Production and Characterization of The Nanostructured Hollow Iron Oxide Spheres and Nanoparticles by Aerosol Route
Production and Characterization of The Nanostructured Hollow Iron Oxide Spheres and Nanoparticles by Aerosol Route
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Nanoshell hollow iron oxide (␣-Fe2 O3 ) spheres and nanoparticles were produced by ultrasonic spray
Received 7 July 2009 pyrolysis (USP) method from iron(III) chloride salts. Iron oxide nanostructures were obtained by thermal
Received in revised form decomposition of aerosol formed in the ultrasonic generator from aqueous solution of FeCl3 as a precur-
23 November 2009
sor. Hollow structure of iron oxide particles was controlled by reaction temperature changing between
Accepted 28 November 2009
600 and 200 ◦ C and with the addition of the polyethylene glycol (PEG) iron oxide nanoparticles were
Available online 3 December 2009
fabricated. X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies and Scherrer crystalline size calculations show that the crystal
sizes of the nanostructured iron oxide were between 33 and 18 nm. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)
Keywords:
Hollow spheres
was performed to determine the chemical composition of the particles. Scanning electron microscope
Nanoparticles (SEM) investigation gave detailed information about particle size and morphology. Transmission electron
Iron oxide microscope (TEM) was used to confirm the hollow structure of the particles and identify the thickness of
Aerosol the shell.
© 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0925-8388/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.186
586 S. Gurmen, B. Ebin / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 492 (2010) 585–589
Table 1
Composition of precursor solutions, conditions of the process, and descriptions of the obtained powders (Tprecursor = 30 ◦ C, test period = 2 h, volume of used solution = 250 ml).
No. Concentration of precursor solution (mol/l) PEG content Temperature (◦ C) Flow rate of air (ml/min) Characteristic of the product
Fig. 1. XRD analyses of the particles obtained from (a) PEG added FeCl3 solution at 600 ◦ C, (b) FeCl3 solution at 600 ◦ C, (c) FeCl3 solution at 400 ◦ C and (d) FeCl3 solution at
200 ◦ C reaction temperatures.
the end semiproducts were oxidized to obtain hollow particles. nanoparticles at 600 ◦ C. Very fine droplets of the aerosol were obtained in an ultra-
Nevertheless, direct production of hollow nanostructured iron sonic atomizer Gapusol 9001 (Ramine Baghai Instrumentation, with a frequency
of 2.5 MHz). The aerosol was transported by air as carrier gas via a quartz tube
oxide particles by USP method has not been studied yet.
(0.7 m length and 0.02 m diameter) to an electrical heated furnace (Nabertherm,
In this research a novel route for production of nanostructured Germany) with a temperature control of ±1 ◦ C. Under spray pyrolysis conditions in
hollow iron oxide spheres and spherical nanoparticles using FeCl3 air atmosphere and at a flow rate of 500 ml/min, the dynamic (continuous) thermal
as a precursor were investigated. The prepared nanostructures decomposition reaction took place in the quartz tube reactor (heated zone 250 mm).
were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron In order to calculate the residence time of the aerosol droplets in the furnace, vol-
ume of the reaction zone and the carried gas flow rate should be taken into account.
microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The residence time was calculated as 9.42 sec by assuming that the rate of droplets
Susceptibility of their morphology and microstructure to the pro- and the carried gas are equal. This short reaction time is sufficient for the thermal
cessing temperature and PEG addition to precursor solution was decomposition of droplets to metal oxide particle in the air atmosphere. An X-ray
determined. diffractometer (Phillips PW 1700), transmission electron microscope (JEOL 2000
EX) and scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM 700F) were used for the charac-
terization of the obtained iron oxide nanostructures. The chemical compositions of
2. Experimental
particles were investigated by the EDS analyses. For XRD analysis, the dispersed
particles were placed on a glass substrate and allowed to dry in air at room temper-
2.1. Materials
ature. TEM images were obtained to prove the hollow structure of the particles. SEM
images were used to observe the surface morphology of particles formed at different
All the reagents (FeCl3 ·6H2 O and polyethylene glycol, PEG) were in analytical
reaction temperatures. The powders were first dispersed in ethanol and inserted in
grade and used without further purification. A water leach solution of FeCl3 ·6H2 O
ultrasonic bath for 5 min and then the suspension was dropwised onto a brass sheet
(salt powders were dissolved in deionized water) was used as starting material for
to make a thick film, which later coated by palladium for SEM characterization.
this research. The deionized water was used for all solutions. The concentration of
Table 1 contains data for chemical composition of the applied solutions, condi-
the precursor solution is 0.1 mol/l. All solutions were stirred for 20 min by using a
tions of the production process and a short description of the obtained structures.
magnetic stirrer.
The nanostructured hollow ␣-Fe2 O3 spheres and nanoparticles were synthe- 3.1. Structure characterization
sized using the ultrasonic spray pyrolysis method. The experiments were done at
600, 400 and 200 ◦ C reaction temperatures starting from iron chloride solution with
concentration of the 0.1 mol/l for obtaining hollow iron oxide spheres. Also, PEG Fig. 1 shows representative XRD patterns of the ␣-Fe2 O3 parti-
added iron chloride with concentration of 0.1 mol/l was used to produce ␣-Fe2 O3 cles and demonstrate clearly that the crystallinity of the samples
Table 2
Crystallographic data of the samples for crystal size determination.
No. Corresponding solution Temperature (◦ C) Position 2 (◦ ) (104) FWHM (◦ ) (104) d-Spacing (Å) (104) Crystalline size (nm)
Fig. 2. EDS analyses of the particles obtained from FeCl3 solution at (a) 600 ◦ C, (b) 400 ◦ C, (c) 200 ◦ C reaction temperatures and (d) PEG added FeCl3 solution at 600 ◦ C reaction
temperature.
Fig. 3. SEM analyses of the particles obtained from FeCl3 solution at reaction temperatures (a) 600 ◦ C, (b) zoomed scale of 600 ◦ C, (c) 400 ◦ C, (d) zoomed scale of 400 ◦ C, (e)
200 ◦ C and (f) zoomed scale of 200 ◦ C.
588 S. Gurmen, B. Ebin / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 492 (2010) 585–589
References