1 ~
ring2
groove 2
ring3
gr°°ve3~start of ~ ./
ring 4 %.¢,~ttctpse/ "~ /
groove4
ring5 / 5 ~ ~
groove5_ ~5
. . . . . . . Bottomend
(b)
2 3 4 5
100
nge
50 nes
0
mm 6 ? 8 9
AL
10 ;;cm, 11
(a)
FIG. 5(a). Buckling modes for spec. 4, see Table 1 for details. 1-8, views of progressive collapse;
9, the 'as recovered' side view; 10, a top view; 11, a bottom view.
Top end
ring 1
groove 1
ring 2
groove 2
ring 3
groove 3
ring4
groove 4
ring 5
groove 5
ring 6
groove 6
ring 7
groove 7
Bottom end
(b)
II
1 2 3 4 5
100
50
0
mm 6 7 8 .,
Hinge
AL lines
, 11
10 2 cm
(a)
FIG. 6(a). Buckling m o d e s for spec. 5, see Table 1 for details. 1-8, views of progressive collapse;
9, the "as recovered" side view: 10, a top view; 11, a bottom view.
Topend[ / ~. / \ Iring 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
, 11
12
, 12 . . . . . . . . . . .
13
B i,o1~
end
(b)
1 2 3 4 5 6
I00
Hinge
lines
0
mm 7 8 9 10
&L
11 , , 12
2cm
(a)
Fto. 7(a). Buckling modes for spec. 6, see Table 1 for details. 1-9, views of progressive collapse;
10, the 'as recovered' side view; ll, a top view; 12, a bottom view.
groov.
2 ,, Top e n d
11
12
13
14
15 S t a r t of
16 _ _ _ cottapse
17
18
19
Bottom
end
(b)
~
Top e n d
First
lobe
(2D)
Second
lobe
(2D)
I
~ Third
lobe
(2D)
Fourth
lobe
(2D)
Bottom end
(a)
Top e n d
First
lobe
(2D)
Second
lobe
(2D)
Third
lobe
(20)
Fourth
Lobe
(2D)
Bottom end
(b)
developed in groove 2 with the formation of an ellipse orthogonal to the previous one of
groove 3 (see 5 in Fig. 3a); further, the ellipse in groove 1 is set at an angle of ~r/2 to the
one in groove 2 (see 6 in Fig. 3a), there having been simultaneous spreading of the in-
clined plastic hinges in rings 1 and 2. We observe that in the final stages of deformation the
top circular end of a specimen is terminally distorted to, essentially, an ellipse, also losing
contact with the upper steel platen along its major axis (see 6-8 in Fig. 3a). Moreover,
the levels of the ellipses in rings 3 and 4 did not remain horizontal but moved downwards
until the ends touched the bottom platen (see 5 in Fig. 3a). This resulted in an increase of
buckling load indicated in these stages of deformation by Fig. 9. Fracture was found
along most of the circumference of the first buckle in groove 3, probably due to the sharp
corner of the groove acting as a stress raiser.
We must point out that some elastic recovery is found in all collapsed specimens after
unloading.
The covering of ring 5 takes place by the initial elliptical collapse of groove 3 moving
downwards (see 4 in Fig. 4a); where inclined hinge lines spread into rings 5 and 6 there is
the formation of an ellipse along the circumference of groove 2 at an angle of ~r/2 relative
to the previous one. Grooves 4 and 5 in Fig. 4(a) are seen at characteristic stages of
deformation after the initiation of collapse (stages i-iv) in specimen 3 which has a ratio
l,/L=O. 15. Final collapse stages are clearly indicated in 6-8 of the same figure along with
the deformation patterns shown in Fig. 4(b). Note that the end of the grooved specimen
after collapsing is an ellipse and that no fracture occurred.
Stages of deformation subsequent to the initial stages (i)-(iv), for specimen 4
(l,/L=O.lO), specimen 5 (l,=0.05) and specimen 6 (l,/L=0.025) show the progressive
deformation of grooves into ellipses with the inclined hinge lines spreading along the
adjacent rings, each lobe have rotated through "rr/2radians relative to its previous one.
Collapse of grooved thin-walled cylinders 51
Hinge
lines
Specimen 1 Specimen 7
I I
20mm
(c)
FIG. 8(c). Recovered tubes (specimens 1 and 7) being immersed in boiling water showing
deformation zones.
Material was seen to move downwards and touch the platens, the top end of the grooved
specimen being finally distorted and losing contact with the steel platen along its major
axis. This is well shown in Figs 4(a)-7(a) where the obtained deformation patterns for the
immersed specimen are clearly indicated in Figs 4(b)-7(b).
As would be expected, the buckling wavelength is fully restricted by the geometrical
discontinuities caused by machining the specimens. Thus, for the tubes with four and five
rings (specimens 2 and 3, respectively) the lobes are formed after each ring and for the
tube with seven rings (specimen 4), the wavelength consists of two adjacent rings. For
the specimens with more rings than seven (specimens 5 and 6) structural behaviour
approaches that of a non-grooved specimen, with equal wavelengths.
For comparison purposes two tubes without any geometrical discontinuities, of the
same initial length and inside diameter as the grooved specimens, were caused to
undergo collapse in the same manner as the grooved specimens. The two tubes have
different wall thicknesses corresponding to (i) Ir/L=l, specimen 1, i.e. with an outside
diameter Dr and (ii) lr/L=O, specimen 7, with an outside diameter Dg. They both showed
the well-known structural behaviour in which the initial plastic and axisymmetric (ring)
buckle system develops into a non-symmetric two-diamond (elliptic) pattern with a ~r/2
radians level-by-level rotation as subsequent loading occurred (see Table 1). The in-
extensional progressive collapse modes with the formation of circumferential and
inclined stationary hinges, and travelling ones as given in ref. [6] and as experimentally
obtained in the present work, are shown in Figs. 8(a) and (b).
52 A.G. MA~,I,XHSet aL
"%\ / ..... -
- _ t i _ i i i •
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Deflection / L
(a)
5 3°I
201
o
A
c~
0f"k / A 093kN
J ~ . . . . . • L___ I . . . . . .
(b)
FIG. 9(a) Load-deflectioncurves for specimens 1-4; - - spec. 1, - - - - - spec. 2 , - - - -
spec. 3, -..- spec. 4. (b) Load-deflectioncurves for specimens 5-7:- spec. 5, -- - -- spec.
6, - - spec. 7.
Based on the experimental observations of the collapse modes outlined above (see
Figs 3b-7b), a theoretical model of inextensional plastic collapse has been developed.
Figure 2(b) shows a generalized, developed shape of the shell surface after a non-
symmetric deformation mode. In the analysis the assumptions made for the inextensional
collapse of thin-walled tubes [6] and conical shells [4] are:
(i) The material is rigid-perfectly plastic with infinite ductility;
(ii) The middle surface of the shell remains unextended and its position does not
depend on the deflections which have taken place: this is to say that membrane
stretching is neglected, among other things;
(iii) The compression is frictionless and both ends of the shell are free to deform or
change shape as they choose;
(iv) The developed theoretical model is based upon the terminal collapse mode and
not upon the history of plastic deformation;
(v) Strains due to direct and shear stresses are neglected and only the vertical action
of the load P is considered.
A collapsing shell contains two sorts of plastic hinges, horizontal ones around the
circumference of a groove and inclined hinges crossing between the rings.
The various stages of plastic compression during the formation of one lobe are:
(i) Flattening each layer from its initial radius of curvature to infinity.
Each layer (see Fig. 2b and also Figs 3b-7b) consists of a number of curvilinear
trapeziums which make up the whole surface of the shell and after full compression these
become fiat trapeziums separated by a horizontal line along which acute bending has
taken place (see also similar remarks in refs [4] and [6]).
The plastic work done in completely flattening and removing the curvature of the
layer, say number j, consisting of nr rings and ng grooves, is, following the notation
given above:
where Mpr=Y~/4 is the full plastic moment per unit length in ringed-regions of the shell
and Mpg= y t 2 / 4 is the full plastic moment per unit length in a grooved region of the shell.
(ii) Bending along the stationary inclined hinge lines crossing the above-mentioned
rings and grooves. Plastic work dissipated during a -rr-radians rotation of the shell-portion
at stationary inclined hinge lines is
(iii) Bending along the stationary horizontal circumferential hinge line, number j, the
plastic work dissipated being
(iv) The mechanism of a travelling hinge for the formation of the stationary horizontal
hinges is now considered. According to the mechanism described in refs [6] and [4],
collapse does not occur simultaneously along the whole of a hinge line, but is 'laid down'
in a progressive manner with travel along the specimen in circumferential bending and
unbending hinges; with the mid-surface inextensibility condition maintained, this
mechanism describes the progress of the travelling hinge - - how it reverses direction and
travels outwards again until the limit of its travel is reached when two more stationary
bends are formed. This is illustrated in Fig. 2(c). The plastic work done in the travelling
hinge around the entire effective circumference of a groove is
5.1 \. (i M,\~lxJls ~'lal'
If the plastic work done by the axial load is completely dissipated at the plastic hinges
then by equating the external work to the above calculated internal work dissipated,
- lg
Pj( h i - 2r)= WI + W2 + W3 + 2W3( - - - 1),
~TF
Or
~5i= W I + W 2 - W s 2WJg
+ ~ (6)
hl- 2r wr(hi-2r)
Differentiating equation (6) with respect to r gives that value of ~ which makes fii a
minimum. It is obtained as
-B+ ~/BZ-4AC
ri* -- 2A /7)
m
(s)
~,' hi
is
Values of fi/Pv calculated from the theoretical model for inextensional collapse and
experimentally predicted from the present work (see Table 1) are plotted against ljL
(length of the ring-section of the grooved specimen/its initial axial length) in Fig. 10.
Experimental tests on rigid PVC specimens provided basic deformation patterns and
the simple failure mechanisms proposed. Collapsed PVC shells immersed in boiling
water immediately recovered (almost) their initial form showing clearly the various
regions of heavily concentrated bending.
To check for circumferential inextensibility of the mid-surface of the shell, measure-
ments of the deformed circumferential lobes at any level were made and allowed the
diameter of the circumscribed and inscribed circles of the non-symmetric diamond folds
to be calculated (see Table 1). No significant increase in the circumference was observed.
Examination of the specimens indicated that the travelling hinge is probably of con-
stant radius around the circumference and throughout the deformation process; similar
observations were reported in ref. [4] for the collapse of conical shells. It has to be noted,
as mentioned above, that some elastic recovery takes place by unloading.
Plastic analysis based on the proposed mechanism of inextensional plastic collapse,
and assuming rigid-perfectly plastic material, allowed the prediction of the mean post-
buckling load and the energy absorbed by the shells. Comparison of those with the
present experimental results for rigid PVC grooved tubes and plain tubes without dis-
continuities (see Fig. 10 and Table 1) indicates that for the geometries examined,
experimental and theoretical values of mean post-buckling load are in good agreement
and in the range of +5%.
Shell geometry and the groove geometrical discontinuities involve factors affecting the
deformation modes and the buckling loads. The initial peak load corresponding to the
elasto-plastic behaviour of the shell and the post-buckling load seem to remain almost
constant for all ratios of lr/L (length of the ring-section of the grooved specimen/total
axial length of the shell). Dividing the peak load by the cross-sectional area of the
groove, where yielding of the material was initiated, gives the initial compressive yield
stress of the material at 0.062 KN mm -2, which is a reasonable value. The initial tensile
yield stress of rigid PVC taken at 3% of strain is 0.048 KN mm -2 (see Fig. 1). The dif-
ference is due to the yield behaviour of the PVC material; it is slightly sensitive to the
hydrostatic component of stress. Note also that the experimentally obtained value from a
quasi-static test compared to the initial compressive yield stress of similar PVC material
was 0.0658 KN mm -2 at 3% of strain used for the work reported in ref. [4].
Calculated values of P/Pr using the estimated compressive yield stres of the material
(see Table 1) were plotted in Fig. 10. Taking into account all the assumptions made the
theoretical (and experimental) results for PVC fit well the equation,
0.5
0.4
>-
0.3 ~, py=0.03 Elr .o.3s6
0.2
0.1
I L I __
Ft6. 10. Variation of P/Pr with the ratio lJL: see Table 1 . 0 : Theoretical. X: Experimental.
5~ A. (;. M.~xM,xJis cta/.
Acknowledgements--The authors are grateful to Professor P. S. Theocaris of the National lcchnical Univcr~,it~
of Athens for providing the laboratory facilities for the present experimental work, Professor W. Johnson ~s
grateful for the support of the Levcrhulme Trust. The authors are also very indebted to Mrs R. Tsopela t(}r
typing their manuscript. The suggestions for improving the initial draft of this paper, made by Profcsst~r
Norman Jones and Professor S. R. Reid. were much appreciated.
REFERENCES