STP Design PDF
STP Design PDF
STP Design PDF
(1) Drawings
A2-1
A2-2
A2-3
A2-4
A2-5
A2-6
A2-7
A2-8
A2-9
A2-10
A2-11
(2) Capacity Calculation
Inflow rate for our design will be determined the same value as Revised Master Plan.
According to Pipe construction plan, phased inflow rate are determined as follows
* Denitrification process is carried out in the future, does not perform immediate.
A2-12
(4) Wastewater Treatment Process
H W
Conduit Dimension 2,000mm x 1,500mm
A2-13
2. Process Flow Diagram
Wastewater Inflow
Coarse Screen
Fine Screen
Lift Pump
Grit chamber
Feed pump
Drum Screen
Pre-Aeration / MBR
to Dump site
A2-14
(4) Lift Pump
type Volute type mixed flow pump
capacity No.1 Diamater 700 mm 70m3/min
Pump head about 35 m (assumed value)
b) for Nitrification
Required unit oxygen for nitrification 64/14 kg-O2/kg-N
A2-15
(11) Available Land for STP
Available land is shown in Figure -1.
A2-16
Sludge Mass Balance Calculation Sheet
A2-17
tank Dsi 25.227t/d tank Dsi 12.609t/d
Conc. 125mg/L Conc. 124mg/L
A2-18
Maximum Daily Flow rate = -29.199 + 1.060 = -28.139 M = -29.199 + 0.669 = -28.530 M
Maximum hourly Flow rate = -29.199 + 1.371 = -27.828 M = -29.199 + 0.833 = -28.366 M
2. Inlet Gate
Invert Elevation = -30.000 M (above sea level) = -30.000 M (above sea level)
Gate Width = 0.800 m = 0.800 m
Gate Height = 2.000 m = 2.000 m
Number of Gate = 4 Nos. = 2 Nos.
Passing Velocity
Avegrage Daily Flow rate = 2.315 /( 0.80 x 1.707 x 4 ) = 0.424 m/s = 1.157 /( 0.80 x 1.381 x 2 ) = 0.524 m/s
Maximum hourly Flow rate = 4.630 /( 0.80 x 2.172 x 4 ) = 0.666 m/s = 2.315 /( 0.80 x 1.634 x 2 ) = 0.885 m/s
Item Final Phase Calculation Phase 1 Calculation
3. Screen
3.1 Coarse Screen
Openning = 100 mm = 100 mm
Type = Manual Rake = Manual Rake
Bottom Elevation = -30.050 M = -30.050 M
Channel width = 2.000 m = 2.000 m
Number of Screen = 4 Nos. = 2 Nos.
Approch water depth
Avegrage Daily Flow rate = -28.307 - -30.050 = 1.743 m = -28.640 - -30.050 = 1.410 m
Maximum hourly Flow rate = -27.862 - -30.050 = 2.188 m = -28.426 - -30.050 = 1.624 m
Approch velocity
Avegrage Daily Flow rate = 2.315 / ( 2.00 x 1.743 x 4) = 0.166 m/s = 1.157 / ( 2.00 x 1.410 x 2 )= 0.205 m/s
Maximum hourly Flow rate = 4.630 / ( 2.00 x 2.188 x 4) = 0.265 m/s = 2.315 / ( 2.00 x 1.624 x 2 )= 0.356 m/s
A2-19
Headloss at coarse screen = neglect = neglect
4. Lift Pump
Type Vertical shaft Volute type mixed flow pump
Pump Capacity
Number of Pump 䋽 4 nos 䋽 2 nos
4 70 3 2 70 3
Pump Capacity 䋽 278.0 / 䋽 䋽 139.0 / 䋽
A2-20
m /min m /min
Pump Diameter 䋽 146 㬍 ( 70.0 / 3 )^0.5 䋽 705 䋽 146 㬍 ( 70.0 / 3 )^0.5 䋽 705
䋽 700 mm 䋽 700 mm
Pump Head
Discharge water level 䋽 5.500 M 䋽 5.500 M
Suction water level 䋽 -27.500 M 䋽 -27.800 M
Actual Pump Head 䋽 5.500 䋭 -27.500 䋽 33.000 m 䋽 5.500 䋭 -27.800 䋽 33.300 m
Others head loss 䋽 2.000 m ( assumed) 䋽 2.000 m ( assumed)
Motor output 㱝 㬍 䌧 㬍 Q 㬍 H
㪧㪔 㬍 䋨 1䋫 㱍 䋩
60 㬍 1000 㬍 㱓
Item Final Phase Calculation Phase 1 Calculation
㱝 䋺
Water Density 1,000 kg/m3
g 䋺
Acceleration of Gravity 9.8 m/sec2
Q 䋺
Flow rate 70 m3/min
H 䋺
Pump head 35.00 m
㱓 䋺 Pump Efficiency 0.8
㱍 䋺 Surplus ratio 0.15
Lift Pimp Specification Type Vertical shaft Volute type mixed flow pump Type Vertical shaft Volute type mixed flow pump
Diamater 700 mm Diamater 700 mm
Capacity 70 m3/min Capacity 70 m3/min
Pump Head 35.00 m Pump Head 35.30 m
Motor output 580 kW Motor output 580 kW
Numbers 5 nos ( Include 1 stand-by) Numbers 3 nos ( Include 1 stand-by)
A2-21
5. Grit Chamber
Type Aerated Grit Chamber Aerated Grit Chamber
Design Flow rate
3 3
Avegrage Daily Flow rate 䋽 264,000 m /d 䋽 132,000 m /d
3 3
Maximum hourly Flow rate 䋽 400,000 m /d 䋽 200,000 m /d
3 3
Required Volume 䋽 400,000 ÷ 1,440 㬍 3 䋽 834 m 䋽 200,000 ÷ 1,440 㬍 3 䋽 417 m
3 3
Required Chamber Volume (each) 䋽 834 ÷ 4 䋽 209 m 䋽 417 ÷ 2 䋽 209 m
Item Final Phase Calculation Phase 1 Calculation
Total Air supply required 䋽 5.3 㬍 4 䋽 21.2 m3 /min 䋽 5.3 㬍 2 䋽 10.6 m3 /min
Airation Blower
Number of Blower 䋽 2 㫌㫅㫀㫋㫊 䋽 1 㫌㫅㫀㫋
3 3
Blower capacity 䋽 11 m /min 䋽 11 m /min
Discharge Pressure
Diffuser Depth 䋽 3,000 㫄㫄㪘㫈 䋽 3,000 㫄㫄㪘㫈
Loss of Diffuser 䋽 750 㫄㫄㪘㫈 䋽 750 㫄㫄㪘㫈
Other loss 䋽 500 㫄㫄㪘㫈 䋽 500 㫄㫄㪘㫈
A2-22
Total Pressure 䋽 4,250 㫄㫄㪘㫈 = 42 kpa 䋽 4,250 㫄㫄㪘㫈 = 42 kpa
Blower Specification
Type 䋽 Rotary Roots Blower 䋽 Rotary Roots Blower
Diameter 䋽 㪈㪌㪇 mm 䋽 㪈㪌㪇 mm
3 3
Capacity 䋽 11 m /min 䋽 11 m /min
Discharge Pressure 䋽 42 kpa 䋽 42 kpa
Motor Output 䋽 22 kW 䋽 22 kW
Qantity 䋽 3 units ( including stand-by 1 unit) 䋽 2 units ( including stand-by 1 unit)
5. Equalizer Tank
Constant rate Pump Install Five (5) Pumps per twe (2) tanks
A2-23
3
Pump capacity = 200,000 / 20 / 1,440 䋽 6.9 m /min = 100,000 / 8 / 1,440 䋽 8.7 m3 /min
Pump diameter = 146 㬍 㺕䋨 6.9 / 2.5 䋩 䋽 243 㫄㫄 = 146 㬍 㺕䋨 8.7 / 3 䋩 䋽 249 㫄㫄
䋽 250 mm 䋽 250 mm
Pump Specification
Type = Nonclogging pump = Nonclogging pump
Diameter = 250 䌭䌭 = 250 䌭䌭
3 3
Capacity = 6.9 m /min = 8.7 m /min
Head = 14 䌭 = 14 䌭
Motor output = 37 䌫㪮 = 37 䌫㪮
Numbers = 24 nos. (including 4 standby) = 12 nos. (including 2 standby)
A2-24
6. Disinfection Tank
3 3
Design Flow (maximum) = 200,000 m /d = 100,000 m /d
Retention Time = 5 min = 5 min
3 3
Required Tank volume = 200,000 / 1,440 㬍 5 = 694 m = 100,000 / 1,440 㬍 5 = 347 m
Tank size Width = 1.20 m = 1.20 m
Length = 70.0 m = 70.0 m
Depth = 2.10 m = 2.10 m
number = 4 tanks = 2 tanks
3 3
Actual tank volume = 706 m = 353 m
Dosage Capacity
Maximum consunption q = Q 㬍 Į 㬍 10-6 㬍 ( 100 / ȕ ) 㬍 ( 1/ Ȗ ) = Q 㬍 Į 㬍 10-6 㬍 ( 100 / ȕ ) 㬍 ( 1 / Ȗ)
= 200,000 㬍 0.00001 㬍 ( 100 / 10 ) 㬍 ( 1 / 1.1 ) = 100,000 㬍 0.00001 㬍 ( 100 / 10 ) 㬍 ( 1 / 1.1 )
3 3
= 18.18 m /d = 12.6 L/min = 9.09 m /d = 6.3 L/min
A2-25
Item Final Phase Calculation Phase 1 Calculation
3 3
Design flow rate = 200,000 m /d = 100,000 m /d
0.42 3 2 0.42 3 2
Design Flux = m /m /d = m /m /d
200,000 2 100,000
Required Area of Membrane 㪔 / 0.42 㪔 476,190 m 㪔 / 0.42 㪔 238,095 m2
2 2
Membrane Area per unit 㪔 600 m /unit 㪔 600 m /unit
Required number of Membrane unit 㪔 476,190 / 600 㪔 794 nos 㪔 238,095 / 600 㪔 397 nos
Number of Basin 㪔 20 basins 㪔 20 basins
Number of Membrane unit per basin 㪔 794 / 20 㪔 40 units 㪔 397 / 20 㪔 20 units
Membrane unit size
Length 㪔 1,288 mm 㪔 1,288 mm
Width 㪔 1,687 mm 㪔 1,687 mm
Depth 㪔 2,852 mm 㪔 2,852 mm
250 㩿㫄㪸㫉㪾㫀㫅㪀
A2-26
1,288 1,800
250 㩿㫄㪸㫉㪾㫀㫅㪀
1,687
400 400
㩿㫄㪸㫉㪾㫀㫅㪀 㩿㫄㪸㫉㪾㫀㫅㪀
2,500
A2-27
Excess sludge production rate = 100 % = 100 %
Nitrogen concentration in sludge = 6 % = 6 %
Nitrogen in excess sludge = 200,000 㬍 120 㬍 0.06 / 1,000 = 1,440 kg/d = 100,000 㬍 120 㬍 0.06 / 1,000 = 720 kg/d
T-N load for nitrification = 8,000 - 1,440 㪔 6,560 kg/d = 4,000 - 720 㪔 3,280 kg/d
Nitrification rate = 0.037 kg-N/kg-SS/d (25 degrees C) = 0.037 kg-N/kg-SS/d (25 degrees C)
MLSS in MBR tank 㪔 9,000 mg/L = 9,000 mg/L
Nitrification rate per unit volume 㪔 0.037 㬍 9,000 / 1,000 㪔 0.33 kg-N/m3 㪔 0.037 㬍 9,000 / 1,000 㪔 0.33 kg-N/m3
Nitrification in MBR tank 㪔 19,600 㬍 0.33 㪔 6,527 kg-N/d -OK- 㪔 9,000 㬍 0.33 㪔 2,997 kg-N/d
A2-28
19,600 3 9,800 3
Pre-aeration tank Volume 㪔 m 㪔 m
19,600 3 9,800 3
Total tank Volume 㪔 m 㪔 m
MLSS in tank 㪔 9,000 mg/L 㪔 9,000 mg/L
MLVSS/MLSS 㪔 0.75 㪔 0.75
Quantity of MLVSS 㪔 9,000 㬍 19,600 㬍 0.750 / 㪈㪃㪇㪇㪇 㪔 9,000 㬍 9,800 㬍 0.750 / 㪈㪃㪇㪇㪇
= 132,300 kg/d 㪔 66,150 kg/d
Required unit Oxygen for endogenous respiration 㪔 0.12 kg-O2 /kg-VSS 㪔 0.12 kg-O2 /kg-VSS
Required Oxygen for endogenous respiration 㪔 132,300 㬍 0.12 㪔 15,876 kg-O2 /d 㪔 66,150 㬍 0.12 㪔 7,938 kg-O2 /d
1)-4 Total required Oxygen for biological treatment 㪔 12,000 + 29,989 + 15,876 = 57,865 kg-O2 /d 㪔 6,000 + 14,994 + 7,938 = 28,932 kg-O2 /d
(AOR)
A2-29
1)-6 Required Air Volime (Gs)
SOR 㪉㪎㪊㩷㪂㩷㪫
Gs 㪔 ×
EA 㬍 ȡ 㬍 Ow 273
917,321 3 458,654 3
㪔 Nm /d 㪔 Nm /d
637 3 319 3
㪔 Nm /min 㪔 Nm /min
32 3 32 3
㪔 Nm /min/each tank 㪔 Nm /min/each tank
Item Final Phase Calculation Phase 1 Calculation
2) Air volume for Membrane air scrubbing
0.18 3 0.18 3
Air volume of one(1) membrane unit 㪔 Nm /min/module x 20module/unit 㪔 Nm /min/module x 20module/unit
3 3
㪔 3.6 Nm /min/unit 㪔 3.6 Nm /min/unit
Number of unit 㪔 800 units 㪔 400 units
Total Air volume for membrane 㪔 800 㬍 3.6 = 2,880 Nm3 /min 㪔 400 㬍 3.6 = 1,440 Nm3 /min
3 3
㪔 144 Nm /min/each tank 㪔 144 Nm /min/each tank
7. Aeration Blowers
A2-30
for MBR Tank N 㪔 4 unit 㪔 4 unit
A2-31
2,719 3 1.9 3 1,359 3 0.9 3
Drawing Sludge Volume = m /d = m /min = m /d = m /min
8.2 Required number of Dehydrater = 24.462 / 0.32 / 23 = 3.3 = 4 nos = 12.237 / 0.32 / 23 = 1.7 = 2 nos
Type = Pressing Rotary Outer Cylinder-type Screw Press (Hybrid type) = Pressing Rotary Outer Cylinder-type Screw Press (Hybrid type)
Screen Diameter = 800 mm = 800 mm
A2-32
Input Sludge Concentration = 0.9 % = 0.9 %
Filtration rate = 320 kg-DS/hr = 320 kg-DS/hr
Operation time = 23 hr/d = 23 hr/d
Dosage type = Organic Polymer (Cation) = Organic Polymer (Cation)
Dosage rate = 1.7 % = 1.7 %
Total Motor power = 1.7 kW/1 unit = 1.7 kW/1 unit
Numbers = 5 nos. including 1 standby = 3 nos. including 1 standby
(3) Main Equipment List
4 Lift pump Vertical shaft Volute type mixed flow pump 3 2 5 570 Include 1 standby
700mm x 70.0m3/min x 34.5mH
A2-33
Facility : Equalization Tank Facility
Quantity
Motor
Final Phase
No. Equipment Brief Spec. output Remarks
Phase I Expan-
Total (kW)
sion
1 Inflow weir gate Manual operation cast iron weir type gate 16 16 32
0.6 mW x 0.6 mH
4 Aeration Blower Turbo Blower (single stage oilless) 5 5 10 220 Phase1 including 1 standby
for BOD removal 120m3/min x 68kps Final phase including 2 standby
7 Aeration Blower Turbo Blower (single stage oilless) 7 7 14 450 Phase1 including 11 standby
for membrane scrubbing 245m3/min x 64kps Final phase including 2 standby
9 Excess Sludge Pump Non-clog type Sludge Pump 4 4 8 11 Phase1 including 2 standby
Final phase including 2 standby
A2-34
Facility : Disinfection Facility
Quantity
Motor
Final Phase
No. Equipment Brief Spec. Phase output Remarks
Expan-
I Total (kW)
sion
1 Sodium hypochlorite Fiberglass plastic construction 2 2 4
storage tank cylindrical tank 10m3
A2-35
(4) Hydraulic Calculation
1. Basic Conditions
㧔㧠㧕Inflow Pipe
Pipe Diameterޓޓ ij2,200mm
㧔㧡㧕Discharge
River BANJIL KANAL
Design High Water Level +4.30 M
A2-36
2. Water Mass Balance
QDA= 2,581
Excess Sludge
QDA= 400,000
Return Sludge
A2-37
Inflow QDA= 200,000 QDA= 202,581 Screen & QDA= 202,581 QDA= 202,581 Grit QDA= 202,581 Equalization Distribution QDA= 200,000 QDA= 600,000 QDA= 600,000 QDA= 197,282 Permeate
Lift Pump Anoxic Tank Aerobic Tank MBR Tank
Pipe QDM= 264,000 QDM= 266,581 Lift Pump QDM= 266,581 QDM= 266,581 Chamber QDM= 266,581 Tank Pump QDM= 200,000 QDM= 600,000 QDM= 600,000 QDM= 197,282 Pump
QHM= 400,000 QHM= 402,581 QHM= 402,581 QHM= 402,581 QHM= 402,581 QHM= 200,000 QHM= 600,000 QHM= 600,000 QHM= 197,282
QDA= 199,863
Discharge
QDM= 263,863
QHM= 399,863
㧽DA㧦Daily Average Flow㧔m3㧛day㧕
㧽DM㧦Daily Maximum Flow㧔m3㧛day㧕
㧽HM㧦Hourly Peak Flow in three units operating㧔m3㧛day㧕
Point 㨇Discharge Conduit (1)㨉̪ޓGravity flow
Formula:Manning
Case
Content Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 200,000 400,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 2.315 4.630
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 1 2
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 2.315 2.315
H Outflow 2
(㨙) 0.054 0.054 1.0*(V /2g)*(Nm+1)
E
A
Friction (㨙) 0.007 0.007 I*L
D
L
O
2
S Inflow (㨙) 0.027 0.027 0.5*(V /2g)*(Nm+1)
S
Total (㨙) h 0.088 0.088
A2-38
Point 㨇Discharge Conduit (2)㨉̪ޓGravity flow
Formula:Manning
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 100,000 200,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 1.157 2.315
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 1 1
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 1.157 2.315
3
Velocity (m /s) V 0.514 1.029 p/A
2/3 2
Hydraulic Gradient (‰) I 0.191 0.767 (n*V/R )
A2-39
Point 㨇Discharge Channel (1)㨉̪ޓGravity flow
Formula:Manning
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 0 50,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 0 0.579
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 1 1
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 0.000 0.579
3
Velocity (m /s) V 0 0.273 p/A
2/3 2
Hydraulic Gradient (‰) I 0.000 0.049 (n*V/R )
L
O
2
S Inflow (㨙) 0.000 0.002 0.5*(V /2g)*(Nm+1)
S
Total (㨙) h 0 0.01
A2-40
Point 㨇Discharge Channel (2)㨉̪ޓGravity flow
Formula:Manning
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 0 50,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 0 0.579
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 1 1
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 0.000 0.579
3
Velocity (m /s) V 0 0.272 p/A
2/3 2
Hydraulic Gradient (‰) I 0.000 0.048 (n*V/R )
L
O
2
S Inflow (㨙) 0.000 0.002 0.5*(V /2g)*(Nm+1)
S
Total (㨙) h 0 0.007
A2-41
Point 㨇Discharge Channel (3)㨉̪ޓGravity flow
Formula:Manning
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 0 25,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 0 0.289
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 1 1
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 0.000 0.289
3
Velocity (m /s) V 0 0.135 p/A
2/3 2
Hydraulic Gradient (‰) I 0.000 0.012 (n*V/R )
L
O
2
S Inflow (㨙) 0.000 0.000 0.5*(V /2g)*(Nm+1)
S
Total (㨙) h 0 0.001
A2-42
Point 㨇Equalization Tank㨉ޓOutflow Though
Formula㧦Thomas Gump
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 0 50,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 0.000 0.579
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 16 16
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 0 0.0361875
Schematic
Diagram
2 2 1/3
Critical depth (㨙) hc 0 0.094 (q /9.8*B )
Upper
Water Depth (㨙) ho 0.000 0.163 л3*hc
Lower
Water Level (㧹) Ho +4.446 +4.640
H
E
A
D
L
O
S
S
A2-43
Point 㨇Equalization Tank㨉ޓOutflow V-notch
Formula㧦Thompson
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 0 50,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 0 0.579
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 1040 1040
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 0.000 55.673
Schematic
Diagram
Lower
Water Level (㧹) Ho +4.700 +4.863
Complete
Overflow (㨙) h 0 0.043 (q/1.42)^(2/5)
W D
A E
T P
E T
R H
A2-44
Point 㨇Equalization Tank 㨉 Inflow gate
Formula:Manning
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 50,000 100,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 0.579 1.157
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 8 8
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 0.072 0.145
Schematic
Diagram
2
H Outflow (㨙) 0.007 0.023 1.0*(V /2g)*1
E
A
D
L
O
S
S 2
Inflow (㨙) 0.003 0.011 0.5*(V /2g)*(Nm+1)
A2-45
Point 㨇Equalization Tank 㨉 Distribution Channel (1)
Formula:Manning
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 25,000 50,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 0.289 0.579
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 1 1
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 0.289 0.579
3
Velocity (m /s) V 0.213 0.395 p/A
2/3 2
Hydraulic Gradient (‰) I 0.029 0.096 (n*V/R )
H
E
A
Friction (㨙) 0.000 0.002 I*L
D
L
O
S
S
Total (㨙) h 0 0.002
A2-46
Point 㨇Equalization Tank 㨉 Distribution Channel (2)
Formula:Manning
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 50,000 100,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 0.579 1.157
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 1 1
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 0.579 1.157
3
Velocity (m /s) V 0.427 0.788 p/A
2/3 2
Hydraulic Gradient (‰) I 0.117 0.381 (n*V/R )
H
E
A
Friction (㨙) 0.002 0.006 I*L
D
L
O
2
S Inflow (㨙) 0.005 0.016 0.5*(V /2g)*(Nm+1)
S
Total (㨙) h 0.007 0.022
A2-47
Point 㨇Equalization Tank to Grit chamer㨉 Connection conduit (1)
Formula:Manning
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 100,000 200,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 1.157 2.315
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 1 1
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 1.157 2.315
3
Velocity (m /s) V 0.514 1.029 p/A
2/3 2
Hydraulic Gradient (‰) I 0.191 0.767 (n*V/R )
L
O
2
S Inflow (㨙) 0.007 0.027 0.5*(V /2g)*(Nm+1)
S
Total (㨙) h 0.028 0.113
A2-48
Point 㨇Grit Chamber㨉ޓOutfall weir
Formula㧦Francis
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 200,000 400,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 2.315 4.63
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 4 4
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 0.579 1.158
Schematic
Diagram
Lower
Water Level (㧹) Ho +4.938 +5.114
Complete
Overflow (㨙) h 0.222 0.353 (q/1.84*L)^(2/3)
W D
A E
T P
E T
R H
A2-49
Point 㨇Grit Chamber㨉ޓInflow Channel
Formula:Manning
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 200,000 400,000
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 2.315 4.630
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 4 4
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 0.579 1.158
3
Velocity (m /s) V 0.407 0.746 p/A
2/3 2
Hydraulic Gradient (‰) I 0.144 0.465 (n*V/R )
L
O
2
S Inflow (㨙) 0.004 0.014 0.5*(V /2g)*(Nm+1)
S
Total (㨙) h 0.013 0.044
Pump Discharge Well
Water Level (㧹) H +5.435 +5.597 Ho+h
A2-50
Point 㨇Grit Chamber㨉ޓInflow Channel
Formula㧦Francis
Case
Contents Symbol
㧽DM 㧽HM
3
(m /d) 150,000 200,000 QDM=Q*1/4, QHM=Q*1/3
Flowrate Q
3
(m /s) 1.736 2.315
Number of pipes (pipe) 㨚 2 2
3
Flowrate/pipe (m /s) 㨝 0.868 1.158
Schematic
Diagram
Lower
Water Level (㧹) Ho +5.422 +5.553
Complete
Overflow (㨙) h 0.962 1.165 (q/1.84*L)^(2/3)
W D
A E
T P
E T
R H
A2-51
3. Results of Survey for Affordability and WTP of Household
ޣOutline of Affordability Surveyޤ
Role of Sewerage System: to improve sanitation and public health, to mitigate storm water inundation,
to conserve water environment and water resource, and to create aesthetic urban view and amenity
spot
WTP (Willingness to Pay): to evaluate the willingness to pay examined by statistical analysis of
contingent valuation, CVM questionnaire survey
A3-1
(Reference)
Table-2 Sample Number of household of PD PAL Jaya customers classified in monthly income.
Group Type A Type B Type C Type D Total
A3-2
(Reference No. )
Q-1
Which is your water supply? ( ) Piped(Tap) water ( ) Well ( ) Both
How much do you pay for water supply? IDR/month
How many and how much pay of 5 gallon-bottled water? bottles IDR/month
Q-2
Do you know water pollution caused by wastewater discharge of household and municipality
activities?
Yes( ) No( )
Q-3
Do you know the role of sewerage system as followings?
Yes( ) No( )
Roles of sewerage system:
to improve sanitation and public health,
to mitigate storm water inundation,
to conserve water environment and water resource, and
to create aesthetic urban view and amenity spot
A3-3
Part-2 Affordability Survey and WTP (Willingness to Pay) Survey
Please answer to Q-4 and Q-5&6, on the assumption that water environment is polluted and
sewerage system restores as follows.
㪩㪼㫃㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅㩷㪹㪼㫋㫎㪼㪼㫅㩷㫎㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㫈㫌㪸㫃㫀㫋㫐㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃㩷㪸㫅㪻㩷㫎㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㫃㫀㪽㪼
Present water environment is (D-level)
㪛㩷㪄㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃
Polluted and offensive odor
㪚㫃㪼㪸㫅㩷㩷㩷㩷㸠䇭䇭䇭䇭㩷㩷㪮㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㫈㫌㪸㫃㫀㫋㫐㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃㩷䇭䇭䇭㩷㸢㩷㩷㩷㪧㫆㫃㫃㫌㫋㪼㪻
Debris deposits 㪧㫆㫃㫃㫌㫋㪼㪻
㪦㪽㪽㪼㫅㫊㫀㫍㪼㩷㫆㪻㫆㫉
Unhygienic and caused habitual diarrhea
Fishable㧔B㧕
㪙㩷㵨㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃
㪩㪸㫀㫊㪼㩷㫋㫆㩷㫇㫃㪸㫐㫀㫅㪾㩷㫀㫅
㫎㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㪆㪹㫀㫆㪄
㪻㫀㫍㪼㫉㫊㫀㫋㫐㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃
㪘㩷㵨㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃
㪩㪸㫀㫊㪼㩷㫋㫆
㫊㫎㫀㫄㫄㪸㪹㫃㪼
ޣAffordability Surveyޤ
Q-4: How much do you pay? Please refer Figure and check ( ) ܂one from (1) through (10).
(1) BFT: Basic food stuffs
(2) H&O: Housing & household operation
(3) FTP: Fuel, transport & public service
(4) A&T: Alcohol & tobacco
(5) N-C: Non-consumables
(6) A&F: Apparel & foot ware
(7) MED: Medicine
(8) REC: Recreation
(9) Others
(10) No
A3-4
ޣWTP, Willingness to Pay, Surveyޤ
Do you pay for sewerage service? IDR/month 1st Bound Amount of Table-1
Please check ( ) ܂
Yes( ) No( )
IDR/month IDR/month
nd
“Yes” 2 Bound Amount Table-1 “No” 2nd Bound Amount Table-1
A3-5
㪟 㫆 㫌 㫊㪼 㪿 㫆 㫃㪻㩷 㪪㫌 㫉㫍㪼 㫐㩷 㩿 㪈 㪆 㪋 㪀
㪝㫃㫆 㫆 㫉 㪟㫆 㫌 㫊 㪼 㪿 㫆 㫃㪻 㪟㫆 㫌 㫊㪼 㪿 㫆 㫃㪻
㪝㪸㫄㫀㫃㫐 㪘㫉㪼 㪸 㪘㫊㫊㪼 㫋 㩷㪫 㪸㫏
㪥㫆㪅 㪢㪼 㪺 㪸㫄㪸㫋㪸㫅 㪢㪼 㫃㫌 㫉㪸㪿 㪸㫅 㪠 㫅 㪺 㫆 㫄㪼 㪜㫏 㫇㪼 㫅 㪻㫀㫋 㫌 㫉 㪼
㩿㪠㪛㪩㪆 㫐㪼 㪸㫉 㪀
㪤㪼 㫄㪹㪼 㫉
㩿 㫄㪉㪀 㩿㪠 㪛㪩 㪆 㫄 㫆 㫅 㫋 㪿 㪀 㩿㪠 㪛㪩 㪆 㫄㫆 㫅 㫋 㪿 㪀
A3-6
㪟㫆㫌 㫊㪼 㪿 㫆㫃㪻㩷 㪪㫌 㫉㫍㪼 㫐㩷 㩿 㪉 㪆 㪋 㪀
A3-7
㪟 㫆 㫌 㫊㪼 㪿 㫆 㫃㪻㩷 㪪㫌 㫉㫍㪼 㫐㩷 㩿 㪊 㪆 㪋 㪀
㪈 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪉 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪊 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪋 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪌 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪍 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪎 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪏 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪐 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪈㪇 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪈㪈 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪈㪉 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪈㪊 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪈㪋 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪈㪌 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪈㪍 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪈㪎 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪈㪏 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪈㪐 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪉㪇 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪉㪈 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪉㪉 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪉㪊 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪉㪋 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪉㪌 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪉㪍 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪉㪎 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪉㪏 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪉㪐 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪊㪇 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪊㪈 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪊㪉 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪊㪊 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪊㪋 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪊㪌 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪊㪍 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪊㪎 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪊㪏 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪊㪐 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪋㪇 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪋㪈 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪋㪉 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪋㪊 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪋㪋 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪋㪌 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪋㪍 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪋㪎 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪋㪏 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪋㪐 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪌㪇 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪌㪈 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪌㪉 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪌㪊 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪌㪋 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪌㪌 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪌㪍 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪌㪎 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪌㪏 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪌㪐 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪍㪇 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪍㪈 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪍㪉 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪍㪊 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪍㪋 㪈 㪈 㪈
㪍㪌 㪈 㪈 㪈
A3-8
㪟 㫆 㫌 㫊㪼 㪿 㫆 㫃㪻㩷 㪪㫌 㫉㫍㪼 㫐㩷 㩿 㪋 㪆 㪋 㪀
㪈 㪈 㪈 㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪉 㪈 㪈 㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪊 㪈 㪈 㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪋 㪈 㪈 㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪌 㪈 㪈 㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪍 㪈 㪈 㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪎 㪈 㪈 㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪏 㪈 㪈 㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪐 㪈 㪈 㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪇 㪈 㪈 㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪈 㪈 㪈 㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪉 㪈 㪈 㪈㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪊 㪈 㪈 㪈㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪋 㪈 㪈 㪈㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪌 㪈 㪈 㪈㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪍 㪈 㪈 㪈㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪎 㪈 㪈 㪈㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪏 㪈 㪈 㪈㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪈㪐 㪈 㪈 㪈㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪇 㪈 㪈 㪈㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪈 㪈 㪈 㪈㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪉 㪈 㪈 㪈㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪊 㪈 㪈 㪈㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪋 㪈 㪈 㪈㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪌 㪈 㪈 㪈㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪍 㪈 㪈 㪈㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪎 㪈 㪈 㪈㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪏 㪈 㪈 㪈㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪉㪐 㪈 㪈 㪈㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪊㪇 㪈 㪈 㪈㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪊㪈 㪈 㪈 㪈㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪊㪉 㪈 㪈 㪈㪌㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪊㪊 㪈 㪈 㪉㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪊㪋 㪈 㪈 㪉㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪊㪌 㪈 㪈 㪉㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪊㪍 㪈 㪈 㪉㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪊㪎 㪈 㪈 㪉㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪊㪏 㪈 㪈 㪉㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪊㪐 㪈 㪈 㪉㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪇 㪈 㪈 㪉㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪈 㪈 㪈 㪉㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪉 㪈 㪈 㪉㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪊 㪈 㪈 㪉㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪋 㪈 㪈 㪊㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪌 㪈 㪈 㪊㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪍 㪈 㪈 㪊㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪎 㪈 㪈 㪊㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪏 㪈 㪈 㪊㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪋㪐 㪈 㪈 㪊㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪌㪇 㪈 㪈 㪊㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪌㪈 㪈 㪈 㪊㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪌㪉 㪈 㪈 㪊㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪌㪊 㪈 㪈 㪊㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪌㪋 㪈 㪈 㪊㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪌㪌 㪈 㪈 㪌㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪌㪍 㪈 㪈 㪌㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪌㪎 㪈 㪈 㪌㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪌㪏 㪈 㪈 㪌㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪌㪐 㪈 㪈 㪌㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪍㪇 㪈 㪈 㪌㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪍㪈 㪈 㪈 㪌㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪍㪉 㪈 㪈 㪌㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪍㪊 㪈 㪈 㪌㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪍㪋 㪈 㪈 㪌㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
㪍㪌 㪈 㪈 㪌㪇㪃㪇㪇㪇
A3-9
Household Income
Average: 3,000,000 IDR/HH/month
Mean Value: 2,000,000 IDR/HH/month
75 % of Existing Survey “5,295 USD㧔2008, Mizuho Research Institute.” which does not include
apartment
A3-10
Property Tax Rate on Household Expenditure
Average: 0.8%
Mean Value: 0.8%
A3-11
Water Supply Cost of Tap water and Bottled water
Average monthly cost: 124,500 IDR/HH/month, Mean value: 124,000 IDR/HH/month
Tap water: 76.300 IDR/HH/month Bottled water: 48,200 IDR/HH/month
Rate of Water supply cost of Tap water & Bottled water on Household expenditure
Average: 6.5% (Tap water 4.1 % and Bottled water 2.4 %)
Mean vale: 5.5%
Water supply cost (Average) is 124,000 IDR/HH/month
A3-12
Sewerage tariff rate per Household expenditure
Average: 0.33%×HH Exp.
Range: 0.1㨪1.6 %×HH Exp.
㧔Estimated by Existing Tariff System㧕
A3-13
Sewerage tariff rate per Household expenditure classified by floor area
Average: 0.41%×HH Exp.
Less than average floor area (63㨙2): 1.0% ×HH Exp.
Less than mean value (50m2): 0.5%×HH Exp.
A3-14
Sewerage tariff rate vs. Water supply cost
Sewerage tariff rate is equivalent to 2.8% of water supply cost plus 4,400 IDR.
Sewerage tariff per water supply㧦Average 11% Mean value 5%
High rate tariff household㧦House owner of large house area more than 200m2.
Only shallow well user (2HH of surveyed 65HH): Sewerage tariff is newly levied , accordingly
poverty mitigation is required.
A3-15
Understanding on Water pollution source
Yes “understanding” : 78% No “not understanding” : 22%
Respondents range over low income to high income.
Understanding on Sewerage
Yes “understanding” : 68% No “not understanding” : 32%
Respondents range over low income to high income.
A3-16
CVMSurvey
A3-17
Affordability Survey
Among respondents of 65 HH,
Yes “have willingness”: 78.5% of Alcohol & tobacco, medicine and recreation.
Most frequent response is “Others”.
No “have not willingness” : 21.5%
AFT㧦Approx. 1.0-1.5% of household expenditure.
Q-4 (ATP)
Responded
BFT H&O FTP A&T N-C A&F MED REC OTHERS NO
Nos.& %
Total = 65 0 13 1 4 3 3 5 4 18 14
% 0 0.2 0.015 0.062 0.046 0.046 0.077 0.062 0.277 0.215
Questionnaire
(1) BFT: Basic food stuffs
(2) H&O: Housing & household
operation
(3) FTP: Fuel, transport & public
service
(4) A&T: Alcohol & tobacco
(5) N-C: Non-consumables
(6) A&F: Apparel & foot ware
(7) MED: Medicine
(8) REC: Recreation
(9) Others
(10) No
Affordability (Conclusion)
x Sewerage tariff (Ave. 7,900 IDR/HH㧕 is 2.4 % of water supply cost (Tap water & Bottled
water) of 124,000 IDR. Water supply cost is 6.5% of HH expenditure.
x AFT & WTP is estimated to apprx. 1% of HH expenditure through existing surveies in
overseas.
x No willingness is approx. 20% of respondents.
x Sewerage tariff level is estimated to 0.41% of household expenditure and less than 1.6% for
99% of respodents. Sewerage tariff levy requires poverty mitigation.
A3-18
4㧚 Results of Survey for Buildings
(1) Buildings in Central Sewerage Area
(#) Building List
A4-1
No. Building Name Location City Floor
61 The Regatta New York Tower Jl. Pantai Mutiara Jakarta Utara 24
62 The Regatta Shanhai Tower Jl. Pantai Mutiara Jakarta Utara 24
63 Graha Reformed Millenium Jl. Kemayoran Jakarta Pusat 24
64 Star City Apartment Tower 1 Jl. Gajahmada No 188 Jakarta Utara 24
65 Star City Apartment Tower 2 Jl. Gajahmada No 188 Jakarta Utara 24
66 Laguna Apartment Pluit Jakarta Utara 24
67 Menara Salemba Batavia Tower 1 Jl. Matraman Jakarta Pusat 22
68 Menara Salemba Batavia Tower 2 Jl. Matraman Jakarta Pusat 22
69 Menara Salemba Batavia Tower 3 Jl. Matraman Jakarta Pusat 22
70 Allson Residence I Jl. Senen Raya No. 135-137 Jakarta Pusat 21
71 Allson Residence 2 Jl. Senen Raya No. 135-137 Jakarta Pusat 21
72 Allson Residence 3 Jl. Senen Raya No. 135-137 Jakarta Pusat 21
73 Hayam Wuruk Plaza Tower Jl. Hayam Wuruk No. 8, Kebon Kelapa Village Jakarta Pusat 21
74 DKI Jakarta Government Office Jl. Merdeka Selatan Jakarta Pusat 21
75 Wisma Kosgoro Jl. MH Thamrin Jakarta Pusat 20
76 Gedung Sapta Pesona Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 17 Jakarta Pusat 20
77 Sheraton Media Hotel & Towers Jl. Gunung Sahari Raya No. 3 Jakarta Utara 19
78 Wisma Antara Jl. Medan Merdeka Selatan. No. 17, Gambir Jakarta Pusat 18
79 BCA Wisma Asia II Jl. S Parman Kav 79 Jakarta Pusat 18
80 Borobudur Jakarta Hotel Jl. Lapangan Banteng Selatan No.1 Jakarta Pusat 18
81 Emporium Pluit Pluit Jakarta Utara 17
82 Hayam Wuruk Residence Jl. Hayam Wuruk Jakarta Pusat 17
83 Mediterania Lagoon Residences Tower 2 Jl. Benyamin Sueb St. Pademangan Jakarta Pusat 16
84 Dusit Mangga Dua Mall Jl. Mangadua Jakarta Utara 16
85 Mahkamah Konstitusi Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6 Jakarta Pusat 16
86 Menteng Park Apartment Tower 1 Jl. Pegangsaan Barat Kav. 6-12 Menteng Jakarta Pusat 16
87 Menteng Park Apartment Tower 2 Jl. Pegangsaan Barat Kav. 6-12 Menteng Jakarta Pusat 16
88 Menteng Park Apartment Tower 3 Jl. Pegangsaan Barat Kav. 6-12 Menteng Jakarta Pusat 16
89 Menteng Park Apartment Tower 4 Jl. Pegangsaan Barat Kav. 6-12 Menteng Jakarta Pusat 16
90 Sahid Sahirman Memorial Hospital Sahid Puri Kencana Superblock Jakarta Pusat 15
91 Dinas Teknis Abdul Muis Jl. Abdul Muis No. 66, Petojo Selatan Village, Jakarta Pusat 15
92 Surya Building Jl. MH. Thamrin, Kav. 9, Menteng Jakarta Pusat 15
93 CBD Pluit Office Tower 1 Jl. Pluit Selatan Raya Jakarta Utara 15
94 CBD Pluit Office Tower 2 Jl. Pluit Selatan Raya Jakarta Utara 15
95 Dusit Mangga Dua Hotel Jl. Arteri Mangga Dua Raya Jakarta Utara 14
96 PT. Pelayaran Nasional Indonesia Jl. Gajah Mada. No.14, Gambir Jakarta Pusat 14
97 Ratu Prabu Jl. Jend. Sudirman. Kav.9, Tanah Abang Jakarta Pusat 14
98 Wisma Hayam Wuruk Jl. Hayam Wuruk. No. 8, Gambir Jakarta Pusat 14
99 Apartemen Mangga Dua Court I Jl. Mangga Dua Raya, Jakarta Utara 14
100 Apartemen Mangga Dua Court 2 Jl. Mangga Dua Raya, Jakarta Utara 14
101 Hotel Sari Pan Pacific Jl. MH Thamrin Jakarta Pusat 13
102 Wisma BII Jl. MH Thamrin Jakarta Pusat 13
103 Menteng I Kecamatan Menteng, Jakarta Pusat 12
104 Menteng II Kecamatan Menteng, Jakarta Pusat 12
105 Menteng III Kecamatan Menteng, Jakarta Pusat 12
106 Wisma BSG Jl. Abdul Muis Kavling 40 Jakarta Pusat 12
107 Departemen Luar Negeri Jakarta Pusat 12
108 Exim Melati Jl. MH. Thamrin, Kav. 8-9, Kebon Melati Villag Jakarta Pusat 12
109 Jaya Building Jl. MH. Thamrin, No.12, Menteng Jakarta Pusat 12
110 Plaza BII Tower II Jl. MH. Thamrin Jakarta Pusat 12
111 Lion Air Tower Jl. Gajah Mada, No. 7 Jakarta Pusat 12
112 Komite Olahraga Nasional Indonesia (KONI) PusaJl. Pintu 1 Gelora Bung Karno, Tanah Abang Jakarta Pusat 12
113 Graha Adira Jl. Raya Menteng, No. 21, Menteng Jakarta Pusat 12
24.1
A4-2
(B) Number & Distribution of Buildings
No. of No. of
District Building use District Building use
Building Building
High rise Apartment &
1 5 21 4 Medium Commercial
Hotel
2 4 High rise Apartment 22 2 Large Hotel & Government
3 4 High rise Apartment 23 8 High rise Apartment
Large Hotel & High rise
4 1 Large Commercial 24 3
Apartment
High rise Apartment &
5 14 Medium Commercial 25 6
Commercial
High rise Apartment &
6 3 26 5 Commercial & Hospital
Hotel
7 2 High rise Apartment 27 30 Large Commercial & Hotel
8 2 High rise Apartment 28 2 Large Commercial
High rise Apartment &
9 7 High rise Apartment 29 8
Commercial
Medium Commercial & Medium Commercial &
10 2 30 5
Hotel Government
11 7 Large Commercial 31 12 Medium Commercial
Medium Apartment &
12 1 Large Commercial 32 8
Commercial
High rise Apartment &
13 1 Large Commercial 33 13
Commercial
Sub-tot
14 1 Large Commercial 225
al
Large Commercial &
15 12
Hotel
Large Commercial &
16 2 High rise Apartment 34 1
Government
Medium Commercial & Large Commercial &
17 13 35 13
Government Apartment
High rise Commercial & Sub-tot
18 9 13
Hotel al
Large & Medium
19 6
Commercial
20 23 Medium Commercial Total 238
A4-3
㧢
㧝 㧞
㧠
㧡
1 km
A4-4
㧤
㧥
㧣
1 km
A4-5
1 km
A4-6
A4-7
1 km
A4-8
(2) Building Sewer Management Survey-1
Questionnaire
Q2
Management Cost of Wastewater Treatment Plant
Monthly O&M 2,700,000 IDR (excl. Labor Cost)
Number of O&M Staff 1 People
Q3
Any Action in order to comply with the effluent standards
1 Examination of water sample in the laboratory every month 115,000 IDR
2 Examination of water sample in the laboratory every three months 300,000 IDR
3 Emptying septic tank once a year 300,000 IDR
A4-9
Survey Results
Building
SK WBM SPP GR GP MB
Property Tax per Area & Month IDR/m2/month 1,792 694 2,517 1,072
Monthly Water Consumption m3/month 3,791 200 24,000 500 2,400 2,952
A4-10
Civil N.A. N.A. N.A. 11,000,000 100,000,000 N.A.
Extended
Treatment Process Septic Tank Extended Aeration Septic Tank Extended Aeration Activated Sludge
Aeration
Number of Staff 1 3 4 2 3 2
A4-11
A4-12
Water Source ( ) ܂
( ) Piped-water ( ) Shallow well ( ) Deep well
3
Monthly Water Consumption m /month IDR/month
Q-1
Wastewater Treatment Plant ( ) ܂
( ) Individual ( ) Communal owned
Treatment Capacity m3/day
Type of Treatment Process
Q-2
Cleansing & Desludging of Treatment Plant
times/year m3 tank truck /each time
Cleaning Cost IDR/year
Please check ( ) ܂ ( ) Private Septic Plumber ( ) Public (Dinas Kebersihan)
Q-3
What bothers you on wastewater disposal and facility management?
( ) Offensive Odor, ( ) Maintenance, ( ) Cost, ( ) Expertise Staff, ( ) Floor Area
(in detail)
A4-13
Q-4
Do you know the role of sewerage system as followings?
Yes ( ) No ( )
Q-5
Do you want to continue owned treatment plant or to connect to public sewer, if public sewerage
system is developed?
Yes ( ) No ( ) ( ) depends on the Tariff ( IDR/month)
㪩㪼㫃㪸㫋㫀㫆㫅㩷㪹㪼㫋㫎㪼㪼㫅㩷㫎㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㫈㫌㪸㫃㫀㫋㫐㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃㩷㪸㫅㪻㩷㫎㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㫃㫀㪽㪼
㪛㩷㪄㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃
㪚㫃㪼㪸㫅㩷㩷㩷㩷㸠䇭䇭䇭䇭㩷㩷㪮㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㫈㫌㪸㫃㫀㫋㫐㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃㩷䇭䇭䇭㩷㸢㩷㩷㩷㪧㫆㫃㫃㫌㫋㪼㪻
Present water environment is (D-level)
㪧㫆㫃㫃㫌㫋㪼㪻
Polluted and offensive odor 㪦㪽㪽㪼㫅㫊㫀㫍㪼㩷㫆㪻㫆㫉
Debris deposits
Unhygienic and caused habitual diarrhea 㪚㩷㵨㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃
㪩㪸㫀㫊㪼㩷㫋㫆㩷㪹㫆㪸㫋㪸㪹㫃㪼㪆
After sewerage system improves water quality 㪽㫀㫊㪿㪸㪹㫃㪼㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃
level to:
Boatable㧔C㧕 㪙㩷㵨㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃
Fishable㧔B㧕 㪩㪸㫀㫊㪼㩷㫋㫆㩷㫇㫃㪸㫐㫀㫅㪾㩷㫀㫅
㫎㪸㫋㪼㫉㩷㪆㪹㫀㫆㪄
㪻㫀㫍㪼㫉㫊㫀㫋㫐㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃
㪘㩷㵨㩷㫃㪼㫍㪼㫃
㪩㪸㫀㫊㪼㩷㫋㫆
㫊㫎㫀㫄㫄㪸㪹㫃㪼
A4-14
GENERAL INFORMATION
Water Source Water Consumption
ID
Kecamatan Kelurahan Area of Building Asset Tax note
no. No. of Floor Piped Shallow Deep Recycled volume
Floor (m2 ) (IDR/year) (m3/month)
cost (IDR/month)
water water well water
21195,97 (gross);
1 Menteng Kebon Sirih 18 N/A 9 3,791 47,729,620
15137,93 (nett)
A4-15
4 Menteng Gondangdia 11 & 30 77,000 3,200,000,000 9 9 15,000 188,250,000
Q-1 Q-2
Waste Treatment Plant Cleaning method
ID Already Treatment Treatment Frequency of Cleaning
capacity
Type of treatment note note
no. Individua Commun connect to capacity desludging cost
sewerage (m 3) (m 3/10,000m 2) process (times/year) Private Public
l al (IDR/year)
pipe
extended aeration
1 9 100 2 5,250,000 9
process
2 9 0
3 9
A4-16
aeration &
4 9 400 52 1 25,000,000 9 included in all STP
bioreactor
operational&maintenance
cost per month
aeration &
5 9 1000 200 12 36,000,000 9
membran
extended aeration
10 9 75 10 2 2,000,000 9
process
ID
Offensive Maintenance
Expertise Don't have note Depends note
no. Cost Floor area in detail Yes No Yes No
Odor staff problem on tariff
A4-17
supply of tap water is vey low and unstable.
6 9 9 9
Wastewater treatment
Treatment process Extended aeration
Trickling filter, Aeration & RO (filtration)
Septic tank
Treatment capacity 26 – 1,000 m3/day
Mode: 70 – 100 m3/day
Sludge disposal 1 – 3 times/year, most frequent 12 times/year
Sludge volume: 5 - 50 m3/time
Cleansing Cost: 42,000 - 200,000 IDR/m3
Ave. Cost: 170,000 IDR/m3
No problem 3 x Broken pump caused by too much solid waste flow into
pump. It cause overflowed to aeration tank (so aeration didn't
perform maximum process)
A4-18
Awareness of Sewerage
Yes No Detailed comment
Sewerage role 10 0
Public sewerage 8 2 x They think if using sewerage system will make operational &
maintenance easier to handle.
x For now, they still using own facility. The reason is because
high demand on water consumption while supply of tap
water is very low and unstable.(Majority is miscellaneous
use = low quality water)
x They already had plan to build recycled treatment.
A4-19
A4-20
A4-21
SUMMARY OF ROAD CONDITION WHICH THAT WILL INSTALLING SEWERAGE PIPELINE
Surveyed on : Saturday‐Sunday, 1‐2 July 2012 (Holiday)
Surveyed by : Ade Erfansyah
Description of Road Condition
Location/Name of
STA. Majority Usage of Side Walk Underground
Road Segment Geometric Traffic Condition and Public Trans Photo Doc
and Roadside Infrastructure
1. Jln Tambak ( 2 ROW 20 m Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Telephone
way), Kelurahan TW 14 m smoothly on holyday. electricity, and billboard Cable and
Pegangsaan, Jkt TL 7 m P‐156, AC‐60, P‐116, Steady Safe Roadside usage are Small Drinking
Pusat SW 0.8 m 936 (Manggarai‐Psr Baru), shop, business and town water pipe
DR 0.5 m Steady Safe AC‐47 (Manggarai‐ house (PAM)
(C) Senen)
2. Jln Bandengan ROW 15 m Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Telephone
Utara ( 1 way), TW 10 m smoothly on holyday. electricity, billboard, Cable
Penjaringan, Jkt TL 5 m Mikrolet M‐13 (Kalideres‐Kota) telephone, traffic sign, Drinking
Utara SW 1 m Ojeg (free route) trees, bridge crossed water pipe
DR 0.7 m Roadside usage are Small (PAM)
(C) shop, business, school,
SR 0.8 m gov’t office and town house
A5-1
3. Jln Proklamasi ( 1 ROW 15 m Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Telephone
way), Kelurahan TW 10 m smoothly on holyday. electricity, billboard, Cable
Pegangsaan, Jkt TL 5 m Trans Jkt coridor V (Kp. Melayu‐ telephone, traffic sign, Gas pipe
Pusat SW 1,5 m Ancol) trees, Drinking
DR 0.8 m Bus Sinar Jaya P‐156 (Kp. Roadside usage are water pipe
Rambutan – Psr Baru), Bus AC P‐ university and town house (PAM)
SR 0.3 m
16 (Rawamangun – Lebak Electricity
bulus), Mayasari 905 (Pulo cable
Gadung – Dr Wahidin),
Steady Safe 962 and AC‐54 (Pulo
Gdg‐Kota),
Metromini T‐49 (Pulo Gadung –
Manggarai),
4 Jln. Bandengan ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting and Telephone
Utara ( 1 way), TW 6m smoothly on holyday. crossing bridge Cable
Kelurahan TL 6 m Mikrolet M‐13 (Kalideres‐Kota) Roadside usage are retail, Electricity
Penjaringan, SW ‐ warong and town house cable
Jakarta Utara DR 1m
SR 0.6m
Description of Road Condition
Location/Name of
STA. Majority Usage of Side Walk Underground
Road Segment Geometric Traffic Condition and Public Trans Photo Doc
and Roadside Infrastructure
5 Jl. Pegangsaan ROW Relatively dense on workday and Parking on right sidewalk Gas pipe
Barat ( 2 way), TW 7 m smoothly on holyday. Roadside usage are offices, Drinking
Kelurahan TL 7 m U 07, T 502 , U 13 Apartment, Puskesmas. water pipe
Pegangsaan, SW 1m Sebrang jln: Taman, Station (PAM)
Jakarta Pusat DR 1m Kereta Cikini
SR 0.6 m
6 Jln. KH. Moch. ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Drinking
Yamin ( 1 way), TW 6m smoothly on holyday electricity, billboard, water pipe
Kelurahan TL 6m Kopaja T‐502 (Kp. Rambutan – telephone, traffic sign, (PAM)
Menteng, Jakarta SW 1 m Tanah Abang) trees,
Pusat DR 2 m Roadside usage is Elite
SR ‐ settlement
7 Jl. Pejalan ( 1 way), ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, the Drinking
kecamatan Roa TW 6m smoothly on holyday big pots water pipe
Malaka, Jakarta TL 6 m Mikrolet M‐10 (Tanah Abang‐ Roadside usage are (PAM)
Utara SW Kota) Commercial building, and Electricity
A5-2
DR 0.8 m retail cable
SR 6 m
8 Jln. KH. Moch. ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Drinking
Yamin ( 1 way), TW 6m smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone, water pipe
Kelurahan TL 6 m P73, P20, p158, P116, 52, 507, trees, (PAM)
Menteng, Jakarta SW 906, P7, 507 Roadside usage are Elite Telephone
Pusat DR 0.8 m settlement, elite settlement fiber optic
SR 6m and embassy office Cable
9 Jl. Perniagaan ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Drinking
Barat, kecamatan TW 5 m holyday electricity, telephone, water pipe
Roa Malaka, TL 5 m Mikrolet M‐10 (Tanahabang‐ trees, (PAM)
Jakarta Utara SW Kota) Roadside usage are
DR 0.8 m Many Ojeg in the traditional townhouse, retail, office,
SR 1 m market area warehouse, and traditional
market (pasar pagi) includes
parking and waste area
Description of Road Condition
Location/Name of
STA. Majority Usage of Side Walk Underground
Road Segment Geometric Traffic Condition and Public Trans Photo Doc
and Roadside Infrastructure
10 Jln. KH. Moch. ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Drinking
Yamin ( 1 way), TW 6m smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone, water pipe
Kelurahan TL 6 m P73, P20, p158, P116, 52, 507, trees, (PAM)
Menteng, Jakarta SW 906, P7, 507 Roadside usage are Elite Telephone
Pusat DR 0.8 m settlement, elite settlement fiber optic
SR 6m and embassy office Cable
11 Jln. KH. Moch. ROW 10 m Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Drinking
Masyur (2 way), TW 10 m smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone, water pipe
Kelurahan TL 5 m trees, (PAM)
Tambora, Jakarta SW 3 m Roadside usage are
Barat DR 0.8 m townhouse, retail, office,
SR 1 m warehouse, and traditional
market includes parking
and school
12 Jl. H. Agus Salim ROW Relatively smoothly on workday Poles of street lighting, Drinking
(2 way), Kelurahan TW 10m and holyday electricity, telephone, water pipe
Menteng, Jakarta TL 5m PPD 916 (Kp Melayu‐Tanah trees, (PAM)
A5-3
Pusat SW ‐ Abang Roadside usage are Elite
DR 2 m settlement, elite settlement
and embassy office
SR
13 Jln. KH. Moch. ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Drinking
Masyur (2 way), TW 10 m smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone, water pipe
Kelurahan TL 5 m trees, (PAM)
Tambora, Jakarta SW 3 m Roadside usage are
Barat DR 0.8 m townhouse, retail, office,
warehouse, and traditional
SR 1 m market includes parking
and school
14 Jl. Sumenep.(1 ROW Relatively smoothly on workday Poles of street lighting, Telephone fiber
way), Kelurahan TW 6 m and holyday electricity, telephone, optic Cable
Menteng‐ Jakarta TL 6 m trees,
Pusat SW 0.3 m Roadside usage are Elite
DR 0.8 m settlement, elite settlement
SR 0.3 m and embassy office
Description of Road Condition
Location/Name of
STA. Majority Usage of Side Walk Underground
Road Segment Geometric Traffic Condition and Public Trans Photo Doc
and Roadside Infrastructure
15 Jl. Purworejo .(1 ROW Relatively smoothly on workday Poles of street lighting, Telephone fiber
way), Kelurahan TW 6 m and holyday electricity, telephone, optic Cable
Menteng‐ Jakarta TL 6 m trees,
Pusat SW 0.7 m Roadside usage are Elite
DR 4 m settlement, elite settlement
SR 0.6 m
MD 0.3 m
16 Jl. Blora .(1 way), ROW Relatively smoothly on workday Poles of street lighting, Telephone
Kelurahan TW 12 m and holyday electricity, telephone, fiber optic
Menteng‐ Jakarta TL 12 m trees, Cable
Pusat SW Roadside usage are Gas pipe
DR 1 m townhouse , restaurant, pot Drinking
SR 0.3 m and un‐ formal retail water pipe
(PAM)
MD Electricity
cable
17 Jl. Teluk Betung (2 ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Telephone
way), Kelurahan TW 8 m smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone, fiber optic
A5-4
Kebon Melati‐ TL 4 m trees, Cable
Jakarta Pusat SW 0.7 m Roadside usage are Drinking
DR 1.5 m townhouse , restaurant, pot water pipe
SR 0.8 m and un‐ formal retail (PAM)
MD
18 Jl. Kebon Kacang ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Drinking
(2 way), Kelurahan TW 12 m smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone and, water pipe
Kebon Melati‐ TL 7 m trees (PAM)
Jakarta Pusat 0.3 Roadside usage are
SW
cm townhouse , hotel,
DR 3 m apartment, and mall
SR 0.3m
MD
Description of Road Condition
Location/Name of
STA. Majority Usage of Side Walk Underground
Road Segment Geometric Traffic Condition and Public Trans Photo Doc
and Roadside Infrastructure
19 Noname Road (1 ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Drinking
way), Kelurahan smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone water pipe
Kebon Melati‐ TW 6 m Roadside usage are (PAM)
Jakarta Pusat TL 6 m townhouse , mall and Street
SW parking (2 road side)
DR
SR
MD
20 Jl. Kebon Kacang ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Drinking
(2 way), Kelurahan TW 7 m smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone, water pipe
Kebon Melati‐ TL 7 m trees, (PAM)
Jakarta Pusat SW 0.3 m Roadside usage are
DR ‐ townhouse , hotel,
SR 0.8 m apartment, and mall
MD
21 Jl. KH. Mas ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Telephone
Mansyur (2 way), TW 12 smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone and, fiber optic
A5-5
Kelurahan Kebon TL 6 Steady Safe P‐133 (Grogol‐ trees Cable
Melati‐ Jakarta SW ‐ Kelender) Roadside usage are Drinking
Pusat DR 1 m Kopaja S‐608 (Blok M‐ townhouse , offices and water pipe
SR Tanahabang), Kopaja S‐615 retail /informal retail (kaki (PAM)
MD (lebak Bulus‐Tanahabang) and lima)
Mikrolet M‐38 (Grogol‐Tanah
abang)
22 Jl. Abdul Muis (2 ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Telephone
way), kelurangan TW 6 m smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone and, fiber optic
Petojo Selatan, TL 3 m Mayasari Bakti 507 (Pulo trees Cable
Jakarta Selatan SW Gadung‐Tanahabang), Steady Roadside usage are Drinking
DR 1 m Safe 939 (Blok M‐Veteran), townhouse , offices and water pipe
SR 0.6 m Steady Safe AC‐110 (Tj. Priok‐ retail /informal retail (kaki (PAM)
Tanahabang) and Mikrolet M‐08 lima)
MD (Tanahabang‐Kota).
Description of Road Condition
Location/Name of
STA. Majority Usage of Side Walk Underground
Road Segment Geometric Traffic Condition and Public Trans Photo Doc
and Roadside Infrastructure
23 Jl. Suryopranoto ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Telephone
(2 way), TW 12 m smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone and, fiber optic
kelurangan 6 m Bus way corridor III (Kalideres‐ trees Cable
Petojo Selatan, (3m harmoni) Roadside usage are Drinking
TL
Jakarta Selatan busw PPD 504 (Pulo Gadung‐Grogol), townhouse , offices, water pipe
ay) PPD P‐25 (Senen‐Tangerang) and settlement and retail (PAM)
SW Kopaja P‐12 (Senen‐Kalideres) /informal retail (kaki lima)
DR 1 m
SR 0.8 m
MD
24 Jl. Ir. H. Juanda (1 ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Telephone
way), kelurahan TW 10 m smoothly on holyday electricity, and telephone fiber optic
Gambir, Jakarta TL 10 m Bus way corridor II (Pulo Roadside usage are Cable
Pusat SW 0.8 m Gadung‐Harmoni), Koridor III townhouse , offices and Drinking
DR 4 m (Kalideres‐Harmoni) settlement water pipe
SR 0.8 m Steady Safe 936 (Manggarai‐Psr (PAM)
Baru), Steady Safe 939 (Blok M‐
MD Veteran), PPD 12 (Blok M‐
Senen), PPD P1 (bekasi‐Harmoni)
A5-6
25 Jl. Veteran (1 ROW Relatively smooth on workday Poles of street lighting, Telephone
way), kelurahan TW 7 m and holyday electricity, telephone and, fiber optic
Gambir, Jakarta 7 m PPD P1 (Bekasi‐Harmoni), PPD trees Cable
Pusat (3 m P43 (Banteng Utara‐Depok) Roadside usage are Elite Drinking
TL
busw settlement on the side back water pipe
ay) of President Palace (PAM)
SW
DR 1 m
SR ‐
MD
26 Jl. Teluk Gong (2 ROW Relatively dense on workday and Poles of street lighting, Telephone
way), kelrahan TL 14 m smoothly on holyday electricity, telephone and, fiber optic
Pejagalan, Jakarta SW 7 m M25 (Grogol –Kota) , B01 trees Cable
utara DR 1 m (grogol‐angke) Roadside usage are Drinking
SR 60 cm townhouse , offices and water pipe
1 m settlement (PAM)
MD
Source : Field Survey, 1‐2 July 2012
SUMMARYOFROADCONDITIONWHICHTHATWILLINSTALLINGSEWERAGEPIPELINE
Surveyedon : SaturdayͲSunday,1Ͳ2July2012(Holiday)
Surveyedby : RandiSuhendi
DescriptionofRoadCondition
Location/Nameof
STA. TrafficConditionandPublic MajorityUsageofSideWalk Underground
RoadSegment Geometric PhotoDoc
TransportationRoute andRoadSide Infrastructure
1. Jl.Moh Mansyur ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
TW 6m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity,andbillboard Cableand
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 1m x MetrominiNo.80KaliDeres glasswaremarketon±100 waterpipe
SW Ͳ JembatanLima mcorridorinthemorning (PAM)
DR 1.5m x MikroletM10TanahAbangͲ andvegetablesinthe
Kota evening(PasarJembatan
Lima)
2. Jl.Latumenten ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
Raya TW 16m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity,andbillboard Cableand
TL 4m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 6m x Buswaycorridor townhouse,officeandretail waterpipe
$
SW Ͳ x Mikrolet25and01GrogolͲ (PAM)
DR 1m Muarakarang
3. Jl.Bendungan ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
Utara TW 10m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity,andbillboard Cableand
TL 4m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 3m townhouse,officeandretail waterpipe
SW 5m (PAM)
DR Ͳ
4. Jl.Tubagus Angke ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
TW 8m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity,andbillboard Cableand
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 1,5m x Metromini86and29,Mikrolet townhouse,retailand waterpipe
SW Ͳ 02 settlementalongtheriver (PAM)
DR 1m side
DescriptionofRoadCondition
Location/Nameof
STA. TrafficConditionandPublic MajorityUsageofSideWalk Underground
RoadSegment Geometric PhotoDoc
TransportationRoute andRoadSide Infrastructure
5. Jl.Tubagus Angke ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
JembatanLima TW 5m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity,andbillboardand Cableand
TL 2m holyday. anexistingtraincrossing x Drinking
SR Ͳ x Metromini86and29, x Roadsideusageare waterpipe
SW 1m Mikrolet02 townhouse,retailand (PAM)
DR 20m settlement
$
$
11. Jl.PluitUtaraRaya ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
TW 12m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity,andbillboard Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 4m x Mikrolet01Grogol–Angke settlementandretail waterpipe
SW Ͳ (PAM)
DR 1m x Electricity
cable
12. Jl.Pantai Mutiara1 ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelysmoothon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Electricity
TW 6m workdayandonholyday. electricity cable
TL 2m x Ojeg x Roadsideusageare
SR 2m housingt
SW Ͳ
DR 1m
DescriptionofRoadCondition
Location/Nameof
STA. TrafficConditionandPublic MajorityUsageofSideWalk Underground
RoadSegment Geometric PhotoDoc
TransportationRoute andRoadSide Infrastructure
13. Jl.Pantai Mutiara ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
TW 8m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusagearehouses x Drinking
SR 2,5m complex waterpipe
SW 1,5m (PAM)
DR Ͳ x Electricity
cable
14. Jl.MandalaBahari ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
TW 8m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusagearedock, x Drinking
SR 2m market,andtownͲhouse waterpipe
SW Ͳ (PAM)
DR 1m x Electricity
cable
$
15. Jl.Pasar Muara ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Drinking
Angke workdayandsmoothlyon electricity waterpipe
TW 7m holyday. x Roadsideusageare (PAM)
TL 2m traditionalmarket(Pasar
SR 1m MuaraAngke)andfish
SW Ͳ storageasswellastown
DR 1m house
16. Jl.Kapau ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
TW 20m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 4m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR Ͳ townhouseandsettlement waterpipe
SW Ͳm inalongtherivercorridor (PAM)
DR Ͳm
DescriptionofRoadCondition
Location/Nameof
STA. TrafficConditionandPublic MajorityUsageofSideWalk Underground
RoadSegment Geometric PhotoDoc
TransportationRoute andRoadSide Infrastructure
17. Jl.LodanRaya ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
TW 20m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 4m holyday. x Roadsideusageareretail x Drinking
SR Ͳ andwarehouse waterpipe
SW Ͳm (PAM)
DR Ͳm
18. Jl.Pakin ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
TW 20m workdayandsmoothlyon electricityandbillboard Cable
TL 40m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR Ͳ x Mitromini02(SenenͲMuara townhouse,retailand waterpipe
SW Karang)andMikroletM15 housingcomplexMuara (PAM)
DR Angke
4m
$
19. Jl.Jalan Muara ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlighting, x Telephone
Baru(jalanraya) TW 10m workdayandsmoothlyon electricityandbillboard Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR Ͳ x MitrominiO2(SenenͲMuara warehouse,apartmentand waterpipe
SW 1,2m Karang) settlement (PAM)
DR 1m
DescriptionofRoadCondition
Location/Nameof
STA. TrafficConditionandPublic MajorityUsageofSideWalk Underground
RoadSegment Geometric PhotoDoc
TransportationRoute andRoadSide Infrastructure
21. Jl.PluitRaya ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 10m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 3m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 6m x Metromini02andMikroletU Settlementontherightand waterpipe
SW 1,5m 11(MuaraBaru–Muara leftroadcorridor (PAM)
DR 1,5m Angke)
22. Jl.PluitRaya ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 8m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 3m x Metromini02andMikroletU Settlementontherightand waterpipe
SW 3,5m 11(MuaraBaru–Muara leftroadcorridor (PAM)
DR 3,5m Angke)
$
23. Jl.MandalaBahari ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 10m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 1m Settlementontherightand waterpipe
SW Ͳ leftroadcorridor (PAM)
DR 1m
24. Jl.Pluit Karang ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
Barat TW 10m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 4m x Bis(kotaͲMuaraAngke)and townhouse,retailand waterpipe
SW Ͳ Mikrolet01(Grogol–Muara settlement (PAM)
DR 2m Angke)
DescriptionofRoadCondition
Location/Nameof
STA. TrafficConditionandPublic MajorityUsageofSideWalk Underground
RoadSegment Geometric PhotoDoc
TransportationRoute andRoadSide Infrastructure
25. Jl.KomplekKarang ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
Elok TW 8m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 2m holyday. x RoadsideusageareHousing x Drinking
SR 2m KomplekofKarangElok waterpipe
SW Ͳ (PAM)
DR 2m x IPALpipeline
ofHousing
complex
26. Jl.MuaraKarang ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
UtaraRaya TW 24m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 4m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 4m Settlementontherightand waterpipe
SW Ͳ leftroadcorridor (PAM)
DR 2m
$
DescriptionofRoadCondition
Location/Nameof
STA. TrafficConditionandPublic MajorityUsageofSideWalk Underground
RoadSegment Geometric PhotoDoc
TransportationRoute andRoadSide Infrastructure
29. Jl.Tambora ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 5,5m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 1m x KWK02(KotaͲCengkareng) Settlementontherightand waterpipe
SW 1,5m leftroadcorridor (PAM)
DR 1,5m
30. Jl.TanahSerial ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 6,5m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 1m x MetrominiM41KotaGrogol Settlementontherightand waterpipe
SW Ͳ leftroadcorridor (PAM)
DR 1m
$
32. Jl.KrendengBarat ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 6m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 1m Settlementontherightand waterpipe
SW Ͳ leftroadcorridor (PAM)
DR 1m
DescriptionofRoadCondition
Location/Nameof
STA. TrafficConditionandPublic MajorityUsageofSideWalk Underground
RoadSegment Geometric PhotoDoc
TransportationRoute andRoadSide Infrastructure
33. Jl.JembatanBesi ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
awal TW 6m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 2m x MikroletM41(KotaͲGrogol) Settlementontherightand waterpipe
SW Ͳ leftroadcorridor (PAM)
DR 2m
34. Jl.JembatanBesi ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
akhir TW 10m workdayandsmoothlyon electricityandbillboard Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 1m x MikroletM41(KotaͲGrogol) townhouseandretail waterpipe
SW 1,5m (PAM)
DR 2m
$
35. Jl.Lutumenten ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 14,5m workdayandsmoothlyon electricityandbillboard Cable
TL 4m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 4m x KWK25and01,BusWay townhouse,retailandoffice waterpipe
SW 3m (MuaraKarangͲKampung x Existingartificiallake,toll (PAM)
DR Ͳm Rambutan)andKopaja86 bridgeandriver
DescriptionofRoadCondition
Location/Nameof
STA. TrafficConditionandPublic MajorityUsageofSideWalk Underground
RoadSegment Geometric PhotoDoc
TransportationRoute andRoadSide Infrastructure
37. Jl.Veteran ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 5,5m workdayandsmoothlyon electricity Cable
TL 1m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 2m Settlementontherightand waterpipe
SW Ͳ leftroadcorridor (PAM)
DR 1m
$
39. Jl.POS ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 12m workdayandsmoothlyon electricityandbillboard Cable
TL 4m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 2m x Metromini(Senen–Benhil)and townhouse,retailandoffice waterpipe
SW 4m Busway(BlokM–KaliDeres (PAM)
DR 3m andPriuk–BlokM)
DescriptionofRoadCondition
Location/Nameof
STA. TrafficConditionandPublic MajorityUsageofSideWalk Underground
RoadSegment Geometric PhotoDoc
TransportationRoute andRoadSide Infrastructure
41. Jl.ManggaBesar5 ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 8,5m workdayandsmoothlyon electricityandbillboard Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 2m x Angkot01(PasarBaruͲKota) townhouse,retailandoffice waterpipe
SW Ͳ (PAM)
DR 1m
42. Jl.Buni ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 8,5m workdayandsmoothlyon electricityandbillboard Cable
TL 2m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 2 x Angkot01(PasarBaruKota) townhouse,retailandoffice waterpipe
SW 3m (PAM)
DR 1m
$
DescriptionofRoadCondition
Location/Nameof
STA. TrafficConditionandPublic MajorityUsageofSideWalk Underground
RoadSegment Geometric PhotoDoc
TransportationRoute andRoadSide Infrastructure
45. Jl.GunungSahari ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
TW 10m workdayandsmoothlyon electricityandbillboard Cable
TL 4m holyday. x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 2m x Angkot53(pulogadungͲkota), townhouse,retailandoffice waterpipe
SW 4m Metromini02(muarakarangͲ (PAM)
DR Ͳm senen)andbusway(AncolͲ
KampungMelayu)
46. Jl.ManggaBesar ROW m x Thetrafficrelativelydenseon x Polesofstreetlightingand x Telephone
Raya TW 8m workdayandsmoothlyon electricityandbillboard Cable
TL 3m holyday.Angkot53pulo x Roadsideusageare x Drinking
SR 1m gadungkota townhouse,retailandoffice waterpipe
SW 2m (PAM)
DR 3m
$
JCC-1 Presentation Material
JKT Sewerage Zone-1 PPP-FS A-3 WWTP capacities to be balanced with sewage inflow
A-4 Zone-1 development phasing plan
Working Group Meeting B. Financial:
B-1 Consideration for PPP model
B-2 Construction cost and Service fee
18 June 2012 B-3 Preliminary Analysis on Cost sharing
B-4 Key to Success of the Project
1
C. Subsequent PPP-FS schedule 2
SEWERAGE ZONING
IN DKI JAKARTA
(Source: JICA MP Review)
Zone-1 Sewer Line
Routes
3 4
Total 89,386 64,267 25,119 2,862 14,967 9,875 6,730 5,934 23,900 64,267 7,081 18,038 0 25,119 241 358 258 10 867 444
$ !(*'#" +
$ !(*" +
)"#$$!'#!!#
!$ '& !%
"#%#% % *"$$ 5 6
$
JCC-1 Presentation Material
Sewer construction Prediction of Sewage Inflow to WWTP
prediction (Source: JICA PPP-FS)
Pipe
Small Diameter Pipe
Dia. 250,000
Jacking Method
Theory Max (Primory sewer collect 100%)
(mm) (m/day) (m/day) (m/day)
φ 150 - - 3.70 Challange (Primary sewer collect 70% by Year 4)
φ 200 3.34 - 3.62
Operation Start
φ 700 3.89 - 2.16
φ 800 - 1.80 2.07 100,000
φ 900 - 1.76 1.93
WWTP
φ 1,000 - 1.75 1.78
φ 1,100 - 1.75 -
φ 1,200 - 1.69 -
φ 1,350 - 1.57 - 50,000
φ 1,500 - 1.56 - 2015 2017 2020 2023
φ 1,650 - 1.49 -
φ 1,800 - 1.43 -
φ 2,000 - 1.37 - 0
φ 2,200 - 1.30 - Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y 10
Years from Starting of Sewer Construction
7 8
200000 200,000 In order to avoid such adverse effects, this PPP-FS propose scenario of sewer
150000 150,000 development as follows;
,,%#%
,,%#%
100000 100,000
200,000 200,000 West area only connection and secondary sewers are not
150,000 150,000 constructed yet.
,,%#%
,,%#%
100,000 100,000
9 10
(Reference Only)
Cost Comparison between Separate Sewer & Interceptor Sewer Proposal on Business Model
JICA PPP-FS Zone1
(for Pre-JCC1 Meeting)
June , 2012
JICA PPP-FS Study Team
11 12
$
JCC-1 Presentation Material
Conditions given by Indonesian sides
in Zone 1 Sewerage Development Physical Constraints for PPP Driver in Zone 1
A. Policy Target of Sewerage Service Coverage in DKI Sewerage Development
Jakarta shall be at 20% by 2020
Sewage Treatment Required in 2020 (A) Taking into account JICA ODA Loan Standard Process,
= 20%Total discharge in JKT sewer pipe construction will be started in 2015.
= 403,462m3/d(this figure based on M/P Draft Final) (B) Then the estimated Zone-1 WWTP inflow rate in the
end of 2016 is estimated to be 6,039m3/average-day.
B. Zone 1 contribution
(C) As well as the above (B), the estimated WWTP inflow
= 198,000m3/average day
rate in the end of 2018 is about 79,926m3/average-day
= 49 % of Sewage Treatment required in 2020
at the completion of Trunk Sewers Construction.
C. WWTP Operation shall be started in 2017
Item of Cost, Type of Payment to SPC and Cases of Phasing Construction of WWTP
Supplementation for Service Fee in O&M Period) Assumption; based on Conditions and Constraints
198,000(m3/
Treatment Capacity 99,000(m3/d) 49,500(m3/d)
d)
Item of
Cost O&M Cost WWTP Initial Capex 1.7 trillion 1.1 trillion 0.8 trillion
(IDR, in case of MBR) (IDR) (IDR) (IDR)
(O&M cost included Additional Capex) WWTP Construction
3 Years 2.5 Years 2.5 Years
Period (Years)
Main Sewer Pipe
Initial Capex 1.6 trillion (IDR)
Type of
Service Fee from Local Govt Main Sewer Pipe
Payment to SPC 10 Years
Construction Period
Estimated Effluent
Water Quantity in 197,878 (m3/d, Average Daily Flow)
2024
Supplementation
for Service Fee Tariff Income Others Estimated Effluent
118,675 (m3/d, Average Daily Flow)
Water Quantity in
2020
<Characteristic of Sewerage Project> Operation Ratio of
14% 29% 58%
Initial and Additional capex Huge WWTP in 2017
Full cost recovery by TariffImpossible
The financial gap should be supplemented in Construction Period
17 18
and/or in O&M Period
$
JCC-1 Presentation Material
Points to be discussed in related to Cases of
Points to be discussed in related to Cases of
Phasing Construction
Phasing Construction
Based on the current Pipe Network Plan, Estimated For the increase of WWTP Operation Ratio, additional
Effluent Water Quantity (Average Daily Flow) will much Construction for Sewer Pipe Networks is necessary.
increase in 34 years.
in 2 Years(2016); 6,039m3/d Shortening the Schedule for necessary Procedures
in 3 Years(2017); 28,525m3/d for JICA ODA Loan is limited.
in 4 Years(2018); 79,926m3/d We want to ask DKI to priorly invest to Sewer
Pipe Networks (for example, 2 Years Prior Invest)
In 2020 (after 6 Years since the Commencement of Pipe
Network Construction by JICA ODA Loan), We want to discuss the extent of Fiscal Burden by GOI
Estimated Effluent Water Quantity is 118,675m3/d. and DKI .
Possible Amount of Initial Capex Investment will
High Operation Ratio of WWTP is important, determine Phasing Construction Pattern.
but if the number of Phasing Construction increase,
we will have more Inflation Risk in the future.
19 20
21 22
Copyright © 2011 ORIX Corporation All rights reserved. 21
B-1. Consideration for PPP model B-1. Consideration for PPP model
Proposed Demarcation of Zone-1 PPP development
Pipe network Wastewater Treatment Plant
2&%#* % 6" %%!
290 million US$ 185 million US$ $!&#
(61%) (39%) 3! $%#&%!
!,, #'%
867#% #'%
GOI GOJ
1 Public 3! $%#&%! 5:6 5:6
!(#$ :
19!
867#%
867#%
2 Public SPC Typical PPP :
#&$*
867#% #'%
185 million US$ !,,
3 :
SPC Impossible
!(#$ #&$*
867#%
867#%
475 million US$
Note:
1. O&M Company will be set up jointly by DKI Jakarta and Japanese Investor.
Note: GOI is very negative to increase Foreign Debt. 2. One agreement to cover EPC and O&M is applied to WWTP.
GOJ is very positive to accelerate PPP by Japanese Companies.
24
$
JCC-1 Presentation Material
B-2. Construction cost and Service fee B-2. Construction cost and Service fee
Source: JICA PPP-FS
3.2 ha
B-2. Construction cost and Service fee B-3. Preliminary Analysis on Cost sharing
Basis of Service fee
6% 2#!(
Payment in OM period
:3!$% / 1 $%#%! 9!#!$%:%#$ (DKI SPC)
Service Fee
:4? / =%%*%#%*(%#
/ 3! $&& O&M Cost Repayment of CAPEX
Break down
6%!4)" $$ / ;&%*$$&# 6 $"%! of Cost Item (OPEX) Replacement, Funding Cost
/ &
$"!$
/ <"#$@# % Supplementation
Tariff Income Shortfall
/ :%#$ for Service Fee
B-3. Preliminary Analysis on Cost sharing B-3. Preliminary Analysis on Cost sharing
Case Study: PPP 4 Model Basic Assumptions (Tentative)
Pipe Network Wastewater Treatment Plant O&M Period 20 years
Management Public SPC Additional included
Construction Cost 290 million US$ 185 million US$ CAPEX (Replacement)
Inflation not considered
475 million US$
Case 1 Sludge Disposal Unit Fee 100 USD/m3
SPC
290 million US$ 185 million US$ Currency Exchange Rate IDR 9,012.5 = USD 1.0
IDR 8,570 = USD 1.0
Case 2 Public SPC
Bank Loan or Project 10%(Annual Interest)
(100%) Finance Interest Rate Note: to be explored more in the study.
345 million US$ 130 million US$
Bank Loan Grace Period 3 years
Case 3 Public SPC
(30%) (70%) Repayment Period 18 years (Principal & Interest Equal Basis)
400 million US$ 75 million US$
Case 4 Public SPC Tariff Revenue: 616 mil. USD (Total for 20 years)
Commercial - 2.5 times, Residents same as it is today
(60%) (40%) 30
$
JCC-1 Presentation Material
B-3. Preliminary Analysis on Cost sharing B-3. Preliminary Analysis on Cost sharing
Sludge Disp. 35 $/m3
DKI Total Expenditure in 2011
VAT
= USD 3,093 mil.
Funding Short
Cost Fall
Case 4-1: VGF around 40% can achieve full cost recovery
Case 1: No Subsidy for Pipe & WWTP only with Tariff
Sludge Disp. 100 $/m3
Case 2: No Subsidy for WWTP Case 3: 30% Subsidy for WWTP Case 4-2: VGF around 50%
B-3. Preliminary Analysis on Cost sharing B-4. Key to Success of the Project
Action by Public Sector
Summary on Service fee Variation Introduction of BOT deduct 10 15% of construction cost
Assumptions Subsidy in Conducting Open Bidding get the Lowest Price with Quality
Ration
OM Period
WWTP Interest of Sewer for
(milli.USD/y Consideration for optimized balance of Subsidy or VGF
investment Private fund Investment DKI Budget
) < Construction Period > < O&M Period >
Case 1 Private 10% Annu. Private 68.9 2.2% WWTP Initial CAPEX Service Fee for WWTP
33 34
G - G Consultation in September
$
JCC-2 Presentation Material
&?6"
*D1>41B4?6*5G5B175$5CC?><51B>549>?D85B3?E>DB95C
(B5@1B1D?BI*EBF5I6?B(((!>6B1CDBE3DEB5(B?:53D
3?>?=95C?6*31<5(B?@5B-?<E=5*5G5B+I@5
*5G175+B51D=5>D(<1>D(B?:53D9>#!"1;1BD1
9>1>391<*E@@?BD6?B*5G5B1755F5<?@=5>D*E2C94I?B81B75
66?B412<5+1B966$5F5<1>4B?CC
CE2C94I
"#+*5G5B1750?>5
(((
*
(B13D9351>4!CCE5C?6'D85B9D95C9>!>4?>5C91
9>1>391<*9=E<1D9?> 66?B412<5+1B966!=@13D?6*E2C94I
NMM %55D9>7K>4
F1<E1D9?>?6+B51D=5>D(B?35CC6?B(5:171B1>%) %) *(
+1B966*5DD9>7C1>466?B4129<9DI
"E<I
!=@13D>1<IC9C?6*E2C94I1>4-
F1<E1D9?>?6?CD)53?F5BI2I!))
!=@<5=5>D1D9?>*DBE3DEB5C1>4*8?BD+5B=*3854E<5
"1@1>!>D5B>1D9?>1<??@5B1D9?>75>3I
1 2
3?>?=95C?6*31<5$5CC?><51B>546?B..+(
3?>?=95C?6*31<5$5CC?><51B>546?B..+(
*31<5=5B9D?6*5G5B175CICD5=5F5<?@=5>D9>, *31<5=5B9D6?B'%?CDH1=@<59>1>7;?;
.9D8?EDB5@19B3?CD1>4B5@<1353?CD
F5
,*=
'%?CD,*=
F5 ,*=
.1CD5G1D5B6<?G= 4
(+I51BL*G9CCB1>3@5B(?@E<1D9?> AE9F1<5>D @5B/51B
*?EB35+85EB?@51>.1D5BCC?391D9?>1>4+855B=1>CC?391D9?>6?B.1D5B .1CD5G1D5B1>4.1CD5
1. Life cycle cost of per capita 50,000 PE is approximately 50 % of 1,000 PE. '%3?CD?6C=1<<C31<5DB51D=5>D@<1>D?6
= 41I?B<5CC9C
,*= 1>4
2. Catchment areas with bigger WWTPs are more efficient <1B75C31<5DB51D=5>D@<1>D9C
,*= G89389C5AE9F1<5>DD??6C=1<<C31<5
- both in terms of cost and pollution control. 3 4
3?>?=95C?6*31<5$5CC?><51B>546?B..+(
(B?@5B*5G5B+I@5$5CC?><51B>546?B*5G5B
(?<93I381>75D?<1B75C31<5@<1>DH1=@<59>%1<1IC91 !>D5B35@D?B 9> D85 CD CD175 1>4 *5@1B1D5 9> >4 CD175
#9D1;IEC8E "1@1>
IBC!>D5B35@D?B I51BC*5@1B1D5
60 100
*5G5B175*1DEB1D9?>
*<?G54?G> 90
50 80
70
'=7$
40
60
30 50
*?EB35?B@?B1D5*ECD19>129<9DI)5@?BD
I51BC?6>F9B?>=5>D1<33?=@<9C8=5>DC
J F5B175'=7$ #1DCEI1=1B9475
J F5B175'=7$ +1>71B9475
40
20
J *5G5B175*1DEB1D9?>$5F5< 30
$5CC?> 10 20
10
*=1<<C31<5DB51D=5>D@<1>D9CDB?E2<5C?=59>G1D5BAE1<9DI3?>DB?<1>4'%?6 0 0
5AE9@=5>DC9>%1<1IC91
?F?6%1<1IC91381>7549DC@?<93I1>481C45F5<?@54<1B75C31<5DB51D=5>D
@<1>D?614F1>354DB51D=5>D6?B>9DB?75>@8?C@8?B?ECB5=?F1<1>4
9C31</51B
=5381>931<45G1D5B9>7 *?EB35#9D1;IECIE9DI)5@?BD
Lesson:
1. Interceptor can be easily installed in a short time and have big contribution to
water quality.
5 2. Separate sewer needs long period for installation and huge cost. 6
$
JCC-2 Presentation Material
(B?@5B*5G5B+I@5$5CC?><51B>546?B*5G5B
(B?@5B*5G5B+I@5$5CC?><51B>546?B*5G5B
!>D5B35@D?B?=29>54 >?*5@1B1D5#1?8C9E>7 +19G1> 5F5<?@546B?=D85C1=5C9DE1D9?>1C?6#!"#+1>7;?;
978G1D5B381>>5<
.1<;9>7@1D8
*5G5B%19>5F5<?@546??D@1D8
!>D5B35@D?B
!>D5B35@D?B*5G5B1>7;?;
!>D5B35@D?B*5G5B1>7;?;
?=29>544B19> 'F5B6<?GG59B $5CC?>
!>D5B35@D?B*5G5B #1?8C9E>7 +19G1> *5G5B175CICD5=9>1>7;?;6?3EC5C?>@?<<ED9?>3?>DB?<?6=E>939@1<7B1IG1D5B
+85B56?B5C5G5B175CICD5=3?>C9CDC9>D5B35@D?BC5G5B=19>1>4*+(
7 *5G5B=19>C1B5<1949>31>1<G85B5G1CD5G1D5B9C49C381B754 8
(B?@5B*5G5B+I@5$5CC?><51B>546?B*5G5B
9>1>391<*E@@?BD?6*5G5B1755F5<?@=5>D
?>F5BC9?>6B?=*5@1B1D5*=1<<@<1>DC 81>75?69>1>391<*E@@?BD?6545B1<?F,*
D??=29>54$1B75@<1>DC%1>9<1
545B1<?F 545B1<?F
*E2C94I 545B1<?F *E2C94I
*E2C94I
*D1D5)5F?<F9>7
E>4
%E>939@1<?F
?>4
%E>939@1<?F %E>939@1<?F
?>4 %E>939@1<?F ?>4
?>4
PD?41I
*?EB35 !=@<5=5>D1D9?>!CCE5C9> .1CD5G1D5B%1>175=5>D6?B%5DB?%1>9<1 B4!>D5B>1D9?>1<.?B;C8?@ .1D5B(?<<ED9?>?>DB?<545B1<.1D5B<51>.1D5B3D
1>4D8>>E1<%55D9>7?6 .1D5B>F9B?>=5>D(1BD>5BC89@9>C91.( 3D=5>4=5>D(?<<ED9?>?>DB?<3D+G9>56939D?6?F
$5CC?> $5CC?>
?=29>54C5G5B175CICD5=81C255>B5@<139>7C5@1B1D5?>54E5D?@B?F945
$571<CICD5=9C1=5>4546B?=G1CD5G1D5BDB51D=5>D@?<<ED9?>3?>DB?<D?C?E>4
3?<<53D9?>?6G1CD5G1D5BEB75>D<I1>4D?B54E35@B?:53D3?CD G1D5B5>F9B?>=5>D
?=29>54C5G5B175CICD5=9C4569>54D?Q1DB1>C9D9?>1<@B?F9C9?>6?BG1CD5G1D5B *E2C94ICICD5=81C5>81>354=E>939@1<9DID?1335<5B1D5..+(9>CD1<<1D9?>
3?<<53D9?>E>D9<C5@1B1D5CICD5=C1B59>@<135R 9 10
9>1>391<*E@@?BD?6*5G5B1755F5<?@=5>D
9>1>391<*E@@?BD?6*5G5B1755F5<?@=5>D
?CD*81B9>72I5>DB1<?F %E>939@1<9DI 9D9O5>C"1@1> Q>F9B?>=5>D1< 81B75R 6B?= Q*5G5B175 81B75R %1>9<1
1@9D1<!>F5CD=5>D '@5B1D9?>?CD ?=29>54*5G5B1751@@<954 1>4
*5G5B17581B753?>F5BD54
9>1>391<5>81>35=5>D
5C97>1D549D95C "1@1>
!>133?B41>35G9D8*5G5B17545F5<?@=5>D
D?>F9B?>=5>D1<81B75
..+( H@5>49DEB5)5F5>E5 %?B5D81>
%19>*5G5B
?6.1D5B81B75
(E2<93H@
"(/= .. >F9B?>=5>D81B75
5>DB1< ?F 81B75
*E2C94I
1@9D1<?CD
)5@1I=5>D >F9B?>=5>D81B75 >F9B?>=5>D81B75
"(/=
*5G5B175
81B75
.1D5B*E@@<I
*5G5B175
%E>9?B@?>4 ?>4
.1D5B*E@@<I .1D5B*E@@<I 81B75
)5@1I=5>D "(/= 81B75 81B75
'%3?CD
(B?F9454 2I "(/=
5>569391B95C
$5CC?>
!>6EDEB5
$5CC?>
1. Considering sewerage role as national infrastructure, financing source is shared by *?EB35%1>9<1.1D5B
Central Gov, Municipality, and Users.
2. Sewerage improve Housing environment for people, therefore, levies house 1. Environmental Charge is introduced because Combined sewer collect Gray water
connection cost, Taxes, and Sewerage charge on Beneficiaries. in whole area regardless of house-connections.
3. Since sewerage contributes to public water environment and urban aesthetic, 2. Environmental Charge from Sewerage Charge is necessary to secure sustainability
Municipality shares on a part of O&M cost. of service and fair burden for public environment of area.
11 12
$
JCC-2 Presentation Material
A-3. Affordable Tariff Level and Cross-subsidy A-3. Affordable Tariff Level and Cross-subsidy
.1D5B *5G5B175D1B966<5F5<6?B ?EC58?<4H@5>49DEB5 )1D9??6.1D5B*5G5B175D1B966
Santiago
London
Exeter Kansas city
Sao Paulo Berlin DC
66?B412<5B1>756?B"#+
Lio D Paris
Yokohama Il de france
Miura
Shenzhen
KL
Xian
EBB5>D@?C9D9?>
BKK
Vietnam
Pattaya
(1@9D1,* (Source: PWC Japan)
$5CC?>
*?EB35(."1@1>
1. There is actually no big difference for Water supply tariff between countries but $5CC?>
sewerage tariff is very different mainly because of applied technologies. *5G5B175D1B9669C1<=?CDC1=51CG1D5BCE@@<I?>59>14F1>3543?E>DB95C
2. Tariff for sewerage should be around 1% or more for HE when an advanced +85*D1B%1B;9>D85697EB59CD85@?C9D9?>?6#!"#+1>49D=51>C
?6G1D5B
technology is introduced. 13 CE@@<ID1B9669CB51C?>12<51CC5G5B175?>5 14
A-3. Affordable Tariff Level and Cross-subsidy A-4. Practice & Issues of Other Cities in Indonesia
)53?==5>41D9?>6?B#!"#+ +B51D=5>D@B?35CC
EBB5>D+1B966<5F5<9>#!"#+ 5B1D54<17??> 9>=?CD39D95C$17??>
)* 1>4*(
.1D5BCE@@<ID1B9669C?6=?>D8<I *5G5BDI@5
*5G5B175D1B9669C=5B5<I
?6=?>D8<I *5G5B=19>C1B53?>CDBE3D5469BCD1>43?>CDBE3D9?>?68?EC53?>>53D9?>81C
255>:ECDCD1BD54
$5CC?><51B>54
*5G5B175D1B966C8?E<425D?6?B=?>D8<I 9>1>35
*+(1>4=19>C5G5BC1B53?>CDBE3D542I(&5>DB1<7?F5B>=5>D6E>4
B?CC
CE2C94I9C1@@<9546B?=?==5B391<D?B5C945>DC9>
B1>38C5G5BC1B53?>CDBE3D542I59D85B(&5>DB1<7?F5B>=5>D6E>4?B
1<=?CD1<<3?E>DB95C
($?31<7?F5B>=5>D6E>4
?EC53?>>53D9?>C1B53?>CDBE3D542I(
>1<IC9C6?B#!"#+
D??6=?>D8<I 9CAE9D566?B412<56?BB5C945>DC '@5B1D9?>1>4=19>D5>1>35
*5G5B175D1B9665AE9F1<5>DD?9C D9=5C?63EBB5>D?>5 '%3?CD1B5?G>542I(
?B3?==5B391< D9=5C?6D1B9669>3B51C59CCD9<<166?B412<5
+1B966CICD5=
<1DB1D5?B(5B
6<??BB1D5
)53?==5>41D9?> )1D9??6B5C945>DD1B9663?==5B391<D1B966 1B5F1B9?EC25DG55>D?P
?B3?==5B391<6139<9D95C 9DC8?E<425B19C542.5 times )1D9??6B5C945>DD1B9669>4ECDB91<D1B9661B51<C?F1B9?EC25DG55>D? P
?BB5C945>DC 9D31>25;5@D9>D853EBB5>D<5F5<
15 16
A-Summary: A-Summary:
Lessons learned to Sewerage System in DKI JKT Recommendation to Sewerage System in DKI JKT
Appropriate development way of Sewerage System in DKI JKT
$5CC?>C<51B>546B?=6?B597>3?E>DB95C
a) Step-wising and sewer main construction in advance
9775BDB51D=5>D @<1>DC1B5?2F9?EC<I5669395>D?>1>I@?9>DC
Sewer main collects wastewater (gray water), which is a principal
pollution load, quickly and widely.
C91>9D95C
Collaboration with urban development project
5>DB1<?F*E2C94I 9C>535CC1BI1>4P 6?B..+(
Effluent quality of on-site systems should be monitored, then
66?B412<5 D1B966 1>4B?CC
CE2C94I9C;5I6?BCECD19>129<9DI encourage Commercial to access to public sewer connection.
Sewer main will provide public sewer connection to urban
17 development & re-development projects (= Separate sewer). 18
$
JCC-2 Presentation Material
*E==1BI
*E==1BI
*5G5B=19>C3?F5B1B51B1@94<I1>43?<<53D+1B966G9D8?ED ?EC5 *D5@
G9C9>745F5<?@=5>D=1;5C@B?@5B9>F5CD=5>D@<1>@?CC92<5
3?>>53D9?>
0?>5
5F5<?@=5>D(81C9>7*?EB35"!(((
*
150000 150,000
..+(*D1BD
..+(*D1BD
100000 100,000
WWTP Capacity - Slow Start Case WWTP capacity - West & North Only
250,000 250,000
150,000 150,000
100,000 100,000
F1<E1D9?>?6+B51D=5>D(B?35CC6?B(5:171B1>
&?6" (5:171B1>..+(5>5B1<(<1>6?B%)*ICD5=
9>1<(81C5
=41CD85419<I1F5B175!>6<?G
*D1>41B4?6*5G5B175$5CC?><51B>549>?D85B3?E>DB95C
3?>?=95C?6*31<5(B?@5B-?<E=5*5G5B+I@5 )5AE9B54 B51
81
9>1>391<*E@@?BD6?B*5G5B1755F5<?@=5>D*E2C94I?B81B75
66?B412<5+1B966$5F5<1>4B?CC
CE2C94I
(B13D9351>4!CCE5C?6'D85B9D95C9>!>4?>5C91
9>1>391<*9=E<1D9?>66?B412<5+1B966!=@13D?6*E2C94I
F1<E1D9?>?6+B51D=5>D(B?35CC6?B(5:171B1>%) %) *(
+1B966*5DD9>7C1>466?B4129<9DI
!=@13D>1<IC9C?6*E2C94I1>4-
F1<E1D9?>?6?CD)53?F5BI2I!))
!=@<5=5>D1D9?>*DBE3DEB5C1>4*8?BD+5B=*3854E<5
&?D5C
Z $96D(E=@ [ B9D81=25B\ AE1<9O1D9?> 1>4*549=5>D1D9?> +1>;] 5B?293+1>;
^ %)+1>;_ %5381>931<B??=6?B%)` 4=9>9CDB1D9?> 5G1D5B9>7E9<49>7 a 9C381B75?>4E9D
21 22
F1<E1D9?>?6+B51D=5>D(B?35CC6?B(5:171B1>
F1<E1D9?>?6+B51D=5>D(B?35CC6?B(5:171B1>
(5:171B1>..+(5>5B1<(<1>6?B*(*ICD5= ?=@1B9C?>?65138DB51D=5>D@B?35CC
&?D5C
Z $96D(E=@ !D5=(B?35CC *( %) %)
[ B9D81=25B
\ AE1<9O1D9?> 1>4
*549=5>D1D9?> +1>; )5AE9B54 B5181
] 5B?293+1>;
^ >4 *5DD<5=5>D+1>; 1B51 )1D9?D?*(
_ <?G5BE9<49>7
` 5G1D5B9>7E9<49>7
a 4=9>9CDB1D9?> E9<
)5AE9B54B5181 b9C381B75?>4E9D 66<E5>D '=7$ V
V
V
WE1<9DI **=7$ V
V
V
$
JCC-2 Presentation Material
F1<E1D9?>?6+B51D=5>D(B?35CC6?B(5:171B1>
F1<E1D9?>?6+B51D=5>D(B?35CC6?B(5:171B1>
=4
=4
'@5B1D9?>3?CD,*=
=4
CD9=1D54'@5B1D9?>3?CD
CD9=1D543?>CDBE3D9?>3?CD
?>CDBE3D9?>3?CD%9<,*
6?B5138DB51D=5>D@B?35CC 9>3<E49>7B5@19B3?CD6?B
I51BC
!>31C5?6
=
*( %) %)
+B51D=5>D@B?35CC
)5@<135=5>D3?CD%9<,*
%) *( %)
+B51D=5>D@B?35CC
CD9=1D54)5@<135=5>D3?CD
)5AE9B541B51
6?B
I51BC
6?B5138DB51D=5>D@B?35CC !>31C5?6
=
*( %) %)
%) *( %)
+B51D=5>D@B?35CC
+B51D=5>D@B?35CC
25 26
+1B966*5DD9>7C1>466?B4129<9DI
+1B966*5DD9>7C1>466?B4129<9DI
)53?==5>41D9?>6B?=
Comparison between MP review and PPP/FS
?B3?==5B391<6139<9D95C 9DC8?E<425B19C54D9=5C ,>9D%9<!)
!>D5B35@D?B9CG945<I9>CD1<<54 9>0?>5
9>
+?D1<'%?CDZ
?B?==5B391<
%()5F95G
+1B9669CB19C54D9=5C 6B?=3EBB5>D?>59>
+85> 9D9CB19C542I3E=E<1D9F5(9>3B51C55F5BII51BC &?>5
!=@13D>1<IC9C?6*E2C94I1>4- )5F95G?6"
!=@13D>1<IC9C?6*E2C94I1>4- )5F95G?6"
Case Study: PPP 4 Model Basic Assumptions (Tentative)
!D5= (9@5&5DG?B; .1CD5G1D5B+B51D=5>D(<1>D
'% (5B9?4
I51BC
%1>175=5>D (E2<93 *(
449D9?>1<
?>CDBE3D9?> ?CD
=9<<9?>,*S =9<<9?>,*S 9>3<E454
(X )5@<135=5>D
475 million US$ !>6<1D9?> >?D 3?>C945B54
Case 1 SPC
*<E475 9C@?C1< ,>9D 55
,*=
290 million US$ 185 million US$ !)
,*
EBB5>3I H381>75 )1D5
Case 2 Public SPC !)
,*
(100%) 1>; $?1> ?B (B?:53D
>>E1< !>D5B5CD
345 million US$ 130 million US$ 9>1>35 !>D5B5CD )1D5 &?D5 D? 25 5H@<?B54 =?B5 9> D85 CDE4I
$
JCC-2 Presentation Material
!=@13D>1<IC9C?6*E2C94I1>4- )5F95G?6"
!=@13D>1<IC9C?6*E2C94I1>4- )5F95G?6"
Case 4-1: VGF around 40% can achieve full cost recovery
Case 1: No Subsidy for Pipe & WWTP only with Tariff
Sludge Disp. 100 $/m3
Case 2: No Subsidy for WWTP Case 3: 30% Subsidy for WWTP Case 4-2: VGF around 50%
31 32
!=@13D>1<IC9C?6*E2C94I1>4-
!=@13D>1<IC9C?6*E2C94I1>4- )5F95G?6"
1C931CCE=@D9?>C6?B9>1>391<>1<IC9C
*E==1BI?>*5BF935655-1B91D9?>
O&M Period : 20 years
Assumptions Subsidy in Ration Additional CAPEX(Replacement) : Included
WWTP Interest of Sewer OM Period for
Inflation : Included
investment Private fund Investment (milli.USD/y) DKI Budget
Sludge Disposal Unit Fee : 60 USD/Dry-t
Case 1 Private 10% Anu. Private 68.9 2.2%
Currency Exchange Rate : IDR 9,012.5=USD 1.0
Case 2 Private -ditto- Public 16.1 0.5%
Loan Interest Rate : 9%(IDR/Annual Interest)
70 % Private -ditto-
Case 3 Public 6.0 0.2% Bank Loan Grace Period : 5 years
30 % Public
60 % Private Repayment Period : 18 years(Principal & Interest Equal Basis)
Case 4-1 -ditto- Public 0.0 0.0%
40 % VGF
Tariff Revenue : 759 Mil.USD(Total for 20 years)
50 % Private
Case 4-2 50 % VGF -ditto- Public 0.0 0.0% Commercial 2.5times, Residents Same as it today
33 34
!=@13D>1<IC9C?6*E2C94I1>4-
!=@13D>1<IC9C?6*E2C94I1>4-
!=@13D?6*E2C94I6?B!>9D91<?>CDBE3D9?>
Impact of Subsidy for Initial Construction and Replacement
*E2C94I 6?B
+1H 'D85BC
*8?BD61<<
*E2C94I *8?BD1<< *5BF93555
%9< !)/51B
E>49>7
6?B!>9D91<
?CD !>9D91<(X +?D1<(X %9<!)I %9<!)I
(X
+1B966
&51B<I
05B?
*8?BD61<<
+1H 'D85BC
%9< !)/51B
!>9D91<(X
(X-
'@5H
+1B966
!>3?=5
by bidding
,C175 *?EB35C
&?D5C
+?D1<(X=51>C!>9D91<(XT449D9?>1< (X
35 *E2C94I6?B+?D1<(X9C=E38<?G5BD81>?>56?B!>9D91<(X 36
$
JCC-2 Presentation Material
!=@13D>1<IC9C?6*E2C94I1>4-
F1<E1D9?>?6?CD)53?F5BI2I!))
Impact of Subsidy for Initial Construction CCE=@D9?>6?B3?>?=93>1<IC9C
?>CDBE3D9?>*D1BD1D
1>4'@5B1D9?>*D1BD1D
(B?:53D$965UI51BC
d
1@9D1<'@@?BDE>9DI?CDU
3?>?=935>569DCU
Z )54E354'%?CD?6*5@D93+1>;C
!=@13D453B51C5G9D8 [ 6653D?6!=@B?F5=5>D9>(E2<93*1>9D1D9?>
*8?BD1<<%9< !)
9>3B51C9>7?6CE2C94I \ 6653D?>!=@B?F5=5>D?6<9F9>7>F9B?>=5>D
Y[c\ U31<3E<1D542I=?E>D?6.9<<9>7>5CCD?(1I.+(*EBF5I
D8B?E78?>D9>75>D-1<E1D9?>%5D8?4-%
] ,C175?6+B51D54.1D5B 6B?=..+(
^ 6653D?6)9C59>$1>4-1<E5
_ 6653D?>+?EB9C=)53E@5B1D9?>
3?>?=93?CDU
!>9D91<(X 6?B..+(1>4*5G5B(9@5
*E2C94I6?B!>9D91<(X
449D9?>1<(X 6?B..+(
37
'% 3?CD6?B..+( 38
F1<E1D9?>?6?CD)53?F5BI2I!))
F1<E1D9?>?6?CD)53?F5BI2I!))
9>1>391<1>43?>?=931<F1<E1D9?> CD9=1D9?>?6449D9?>1<1C8!>6<?G
*E2C94I6?B !D5=/51B
?>CDBE3D9?> !))Z
!>9D91< !)) [ \
*D175 (B?:53D!)) .+(6?B>F9B?>=5>D1<
(X !=@B?F5=5>D
!>3B51C9>7?6!>3?=5+1H
6B?=9>3B51C54 +?EB9C=
!>3?=52I9=@B?F9>7 ?D5<
'33E@1>3I
+9=5C
!>3B51C9>7?6-+ 6B?=
9>3B51C54 +?EB9CDH@5>49DEB5
2I453B51C9>7 )1D5?6.1D5B
&?D5C ?B>59C51C5
%19><I2I)9C5?6$1>4-1<E5
ZU*5G5B@9@53?>CDBE3D9?>3?CD9C>?D9>3<E454 1>4 '@@?BDE>9DI3?CD
[ \UC5G5B@9@53?>CDBE3D9?>3?CD9C9>3<E454 Additional Cash Inflow
39 40
F1<E1D9?>?6?CD)53?F5BI2I!))
F1<E1D9?>?6?CD)53?F5BI2I!))
Sewerage in Zone-1 is indirectly over Full- cost recovery Sewerage in Zone-1 is directly Full- cost recovery
+9=5$9>5?6CD9=1D54)5F5>E51>4+?D1<(B?:53D?CD +9=5$9>5?6+1B9661>4+?D1<(B?:53D?CD
%9< !) %9< !)
?>CDBE3D9?>*D175D9=5 ?>CDBE3D9?>*D175D9=5
'%
'%
449D9?>1<(X
!>9D91<(X 449D9?>1<(X
+1B966
!>9D91<(X
+1B966&?>
+1B966
.+(6?B>F9B?>=5>D1<!=@B?F5=5>D
!>3B51C5?6$1>4+1H
+1B966&?>
'D85BC
/51B
/51B
Remarks: Funding cost & tax are not considered. Remarks: Funding cost & tax are not considered. 42
41
$
JCC-2 Presentation Material
F1<E1D9?>?6?CD)53?F5BI2I!))
F1<E1D9?>?6?CD)53?F5BI2I!))
Sewerage in Zone-1 is indirectly over Full- cost recovery Sewerage in Zone-1 is directly Full- cost recovery
+9=5$9>5?6CD9=1D54)5F5>E51>4+?D1<(B?:53D?CD +9=5$9>5?6+1B9661>4+?D1<(B?:53D?CD
%9< !) %9< !)
?>CDBE3D9?>*D175D9=5 ?>CDBE3D9?>*D175D9=5
'% '%
449D9?>1<(X
449D9?>1<(X
!>9D91<(X
+1B966 !>9D91<(X
+1B966&?>
+1B966
.+(6?B>F9B?>=5>D1<!=@B?F5=5>D
+1B966&?>
!>3B51C5?6$1>4+1H
'D85BC
/51B
/51B
Remarks: Funding cost & tax are not considered. 43
Remarks: Funding cost & tax are not considered. 44
B-Summary: !=@<5=5>D1D9?>*DBE3DEB5C
Recommendation to Sewerage System in DKI JKT
@@B?@B91D545F5<?@=5>DG1I?6*5G5B175*ICD5=9>#!"#+
1+B51D=5>D(B?35CC6?B(5:171B1>
%)9CD8525CD 6B?=D85@?9>DC?6?CD(5B6?B=1>35 B51?>CDB19>DC
1>41CI'%
2*E2C94I1>4-
!=@13D?6*E2C94I453B51C5G9D89DC9>3B51C9>7F?<E=5
P
*E2C94I 9C5>?E786?B3?>CDBE3D9?>1>4B5@<135=5>D9>0?>5
G89389C5AE9F1<5>DD?
CE2C94I?6D9=5 9>'+
3?CD)53?F5BI
*5G5B1759>0?>5
9CF912<5 2531EC5?6@?C9D9F5!))
*5G5B1759>0?>5
9C9>49B53D<I6E<<
3?CDB53?F5BI @B?:53D
45 46
%94
D5B=C3854E<5 *8?BD
D5B=C3854E<5
47 48
$
JCC-3 Presentation Material
+*+($&*&#
+*+($
*+#-$'# % *".+)+'%
Sewerage PPP Project in DKI JKT Murasakigawa River
Murasakigawa River, flows in
Future Image of the Goal urban center, is a symbolic river
in Kitakyushu.
Sewerage has remarkably
restored water environment Kitakyushu Administrative
Issues and Solutions since watershed of
Murasakigawa retains in
Administrative region.
Cost, Revenue, and Fund Resource
Steps to the Initiation
December 5, 2012
JICA PPP Study Team Murasakigawa River
1 2
+*+($&*&# +*+($&*&#
+*+($
*+#-$'# % *".+)+'% +*+($
*+#-$'# % *".+)+'%
Before After
(in 1979) (in 2008)
After
(in 2004)
Before
(in 1979)
3 4
$
JCC-3 Presentation Material
))+)&#+* &%) Issues & Solutions:
Traffic Jam → Difficulties for Sewer Construction
))+)&(,(
4#&'$%* %
Huge Number of Terraced Houses → Difficulties of House-connection installment
Remarkable Inflation → Cost Increase by Implementation Delay Large Commercial & Others
Lack of Budget → Shortage of Necessary & Timely Investment
Septic
SEWER
8
Trunk sewer
Vertical shaft
Bore hole (Boring)
&%,(/ %(&+*)
10
9
Cut & Fill Curb & Long distance pipe jacking Pejagaran WWTP General Plan for MBR System
(Final Phase : 264,000m3/day for the maximum Inflow)
$
JCC-3 Presentation Material
))+&#+* &%) ))+&#+* &%)
&)*&$'( )&%2,A*', )%+##'(* &)**&()&(*', )4)A+##'(*
Increase of Total Investment:
Rapid Increase
Coverage 100% of Wastewater Collection
Full Separate > 13% Step-wised
WWTP to be
expanded according
to increase of house
connections. Remarkable Improvement
of Cost Performance
13 14
))+&#+* &%)
&(2#( % %%
&)**&()&(*', )4)A+##'(* 1&#( %&,(
4#&'$%* %&%
Rapid Improvement
of Water Environment
&,(*)+)* %2 # *.
Remarkable Improvement
of Cost Performance
.&1&#( % )&)*( %A
15
16
$
JCC-3 Presentation Material
Operation
with Private Fund (358) (
G DKI JKT ,( ( 4* G 736 ~ 887 ,(
( (630) (
Construction
JJ Central Gov. = JJ 167
(%* EBEAEB 60%
Central Gov.
%,( (%* %,( 290
DKI JKT
&,(*)+)* %2 # *.
&,(*)+)* %2 # *.
( 4*+%
4 #2 # *.*&2 -'(&'(#.A ( &(/(&$$( # ).A
19 20
&(*##
Subsidy
Full cost recovery 40% by Private is necessary
only with Tariff (VGF=60%)
Tax
Funding Tariff
Tax Cost Tariff Income
Income
Funding Tariff Replace
Cost Income
% * #
'-
Replace
% * #
'- O&M
Cost
O&M
Cost
$
JCC-3 Presentation Material
Operation
CC?
(%*C
( 4*
G
40% by Private
(VGF=60%)
+% '# *. ( 4*
Construction
JJ
FB?
(%*F
CC?
(%*C
%,( (%*
&,(*)+)* %2 # *.
+2) )(+% * %*&* $I %
G+**&*#&)*2.EB? %%#%A25
26
27
29
30
$
JCC-3 Presentation Material
&(* *($)+#
(*
31 32
• One of the requirements for unsolicited project is “not included in the master
The proposed project is considered a solicited project, plan of the relevant sector”;
given that it is contained a master plan for sewerage
sector in Jakarta and listed in the 2012 PPP Book. • The PPP Presidential Regulation states that Solicited projects are openly
published and accessible. In the 2012 PPP Book, the Project is included as
solicited project.
In case of solicited projects,
[Relevant Laws]
procurements for PPP services must be open bidding • Presidential Regulation No. 67 of 2005 on Cooperation between the
Government and Private Entities in Infrastructure Procurement as amended by
(public tender) by the Government Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2010 and lastly amended by Presidential
Regulation No. 56 of 2011
project companies may be granted government support.
33 34
$
7㧚Memorandum of JCC
MINUTES OF MEETING
JOINT COORDINATION COMMITTEE
JUNE 21, 2012
SS1 BAPPENAS
Chair of the Meeting: Dr. Dedy S. Priatna, Deputy to the Minister of Bappenas
1. On the Summary of Service fee Variation (page 33): In the case 4.1, it is stated that the
subsidy required for service fee in the operation and maintenance period is 0 per year. This
situation can be achieved by cost sharing in Capital Expenditure for WWTP between the
private (SPC, 60 %) and public (DKI Jakarta Government, 40%). This option shows that
the DKI Jakarta will choose providing “Government Support“ for the construction of the
WWTP at the initial stage instead of giving subsidy for the service fee to the SPC annually.
Several questions can be raised as follows. Will the DKI Jakarta accept this option? Do we
believe to the consultant? Is the Japanese standard quality applied in this case not too
expensive?
2. In the scenario of the report, pipeline sewerage will be provided through the public fund.
How about lessons learned from other countries such as Taiwan, Vietnam and others?
3. According to the consultant, the technical model applied for the proposed WWTP is a
membrane system. How is the trade - off between the cost and performance? What are
models employed for other countries?
4. Options for staging in the construction period of the WWTP proposed by the consultant
are very important. Which one should be chosen for optimizing the capacity of the plant
and the cost which should be paid?
5. Comment on the assumption on flat tariff for the residential uses during the o & m period:
A scenario for gradual increase on tariff should be employed in the calculation of
affordability to pay of the Jakarta Government for service fee.
A7-1
1. Prior to giving comments, Mr. Amien Reported to the Chair of the JCC regarding last
week meeting between the MPW and the consultant.
2. Based on the scenario proposed by the consultant, the construction of sewerage pipelines
will be conducted by the government through the public fund (either loan or APBN) due to
various reasons. Although the consultant should be responsible to the JICA, the scope of
the PPP project should include a particular section or coverage area of the sewerage
pipeline.
4. Comment on the option of construction staging of the WWTP: To build a full capacity of
the WWTP at the initial stage will be ineffective because there will be idle capacity of the
facility. Accordingly, option no 4 (staging approach) is more appropriate.
5. Comment on membrane technology for the WWTP: Membrane technology is very good
but expensive. If possible the construction cost should be minimized and staging approach
to the construction should be applied.
1. Comment on Operation and Maintenance: Are the operation and maintenance proposed by
the consultant is only limited to the WWTP or they include the sewerage pipeline? As a
system, O & M suppose to be conducted by one provider, to ensure continues supply of
waste water intake to the WWTP.
2. On tariff and its relation to the revenue: Based on current survey, an initial model on the
relationship between tariff and potential revenue in some zones is available.
3. PPP project scheme requires involvement of various agencies in the management and
implementation processes. Therefore, the FS report should clearly describe their roles,
tasks and responsibilities.
A7-2
1. Since the PPP project will deal with big asset and high value, therefore institutional
arrangements for the project management is crucial and should be comprehensively
included in the report.
1. Subsidy from the Government (GOI and DKI Jakarta) should be minimized.
1. Consultant should take into account the relationship between Zona 1 and other Zones in the
management processes including its environmental impacts.
1. Up till now there is no formal regulation on Viability of Gap Funding (VGF) from the
MOF. RPMK (Rencana Peraturan Menteri Keuangan/ Draft Regulation of the MOF) will
be issued within 2 -3 months later.
1. Based on lessons learned (practices), up till today, there is no Sewerage Projects in the
world, Financially Feasible (no subsidy).
2. The sewerage system projects are based on principle of improving the welfare of the
society or on social-economic benefit. In this case the government support or subsidy is
categorized as sunk cost.
3. It should be emphasized here that the principle of matching grant will be employed in the
case of grant from the Government to the local government.
1. Experiences in several cities in Indonesia show that provision of Sewerage System through
merely public fund, does not work well due to the limited budget of the national as well as
local governments.
A7-3
2. The WWTP PPP DKI Jakarta project may be considered as a “good potential project”
since it is not purely public fund but a combination of both the private and public funds.
2. Emphasized that the Study is a grant from the JICA to the GOI. Therefore the project will
be treated as a solicited project and will be delivered through a competitive open tender.
1. Possible options proposed by the consultant in the report will be carefully scrutinized and
taken into account in the decision making process by the government of DKI Jakarta,
Ministry of Public Works, Bappenas and other main stakeholders.
2. Suggestion to the government of DKI Jakarta: Annual subsidy to fulfill the gap between
service fee (payment for SPC for Opex and Capex of the WWTP) and revenue from tariff
should be avoided. Instead, DKI should provide initial Capex for the WWTP as a sunk
cost).
3. Consultant should include in the report other countries experiences in providing and
managing sewerage facilities.
4. Consultant should include a scenario on a package of PPP project in which WWTP and the
sewerage pipeline (covers a certain area probably dominated by commercial uses) are
bundled, utilizing private fund.
5. The DKI Jakarta government will explore the possibility of utilization of VGF from the
Ministry of Finance.
6. Indonesian consultant, in this regard Mr. Windu is assigned to complete and submit the
minutes of meeting.
1. In responding to the technology employed in the project: China adopts the membrane
system and there is no objection to such a method so far.
2. Further response will be conducted by the consultant after receiving the translation of
MoM
A7-4
i. Sewer Development Strategy, on early stage: rain water will go to the sewer
pipe, therefore it will increase the volume of waste water flowing to the
WWTP.
ii. The facilities and building should be shifted toward north direction within
the site
b. Dr Dedy request Mr Windu to include the result of the limited discussion in the
Minutes of Meeting of JCC.
A7-5
MINUTES OF MEETING
JOINT COORDINATION COMMITTEE 2
SS 1, Bappenas
OPENING
x Both teams were asked to present the progress of their studies in the JCC 2
meeting,
x The Zone 1 is implemented through PPP, while Zone 6 is managed through the
ODA loan or Public-funding. Based on those two studies, the GOI will then
determine, which approach should be more appropriate for the case of DKI Jakarta
x Several Studies have been conducted under the Master Plan of the DKI-Jakarta.
Some of them will be implemented through PPP approach, including the WWTP of
the Zone 1.
x Emphasized the different management approaches employed in Zone 1 and Zone 6.
PRESENTATION
x See attachment
A7-6
x See attachment
DISCUSSION
x He was surprised with the time schedule proposed by the Zone 6 team. Why does
the Zone 6 require longer period in the project completion (project formulation,
procurement and construction) in comparison with the Zone 1 which adopts the
PPP approach? The period of project completion in the case of Zone 6 was too long
according to Dr.Dedy
x Two main financial alternatives proposed by the team of the Zone 1, they are: (1)
go by loan/public fund and (2) some parts will be funded through private sector.
x Agreed with the request of Dr. Dedy; the Zone 1 team will include both the project
financing scenarios through public funding and PPP model
x In the JCC1, an option for a step by step construction process was discussed, since
there were constraints/problems related to house-connections. However, he had an
objection if the construction of WWTP should be divided into 4 steps. A single step
for constructing the WWTP is preferable; however, the scope of the water sewage
treatment will be the grey water.
x Based on the proposal for the Zone 1, 60 % of the CAPEX of WWTP will come
from the government and another 40 % from the SPC, and 100 % CAPEX of the
pipe network will be provided by the government, if O % of subsidy is required
in the Operation and Maintenance. In this scenario, therefore, around 400 + 110
million IDR is required from the government fund. Accordingly, careful
consideration and decision should be conducted by the government of Indonesia,
since the decision will concern with huge investment.
A7-7
x The Zone 6 team offered the cost-sharing scheme between the central and the local
governments.
x The government of Jakarta would be very glad with the initiative to solve the
environmental matters.
x There are 15 zones in Jakarta. Therefore, the systems and technologies employed
across those zones should be designed in such a way to maintain their harmony and
consistency. The investment cost for Zone 1 is approximately 4.5 trillion IDR.
x As discussed in the previous limited meeting, the site-plan of the project should be
modified towards the north-west direction. The project location is still the same
with the initial design.
x In the case of piping network, the existing network and the new one are combined
in order to reduce the cost.
x Further clarification was needed: (1) will the black water be channeled through
special pipes? Whether user charge will be imposed on the grey water?
x Social study on social- behavior change is required in relation to the burden of tariff
imposed on the house-holds. Currently, the tariff for house hold is only 10 – 15
thousand IDR per month and about 40% of costumers have not paid the bill yet.
x To keep the house hold’s tariff similar with the existing charge as proposed by the
consultant was inappropriate according to her, since this would not educate the
people.
x The DKI-Jakarta government may not be able to solve its environmental problems.
Accordingly, support from the central government is strongly required.
x Emphasized the need for in-depth social study to influence the behavioral change.
A7-8
x According to the Consultant, tariff for the commercial users will be increased 2,5
times from the current one. Two issues should be taken into account: (1) Currently,
the government of DKI-Jakarta attempts to increase 15 % of the commercial tariff;
many of commercial users oppose to such a policy; (2) The proposed tariff should
be less than the cost for individual treatment. In this regard, individual septic tank is
still allowed according to the environmental law
x Option not to increase the house hold tariff during the concession period should be
further elaborated.
A7-9
A7-10
A7-11
A7-12
MINUTES OF MEETING
JOINT COORDINATION COMMITTEE 3
Sewerage Treatment Plant/ STP PPP Project in DKI Jakarta
Akmani Hotel, Jakarta
OPENING
PRESENTATION
Schedule
9 The Minister of Public Works and the new Governor of DKI Jakarta have agreed on
the Sewerage PPP project in DKI Jakarta
9 The construction period would take within 3 years started from the end of 2014 and
completed in 2017 (see draft mid-term schedule, presentation 05 Dec, 2005 in the
attachment))
9 Based on the above time schedule for the construction, Mr. Yamamoto emphasized
the importance of fulfilling the readiness criteria for the PPP project, i.e.,
clarification of the Government Contracting Agency /GCA, establishment of the
Project Management Unit/PMU), formulation of the Pre-Feasibility Study,
registration for the next 2013 PPP book (see also Steps to Implementation.
Presentation 05 Dec, 2005 in the attachment).
A7-13
Financial Issue
9 Financial analysis is shown in page 18 to 27 of the presentation:
o Cost for the STP would be funded through government (1 time VGF) and
private sector. The proportion of the private sector would be further
discussed and decided in the discussion (initial proposal VGF : SPC = 60% :
40%)
o PPP structure: BOT
o Tariff setting: Cross-subsidy from commercial
9 Clear and appropriate tariff setting was required and tariff adjustment should be
conducted. Cross-subsidy approach with increasing tariff (2 x) for the large
commercial business would be applied. The tariff should be lower than the cost
for Independent Treatment Plant/ITP of large commercial (see page 18}.
DISCUSSION
Mr. Yamamoto
x Projection of tariff revenue was based on Floor Area growth of commercial areas.
x Three scenario of tariff escalation was presented by the team namely: (1) W/O GDP
escalation; (2) With GDP escalation 6 % annually; (3) 2 X of tariff of large commercial
with GDP escalation 6 % annually.
A7-14
Mr. Budiyuwono, DG-Ciptakarya, MPW
x For this STP PPP project, VGF could be provided by the central government in the form
of loan from overseas.
x With regard to tariff adjustment, he was unsure whether the provincial government of
Jakarta could easily increase the tariff.
A7-15
x He also reminded that according to the PPP guideline, the governor of DKI Jakarta
should request VGF to the Minister of Finance
x Above all, the team should devote its efforts to convince the new governor of DKI
Jakarta that PPP approach to infrastructure provision is beneficial for the DKI Jakarta
government
A7-16
x The DKI Jakarta provincial government should calculate its capacity in investment cost of
the project based on the provincial tax/ non tax revenues and other possible sources.
x He reminded that the ground-breaking would be at the end of 2013 or the beginning of
2014.
A7-17