Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 785 views

    Rubrics For Portfolio

    Uploaded by

    Ebology
    This rubric evaluates a student teaching portfolio across 5 criteria: components, organization, grammaticality and mechanics in writing, neatness and format, and completeness of contents. An exemplary portfolio will have all required components clearly marked and organized, proper grammar and formatting, and fully completed contents demonstrating a deep understanding of the professional education subjects. A poor portfolio is missing multiple required components, has disorganized contents, numerous grammar errors affecting readability, and incomplete discussions lacking scholarly understanding.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubrics For Portfolio

    Uploaded by

    Ebology
    785 views1 page
    This rubric evaluates a student teaching portfolio across 5 criteria: components, organization, grammaticality and mechanics in writing, neatness and format, and completeness of contents. An exemplary portfolio will have all required components clearly marked and organized, proper grammar and formatting, and fully completed contents demonstrating a deep understanding of the professional education subjects. A poor portfolio is missing multiple required components, has disorganized contents, numerous grammar errors affecting readability, and incomplete discussions lacking scholarly understanding.

    Original Description:

    This is rubric for creating portfolio in field study

    Original Title

    Rubrics for Portfolio

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric evaluates a student teaching portfolio across 5 criteria: components, organization, grammaticality and mechanics in writing, neatness and format, and completeness of contents. An exemplary portfolio will have all required components clearly marked and organized, proper grammar and formatting, and fully completed contents demonstrating a deep understanding of the professional education subjects. A poor portfolio is missing multiple required components, has disorganized contents, numerous grammar errors affecting readability, and incomplete discussions lacking scholarly understanding.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    785 views1 page

    Rubrics For Portfolio

    Uploaded by

    Ebology
    This rubric evaluates a student teaching portfolio across 5 criteria: components, organization, grammaticality and mechanics in writing, neatness and format, and completeness of contents. An exemplary portfolio will have all required components clearly marked and organized, proper grammar and formatting, and fully completed contents demonstrating a deep understanding of the professional education subjects. A poor portfolio is missing multiple required components, has disorganized contents, numerous grammar errors affecting readability, and incomplete discussions lacking scholarly understanding.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Rubrics for Student Teaching Portfolio

    Criteria Exemplary Good Fair Poor


    Components, which All components One of the Two of the More than
    include the cover are present and components is components two of the
    page, table of clearly marked missing are missing components
    contents, learning are missing
    tasks, attendance
    and endorsement
    letter (10%)
    Organization (15%) Organization Organization Organization is Organization
    follows the slightly differs different from does not
    instruction for the from the the instruction follow the
    portfolio correctly instruction given. Page instructions
    and completely. given. Page numbers are given and
    Page numbers numbers are correct. there are no
    were correct. correct. page
    numbers.
    Grammaticality and The written work is There are few There are The errors in
    mechanics in writing processed well, minor errors several minor grammar and
    (15%) edited and with the errors with the mechanics
    obviously grammar and grammar and affect the
    proofread. mechanics of mechanics of readability of
    the work. the work. the work.
    Neatness and Format Presentation and Presentation Presentation Presentation
    (10%) organization of the and slightly is not neat
    folio demonstrate organization of demonstrate and shows
    professionalism. the folio is neat neatness. half-baked
    and formal. output.
    Completeness of Contents are all Contents are Few contents Several of
    Contents (50%) completely filled all filled and are missing but the contents
    with scholarly has a well has well are missing
    discussion. It written written and the
    clearly explanation. It explanation. It discussion is
    demonstrates in- demonstrates mentions some poorly
    depth good understanding written. All
    understanding of understanding of lessons explanation
    professional of learning in learned in are opinion-
    education professional professional based.
    subjects. subjects. subjects.

    Rating: ___________

    Rated By

    ____________________________
    Name of the FS Instructor

    You might also like