Chapter 5 Summary of Organizational Behavior by Stephen Robbins
Chapter 5 Summary of Organizational Behavior by Stephen Robbins
Chapter 5 Summary of Organizational Behavior by Stephen Robbins
- Most often described in terms of the measurable - Enduring characteristics that describe an
traits a person exhibits individual’s behavior.
- The Weaknesses of self-report surveys are: A personality test that taps four
characteristics and classifies people into 1 of
If the respondent lies or practices impression 16 personality types.
management to create a good impression.
When people know their personality scores - The MBTI has problems such as:
are going to be used for hiring decisions,
they rate themselves as about half a • It forces a person into one type or another,
standard deviation more conscientious and for example one person is only either
emotionally stable than if they are taking introverted or extroverted, no type in
the test just to learn more about themselves. between.
Accuracy. A perfectly good candidate
could have been in a bad mood when • Lacks strong supporting evidence to its
taking the survey, and that will make the validity
scores less accurate.
2. Big Five Model
- Another way to measure personality is through
Observer-rating surveys. - A personality assessment model that taps five
basic dimensions.
A co-worker or another observer does the
measuring with or without the subject’s The five basic dimensions are
knowledge.
1. Extraversion
Research suggests observer-ratings surveys • A personality dimension describing someone who
are a better predictor of success on the job is sociable, gregarious, and assertive.
- Further research shows that heredity is more • A personality dimension that characterizes
important than the environment someone in terms
of imagination, sensitivity, and curiosity.
Heredity
Research has found relationships between these
- Refers to the factors determined at conception. personality dimensions and job performance
"The preponderance of evidence shows that
individuals who are dependable, reliable, careful, 2. Machiavellianism
thorough, able to plan, organized, hardworking, • Named after Niccolo Machiavelli
persistent, and achievement-oriented tend to have • Individuals high in this trait are more
higher job performance in most if not all pragmatic, maintains emotional distance
occupations.” said the authors of the most-cited and believes ends can justify means.
review
• Research shows they manipulate more, win
more, are persuaded more, and persuade
others more.
4. Self Monitoring
• Employees high in other orientation also - The theory argues that satisfaction is highest and
exert especially high levels of effort when turnover lowest when personality and occupation
engaged in helping work or prosocial are in agreement. The closer two fields or
behavior. In sum, it appears that having a orientations are in the hexagon, the more
strong orientation toward helping others compatible they are. Adjacent categories are
does affect some behaviors that actually quite similar, whereas diagonally opposite ones are
matter for organizations. highly dissimilar.
- Basic convictions that a specific mode of conduct 1. There do appear to be intrinsic differences in
or end-state of existence is personally or socially personality among individuals.
preferable to an opposite or converse mode of
conduct or end-state of existence. 2. There are different types of jobs.
- Has content and intensity attributes 3. People in jobs congruent with their personality
should be more satisfied and less likely to voluntarily
• The content attribute says a mode of resign than people in incongruent jobs.
conduct or end-state of existence is
important. Person-Organization Fit
• The intensity attribute specifies how - The person–organization fit essentially argues that
important it is people are attracted to and selected by
organizations that match their values, and they
- Values tend to be relatively stable and enduring. leave organizations that are not compatible with
They are more often reinforced than changed their personalities.
4. Uncertainty avoidance