Development of Multiport Converter For Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Development of Multiport Converter For Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
org
ISSN (e): 2250-3021, ISSN (p): 2278-8719
PP 81-88
Abstract: This project presents a multiport converter with pulse width modulation (PWM) and phase shift
control for renewable energy systems. The proposed converter works on the principle of an interleaved boost
full bridge circuit. The advantages of zero voltage switching (ZVS) and zero current switching (ZCS) is applied
in this work. By this method the voltage regulation is improved and powerflow can be regulated. Power flow
between the inputs is controlled by duty cycle and voltage can be regulated via phase shift. Primary side
MOSFETs achieve ZVS and secondary side diodes operate under ZCS. This converter can operates on various
modes according to the availability of renewable energy source and load consumption. This topology has wide
applications in hybrid energy systems. Solar energy is taken as the renewable energy source and maximum
power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm is used to maximize the power delivered to the system. Simulation of the
converter with two input ports and one output port is carried out and results are presented.
Keywords: Hybrid energy systems, interleaved boost full bridge, multiport converter, phase shift control,
renewable energy.
I. Introduction
Renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, tidal, hydrogen etc. has been widely used to overcome
the current energy crisis. These sources are abundant in nature and can be used for supplying electricity
effectively. It can eliminate the pollution and are dependable in future. The use of a single renewable source for
powering the loads is not a accepted way. So for ensuring the proper energy transfer more number of renewable
sources are connected to a single system called as hybrid systems. Hybrid energy conversion systems are
applicable where average power demand is low and load dynamics are relatively high. Sometimes the power from
sources are more than that of load demand and so extra energy has to be stored in some energy storage units. In
contrast the load cannot be met by the sources in sometimes. Hence these energy storage devices need to be
power the loads. Thus energy storage units are needed in order to balance the electricity generation and
consumption within a power system. The variations in renewable energy results in power flow fluctuations. So
that power flow has to be controlled effectively.
For galvanic isolation, multiple converter and multiple port conversions are used. In multiple converter
conversion, power converters are connected in parallel or in series. In multiple port conversion, some components
and circuits can be shared as a common part along the conversion path. It has high power density and low cost
than that of multiple converter configurations. In general magnetic coupling method is used to obtain an isolated
multiple port converter. The converter can be constructed from the basic high frequency switching cells including
half bridge (HB), full bridge (FB), boost half bridge (BHB) and their combinations. A fully isolated three port
converter in earlier stages includes large number of power switches. Hence it results in high components cost. In
partially isolated multiport topologies, some of the input or output are fully isolated. But it requires only less
number of components. So they can be easily controlled due to it's simple structure.
The proposed converter configuration is derived from a ZVS half bridge (HB) inductive dc-dc
converter. The secondary rectifier diodes achieve ZCS and avoid reverse recovery losses. Voltage across the
diodes is clamped by the output capacitor C0. Secondary freewheeling current is also limited due to the absence of
a dc inductor. Both phase shift and duty cycle of the primary side MOSFET switches are simultaneously
controlled for obtaining power flow and voltage regulation.
The ac inductor current is chosen to be completely demagnetized for the analysis. Principle of operation
of the proposed converter can be described based on the six time intervals. During interval [0- t1], M2 and M3 are
conducting. L1 , L2 are charged and discharged respectively. Voltage across midpoints a and b is given by Vab = -
V2 and Vcd = -Vo. This interval is shown in fig.2. Lac is charged with
nVab – Vcd = -nV2 + V0
ILacpk = (-nV2 + V0 )ϕT / Lac (1)
Phase shift angle normalized to period
Φ = Ψ/2π (2)
Operating waveforms for the entire time intervals are shown in fig.3. During interval [t1 - t2] ,M4 is triggered
and L1 , L2 are charged.
In this interval volte across the transformer vab is clamped to zero and Lac is discharged with a slope by Vo.
Therefore, Vab = 0 , VLac = Vo. This interval is normalized to period b which is given by,
β = (nV2 - V0 )ϕ / V0 (3)
Lac discharge interval,
∆t = t2 – t1 = βT (4)
Emerging Research Trends in Electrical Engineering-2018 (ERTEE’18) 82 |Page
Adi Shankara Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kalady, Kerala
Development of Multiport Converter for Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
When iLac reaches zero, diodes stop conducting. The equivalent circuit is shown in fig.4.
where k is dimensionless and is dependent on output load, inductance and switching frequency. It is given in (8)
k = 2Lac / RLT (8)
In the completely demagnetized mode power flow from input to output port will be entirely controlled by f . If i Lac
does not decrease to zero before M2 is triggered, then the resultant mode is partially magnetized.
Boundary condition between completely magnetized and partially magnetized inductor current is given by,
∆t + ϕT ≤ (1-D)T (10)
On substituting (4) into (10)
Φ ≤ (1-D) / M (11)
Relation between input and output ports is defined as
M = nVab / Vcd = nV1 / (1-D) V0 = nV2 / V0 (12)
If iLac does not decrease to zero before M2 is turned off, then resultant mode will be fully magnetized.
Both partial and fully magnetized modes allow high power transfer to output. This is due to increased charge per
switching cycle delivered to output capacitor. But they results in higher current stress and higher losses than the
completely demagnetized mode. When converter leaves completely demagnetized mode , output voltage no
longer can be controlled by ϕ . Therefore the proposed converter works on completely demagnetized mode.
plotted. Proper gate pulses are given to the primary side switches by implementing suitable closed loop
feedback control scheme. To obtain voltage regulation at output port and powerflow balance in the converter,
both duty ratio and phase shift angle should be simultaneously adjusted. But it is a difficult task to be performed.
So an accurate microcontroller based feedback loop has to be implemented. The switching pulses for the
converter is developed by the closed loop control and waveforms are shown in fig.11.
ͦ
All switches are conducting for a duty cycle of 0.5 and phase shift angle is chosen to be 90. The
converter works in completely demagnetized mode and the waveform that shows this ac inductor current is
plotted in fig.12. The ac inductor current is in a range of 1.25A and is symmetrical in nature. Output voltage of
the converter is found to be constant and the magnitude is given as 50V. Output current and power of the
converter are found to be 0.5A, 25W respectively. They are shown in fig. 13.
VII. Conclusion
A TPC was designed and modelled as per the requirement. Simulation of the proposed converter was
done and results are shown. Design of feedback loop is on progress. The concept will help to extract renewable
energy from wind and solar with maximum efficiency even for low power applications. This converter is
applicable for hybrid renewable energy systems so that power flow fluctuations can be eliminated and balance the
power between different energy sources. It maximize the power delivered to the system through a maximum
power point tracking algorithm (MPPT). The overall energy utilization can be improved.
References
[1] H. Al-Atrash, F. Tian, and I. Batarseh, “Tri-modal half-bridge converter topology for three-port interface,” IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 341–345, Jan.
[2] Z. Zhang, R. Pittini, M. A. E. Andersen, and O. C. Thomsen, “A review and design of power electronics converters for fuel cell
hybrid system applications,” Energy Procedia, vol. 20, pp. 301–310, 2012.
[3] H. Wu, K. Sun, R. Chen, H. Hu, and Y. Xing, “Multiport converters based on integration of full-bridge and bidirectional DC–DC
topologies for renewable generation systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 856–869, Feb. 2014.
[4] H. Wu, J. Zhang, X. Qin, T. Mu, and Y. Xing, “Secondary-side-regulated soft-switching full-bridge three-port converter based on
bridgeless boost rectifier and bidirectional converter for multiple energy interface,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 31, no. 7,
pp. 4847–4860, Jul. 2016.
[5] W. Li, J. Xiao, Y. Zhao, and X. He, “PWM plus phase angle shift (PPAS) control scheme for combined multiport DC/DC
converters,” IEEE Trans.Power Electron., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1479–1489, Mar. 2012.
[6] X. Sun, Y. Shen, Y. Zhu, and X. Guo, “Interleaved boost-integrated LLC resonant converter with fixed-frequency PWM control for
renewable energy generation applications,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 4312–4326, Aug. 2015.
[7] Maria C. Mira, Zhe Zhang, Arnold Knott, and Michael A. E. Andersen, “Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Control of an
Interleaved-Boost Full-Bridge Three-Port Converter for Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems”, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON
POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 32, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2017.