Impact of Service Charges Charged by Public Sector Banks With Special Reference To Coimbatore City
Impact of Service Charges Charged by Public Sector Banks With Special Reference To Coimbatore City
Impact of Service Charges Charged by Public Sector Banks With Special Reference To Coimbatore City
6.1: DESCRIPTIVE
PARTICULARS Frequency Percentage Mean Std Dev
SB 76 31.7
TYPE OF CURRENT 55 22.9
2.5 1.3
ACCOUNT OD 23 9.6
SALARY 86 35.8
18-25 54 22.5
26-35 101 42.1
AGE 36-45 38 15.8 2.4 1.1
46-55 40 16.7
55 & ABOVE 7 2.9
MALE 108 45.0
GENDER 1.6 2.6
FEMALE 132 55.0
ILLETRATE 32 13.3
GRADUATE 84 35.0
EDUCATION
POST GRADUATE 85 35.4 2.6 .9
QUALIFICATION
PROFESSIONAL 37 15.4
OTHERS 2 8.0
BUSINESS 77 32.1
EMPLOYED 120 50.0
OCCUPATION PROFESSIONAL 11 4.6 2.1 1.2
RETIRED 75 2.9
OTHERS 2 10.4
not
GENDER 0.062 1 3.841 0.803
Significant
6.2.3: INTERPRETATION
It is marked from the above table that the calculated chi-square value is less than the table
value and the result is not significant. Hence, the hypothesis “gender of the respondents and awareness
level of service charges charged by public sector banks. From the analysis, it is concluded that there is
no relationship between the gender of the respondents and awareness level of service charges charged
by public sector banks.
INCONVENIENCES FACED
INTERNET
PARTICUALRS ATM& NEGOTIABLE ALL THE
LOAN /MOBILE
FREQUENCY CDM INSTRUMENT ABOVE
BANKING
A/C TYPE YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES
CURRENT FREQUENCY 42 7 27 22 9 40 23 25 29
OD FREQUENCY 28 11 28 9 33 4 10 23 24
SALARY FREQUENCY 13 1 4 9 13 0 6 3 15
SAVINGS FREQUENCY 53 8 32 29 9 52 38 23 25
6.3.2: CHI-SQUARE FOR INCONVIENCE FACED & ACCOUNT TYPE:
ASYMP.
CHI-SQUARE TABLE
FACTOR DF SIG. (2- S/NS
VALUE VALUE
SIDED)
INCONVIENCE Not
5.432 3 7.815 0.143
ATM Significant
INCONVIENCE
9.492 3 7.815 0.23 Significant
LOAN
INCONVIENCE
Significant
NEGOTIABLE 82.556 3 7.815 0
at 5% level
INSTRUMENT
ICONVIENCE
Significant
INTERNET/MOBILE 9.837 3 7.815 0.02
at 5% level
BANKING
INCONVIENCE ON Significant
10.748 3 7.815 0.013
ALL THE ABOVE at 5% level
INTERPRETATION:
It is marked from the above table the calculated chi-square value is lesser than the table value
and the result is not significant. From the analysis, it is concluded that there is relationship between the
account type and inconveniences on ATM & CDM.
It is marked from the above table the calculated chi-square value is lesser than the table value
and the result is significant. From the analysis, it is concluded that there is relationship between the
account type and inconveniences on Loan.
It is marked from the above table the calculated chi-square value is greater than the table value
and the result is significant. From the analysis, it is concluded that there is no relationship between the
account type and inconveniences on Negotiable instrument.
It is marked from the above table the calculated chi-square value is greater than the table value
and the result is significant. From the analysis, it is concluded that there is relationship between the
account type and inconveniences on Mobile/Internet banking.
It is marked from the above table the calculated chi-square value is greater than the table value
and the result is significant. From the analysis, it is concluded that there is relationship between the
account type and inconveniences on all the factors.
6.4: FIREDMAN RANK TEST
Significant
RANKING 188.277 4 9.488 0 at 5%
Level
It is found that according to age, gender,
6.4.4: INTERPRETATION occupation, account type category of
respondents say that they are aware of the
It is marked from the above table that the service charges charged at 97.5% and 2.5%
calculated chi-square value is greater than the table say they are not aware of the respondents.
value and the result is significant. Hence, the To identify the level of satisfaction of the
hypothesis “ranking of the respondents and respondents towards the service charges
awareness level of service charges charged by issued by the Public Sector Banks.
public sector banks. From the analysis, it is It is found that according to age,
concluded that there is relationship between the occupation, and gender of respondents say
ranking of the respondents and awareness level of 11.25% are highly satisfied, 77.5% are
service charges charged by public sector banks. satisfied, 7.9% are neutral, and 3.3% are
dissatisfied.
7. FINDINGS To identify the areas of major problems
faced by the type of account holder due to
The findings are based on the objective that
is framed for the study. the services charges issued by the Public
To identify whether the respondents are Sector Banks.
aware of service charges charged for their It is found that according to the account
service type current account holder 54 say
maximum inconveniences is ATM & on gender of the respondents female is
CDM, OD account type account holder 33 42.1%,educational qualification of the respondents
say maximum inconveniences is negotiable among them post graduate is 35.4%, based on the
instrument, Savings account holder 13 say occupation respondents among them employed is
maximum inconveniences is to ATM & at 50%.
CDM and negotiable instrument, saving
account holder say 53 maximum 8. CONCLUSION:
inconveniences to ATM & CDM. Based on this study, the view of the
It is found that according to the age of the respondents among the public sector bank account
respondents at 18-25 say 37 say maximum holding customers based on the service charges
inconveniences is ATM & CDM, 26-35 say and its impact towards it are evaluated using
41 maximum inconveniences is ATM & appropriate statistical techniques such as Cross
CDM, 36-45 say 22 maximum tabulation analysis with Chi-square test, fired men
inconveniences is to ATM & CDM, 45-55 ranking in addition to descriptive statistics like
say 32 maximum inconveniences to ATM mean and standard deviation. It is concluded from
& CDM and age above 55 say 4 maximum the results of the study that major respondents are
inconveniences to ATM & CDM aware of the service charges that is been charged
It is found that according to the Gender of for their transaction but they do not have much
the respondents of 66 male say maximum knowledge about the percentage that is been
inconveniences is ATM & CDM, 70 female charged. It is determined that the mainstream of
say maximum inconveniences is ATM & service users prefer service counter than internet
CDM. and mobile banking service. But when they use
It is found that according to the occupation other type of transactions they do could not find
of the respondents 47 business respondents the service charges that is been made. It is
maximum inconveniences is negotiable concluded that majority of the Over Draft account
instrument, 65 employed respondents say holder face inconveniences in negotiable
maximum inconveniences ATM & CDM, 4 instrument and other account holder like saving,
professional say maximum inconveniences salary and current holder face inconvenience on
is to ATM & CDM, 4 retired respondents ATM & CDM & Mobile/Internet banking. It is
say maximum inconveniences to ATM & concluded that male face more inconveniences on
CDM and internet banking, 24 other(house loans and female face more inconveniences on
wife, students) respondents say maximum ATM & CDM. It is concluded that based on the
inconveniences to ATM & CDM ranking the ATM & CDM is given first rank and
It is been summarized from above table the loan is given fifth rank. It is concluded that based
respondents has given first rank for ATM, likely level service charges that is charged is ok
second rank for internet banking, third rank among gender. From the above study it is
for mobile banking, fourth rank for concluded that the respondents are aware of the
cheques/deposits and fifth rank for loan service charges that been charged by the public
with related to awareness level for the sector banks but their satisfactory level is neutral
service charges charged. were they do not understand in what criteria the
charges are made.
7.1: DESCRIPTIVE
REFRENCES:
It is found that based on type of account 1. Zeithmal VA, Parasuraman A & Berry LL
holder’s current holders is 22.9%, based on the age (1990),“Delivering quality service balancing
of respondent’s age between 26-35 is 42.1%, based
customer perceptions and expectations in”. 10. Levesque T & McDougall GHG (1996),
Free Press, New York. “Determinants of customer satisfaction in
2. Aish EMA, Ennew CT, McKechnie SA, et retail banking”. International Journal of
al., (2003), “Across-cultural perspective on Bank Marketing; Vol. 14,Pp. 12-20.
the role of branding in financial services: 11. Mylonakis J, Malliaris PG, Siomkos GJ, et
The Small Business Market”.Journal of al., (1998), “Marketing-Driven factors
Marketing Management; Vol. 19, Pp.1021- influencing savers in the Hellenic bank
1042.Almossawi M. (2001), “Bank selection market”. Journal of Applied Business
criteria employed by college students in Research, Vol. 14, Pp. 109-116.
Bahrain: An empirical analysis”. 12. Nielsen JF, Terry C, Trayler RM, et al.,
International Journal of Bank Marketing; (1998), “Business banking in Australia: a
Vol. 19, Pp. 115-125. comparison of expectations”. International
3. Biranchi Narayan Swar and Prasant Kumar Journal of Bank Marketing; Vol. 16, Pp.
Sahoo (2012),“Service Quality : Public, 253-263.
Private and Foreign Banks”, SCMS Journal 13. Phuong HT & Har KY (2000), “A study of
of Indian Management, Vol. IX, No. 11, bank selection decisions in Singapore using
July-September, IISN 0973– 3167,pp. 43 - the analytical hierarchy process”.
51. International Journal of Bank Marketing;
4. Colgate M & Hedge R. (2001), “An Vol. 18, Pp. 170-180.
investigation into the switching process in 14. Thwaites D & Vere L (1995), “Bank
retail banking services”. International selection criteria-a student perspective”.
Journal of Bank Marketing; Vol. 19,Pp. 201- Journal of Marketing Management; Vol. 11,
212. Pp. 133-149.
5. Devlin JF (2002), “Customer Knowledge 15. Zineldin M (1996), “Bank Strategic
and Choice criteria in retail banking”. Positioning and some determinants of bank
Journal of Strategic Marketing; Vol. 10, Pp. selection”. International Journal of Bank
273-290. Marketing; Vol. 14, Pp. 12-22.
6. Devlin J & Gerrard P. (2005), “A study of 16. Prabha, Divya and Krishnaveni (2006).
Customer Choice Criteria for multiple bank Service quality perception of banking
users”. Journal of Retailing and Customer service - with reference to corporate
Services; Vol. 12, Pp. 297-306. customers, ACRM Journal of Business and
7. Edris TA & Almahmeed MA (1997), Management Research, Vol. l , No. 1,
“Services considered important to business February, pp. 45-49
customers and determinants of bank 17. Bhat, Mushtaq A. (2005). Correlates of
selection in Kuwait - A segmentation service quality in banks: An Empirical
analysis”. International Journal of Bank Investigation, Journal of Services Research,
Marketing; Vol. 15, Pp. 126. Vol. 5, No. l, April-September, pp. 77-99
8. Huber CP, Lane KR & Pofcher S. (1998), 18. Bhat, Mushtaq A. (2005). Service quality
“Format renewal in banks - it's not easy”, perceptions in banks: A comparative
McKinsey quarterly; Vol. 2, Pp. 148-154. analysis, VISION - The Journal of Business
9. Kannabiran G & Narayan PC (2005), Perspective, Vol. 9, No.1, January-March,
“Deploying Internet banking and e- pp. 11- 19
commerce - Case study of a private sector 19. Krishna Chaitanya, V. (2005).
bank in India”. Information Technology for Metamorphosis of marketing financial
Development, Vol. 11, Pp. 363-379. services in India, Journal of Services
Research, Vol. 5, No. l, April-September,
pp. 155-169
20. Bauer, Hans H. et al. (2005). Measuring the
quality of e-banking portals, International
Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 23, No.2,
pp. 153-175
21. Bodla, B.S. (2004-05). Service quality
perception in banks: An Indian perspective,
Prajnan, Vol. XXXIII, No.4, pp. 321-333