Last 10 Mins PDF
Last 10 Mins PDF
Last 10 Mins PDF
5. Distribution of documents
6. Issuance
Briones v. Miguel, G.R No. 156343, October 18, 2004
Writ of
Habeas Corpus
– In the matter of the petition for cancellation of certificate of live
birth of Tinitigan v. Republic (G.R. No. 222095, August 7, 2007)
❑ “The law is clear that illegitimate children shall use the surname and shall
be under the parental authority of their mother. The use of the word "shall"
underscores its mandatory character. The discretion on the part of the
illegitimate child to use the surname of the father is conditional upon proof of
compliance with RA 9255 and its IRR.”
❑ “Thus, it is mandatory that the mother of an illegitimate child signs the birth
certificate of her child in all cases, irrespective of whether the father
recognizes the child as his or not. The only legally known parent of an
illegitimate child, by the fact of illegitimacy, is the mother of the child who
conclusively carries the blood of the mother. Thus, this provision ensures
that individuals are not falsely named as parents.”
❑ The mother must sign and agree to the information entered in the birth
certificate because she has the parental authority and custody of the
illegitimate child.
ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN: RIGHTS
– People v. Glabo
– Article 345, RPC: Monthly Support
1. Indemnification;
2. 2. Acknowledgment,
3. 3. Support
ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN: RIGHTS
3. The legitime of each illegitimate child shall consist of one half of the
legitime of a legitimate child
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
Art. 177, FC as amended by Republic Act 9858
– Art. 269 CC. Only natural children can be legitimated. Children born
outside of wedlock of parents who, at the time of the conception of the
former, were not disqualified by any impediment to marry each other,
are natural.
– Legitimation is limited to natural children and cannot include those
born of adulterous relations (Ramirez vs. Gmur, 42 Phil. 855). The
Family Code: (Executive Order, No. 209), which took effect on August 3,
1988, Art. 177. Only children conceived and born outside of wedlock of
parents who, at the time of the conception of the former, were not
disqualified by any impediment to marry each other may be
legitimated.
The Reasons For The Limitation
To “Natural Children”
1) The rationale of legitimation would be destroyed;
2) It would be unfair to the legitimate children in terms of successional
rights;
3) There will be the problem of public scandal, unless social mores
change;
4) It is too violent to grant the privilege of legitimation to adulterous
children as it will destroy the sanctity of marriage;
5) It will be very scandalous, especially if the parents marry many years
after the birth of the child. (The Family Code, p. 252, Alicia v. Sempio Diy).
DE SANTOS VS ANGELES
G.R. No. 105619 December 12, 1995
– Under the Civil Code, children born of marriages which are void from the
beginning or after the decree of annulment in voidable marriages are
"natural children by legal fiction".
– The parents of the child could not validly marry because one had a prior
subsisting marriage. They did marry but their marriage was bigamous or
void from the beginning.
DE SANTOS VS ANGELES
G.R. No. 105619 December 12, 1995
– Art. 895. The legitime of each of the acknowledged natural children and
each of the natural children by legal fiction shall consist of one-half of
the legitime of each of the legitimate children or descendants