Topic 2
Topic 2
Topic 2
Zhongguang Ji
National Engineering Laboratory of Biohydrometallurgy, General Research Institute
for Nonferrous Metals, Beijing 100088, China
1. Introduction
Heavy metal wastewater is a common byproduct in heavy metal industries. Chemical precipitation is
commonly used to treat such wastewater. However, solid waste produced in the process of chemical
precipitation easily causes secondary pollution to the environment [1]. Besides, the loss of heavy metal
resources is also worth paying attention. Recovering water and heavy metal should be the target to
treat such wastewater. Thus, one kind of technology which can realize concentration and distillation is
necessary. Membrane distillation is such a technology exactly, which uses hydrophobic membrane
materials as separation membrane [2,3].
In contrast to reverse osmosis (RO), membrane distillation has better separation efficiency and
higher concentration ratio. Membrane distillation includes several operation modes. Vacuum
membrane distillation (VMD) is a very common operation mode in laboratory research [4].
At present, there is few work on the treatment of heavy metal wastewater by VMD. The heavy
metal wastewater has a lower pH and contains many heavy metal ions, such as Zn2+, Ni2+, Cr (VI), and
Fe (III) etc., as well as organic acids [5,6]. In consideration of the complexity of heavy metal
wastewater, investigating the effect of wastewater properties on vacuum membrane distillation is
significant.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
A kind of PTFE hollow membrane, which was provided by Zhejiang Dongda Environment
Engineering Co., Ltd, China, was chosen to fabricate hollow fiber membrane modules. The
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
ESMA 2017 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science1234567890
108 (2018) 042019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/108/4/042019
characteristics of the membrane are presented in Table 1. The effective membrane areas of all modules
in this work are 0.018 m2.
2.2. Methods
The VMD experimental equipment was self-made. A series of manual solutions as displayed in Table
2 containing all or part of Zn2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Ca2+and EDTA was prepared as the feed solution of VMD.
Then, a batch of experiments were conducted on the VMD system to investigate the influences of
wastewater properties on the VMD performance. Process parameters were set as below: feed
temperature 57℃, feed velocity 0.7 m·s-1, vacuum degree -93 KPa.
6
-1
Flux (kg•m •h )
-1
30
-2
20
4
3 10
2 0
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Time (h) Time (h)
Fig. 1 Effect of pH on permeate flux and conductivity in VMD process. (a, permeate flux; b, permeate
conductivity)
2
ESMA 2017 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science1234567890
108 (2018) 042019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/108/4/042019
The permeate flux is slightly decreasing with the varying of pH from 4.8 to 0 (Fig. 1a). The
permeate conductivity is slightly increasing with the varying of pH from 4.8 to 0 (Fig. 1b). What is
more, the permeate flux and conductivity are stable and keep at a good level in the whole process,
which indicates that high acidity has no significant influence on VMD performance. Based on PTFE
hollow fiber membrane, VMD process has a good acid resistance.
8 50 8 50
Flux
7 (a) Conductivity 7
(b) Flux
Conductivity
40 40
6 6
Conductivity (μS•cm )
-1
Conductivity(S.cm )
-1
Flux (kg•m •h )
Flux(kg.m .h )
5 5
-1
-1
30 30
-2
-2
4 4
3 20 3 20
2 2
10 10
1 1
0 0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Time (h) Time(h)
Fig. 2 Effect of calcium on permeate flux and conductivity in VMD process. (a, Ca2+ 100 mg∙L-1; b,
Ca2+ 500 mg∙L-1)
Fig. 2 shows that the permeate conductivity for both solution stay within 10 μS·cm-1 in the whole
process. However, for the solution with Ca2+ of 100 mg∙L-1, the permeate flux stays nearly 5.6 kg·m-
2 -1
·h , while the permeate flux drops 20% in the end of the whole process for the solution with Ca2+ of
500 mg∙L-1. It was observed that sediment produced in the process for the solution with Ca2+ of 500
mg∙L-1. the results indicate that high concentration of Ca2+ in wastewater is not advantage for VMD
process.
3
ESMA 2017 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science1234567890
108 (2018) 042019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/108/4/042019
8 150 8 150
Flux Flux
7 (a) Conductivity 7 Conductivity
120 120
6 6 (b)
Conductivity (μS•cm )
Conductivity(S.cm )
-1
-1
Flux (kg•m •h )
Flux (kg.m .h )
5 5
-1
-1
90 90
-2
-2
4 4
3 60 60
3
2 2
30 30
1 1
0 0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time(h) Time (h)
Fig. 3 Effect of EDTA on permeate flux and conductivity in VMD process. (a, no EDTA; b, EDTA
300 mg∙L-1)
Fig. 3 shows that EDTA has almost no influence on permeate flux, but has obvious effect on
permeate conductivity. For the solution with EDTA of 300 mg∙L-1, the permeate conductivity is up to
90.6 μS·cm-1 from 6.4 μS·cm-1 in the whole process. The results indicate that EDTA will cause VMD
performance worsen. The controlling of EDTA content in the wastewater is necessary for VMD
process.
4. Conclusion
VMD process was applied to deal with heavy metal wastewater. The effect of wastewater properties
containing pH, calcium and EDTA on VMD performance was investigated in this work. Based on
PTFE hollow fiber membrane, VMD process showed a good acid resistance as the solution pH above
0. However, calcium and EDTA had influence on VMD performance to some extent. The research
indicates that the controlling of calcium and EDTA content in the wastewater is necessary for VMD
process.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of
China (2014DFA90920).
References
[1] Wang T, Li X G, Du Q Y. Research progress in treatment technologies for heavy metal ion
containing wastewater. Environmental protection of chemical industry. 2008,28 (4):323-326.
[2] [2] Lawson KW, Lloyd DR. Membrane distillation [J]. Journal of Membrane Science.
1997,124 (1):1-25.
[3] Alkhudhiri A, Darwish N, Hilal N. Membrane distillation: A comprehensive review.
Desalination. 2012,287 (0):2-18.
[4] Liu J, Wu C R, Lv X L. Heat and mass transfer in vacuum membrane distillation. CIESC
Journal. 2011,62 (4):908-915.
[5] Fu F, Wang Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review [J]. Journal of
[6] Environmental Management. 2011,92 (3):407-418.
[7] Barakat MA. New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater [J]. Arabian
Journal of Chemistry. 2011,4 (4):361-377.