Experimental Study On Comparison of Strength Properties of Natural Waste Fiber (Coir and Jute) Reinforced Concrete
Experimental Study On Comparison of Strength Properties of Natural Waste Fiber (Coir and Jute) Reinforced Concrete
Experimental Study On Comparison of Strength Properties of Natural Waste Fiber (Coir and Jute) Reinforced Concrete
, 2017, 7(2)
Syed Nasir, Muhammad Ayoub, Syed Zafar, Ahmed Bilal, Anwaar Hazoor, Ehsanullah Kakar, Aamir
Mehmood
Department of Civil Engineering, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management
Sciences, Quetta, Pakistan.
Abstract
For this study, natural waste fiber (coir and jute) were used as they are freely available in large quantities.
The property of natural waste fiber (coir and jute) reinforced concrete was compared with conventional
concrete based on experiments performed in the laboratory. The use of coir and jute fiber will also lead to
better management of these natural waste fibers. Coconut and jute fibers were cut into desire length of 71.67
mm and 96.48 mm per aspect ratio of 75. 1:2:4 ratios concrete mix was produced which contains coir and
jute fiber of 0.5, 1 and 1.5% by volume of concrete. Engineering properties such as workability, flexural
strength and compressive strength of coir and jute fibers reinforce concrete specimens were determined
following standard procedures at curing ages of 7, 14 and 28 days. The results showed that the workability
decrease from increase of fibers, while the compressive strength increased up to 4.5% and flexural strength
increased up to 5.9% but dropped afterwards when compared with conventional concrete.
Keywords: Natural Fiber; Coir Fiber; Jute Fibers; Concrete; Compressive Strength; Flexural Strength;
Workability
INTRODUCTION
Concrete is inexpensive, durable, and readily moldable into complicated shapes and has good compressive
strength and stiffness due to which it is most frequently used man made material in the world. However, it
has low ductility, low energy absorption and low tensile strength. In structures, it is reinforced with
reinforcement bars or mesh (rebar's) due its lack of tensile strength. But this type of reinforcement is crude
and ineffective for controlling cracks. Also, this reinforcement gets decayed and corroded in abusive
environments. Concrete technology now contains reinforcement in the form of fibers, Fiber-reinforcement is
not used for structural strengthening, and rather it reduces the requirement of amount of rebar’s or mesh
and adds to the improvement of durability by delaying the crack propagation.
The concept of reinforcement in the form of fibers is not new. In ancient times horsehair was used in mortar
and straw in mud bricks as fiber reinforcement. Considerable efforts have been made world-wide to add
various types of fibers to concrete so to make it more strong, durable and economical. Natural fiber such as
coir and jute has certain mechanical and physical characteristics due to which it can be utilized effectively
in the development of reinforced concrete material. In most cases, these fibers are dumped as agricultural
waste, so can be easily available in large quantity hence making them cheap.
(Hasan et al., 2012) from Malaysia, have investigated concrete physical and mechanical characteristics after
adding coconut fiber on a volume basis. They conducted a micro structural analysis test using a scanning
electron microscope for understanding the bonding behavior of the coconut fibers. (Domke, 2012) from
Nagpur, Maharashtra has investigated the use of natural and agricultural waste products such as coconut
fibers and rice husk ash to enhance the properties of concrete. The study also emphasizes on the fact that
coconut fibers and rice husk ash not only improve the properties of concrete, but it also leads to proper
disposal of these waste materials and reduces their impact on the environment.(Baruah and Talukdar, 2007)
Investigated coir fiber reinforced concrete with the volume fraction 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0% by the
volume fraction of concrete shows compressive strength, modulus of rupture, split tensile strength, toughness
and shear strength continuously increases up to 2% volume fraction of concrete.
105
J. Appl. Emerg. Sci., 2017, 7(2)
Experimental Study on Comparison of Strength Properties of Natural Waste Fiber (Coir and Jute) Reinforced Concrete
(Majid et al., 2012) from New Zealand has investigated coconut fiber reinforced concrete (CFRC) members
mechanical and dynamic properties. An assessment between the static and dynamic moduli was conducted.
The influence of 1%, 2%, 3% and 5% fiber contents by mass of cement and fiber lengths of 2.5, 5 and 7.5
cm is investigated. CFRC with higher fiber content has a higher damping but lower dynamic and static
modulus of elasticity. It is found that CFRC with a fiber length of 5 cm and a fiber content of 5% has the best
properties. (Ramli et al., 2013) from Malaysia studied the strength and durability of coconut fiber reinforced
concrete in aggressive environments. Their aim was to mitigate the development of cracks in marine
structures by introducing coconut fibers which would provide a localized reinforcing effect. The result shows
that the fibers play a role in restraining the development of cracks. However, the dosage of coconut fiber
should be low, not exceeding 1.2% of the binder volume, due to the drawback of its natural degradation.
(Yalley and Khen, 2009) from United Kingdom performed various tests to study the enhancement of concrete
properties after addition of coconut fiber. Their study focused on the coconut fiber obtained from Ghana
Africa. They investigated the compressive strength, tensile strength, torsional strength, toughness and its
ability to resist cracking and spalling. That addition of coconut fiber to concrete leads to improvement of
concrete the toughness torsion and the tensile stress, further work is however, required to assess the
long-term durability of concrete enhanced with coconut fibers.
In research
In this this research 1:2:4
1:2:4 ratio ratiomixconcrete
concrete was used.mix The was used. investigation
experimental The experimental
was carriedinvestigation
out for both was
Plain Concrete and Fiber Reinforced Concrete on casting cubes of 6” × 6”, and beams of 6” × 6” × 18” by
varying
carried out forthe percentage
both PlainofConcrete
addition ofand75 Aspect
Fiber ratio Natural fibers
Reinforced by 0%,on
Concrete 0.5%, 1% & cubes
casting 1.5% toof the6”total
× 6”, and
volume of the concrete. Three samples for dissimilar percentages and proportions of fibers added to concrete
beamswas ofcasted
6” × and
6” cured.
× 18”The by cured
varyingsamplethewas tested for fresh
percentage and hard of
of addition properties of concrete
75 Aspect ratiofor 7, 14 and
Natural fibers by
28-day strength.
Weigh batching
0%, 0.5%, 1% & 1.5%was adapted
to thetototal
batchvolume
materialsof like cement,
the fine aggregate,
concrete. coarse aggregate,
Three samples coir andpercentages
for dissimilar jute
for a higher degree of accuracy in experimental work. Concrete mixing has been done with help of concrete
mixing machine
and proportions ofand manual
fibers distribution
added of fiber was
to concrete wasadopted
castedto and
overcome
cured. theThe
problem
curedof uniform
sampledistribution
was tested for
in concrete. Once the concrete was mixed thoroughly it was placed in a large rigid pan where the quality of
freshconcrete
and hard was observed and
properties test for fresh
of concrete forconcrete was 28-day
7, 14 and conducted according to (ASTM International, 2003)
strength.
and then it was poured in the moulds of cubes and beams. The inner surface of the moulds was coated with
oil before pouring so that they can be easily demoulded after 24 hours.
Once the concrete
Weigh was set
batching wasthoroughly,
adapted the to
cubes and beams
batch were demoulded
materials like cement,and were cured
fine in ordinary coarse
aggregate,
water by complete immersion for the required time of 7, 14 and 28 days. After curing period of 7, 14 and 28
days, the
aggregate, specimens
coir and jutewere
for allowed
a higher to degree
dry for about one hoursinthen
of accuracy they were tested
experimental work. in universal
Concrete testing
mixing has
machine, for studying the properties compressive strength (British Standard, 1983) and flexural strength
been (ASTM
done International,
with help of 2016) of hardened
concrete mixing concrete.
machineFinally,and
the results
manual gotdistribution
from several percentages
of fiber was of fibers
adopted to
in concrete were compared.
overcome the problem of uniform distribution in concrete. Once the concrete was mixed thoroughly
it was placed in a large rigid pan where the quality of concrete was observed and test for fresh
concrete was conducted according to (ASTM International, 2003) and then it was poured in the
moulds of cubes and beams. The inner surface
106of the moulds was coated with oil before pouring so
Workability
J. Appl. Emerg. Sci., 2017, 7(2)
The workability was tested by slump test in accordance with ASTM. The results are show
Experimental Study on Comparison of Strength Properties of Natural Waste Fiber (Coir and Jute) Reinforced Concrete
in Table 2, from the obtained results, it was observed that there was decrease in the concret
workability with increase in the percentage of fiber in the concrete as shown in Figure 1. The reaso
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
wasWorkability
due to the absorption capacity of fibers which absorb the water from the concrete mix whic
The workability was tested by slump test in accordance with ASTM. The results are shown in Table 2, from
the obtained results, it was observed that there was decrease in the concrete workability with increase in
lowers the workability furthermore the fiber in concrete prevented the concrete ingredients from
the percentage of fiber in the concrete as shown in Figure 1. The reason was due to the absorption capacity
of fibers which absorb the water from the concrete mix which lowers the workability furthermore the fiber in
flowing which also decreased the workability.
concrete prevented the concrete ingredients from flowing which also decreased the workability.
Table 2:2:Workability
Table Workabilityresults (slump)(slump)
results
90
80
70
Slump (mm)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 0.5 1 1.5
% Age of Fiber
Compressive Strength
Compressive strength test was conducted on compressive testing machine in accordance with British
Standard to evaluate the strength development of concrete containing various percentages result is shown
in Table 3. From the obtained results, it was observed that the compressive strength of all concrete samples
was increasing up to addition of 1% fiber and after that, strength reduced with the increase in fiber Percentage.
After 28 days compressive strength of 1% fiber reinforced concrete increases 4.5% as compared to plain
concrete as shown in Figure 2.
107
J. Appl. Emerg. Sci., 2017, 7(2)
Experimental Study on Comparison of Strength Properties of Natural Waste Fiber (Coir and Jute) Reinforced Concrete
108
J. Appl. Emerg. Sci., 2017, 7(2)
Experimental Study on Comparison of Strength Properties of Natural Waste Fiber (Coir and Jute) Reinforced Concrete
Flexural Test
Flexural strength test was conducted on universal testing machine as per ASTM to evaluate the strength
development of concrete containing various fiber contents. Test results obtained for different sample are
shown in Table 4. From the obtained results, it was observed that the flexural strength of the beam specimens
obtained from fiber reinforced concrete at different ages are effectively increases with the increase in fiber
percentage and the flexural strength of 28 days sample for 1% fiber increased 5.9 % as compared to plain
concrete as shown in Figure 3.
109
J. Appl. Emerg. Sci., 2017, 7(2)
Experimental Study on Comparison of Strength Properties of Natural Waste Fiber (Coir and Jute) Reinforced Concrete
CONCLUSION
The following conclusions are drawn based on current study and the laboratory experimental work carried
out in the research. Workability reduced as the fiber content increases. Because as the fiber percentage
was enlarged, the mix became more cohesive. The compressive strength has an increasing trend up to 1%.
After that, strength reduced with the increase in fiber Percentage. The compressive strength of 1% of coir
and Jute fibers by volume of concrete gave optimum results with increase of 4.5% compressive strength as
compared to normal concrete. The flexural strength also has an increasing trend. The flexural strength of
1% of coir and Jute fibers by volume of concrete increases up to 5.9% as compared to normal concrete.
REFERENCES
Ÿ ASTM International. (2003). Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete C 143/C
143M – 03. United States.
Ÿ ASTM International. (2016). Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple
Beam With CenterPoint Loading) C293/C293M − 16. United States.
Ÿ Baruah P, Talukdar SA. (2007). A Comparative Study of Compressive, Flexural, Tensile and Shear
Strength of Concrete with Fibres of Different Origins. Indian Concrete Journal 81:17-24.
Ÿ British Standard. (1983). Method for determination of compressive strength of concrete cubes BS
1881-116: UK: BSI publications.
Ÿ Domke PV. (2012). Improvement in the strength of concrete by using industrial and agricultural waste.
IOSR Journal of Engineering 2(4):755-759.
Ÿ Hasan NMS, Sobuz HR, Sayed MS, Islam MS. (2012). The Use of Coconut fibre in the Production of
Structural Lightweight Concrete. Journal of Applied Sciences 12:831-839.
Ÿ Majid A, HouSou, Liu A, Chouw N. (2012). Mechanical and Dynamic Properties of Coconut Fibre
Reinforced Concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 30:814-825.
Ÿ Ramli M, Kwan WH, Abas NF. (2013). Strength and durability of coconut-fibre-reinforced concrete in
aggressive environments. Construction and Building Materials. 38:554-566.
Ÿ Syed Nasir Shah et al. (2017). Experimental Investigation of Natural Waste Fiber (Coir and Jute)
Reinforced Concrete in Term of Compressive Strength and Workability. Paper presented at the Striving
Towards Resilient Built Environment, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ÿ Yalley PP, Khen KAS. (2009). Use of coconut fibre as an enhancement of concrete. Journal of
Engineering and Technology 3:54-73.
110